Re: [Wicket-user] Validation messages
It shouldn't. I guess the important point is that
ComponentStringResourceLoade does not get the FormComponent (text1)
You don't start looking for text1 in the formComponents properties
file, do you? You start with the parent component containing text1. A
key text1 expresses that text1 is a child of the parent.
Juergen
On 11/5/05, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Juergen,
I've taken a short look on your code in the CVS :
DefaultValidatorResourceKeyFactory.java:
* public* String newKey(IValidator validator, FormComponent formComponent)
{
*return* formComponent.getId() + *.* +
Classes.name(validator.getClass());
}
ComponentStringResourceLoader.java:
...
/// Build search stack
/ Stack searchStack = *new* Stack();
searchStack.push(component);
String prefixKey = component.getId() + *.* + key;
I'm wondering if this leads to a duplicated ID of the validated
component in prefixId? e.g.
form1.text1.text1.RequiredValidator
But maybe I'm wrong - so I'll better give it a try on Monday.
Thanks
Sven
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Repetition: Message retrieval for the following scenario -
form-panel-textfield - is currently not supported
Let's say that we have the following component hierarchy:
APage
-BForm id=b
--XPanel id=x
RequiredTextField id=foo
--YPanel id=y
RequiredTextField id=foo
Sven made a suggestion on how to change which is not 100% compliant. I
worked a bit on it and I think I found a solution. An example:
The Page looks like
add(new Label(label));
Form form1 = new Form(form1);
add(form1);
form1.add(new MyTextField(text1, input-1));
form1.add(new MyTextField(text2, input-2));
Form form2 = new Form(form2);
add(form2);
Panel panel1 = new Panel(panel1);
form2.add(panel1);
panel1.add(new MyTextField(text3, input-3));
panel1.add(new MyTextField(text4, input-4));
Panel panel2 = new Panel(panel2);
form2.add(panel2);
panel2.add(new MyTextField(text5, input-5));
panel2.add(new MyTextField(text6, input-6));
And the properties file:
# Default message
RequiredValidator = Default message: ${label} required
# A Textfield with label
form1.text1 = text1label
form1.text1.RequiredValidator = ${label} is required
# A TextField without label. label should default to the formComponent's id
form1.text2.RequiredValidator = ${label} is required
# This one is wrong. Because the panel id is missing
form2.text3.RequiredValidator = wrong: text is missing
# Must be like
form2.panel1.text3.RequiredValidator = ok: text is missing
form2.panel1.text4 = Text4Label
form2.panel1.text4.RequiredValidator = ok: ${label} is missing
form2.panel2.text5.RequiredValidator = ok: text555 is missing
#form2.panel2.text6.RequiredValidator = ok: text555 is missing
form2.text5.RequiredValidator = wrong: text555 is missing
form2.text6.RequiredValidator = wrong: text555 is missing
form2.panel1.text5.RequiredValidator = wrong: text555 is missing
form2.panel1.text6.RequiredValidator = wrong: text555 is missing
I think it is 100% compliant now, solves the panel problem and as
suggested by Sven adds one more (IMO useful) feature; useful for
self-contained, re-usable components. The key (e.g.
text6.RequiredValidator) is prepended with the relativ path (virtual
root component is the component associated with the properties files).
His english is better than mine and his examples probably as well.
I'll check it in tonight.
Juergen
On 10/29/05, Sven Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've opened a bug, see:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1339904group_id=119783atid=684975
Sven
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Did you open a bug or RFE already? If not, please do so, otherwise
there is always a risk that it'll be forgotten.
Juergen
On 10/27/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, if it doesn't break stuff.
Martijn
On 10/27/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you please open a bug for it. Thanks.
As long as long as no one else on the list is against fixing it that
way, I'll try and put it into 1.1.
Juergen
On 10/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks to me you are right. We didn't think about a Panel being a child
of a Form. I guess it was our assumption that FormComponents are
always a direct child of a Form.
