Re: [libreoffice-website] Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Pedro,

On 2 avril 2014 00:09:12 CEST, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all

Apparently some users feel obligated and compelled to donate in order
to be
able to download.
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/29380/how-can-you-say-its-free-when-theres-no-way-to-get-rid-of-the-money-amounts/
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/23053/why-cant-i-even-start-a-download-i-donated-the-default-amount/

One is actually offering to PAY to skip the donation page on each
update
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/32239/donation-methods/

That is a bit strange since you do not have to pay anything to download 
LibreOffice.  Besides LibreOffice is gree as in speech before being free as in 
beer as FOSS is about freedom but not price. Anyway...




Please look at the download page (which is by coincidence entitled
Donate...)
http://donate.libreoffice.org/home/dl/win-x86/4.2.2/en-US/LibreOffice_4.2.2_Win_x86.msi

It's a whole page about Donation with a small link to the built-in
Help...


Two things here.  You can reach the download page, click on the main link and 
the download starts but in the mean time tje donation page appears.  On its 
side there is a button to download the built in help. What id wrong with that?


For a Free Open Source software from a Foundation whose goal is to to
eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone access to
office
productivity tools free of charge don't you think that there is too
much
pressure on users to donate???


No.  We rely on these donations to ensure the project and the foundation works. 

What is pressure is to force people to pay hundreds of dollars or euros for a 
proprietary office suite and make them believe that is their only choice.

Another pressure is to complain that we are never 100% compatible with closed 
formats and that it is our fault.


Apparently some users feel that... Maybe the page needs a re-design?

1. This is the same mecanism as with the old website

2. Anybody could provide his or her feedback on the new website specs.

3. There will always be some disgruntled users.

4. Personal comment: I have yet to see a post from you that does not look like 
a rant. But then I cannot do much about it.


 Best,

Charles. 



Just my 2 cents



--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Too-much-emphasys-on-donation-tp4103755.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-website] Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
For what it's worth, here is what the donation pages clearly states upfront and 
not in footer notes:


[...] Your donation, which is purely optional, [..]
in big fat green characters.

it also states:
Your download LibreOffice_4.2.2_MacOS_x86-64.dmg should begin
shortly. Please click the link in case it doesn't start.


So far it is worth noting we have received very few complaints about this. 

Best, 

Charles. 


On 2 avril 2014 08:20:51 CEST, Charles-H. Schulz 
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hello Pedro,

On 2 avril 2014 00:09:12 CEST, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all

Apparently some users feel obligated and compelled to donate in order
to be
able to download.
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/29380/how-can-you-say-its-free-when-theres-no-way-to-get-rid-of-the-money-amounts/
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/23053/why-cant-i-even-start-a-download-i-donated-the-default-amount/

One is actually offering to PAY to skip the donation page on each
update
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/32239/donation-methods/

That is a bit strange since you do not have to pay anything to download
LibreOffice.  Besides LibreOffice is gree as in speech before being
free as in beer as FOSS is about freedom but not price. Anyway...




Please look at the download page (which is by coincidence entitled
Donate...)
http://donate.libreoffice.org/home/dl/win-x86/4.2.2/en-US/LibreOffice_4.2.2_Win_x86.msi

It's a whole page about Donation with a small link to the built-in
Help...


Two things here.  You can reach the download page, click on the main
link and the download starts but in the mean time tje donation page
appears.  On its side there is a button to download the built in help.
What id wrong with that?


For a Free Open Source software from a Foundation whose goal is to to
eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone access to
office
productivity tools free of charge don't you think that there is too
much
pressure on users to donate???


No.  We rely on these donations to ensure the project and the
foundation works. 

What is pressure is to force people to pay hundreds of dollars or euros
for a proprietary office suite and make them believe that is their only
choice.

Another pressure is to complain that we are never 100% compatible with
closed formats and that it is our fault.


Apparently some users feel that... Maybe the page needs a re-design?

1. This is the same mecanism as with the old website

2. Anybody could provide his or her feedback on the new website specs.

3. There will always be some disgruntled users.

4. Personal comment: I have yet to see a post from you that does not
look like a rant. But then I cannot do much about it.


 Best,

Charles. 



Just my 2 cents



--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Too-much-emphasys-on-donation-tp4103755.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-website] Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Joren DC

Op 2 apr. 2014 08:20 schreef Charles-H. Schulz 
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:

 4. Personal comment: I have yet to see a post from you that does not look 
 like a rant. But then I cannot do much about it.

I'm sorry about that. Your conservative point of view, to keep the current 
state as it is, is not bad and appreciated. Your arguments do make sense too. 
But to feel personally attacked or categorise feedback like this as rant is a 
bridge to far. I agree with the mentioned comments and advice from Pedro and 
Robinson. Am I now member to the rant-club to :)?

