[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-509) VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording
Title: Message Title Tomas Remes commented on CDITCK-509 Re: VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording I think this is possible only when @Specializes is used. If you have disabled @Alternative (PBA is not fired) then I cannot see any way how to explicitly enable it via lifecycle events. Another case is of course when you have enabled bean already and you start to play with types, isAlternative, etc. Anyway I think it would be great if we can concentrate these discussions at one place - CDI-581 is good candidate IMHO. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2109) beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders?
Title: Message Title Martin Kouba commented on WELD-2109 Re: beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders? Also note that this is a non-portable behavior, see also "12.1. Bean archives": If a bean class is deployed in two different bean archives, non-portable behavior results. Portable applications must deploy each bean class in no more than one bean archive. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (WELD-2109) beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders?
Title: Message Title Jive JIRA Integration updated an issue Weld / WELD-2109 beanmanager wont respect java classlaoders? Change By: Jive JIRA Integration Forum Reference: https://developer.jboss.org/message/950808#950808 Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-509) VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording
Title: Message Title Mark Struberg commented on CDITCK-509 Re: VetoTest is based on invalid spec wording Again: if you play with changing types and isAlternative then you might end up with PBA not getting fired for AnnotatedTypes which will later end up as enabled Beans. Not that this is an everyday problem, but it might happen. Add Comment This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026-sha1:78f6ec4) ___ weld-issues mailing list weld-issues@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues
