RE: [SPAM] RE: wget problem
Yes, wget is not a DOS command, but you can download the Windows version from http://xoomer.alice.it/hherold/ Regards, Pat -Original Message- From: Paula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:37 PM To: Willener, Pat; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: wget problem Thanks Pat, yes I understand, but I thought that wget was a built-in DOS command, but it is not. So I am trying to find where I can download it from. I am looking at your GNU.org website. Any suggestion or direction you can give me about the download? Thanks.. Paula -Original Message- From: Willener, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Paula Subject: [SPAM] RE: wget problem ..OR... specify the full path name - C:\> "C:\Program Files\wget\wget" parameters ..OR... add the path to the %PATH% - C:\> PATH %PATH%;C:\Program Files\wget ..OR... drag and drop a shortcut to the C: root -Original Message- From: Sandhu, Ranjit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:00 AM To: Paula; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wget problem Paula, Go to the directory where you have WGET installed, ie. The directory in which wget.exe is located. The error is saying windows cannot find the "wget" program. Ranjit Sandhu SRA -Original Message- From: Paula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wget problem Hello GNU, when I type in C:\>wget http://.com I get the message: Wget is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. What am I doing wrong? I start out from the C prompt. Thank you. Paula Van Berkom
RE: [SPAM] RE: wget problem
Thanks Pat, yes I understand, but I thought that wget was a built-in DOS command, but it is not. So I am trying to find where I can download it from. I am looking at your GNU.org website. Any suggestion or direction you can give me about the download? Thanks.. Paula -Original Message- From: Willener, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Paula Subject: [SPAM] RE: wget problem ..OR... specify the full path name - C:\> "C:\Program Files\wget\wget" parameters ..OR... add the path to the %PATH% - C:\> PATH %PATH%;C:\Program Files\wget ..OR... drag and drop a shortcut to the C: root -Original Message- From: Sandhu, Ranjit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:00 AM To: Paula; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: wget problem Paula, Go to the directory where you have WGET installed, ie. The directory in which wget.exe is located. The error is saying windows cannot find the "wget" program. Ranjit Sandhu SRA -Original Message- From: Paula [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wget problem Hello GNU, when I type in C:\>wget http://.com I get the message: Wget is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. What am I doing wrong? I start out from the C prompt. Thank you. Paula Van Berkom
Re: Spam?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 28 Jan 2004 02:09:33 +0100), Hrvoje Niksic (B<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: (B (B> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: (B> (B> > It is likely there're no users infected since the "From:" field is very (B> > likely forged by viruses and spammers. (B> (B> I think the mailing list software looks at the "From " line, not the (B> "From:" header field, but I could be mistaken. Anyway, how would the (B> virus know which name to fake for a particular list? (B (Bditto; the "From " is not reliable, unfortunately. (B (BIt is known many virus scans mail addresses in local files and (Bit uses (or forge) them. It is possible the forged address (B(which is subscriber to the list) and the address of the list (Bitself are on the local files and are used at the same time. (B (B--yoshfuji
Re: Spam?
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: (B (B> It is likely there're no users infected since the "From:" field is very (B> likely forged by viruses and spammers. (B (BI think the mailing list software looks at the "From " line, not the (B"From:" header field, but I could be mistaken. Anyway, how would the (Bvirus know which name to fake for a particular list?
Re: Spam?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 28 Jan 2004 01:28:34 +0100), Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > Greg Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yeah, I got some spam from the list. > > It seems that the spam are in fact viruses, most likely originating > from infected subscribers. A sunsite staff member told me they have > just updated the virus scanner, which should make the problem go away. It is likely there're no users infected since the "From:" field is very likely forged by viruses and spammers. Subscribers-only setting does not prevent people posting viruses / spams in this case. -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
Re: Spam?
Greg Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, I got some spam from the list. It seems that the spam are in fact viruses, most likely originating from infected subscribers. A sunsite staff member told me they have just updated the virus scanner, which should make the problem go away.
RE: Spam?