Nested panels inside the same form was the first thing I checked when
evaluating Wicket. It's a very handy solution to break large forms into
logical units.
I'm currently not able to look into the code. Do we traverse up the
component tree already, like you do?
Yes, code is taken from the
[Wicket-user] eclipse refactoring plugin
Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html I created a small plugin for eclispe that does the renaming of all non-java resources when you rename a class that extends wicket.MarkupContainer. Essentially if you have a page called SomePage class and you rename it to SomeOtherPage all resources SomePage.* in the same package will be renamed to SomeOtherPage.* If there is any interest i can make it available as a wicket-stuff project. keeping in mind that it was my first forray into eclipse, so i cannot guarantee it works 100%. -Igor
Re: [Wicket-user] Adding Support for optgroup
I think the way to go would be to have a set of components that work like CheckGroup/Check we can have a Select component that acts like the CheckGroup component, and a SelectChoices component that works like the dropdownchoice with the exception of rendering select tags. We also have a SelectChoicesGroup which is a simple webmarkupcotainer with a builtin label attr modifier. that way you have all the flexibility, the java code can look like this: Select select=new Select(sel); Choices nogroup=new Choices(nogroup, mylistofchoices, choicerenderer); select.add(nogroup); ChoiceGroup group1=new ChoiceGroup(group1, this is group 1 choices); select.add(group1); group1.add(new Choices(group1choices, mylistofchoices2, choicerenderer)); and html will look like this select wicket:id=select option wicket:id=nogroup/option optgroup wicket:id=group1 option wicket:id=group1choices/option /optgroup /select what do you think? -Igor -Igor On 11/4/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes my bad, I meant the label attribute, I got it confused with the label tag's for attribute. I'm not sure what the best solution is either. Passing a string in definitely works, but it's not really consistent with the rest of the Wicket components (except Label which just takes the string and creates a new model with it). Nevertheless, I use i18n in my app and I use the getString(...) method all over the place, so passing in a String is, IMHO, not a bad thing. Ok, what if we made OptGroup a component just like DropDownChoice, as you mentioned. Then couldn't we just do a test in the DropDownChoice/MultiChoice constructors to see if the list/model contains OptGroups? The only problem is what does the ChoiceRenderer passed into the DropDownChoice refer to at that point? How to display the optgroup or display the options? Should optgroup take in a ChoiceRenderer? --AndrewOn 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unless of course we just pass in a string instead of imodel and leave i18n to the user... -Igor On 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean for the label attribute? Optgroup in this case wouldnt be a component so the IModel provided needs to be attached to some component so that it is detached properly, so the user needs to worry about attaching it somewhere, and the more optgroups you have the trickier that gets. -Igor On 11/4/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, why wouldn't the model be attached to the OptGroup object? Each OptGroup takes a model which is used for the for attribute.On 11/4/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the other choice objects (The singleselectchoice, dropdownchoice) we could have a list of optgroups and the optgroup has a list of its choices So you are just makeing one line with choices and optgroups (with again a list of choices) johan On 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: havent decided what the best way to do this is. one problem i see with passing a list of optgroups is that the optgroup will have to have an IModel for its label in case someone wants to i18n it, but then how do we handle attaching and detaching that model since its not attached to any component. maybe separate components like check and checkbox are the best way, and have an optgroup that works exactly like dropdown choice to simplify things. still thinking, thoughts? -Igor On 