Re: [whatwg] (no subject)

2014-09-13 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer 
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:17 PM,   wrote:
>
>
> On 9/12/14, Silvia Pfeiffer  wrote:
>>
>> What I'd you're a long way away from any medical help?
>>
>
> What?

s/I'd/if/

(sorry - mobile keyboard)


>> In my mind this is part of the larger drive of the web of things (IoT
>> applied to the web) and needs device APIs. This might not be the right
>> group to discuss it in though.
>>
>
> Where is the best place to define the APIs for devices to track, monitor,
> and surveil us?
>
> Perhaps the W3C is the best place. It is funded by the very corporations
> that are making such monitoring devices and with developer relations experts
> to tell you how. These corporations are backed by  philanthropists, such as
> William Gates III, whose opposes climate change, whistleblowers, and
> overpopulation.
>
> Sure, Microsoft might've backdoored stuff for the NSA for the past 10 years,
> and Apple might share your info to the NSA (they'll get it anyway). And
> Google and the CIA might want info for MindMeld (TM) or Recorded Future,
> which they openly fund (links below).
>
> He who pays the piper calls the tune.
>
> You don't have anything to hide, right?
>
> Or maybe the question of "how" or where to "best to engineer" this or that
> new gadget is best answered by first asking how to prevent such engineering
> from being used by a top-down, "efficient" system.
>
> The system is working. That is the problem.
>
>
> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/10/cant-wait-for-the-apple-watch-beware-your-fitness-data-may-be-sold-or-used-against-you/
>
> http://rt.com/usa/microsoft-nsa-snowden-leak-971/
>
> Google & CIA funded MindMeld
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recorded_Future
>
> CIA funded MindMeld
> http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/17/expect-labs-lands-in-q-tel-investment-will-help-u-s-intelligence-integrate-its-mindmeld-technology/


If you don't want to give your data to anyone, don't. Nobody is
forcing you to share your medical data over the Internet.

I don't see that stopping the world moving forward though. Given that
it is happening anyway, I'd rather go with an open API than
proprietary ones where we don't know what is happening.

Silvia.

[whatwg] (no subject)

2014-09-13 Thread javascript 



On 9/12/14, Silvia Pfeiffer  wrote:

What I'd you're a long way away from any medical help?



What?


In my mind this is part of the larger drive of the web of things (IoT
applied to the web) and needs device APIs. This might not be the right
group to discuss it in though.



Where is the best place to define the APIs for devices to track, 
monitor, and surveil us?


Perhaps the W3C is the best place. It is funded by the very corporations 
that are making such monitoring devices and with developer relations 
experts to tell you how. These corporations are backed by  
philanthropists, such as William Gates III, whose opposes climate 
change, whistleblowers, and overpopulation.


Sure, Microsoft might've backdoored stuff for the NSA for the past 10 
years, and Apple might share your info to the NSA (they'll get it 
anyway). And Google and the CIA might want info for MindMeld (TM) or 
Recorded Future, which they openly fund (links below).


He who pays the piper calls the tune.

You don't have anything to hide, right?

Or maybe the question of "how" or where to "best to engineer" this or 
that new gadget is best answered by first asking how to prevent such 
engineering from being used by a top-down, "efficient" system.


The system is working. That is the problem.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/10/cant-wait-for-the-apple-watch-beware-your-fitness-data-may-be-sold-or-used-against-you/

http://rt.com/usa/microsoft-nsa-snowden-leak-971/

Google & CIA funded MindMeld
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recorded_Future

CIA funded MindMeld
http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/17/expect-labs-lands-in-q-tel-investment-will-help-u-s-intelligence-integrate-its-mindmeld-technology/
--

Re: [whatwg] Preloading and deferred loading of scripts and other resources

2014-09-13 Thread Ryosuke Niwa 

On Sep 8, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Ian Hickson  wrote:

> 
> I got some feedback on my last e-mail to the effect that having the 
> proposal sandwiched between the rationale and the examples of how it would 
> be used made it hard to find, so I'm reproducing the proposal here 
> (slightly updated based on feedback):
> 
> ---
> These "loadable" elements:
> 
>