Re: [whatwg] Kinds of Content
Lachlan Hunt wrote: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#kinds-of-content In the list of categories near the beginning of that section, it includes Form control content. But this isn't mentioned or described anywhere else in the spec. Is its inclusion in the list intentional or is it a mistake? -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Re: [whatwg] Kinds of Content
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Lachlan Hunt wrote: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#kinds-of-content In the list of categories near the beginning of that section, it includes Form control content. But this isn't mentioned or described anywhere else in the spec. Is its inclusion in the list intentional or is it a mistake? Fixed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
[whatwg] Kinds of Content
Hi, All elements currently defined to be in the heading content category (h1-h6 and header) are also included within the flow content category. It seems that it would be easier and more consistent to state the definition of heading content that: All heading content is also flow content. Any content model that expects flow content also expects heading content. And then remove Flow content from category lists for those elements, as it would be implied by Heading content. Additionally, to improve readability, it would be useful to add a note to the definition of flow content that it includes all of heading content, phrasing content and embedded content; and a similar note in the definition of phrasing content that it includes embedded content. Finally, it would be useful if the spec eventually included some kind of diagram that illustrated the relationships between each of the categories. http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#kinds-of-content -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
