[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-467) SpecializationTest wrongly assumes that ProcessBeanAttribute does not get called for specialized beans

2015-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Mark Struberg commented on  CDITCK-467 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: SpecializationTest wrongly assumes that ProcessBeanAttribute does not get called for specialized beans   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
VerifyValuesTest#testManagedBeanAttributes doe the same for not enabled @Alternatives.  Despite the spec even explicitly says that not-enabled alternatives are 'disabled beans' (and thus ARE Beans). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.11#6341-sha1:83c4d29) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-467) SpecializationTest wrongly assumes that ProcessBeanAttribute does not get called for specialized beans

2015-03-07 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA)
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Mark Struberg created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDI TCK /  CDITCK-467 
 
 
 
  SpecializationTest wrongly assumes that ProcessBeanAttribute does not get called for specialized beans   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Feature Request 
 
 
 

Affects Versions:
 

 1.2.4.Final 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 
 Tomas Remes 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 07/Mar/15 11:07 AM 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Major 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 Mark Struberg 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SpecializationTest wrongly assumes that ProcessBeanAttribute does not get called for specialized beans. 
The spec says nothing about when the 'disabling' of specialized away beans is to be performed or how this is done. Thus it also doesn't define whether ProcessBeanAttributes gets called for those beans. 
Pretty much the only thing the spec defines is that those beans shall not get found by BeanManager#getBeans(). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment