Re: [whatwg] Note on 4.8.7 (video) and 4.8.8 (audio)

2009-09-26 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> Ian Hickson , 2009-09-14 06:52 +:
> > 
> > The whole point is that this is _not_ fallback content of that nature. 
> > That's what the note was saying. Linking to that section would be 
> > flat-out wrong. Is there some other way in which I can clarify that 
> > the contents of the element are not "fallback content" as defined by 
> > the spec?
> 
> The note for the video element reads:
> 
>   In particular, this content is not intended to address
>   accessibility concerns. To make video content accessible to the
>   blind, deaf, and those with other physical or cognitive
>   disabilities, authors are expected to provide alternative media
>   streams and/or to embed accessibility aids (such as caption or
>   subtitle tracks) into their media streams.
> 
> What would then be the recommended way to provide fallback content for a 
> video like the following?
>   
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Ara_chloroptera.ogg
> 
> That's a 6-second video of a Red-and-green Macaw moving along a tree 
> branch, with the only sounds being it making a brief vocalization, and 
> some background sounds. It doesn't seem to lend itself either to 
> fallback content provided by alternative media streams or by embedded 
> captions or subtitles.

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jim Jewett wrote:
>
> That paragraph sounds like a reasonable alternative -- another argument 
> for the text/html (or text/plain) source as a final alternative.
> 
> On the other hand, I personally would prefer that sort of caption before 
> deciding whether to watch in the first place, so maybe it could just be 
> handled with an aria-describedby.

Or even just having that paragraph before the video, yeah. I don't really 
see much that could be done to make that video enjoyable to someone who's 
both blind and deaf. It's similar to Rorschach inkblot tests or Pantone 
colour swatches -- there's not much point in trying to convey the 
information any other way, the information is specifically sense-oriented 
and isn't media-independent.

-- 
Ian Hickson   U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/   U+263A/,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'


Re: [whatwg] Note on 4.8.7 (video) and 4.8.8 (audio)

2009-09-17 Thread Michael(tm) Smith
Ian Hickson , 2009-09-14 06:52 +:

> The whole point is that this is _not_ fallback content of that nature. 
> That's what the note was saying. Linking to that section would be flat-out 
> wrong. Is there some other way in which I can clarify that the contents of 
> the element are not "fallback content" as defined by the spec?

The note for the video element reads:

  In particular, this content is not intended to address
  accessibility concerns. To make video content accessible to the
  blind, deaf, and those with other physical or cognitive
  disabilities, authors are expected to provide alternative media
  streams and/or to embed accessibility aids (such as caption or
  subtitle tracks) into their media streams.

What would then be the recommended way to provide fallback content
for a video like the following?

  http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Ara_chloroptera.ogg

That's a 6-second video of a Red-and-green Macaw moving along a
tree branch, with the only sounds being it making a brief
vocalization, and some background sounds. It doesn't seem to lend
itself either to fallback content provided by alternative media
streams or by embedded captions or subtitles.

  --Mike

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/


Re: [whatwg] Note on 4.8.7 (video) and 4.8.8 (audio)

2009-09-13 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Jeremy Keith wrote:
> Hixie wrote:
> > Fixed.
> 
> Thanks.  Much appreciated.
> 
> Don't forget to update the note for  as well as .

Fixed.


> Also, with the new wording of the note removing the link to the section 
> on fallback content, it might be a good idea to update the opening of 
> the preceding paragraph from:
> 
> "Content may be provided inside the video element."
> 
> to:
> 
> "Fallback content may be provided inside the video element."
> 
> ...with the words "Fallback content" linking to the relevant section:
> 
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#fallback-content
> or
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded-content-0.html#fallback-content

The whole point is that this is _not_ fallback content of that nature. 
That's what the note was saying. Linking to that section would be flat-out 
wrong. Is there some other way in which I can clarify that the contents of 
the element are not "fallback content" as defined by the spec?

-- 
Ian Hickson   U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/   U+263A/,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'


Re: [whatwg] Note on 4.8.7 (video) and 4.8.8 (audio)

2009-09-03 Thread Jeremy Keith

Hixie wrote:

Fixed.


Thanks.  Much appreciated.

Don't forget to update the note for  as well as .

Also, with the new wording of the note removing the link to the  
section on fallback content, it might be a good idea to update the  
opening of the preceding paragraph from:


"Content may be provided inside the video element."

to:

"Fallback content may be provided inside the video element."

...with the words "Fallback content" linking to the relevant section:

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#fallback-content
or
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/embedded-content-0.html#fallback-content

Just a thought.

--
Jeremy Keith

a d a c t i o

http://adactio.com/




Re: [whatwg] Note on 4.8.7 (video) and 4.8.8 (audio)

2009-09-03 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Jeremy Keith wrote:
>
> I'm finding the wording of the note on the content between opening and closing
> audio and video tags to be a tad confusing. It reads:
> 
> "In particular, this content is not fallback content intended to address
> accessibility concerns."
> 
> This could be interpreted in one of two ways:
> 
> 1. This content is not fallback content at all.
> 
> 2. This content is fallback content but it is not the specific kind of
> fallback content that is intended to address accessibility concerns.

Fixed.

-- 
Ian Hickson   U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/   U+263A/,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'