Yes, I'm getting spam originating from the list, too. Today I counted more than 10 mails carrying [EMAIL PROTECTED], all with To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Vesko > -Original Message- > From: Hrvoje Niksic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 11:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Spam? > > Is it my weird setup, or has spam reemerged on this list? If others > are seeing the spams that seem to originate from the list, I'll try to > contact the admins.
Re: Spam?
Yeah, I got some spam from the list. -Greg On Tuesday 27 January 2004 01:07 pm, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Is it my weird setup, or has spam reemerged on this list? If others > are seeing the spams that seem to originate from the list, I'll try to > contact the admins.
Spam?
Is it my weird setup, or has spam reemerged on this list? If others are seeing the spams that seem to originate from the list, I'll try to contact the admins.
Re: [SPAM?:###] RE: wget -r -p -k -l 5 www.protcast.com doesnt pull some images t hough they are part of the HREF
I, on the other hand, am actually not sure why you're not able to
have Wget find the marked up (not javascript) image.
Cause it worked for me.
% ls -l www.protcast.com/Grafx/menu-contact_\(off\).jpg
-rw--- 1 ashawley usr 2377 Jan 10 2003
www.protcast.com/Grafx/menu-contact_(off).jpg
/a
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
> No, it won't. The javascript stuff makes sure of that.
>
>
> Mark Post
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: wget -r -p -k -l 5 www.protcast.com doesnt pull some images
> though they are part of the HREF
>
>
> Hi,
> I am having some problems with downloading www.protcast.com.
> I used wget -r -p -k -l 5 www.protcast.com
> In www.protcast.com/Grafx files menu-contact_(off).jpg get downloaded.
> However menu-contact_(on).jpg does not get downloaded though it lies in the
> same directory as the
> menu-contact_(off).jpg file.
>
> index.html contains the following HREF
>
> ONMOUSEOVER="msover1('m-contact','Grafx/menu-contact_(on).jpg');"
> ONMOUSEOUT="msout1('m-contact','Grafx/menu-contact_(off).jpg');">
> HEIGHT="29" BORDER="0">
>
> so wget should be able to see this image right?.
>
> Please help/advice.
> bye
Re: 14 MB of Spam
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:24:25PM +0100, Brix Lichtenberg wrote: > If whoever in charge isn't able or doesn't want to do something about > it, isn't it time to migrate to another provider with the list, even > free ones like yahoogroups or whatever? Compared to here they're > spam-free and there are digest modes if you don't want attachments at > all. I couldn't agree more. I run a small ISP and would be glad to host this list in our MailMan instatiation. All the modern conveniences mentioned above, plus no ads. -- Gus "Don't tell them anything. When it's over, tell them who won." -- Admiral Ernest King, on Military/Press relations
14 MB of Spam
OK, that does it. I usually don't complain much about spam and simply deal with it. But blocking my dial-up with 20 spam-mails with >700k attachments each only happens on this very list. If whoever in charge isn't able or doesn't want to do something about it, isn't it time to migrate to another provider with the list, even free ones like yahoogroups or whatever? Compared to here they're spam-free and there are digest modes if you don't want attachments at all. -- Brix
Re: How about leaving the headers from the spam messages?
> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hrvoje> How about my other suggestion, i.e. plugging a filter before Hrvoje> Mailman? :-) I have put a filter before ezmlm (spamassassin). See me previous post to you about that... Karsten
Re: How about leaving the headers from the spam messages?
Karsten Thygesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hrvoje> Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It would be a lot easier to report this shit to SpamCop if the > >> mailing list software didn't strip the incoming headers. > > Hrvoje> I don't know if ezmlm can be made not to strip the headers. > Hrvoje> Perhaps one of the admins knows if that's possible? > > It can - I will disable the stripping... Excellent, thanks. How about my other suggestion, i.e. plugging a filter before Mailman? :-)
Re: How about leaving the headers from the spam messages?
> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hrvoje> Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It would be a lot easier to report this shit to SpamCop if the >> mailing list software didn't strip the incoming headers. Hrvoje> I don't know if ezmlm can be made not to strip the headers. Hrvoje> Perhaps one of the admins knows if that's possible? It can - I will disable the stripping... Karsten
Re: How about leaving the headers from the spam messages?
Alan E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be a lot easier to report this shit to SpamCop if the > mailing list software didn't strip the incoming headers. I don't know if ezmlm can be made not to strip the headers. Perhaps one of the admins knows if that's possible?
How about leaving the headers from the spam messages?
It would be a lot easier to report this shit to SpamCop if the mailing list software didn't strip the incoming headers. -- AlanE
Re: Spam
Johnnie, Some of us may enjoy a little free porn. Just Kidding ; ) Sam "Johnnie J. Young" wrote: > Can whoever is in charge of this list please set it up so people have to join > the list to post to it. This spam is getting ridiculous and if we are going to > continue to receive all of these porn solicitations, etc., I am going to have to > unsubscribe. > > Johnnie > > On 31 Jan 2002 at 21:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Below is the details filled out on the website. It was submitted by > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 21:08:10 > > --- > > : Hey there! I'm a 19/f/Florida. Would you like to see PORN AND LIVE VIDEOS FOR >FREE?!?!?! How about a whole year for FREE!?!!? NO FEES, NO PAYING FOR MEMBERSHIPS, >IT'S ALL 100% FREE > > If so click this link below and enjoy porn for FREE > > http://www.purefuck.com/index.asp?id=kevins";>CLICK HERE FOR FREE PORN > > If you would like to be removed from this list please email me back saying >"remove" thanks. -- Regards, -- Samuel Hargis --- Software Developer/Systems Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 850-508-8583 CataBot - Dual Stream Publishing - ©2002 Samuel Hargis - All Rights Reserved
Re: Spam
Can whoever is in charge of this list please set it up so people have to join the list to post to it. This spam is getting ridiculous and if we are going to continue to receive all of these porn solicitations, etc., I am going to have to unsubscribe. Johnnie On 31 Jan 2002 at 21:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Below is the details filled out on the website. It was submitted by > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, January 31, 2002 at 21:08:10 > --- > : Hey there! I'm a 19/f/Florida. Would you like to see PORN AND LIVE VIDEOS FOR >FREE?!?!?! How about a whole year for FREE!?!!? NO FEES, NO PAYING FOR MEMBERSHIPS, >IT'S ALL 100% FREE > If so click this link below and enjoy porn for FREE > http://www.purefuck.com/index.asp?id=kevins";>CLICK HERE FOR FREE PORN > If you would like to be removed from this list please email me back saying "remove" >thanks.
spam on list
The amount of spam I get daily since I joined this list has doubled, most of it coming from the list itself. Ezmlm doesn't set up messages in such a way that SpamCop can filter out the real sender and deal with it. I keep seeing the same spammers hitting the list multiple times. Can't somebody with admin privs on the list machine get some filtering software in place, and start reporting each and every one of these piece-of-shit spammers? I want to follow along on the development track, and the web mirrors of the list are useless (one of them seems to save nothing but the spam), but the annoyance factor is getting really high. Help? -- Alan Eldridge #include free(sklyarov);
it's not spam: it's WORM sircam
don't open, don't execute!! who did: get yourself a new (less than a week old) data file for your virus scanner! -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Hartmut Steffin - "640K ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981 "OS/2 will be the platform of the 90's." -- Bill Gates, 1989 "OS/2 is destined to be the most important operating system, and possibly program, of all time." -- Bill Gates, 1990
several SPAM in the mailing-list
hi there, - sorry i've to talk (shortly) OT; A vivid mailing list PLUS all that [censored] is too much for me. Else somebody grants it is possible to keep out MORE [censored] than the last two weeks showed up, i might preferrably retire. Not that i think it would be a loss to most of you... Who assures? \hg
Re: you make spam!!!!!!!!!