Please don't forget we all have the same goal for LibreOffice and its users.

Kind regards,
Joren

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-website] Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Joren,

On 2 avril 2014 08:54:06 CEST, Joren DC jore...@libreoffice.org wrote:

Op 2 apr. 2014 08:20 schreef Charles-H. Schulz
charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org:

 4. Personal comment: I have yet to see a post from you that does not
look like a rant. But then I cannot do much about it.

I'm sorry about that. Your conservative point of view, to keep the
current state as it is, is not bad and appreciated. Your arguments do
make sense too. But to feel personally attacked or categorise feedback
like this as rant is a bridge to far. I agree with the mentioned
comments and advice from Pedro and Robinson. Am I now member to the
rant-club to :)?


No. Critics and feedback are a normal part of our processes and we do all work 
for LibreOffice.  But sometimes having only rants or nitpicks also displays a 
negative attitude. Looking at Pedro's posts all around I believe it would be 
difficult to find anything else aside that. That's what I meant.

Best,

Charles. 



Please don't forget we all have the same goal for LibreOffice and its
users.

Kind regards,
Joren

-- 
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

thanks for the feedback, and let me shed some light to this from my 
point of view.


The donation page as it is today, shown during the moment of download, 
is the result of some extensive research and discussion with other free 
software projects, and it has been very well received, not only from the 
donation side, but also from the way it outlines why we need financial 
support, and what we do with the money.


Where we definitely have room for improvement, and it's in fact 
something on our todo list, is to provide some better graphical overview 
on how we spend the money, what projects and areas we cover - which is 
something that will also be featured in the upcoming annual report.


As for the link to the financial reports, I have been using 
mail-archive.com as they, in contrast to our own archives, provide a 
search functionality. Sadly, it indeed seems we need to adjust the 
search string a bit, as Thorsten has been posting updated ledgers also 
after February 2013. ;-) Accounting has become much more work the last 
year, and I am very thankful to Thorsten for carrying the burden on the 
topic so far - his free time is spare as well, so ledgers take some time 
to be published. Since a few days, we have handed over the 2014 
accounting to a professional accountant, and I expect we get timely 
reports from them, which we will then make public as well.


Looking at the number of donations, and the number of questions we 
receive with regards to donations, the rate is fairly well below 1%. So 
I think we do not have a general problem with the page. Over time, we 
have gradually improved it in its design and wording, and it clearly 
states, in many languages, that donations are purely optional, that 
LibreOffice is free of charge, and also provides a link to the direct 
download in case something goes wrong.


Like with several other pages - the mailing list unsubscription 
instructions, the fact that mailing lists posts are public, and the note 
that neither info@ nor our phone number are a support line - every now 
and then it happens people have issues and don't read what we write. 
When we are made aware of this, we help out, we explain, and - even if 
that is a pain accounting-wise and eats a chunk of time - generously 
refund donations if people have problems.


I hope that sheds some light on the overall process. I think no matter 
what we do with the page, there will always be people who do not read 
even a highlighted text, which can lead to confusion, independent from 
how the page is designed or worded.


I personally would not change the download mechanism for the reasons 
outlined - however, if you have concrete proposals on what to improve, 
on how the wording should be changed, I am more than happy to hear and 
incorporate them.


Thanks,
Florian

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-website] Re: Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Pedro
Hi Charles


Charles-H. Schulz wrote
 Looking at Pedro's posts all around I believe it would be difficult to
 find anything else aside that. That's what I meant.

This post is about how other users perceive the download page. It is not
even a problem that affects me.

Regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Too-much-emphasys-on-donation-tp4103755p4103795.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-website] Re: Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Pedro
Hi Florian

Thank you for the quick answer.


Florian Effenberger wrote
 I personally would not change the download mechanism for the reasons 
 outlined - however, if you have concrete proposals on what to improve, 
 on how the wording should be changed, I am more than happy to hear and 
 incorporate them.

I think that Robinson's suggestion to make it a quite visible side bar while
the focus is on the download itself makes sense.

Still, I'm not a designer. That is why I suggested they should provide some
feedback.

My perception is that people who have donated don't like to be imposed...
Maybe some sentence in the sense of If you have already donated, please
disregard this. We appreciate your contribution,etc

There are also questions about refund which I didn't even knew (until your
post) it was possible (it is only mentioned in the bitcoin section)
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/23261/is-there-a-way-to-get-a-refund-of-my-donation/

I believe there is always room for improvement ;)

Regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Too-much-emphasys-on-donation-tp4103755p4103800.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hello,

Pedro wrote on 2014-04-02 12:20:


I think that Robinson's suggestion to make it a quite visible side bar while
the focus is on the download itself makes sense.

