On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Tantek �~Gelik wrote:
Currently the datetime attribute requires both a date and a time.
On the other hand, the time element's datetime attribute allows just a
date.
Allowing just a date [is] easier for hand-authoring [...]. Authors can
more easily add ins/del elements with explicit datetime attributes if
they are permitted to specify only the date (they might not know or care
about the precise time), e.g. in blog posts that are updated by the
author.
[Allowing just a date] avoids artificial precision. Forcing an explicit
date and time forces authors to enter artificial precision (e.g.
-MM-DDT00:00:00Z instead of -MM-DD). Allowing just dates permits
authors to convey that a del/ins occurred on a certain day, and that the
precise time is unknown or irrelevant.
this happens to me often when I have blog-like or other essay content
that I update by hand. Since I typically do updates to any particular
content about once a day, day-level granularity is sufficient. Picking
an arbitrary time seems like being forced to provide fake metadata
which I don't want to do.
Fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'