Re: [whatwg] Signature Link Relation for Cryptographic Resource Verification
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > I expect that I will be continuing this discussion largely with the > WebAppSpec team, as their work is so obviously related to the contents > of the Internet-Draft. Thank you, that does indeed seem like the right place. And then from there it can be merged into the HTML Standard down the road. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Re: [whatwg] Using time-origin-relative times for the .timeStamp property of animation events is not web-compatible
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > It looks like at least the angular-animate assumes that the .timeStamp > property of animation events produces values that can be compared to > Date.now() return values. See > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231619#c3 for details. Added a note to the corresponding issue: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/23#issuecomment-163740275 -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
[whatwg] Using time-origin-relative times for the .timeStamp property of animation events is not web-compatible
It looks like at least the angular-animate assumes that the .timeStamp property of animation events produces values that can be compared to Date.now() return values. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1231619#c3 for details. -Boris