Still, I'm not a designer. That is why I suggested they should provide some
feedback.


if we have a concrete proposal, we can look at it. What I can tell is 
that since we have changed the timing of the donation request, we have 
received lots of positive feedback, people telling us - that despite the 
donation texts on the website before - they were not aware, and that it 
actually is a good idea to ask for donations while people do get the 
software. This is not different from what Wikipedia does when they run 
their campaigns - above the articles you find rather prominent text 
boxes asking for donations.


So, my personal take is that of course improving the page and maybe 
editing the design for sure can be done, I just wouldn't change the 
overall process - it has proven to be working. And no matter what you 
change, you will always find someone who has issues with that. From time 
to time, there are still people saying I dislike the green or the 
name is stupid, so we can't make everyone happy. ;-) So far, the number 
of complaints is rather low, which tells me we have not been doing 
terribly wrong.



My perception is that people who have donated don't like to be imposed...
Maybe some sentence in the sense of If you have already donated, please
disregard this. We appreciate your contribution,etc


I wouldn't do so. On the opposite, many people are asking for options to 
have recurring donations, that's actually a demand, not by one, but by 
many (and we are looking into this). So telling them If you donated 
once, please don't donate anymore would turn that around.


To me, it's all about understanding and explaining the software is free 
of charge, can be used without any obligation, but at the same time tell 
people that TDF solely relies on donations - otherwise they won't know, 
from where should they?


People have a choice to not donate, to donate once, or to donate 
regularly. I think the current page has that explained quite well in 
balance, but if there's a concrete proposal, of course we can have a 
look at it - anything can be improved. :)



There are also questions about refund which I didn't even knew (until your
post) it was possible (it is only mentioned in the bitcoin section)
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/23261/is-there-a-way-to-get-a-refund-of-my-donation/


People can always contact us and we find a solution. What we should try 
to avoid is to refund anyone who experiences a bug. Refunding costs time 
and money, and produces more accounting work. So, if someone really 
didn't know he doesn't have to donate, or accidentially donated twice or 
the like, we of course refund. I just don't want to open the door to 
refunding if people are dissatisfied with anything.


Imagine donors at Wikipedia would ask for a refund two months later, 
because they found a mistake in an article...



I believe there is always room for improvement ;)


I share your view here, and am happy to look at concrete proposals to 
what can be improved, of course.


Florian

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-website] Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Pedro, *,

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
 [...]
 Please look at the download page (which is by coincidence entitled
 Donate...)
 http://donate.libreoffice.org/home/dl/win-x86/4.2.2/en-US/LibreOffice_4.2.2_Win_x86.msi

That as Charles already mentioned is of course not the download page.
This is the page you are directed to after triggering the download.
This is where you get the main installer. Before seeing this page, you
already had the big fat download buttons that should not pose any
question as to what the result will be when you click one. I.e. you
want the file, you'll get the file.

 It's a whole page about Donation with a small link to the built-in Help...

The donation stuff is displayed *in addition* to your download. And as
a convenience it also displays the optional downloads for the main
installer you picked earlier, so you don't have to browse back to the
download page to get the help and/or language packs.


 For a Free Open Source software from a Foundation whose goal is to to
 eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone access to office
 productivity tools free of charge don't you think that there is too much
 pressure on users to donate???

Stating clearly that any donation is optional, and starting the
download automatically before a user has to press no, I don't want to
donate or similar is not what I consider putting pressure on users.

As Florian mentioned we now reduced the delay until the download is
started (initially it was setup to allow the page to load completely
before starting additional activity (i.e. sending the file to the
browser). That should make it even more clear that donating is
optional.

 Apparently some users feel that... Maybe the page needs a re-design?

And here I chime in with the others: That maybe and redesign are
easily requested, but when it comes to asking for concrete proposals,
you hear the cicades chirp (that probably  won't translate well)

From my POV the way the donations are presented is not obtrusive. It
doesn't block you from getting what you want. You don't have to click
stuff away to start download, you're free to just ignore all of the
donate page.

As you mentioned people getting the donation request on an update as
well: Then they already know that the download will start, without the
need to pay anything, so I can understand that point even less.

I don't see how a sidebar will help. The download page where you pick
the version has focus *only* on the download, it doesn't tell a word
about donations

ciao
Christian

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



[libreoffice-website] Re: Too much emphasys on donation?

2014-04-02 Thread Jean Spiteri
First of all, I always believed that the TDF is an open foundation and
therefore CRITICISM SHOULD ALWAYS BE WELCOME because that is what makes the
project improves. Imagine, if someone found a bug and did not report it
because someone just decided that those who criticizes  should not do it.
Secondly, I also think that the design could be changed by, maybe, not
redirect to the full Donate page but add a small widget in the page that
invites users to donate. 



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Too-much-emphasys-on-donation-tp4103755p4103834.html
Sent from the Website mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted