[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-07-01 Thread Martin Kouba (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Martin Kouba commented on  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes, I think we should remove this test as it's not explicitly and clearly defined by the spec. On the other hand, a producer method is a kind of bean and as such is a part of the bean dependency graph. The section 5.5.4. Invocation of producer or disposer methods doesn't say anything about circular dependencies though. 
Note that we should remove this test from 1.0.x as well. In fact, the test was a no-op in 1.0.x. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-07-01 Thread Martin Kouba (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Martin Kouba updated an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDI TCK /  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
  NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Martin Kouba 
 
 
 

Fix Version/s:
 
 2.0.0.Alpha1 
 
 
 

Fix Version/s:
 
 1.2.2.Final 
 
 
 

Fix Version/s:
 
 1.1.5.Final 
 
 
 

Fix Version/s:
 
 1.0.7.Final 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-07-01 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes commented on  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ok, true. I am going to remove the test. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-07-01 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes resolved as Done 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDI TCK /  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
  NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Change By:
 
 Tomas Remes 
 
 
 

Status:
 
 Open Resolved 
 
 
 

Resolution:
 
 Done 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-06-30 Thread Tomas Remes (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Tomas Remes commented on  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I think this is legal and matches the tested assertion: 
 
The container is required to support circularities in the bean dependency graph where at least one bean participating in every circular chain of dependencies has a normal scope
 
I guess incompletely initialized contextual instance is used in this case.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-06-30 Thread Arne Limburg (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Arne Limburg commented on  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
  Re: NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Where in the spec we can read, that the incomplete instance should be used? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Add Comment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.6#6264-sha1:ee76422) 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   

___
weld-issues mailing list
weld-issues@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues

[weld-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (CDITCK-427) NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal

2014-06-29 Thread Mark Struberg (JIRA) 
Title: Message Title
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Mark Struberg created an issue 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 CDI TCK /  CDITCK-427 
 
 
 
  NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is illegal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Issue Type:
 
  Feature Request 
 
 
 

Assignee:
 
 Tomas Remes 
 
 
 

Components:
 

 Tests 
 
 
 

Created:
 

 29/Jun/14 2:47 PM 
 
 
 

Priority:
 
  Major 
 
 
 

Reporter:
 
 Mark Struberg 
 
 
 

Security Level:
 

 Public (Everyone can see) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NormalSelfConsumingDependentProducer is an illegal class. 
This class contains a producer method for a @Dependent scoped bean 'Violation' and also an injection point for this very bean. 
So for invoking the producer method on the bean we first need to inject all @Inject ct, fields, methods and then call any @PostConstruct method. And only AFTER that we are allowed to invoke the producer method. This is not perfectly clear from the CDI spec itself, but you can deduct this from JSR-250 @PostConstruct wording. (see 'must not be put into service'). 
But we cannot @Inject Violation before we have the owner bean class created...