Submit rules, please publish them
Hi, all. Can anybody publish rules for submitting new features and code to wget? It seems to me that this process must be faster. As far as I understand wget (chief?) maintainer Mauro Tortonesi is busy with current work and cannot reply quickly. Maybe there are other maintainers/testers? P.S. I present Mauro my plans on wget reporting, but since 09.01.2007 nothing in reply. Is he ok? Thanks.
Re: wget POST 'multipart/form-data' problem (win xp sp2)
Gerhard Blum [EMAIL PROTECTED] news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] hi, i'm wondering if my mail 2 weeks ago was received... or am i too silly to ask correct, or is this problem off topic? could someone please be so kind and send a short reply - thanks a lot Hi, Gerhard Blum. I am also a new reader of this conference. It seems to me everyone is dead here. Sorry, I can't help you with your problem.
Logging useful info on downloaded files
Hi, all! I need some advanced logging capabilities in wget. Since long-awaited content-disposition feature appeared, it came impossible to associate textual descriptions with downloaded files (filename on disk can be completely different of url). Yes, I know of --no-content-disposition option, but maybe it's time to write some code to add such feature? Looking at the sources of wget, I assume that I can add such code. But maybe someone already did such a job, but haven't committed to svn? Some details on feature request: - description can be added as command-line option and as a comment in url list for downloading ( comment start marker like double spaces or something ) - description file can be created one per url, or for the entire url list in one file - description file format can be one line per url (using some template) (Far manager users'll benefit from descript.ion), or be of some tagged structure like Record-Jar Format - description file macros like %file% (stands for filename on disk), %describ%, %time-download%, %url-org% and so on. Thanks
directory-prefix bug in Win32
Hi! When using -P or --directory-prefix in v1.11 Beta 1 and later v1.11 Beta 1(with spider patch) command-line switches wget does not pay attention to neither of them. It saves files in the current directory. Wget v1.10.2 worked right. Hope, this bug won't live long :).
More detail on bug
When using -P or --directory-prefix in v1.11 Beta 1 and later v1.11 Beta 1(with spider patch) command-line switches wget does not pay attention to neither of them. It saves files in the current directory. Wget v1.10.2 worked right. Such incorrent behaviour appeares only if server http answer contains Content-disposition tag. Looking forward to developers comments!