11/3/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah sorry, think of it as pseudo html :) -Igor On 11/3/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be similar to Check/CheckGroup because you could create a Select object, which is like the CheckGroup object, and an Option object, which is similar to the Check object. By doing that, then I can manually insert the optgroup tag either directly in the HTML or using a WebMarkupContainer in the JavaCode if the label needs to be dynamic. However, your thought about having an OptGroup object and extending the current DropDownChoice (and it makes sense to do the ListMultipleChoice too as you can use OptGroup with a select box that allows multiple choices) intrigues me. Maybe that is the smoothest way to go because it will reuse what's already available and would only add the one OptGroup component. I like it. By the way, your html should look like below, your HTML above is not correct:select wicket:id=selectGroup optgroup label=Label 1 option/option option/option /optgroup optgroup label=Label 2 option/option option/option /optgroup/select--AndrewOn 11/3/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I dont really understant what you mean. If you want to do it like the Check/CheckGroup is done you would have a SelectGroup and Select components that you would put into your html and then you can manually insert optgroup ie select wicket:id=selectGroup optgroupwicket doesnt care/optgroup select wicked:id=choice1 select wicket:id=choice2 /optgroup /select But then you are talking about making it a single component, so that is
[Wicket-user] Re: wicket:body and Border component
Nick Heudecker wrote: Didn't work. So I have a Border component with the following markup: wicket:border wicket:body/ /wicket:border Then I have a Page with the following markup: span wicket:id=border span wicket:id=eventSummaryPanel/ /span And the error is: There must be exactly one wicket:body tag for each border compoment. Well, I have exactly one wicket:body/ tag for I just started learning wicket and one of the first things I ran into was that error message. My problem was that I had a border component like yours. In the page-java I tried to add the nested component to the page thus: Page.html span wicket:id=border span wicket:id=message /span Page.java add(new MyBorder(border)); add(new Label(message, the message)) ; The problem is that the message-label does not belong to the page anymore. It belongs to the border so you have to add the message to the border and not the page. This is confusing for someone like myself that comes from tapestry where the same pattern works differently. The wicket error message is really confusing too. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] eclipse refactoring plugin
that looks nice and handyOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html I created a small plugin for eclispe that does the renaming of all non-java resources when you rename a class that extends wicket.MarkupContainer. Essentially if you have a page called SomePage class and you rename it to SomeOtherPage all resources SomePage.* in the same package will be renamed to SomeOtherPage.* If there is any interest i can make it available as a wicket-stuff project. keeping in mind that it was my first forray into eclipse, so i cannot guarantee it works 100%. -Igor
Re: [Wicket-user] eclipse refactoring plugin
H YEAH! Martijn On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html I created a small plugin for eclispe that does the renaming of all non-java resources when you rename a class that extends wicket.MarkupContainer. Essentially if you have a page called SomePage class and you rename it to SomeOtherPage all resources SomePage.* in the same package will be renamed to SomeOtherPage.* If there is any interest i can make it available as a wicket-stuff project. keeping in mind that it was my first forray into eclipse, so i cannot guarantee it works 100%. -Igor -- Living a wicket life... Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] wicket-core-tree doesn't work with wicket-contrib-navmenu correctly
Hi, I havetried to use the navmenu in my project sucessfully. However, when I click on a tree's node, the navmenu disappeared. Any idea how I can solved this? Regards, James Yong Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 1GB free storage!
