Re: [whatwg] Minor error in content‐type sniffing t able
On 2 Jan 2009, at 22:39, 111...@gmail.com wrote: In section 2.7.4 of the specification, part of the table reads FF FF 00 00 FE FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16BE BOM FF FF 00 00 FF FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16LE BOM in the 1 January draft. Should this be FF FF 00 00 FE FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16BE BOM FF FF 00 00 FF FE 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16LE BOM ? Yes. -- Geoffrey Sneddon
[whatwg] Minor error in content‐type sniffing t able
In section 2.7.4 of the specification, part of the table reads FF FF 00 00 FE FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16BE BOM FF FF 00 00 FF FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16LE BOM in the 1 January draft. Should this be FF FF 00 00 FE FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16BE BOM FF FF 00 00 FF FE 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16LE BOM ?