"OBone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use 1 time wget and now everytime i connect to internet 2 pop-up > windows (spam) are opened automatically. I have no idea what "popup windows" and "spam" you're referring to, but I doubt it has anything to do with Wget. > Now i want an answer about that from you or i will denounce you for > that spam Instead of posting silly threats, why don't you describe *exactly* what problem you have *with Wget* so that someone can help you.
you make spam!!!!!!!!!
I use 1 time wget and now everytime i connect to internet 2 pop-up windows (spam) are opened automatically. Now i want an answer about that from you or i will denounce you for that spam The zip file i send to you is the version of wget i downloaded giamm
you make spam!!!!!!!!!
I use 1 time wget and now everytime i connect to internet 2 pop-up windows (spam) are opened automatically. Now i want an answer about that from you or i will denounce you for that spam giamm
Re: Spam
>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hrvoje> "Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> David VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anyone else >> getting this junk, with the wget servers as the > intermediary? >> >> Yes. As has been stated clearly, the sunsite.[auc.]dk issue and >> the existence of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward means that the >> list-address-must-be-in-to-or-cc SPAM protection has been turned >> off for wget and wget-patches. Hrvoje> That's a great shame. It would be nice if we could at least Hrvoje> pass mails through a Perl filter that would perform the check Hrvoje> (and allow for bug-wget alias.) >> Of course even with all that in place, you'll still get SPAM from >> the list, since Hrvoje wants it to be postable by non-subscribers. Hrvoje> I checked; none of the recent spams had the list in To or Cc Hrvoje> header fields. So allowing spams from non-subscribers is Hrvoje> still OK, I think. It's fixed now - it will be announced at [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a few minuttes... Karsten
Re: Spam
"Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Is anyone else getting this junk, with the wget servers as the > > intermediary? > > Yes. As has been stated clearly, the sunsite.[auc.]dk issue and the > existence of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward means that the > list-address-must-be-in-to-or-cc SPAM protection has been turned off > for wget and wget-patches. That's a great shame. It would be nice if we could at least pass mails through a Perl filter that would perform the check (and allow for bug-wget alias.) > Of course even with all that in place, you'll still get SPAM from > the list, since Hrvoje wants it to be postable by non-subscribers. I checked; none of the recent spams had the list in To or Cc header fields. So allowing spams from non-subscribers is still OK, I think.
Re: Spam
David VanHorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anyone else getting this junk, with the wget servers as the intermediary? Yes. As has been stated clearly, the sunsite.[auc.]dk issue and the existence of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] forward means that the list-address-must-be-in-to-or-cc SPAM protection has been turned off for wget and wget-patches. Since wget-patches is a less general-interest list than wget, it should be no problem to get it moved over to @sunsite.dk (if it wasn't already -- I don't remember) and get the SPAM protection turned on. To be able to do that with wget we'll have to inconvenience a larger base and we'll have to start handling the bug-wget address differently, like having it send to a person or people whose responsibility it'd become to forward on to the list. Of course even with all that in place, you'll still get SPAM from the list, since Hrvoje wants it to be postable by non-subscribers. Personally, I much prefer subscriber-only lists, as they get rid of ambiguities of whether or not people are subscribed to the list, and people aren't SPAMmed with so many duplicate copies of emails (sent in case they aren't list subscribers). --- Dan Harkless| To help prevent SPAM contamination, GNU Wget co-maintainer | please do not mention this email http://sunsite.dk/wget/ | address in Usenet posts -- thank you.
Spam
Is anyone else getting this junk, with the wget servers as the intermediary? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (sunsite.dk [130.225.51.30]) by www.cedar.net (8.9.3/SCO5.0.4) with SMTP id XAA21229 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:19:41 GMT Received: (qmail 29057 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2001 23:19:06 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 29051 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2001 23:19:05 - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Incredible Home e-Business Opportunity! Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 16:43:40 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Friend, Perhaps this might be of interest to you. If not, please disregard. -- Where's dave? http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?kc6ete-9
