Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0
I have compiled a how-to for this process, blending the advice from Cactus at SME, with that from Gary and Christoph on this list. [url]http://www.mophilly.com/wiki/Installing_% 26_Configuring_Webware_on_SME_7.2[/url] I will add the instructions for the boot process, if there is anything not covered by the SME documentation. Thanks for all the help. - Mark Phillips - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0
On Dec 29, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Christoph Zwerschke wrote: It should work with Apache 2.0 as well. Only the make.bat and dll file for Windows are Apache 2.2 specific. Thank you, Chris, for the clarification. I look forward to setting this up soon. - Mark Phillips - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0
Just a follow up on this topic: The compilation worked just fine following Gary's instructions with a couple of additional steps to conform to SME 7 standards as suggested by mcairn of the SME documentation team. The test of Webware worked fine; all the examples worked out of the box, proving Christoph's assurance the mod_webkit.so would work under apache 2.0 is spot on. FYI, next on my list of items to compete is the boot/shutdown script for init.d, and Webware is ready for my application code. Many thanks to all, - Mark Phillips - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0
Quoting Gary Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I cannot address whether or not the latest version of Webware is dependent on any Apache 2.2-specific features, but--having used many different versions of Webware on a variety of different platforms and OSes--my guess is that its dependencies would be limited to the mod_webkit2 module. Thanks for the link to the setup on Centos 5, Gary. Your instructions are very clear and will be very helpful. I agree that the dependencies, if any, would be in the mod_webkit2 module. That is the specific concern. Thanks again, - Mark Phillips- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
Re: [Webware-discuss] restated question about mod_webkit and apache 2.0
Mark Phillips wrote: The WebKit discussion mentions apache 1.3. and apache 2.2. The WebKit for apache 1.3 version won't work with apache 2.0. Will the WebKit for apache 2.2 work with apache 2.0? That is, is it dependent on 2.2 features or is the reference to 2.2 the highest version it was tested with? It should work with Apache 2.0 as well. Only the make.bat and dll file for Windows are Apache 2.2 specific. -- Chris - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
