Re: Seaside (was; Finding WO people for startups)
+1. I attended a lightning talk at a conference on Smalltalk + Seaside and what little I gathered in those 5 minutes looked interesting. I've been meaning to investigate it further. On 28 Sep 2011, at 03:33, Chuck Hill wrote: I'd be interested as well. I have always admired smalltalk as a language. On 2011-09-27, at 4:38 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote: Hello Aaron; Would you be able to give a brief overview of Smalltalk+Seaside so we can understand what is WebObjects-esque about it? cheers On 28/09/11 11:02 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: Hi Aaron, On 2011-09-27, at 9:19 AM, arosenzw...@clinworx.com wrote: What is cool about Smalltalk / Seaside with respect to WO? 5) Even better than in-line binding it has no template file what-so-ever by design. All your HTML output is coded in the programming language. No more unbalanced DIV tags. Everything is refactorable. Is that better? In my imagination that makes it like PHP. Would that not obstruct what little view of page structure that is still there in WO? -- Andrew Lindesay www.silvereye.co.nz ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jim.kinsey%40bbc.co.uk This email sent to jim.kin...@bbc.co.uk http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Seaside (was; Finding WO people for startups)
Hello Aaron; Would you be able to give a brief overview of Smalltalk+Seaside so we can understand what is WebObjects-esque about it? cheers On 28/09/11 11:02 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: Hi Aaron, On 2011-09-27, at 9:19 AM, arosenzw...@clinworx.com wrote: What is cool about Smalltalk / Seaside with respect to WO? 5) Even better than in-line binding it has no template file what-so-ever by design. All your HTML output is coded in the programming language. No more unbalanced DIV tags. Everything is refactorable. Is that better? In my imagination that makes it like PHP. Would that not obstruct what little view of page structure that is still there in WO? -- Andrew Lindesay www.silvereye.co.nz ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Seaside (was; Finding WO people for startups)
I'd be interested as well. I have always admired smalltalk as a language. On 2011-09-27, at 4:38 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote: Hello Aaron; Would you be able to give a brief overview of Smalltalk+Seaside so we can understand what is WebObjects-esque about it? cheers On 28/09/11 11:02 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: Hi Aaron, On 2011-09-27, at 9:19 AM, arosenzw...@clinworx.com wrote: What is cool about Smalltalk / Seaside with respect to WO? 5) Even better than in-line binding it has no template file what-so-ever by design. All your HTML output is coded in the programming language. No more unbalanced DIV tags. Everything is refactorable. Is that better? In my imagination that makes it like PHP. Would that not obstruct what little view of page structure that is still there in WO? -- Andrew Lindesay www.silvereye.co.nz ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net This email sent to ch...@global-village.net -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: Seaside (was; Finding WO people for startups)
On 27/Sep/2011, at 7:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: I'd be interested as well. I have always admired smalltalk as a language. Hrm... SmallTalk is what some parts of ObjC are based on. Takes me back to my early days with EOF WO. ;-) I'd be interested in the talk as well! Thanks! M. ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