[Wicket-user] Re: wicket-core-tree doesn't work with wicket-contrib-navmenu correctly
yongbl i_yongbl at yahoo.com.sg writes: Hi, I have tried to use the navmenu in my project sucessfully. However, when I click on a tree's node, the navmenu disappeared. Any idea how I can solved this? Regards, James Yong Do you Yahoo!?New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 1GB free storage! To add on, I found that the following css is missing in the head tag when the problem occurs. link href=/cms/ex_card/resources/wicket.contrib.markup.html.navmenu.style.tabs.TabsS tyle/tabs-folders.css type=text/css rel=stylesheet wicket:id=cssStyleResource/ link href=/cms/ex_card/resources/wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree/tree.css type=text/css rel=StyleSheet wicket:id=css/ --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: wicket-core-tree doesn't work with wicket-contrib-navmenu correctly
To add on, I found that the following css is missing in the head tag when the problem occurs. link href=/cms/ex_card/resources/wicket.contrib.markup.html.navmenu.style.tabs.TabsS tyle/tabs-folders.css type=text/css rel=stylesheet wicket:id=cssStyleResource/ link href=/cms/ex_card/resources/wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree/tree.css type=text/css rel=StyleSheet wicket:id=css/ Hi, I have solved the problem. It turn out that I had overrided onEndRequest() in my parent page and adding a super.onEndRequest() solved the problem. Anyway, thanks for reading :mrgreen: Regards, James Yong --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it: 1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor) If a component implements protected Object readResolve() throws ObjectStreamException, as specified in Serializable class, I think this could be handled, what do you think? 2. The component itself would do lookups (Alexandru). Yes, but it would be a base class, and as a user you would never see as your component doing the lookup. Otherwise, as said in a previous thread, there could be a phase in the RequestCycle responsible for injecting things, and that would also solve the issue (1). 3. You should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor (Eelco). Make it final? 2005/10/27, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:15:37 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, you should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor. You are right. It must be commented to not be dependent on any state set of the constructors below this magic helper class. Apart of this overriding is generaly a bit dangerous if you don't read the comment well and don't know when it is called. Anyway it was just an idea. I like this 'injection' thing just not AOP. Christian Eelco On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #: Christian Essl changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/28/2005 12:54 AM :# Is AOP realy needed for that? Propably I do not understand the problem but why can't you just write a special Panel, Page etc which calls an overrideable injectDependencies() method in the constructor. The default implementation of injectDependencies() does basicly read the annotations, lookup the services and inject them? Because in this case the component itself does the lookup. And this is not what you really want. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. I think this way you could on an instance by instance basis fine-grain control what gets injected. And during testing you just inject the mocks in this overriden method. Just my two cents. Thanks, Christian On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:50:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Sven Meier wrote: BTW rather than letting panels pull service from the page, I'd prefer the page to push services into its panels (i.e. the page injects dependencies into its panels). I don't want my panels to be dependent on the containing page. Yup. That is exactly what I do. But. I just moved the aspect from WebPage to Component and guess what, the annotation and bean resolving works fine in Panels and WebComponents too now :-) It is still to hackerish to use btw. There are some really nasty delays for example. I need to find some time to polish this. S. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Christian Essl ___ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
Make it final? I personally dislike Wicket's final methods, but I would like to read people's opinion :) - and in this case it is the easiest way. 2005/11/6, Eduardo Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it: 1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor) If a component implements protected Object readResolve() throws ObjectStreamException, as specified in Serializable class, I think this could be handled, what do you think? 2. The component itself would do lookups (Alexandru). Yes, but it would be a base class, and as a user you would never see as your component doing the lookup. Otherwise, as said in a previous thread, there could be a phase in the RequestCycle responsible for injecting things, and that would also solve the issue (1). 3. You should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor (Eelco). Make it final? 2005/10/27, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:15:37 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, you should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor. You are right. It must be commented to not be dependent on any state set of the constructors below this magic helper class. Apart of this overriding is generaly a bit dangerous if you don't read the comment well and don't know when it is called. Anyway it was just an idea. I like this 'injection' thing just not AOP. Christian Eelco On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #: Christian Essl changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/28/2005 12:54 AM :# Is AOP realy needed for that? Propably I do not understand the problem but why can't you just write a special Panel, Page etc which calls an overrideable injectDependencies() method in the constructor. The default implementation of injectDependencies() does basicly read the annotations, lookup the services and inject them? Because in this case the component itself does the lookup. And this is not what you really want. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. I think this way you could on an instance by instance basis fine-grain control what gets injected. And during testing you just inject the mocks in this overriden method. Just my two cents. Thanks, Christian On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:50:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Sven Meier wrote: BTW rather than letting panels pull service from the page, I'd prefer the page to push services into its panels (i.e. the page injects dependencies into its panels). I don't want my panels to be dependent on the containing page. Yup. That is exactly what I do. But. I just moved the aspect from WebPage to Component and guess what, the annotation and bean resolving works fine in Panels and WebComponents too now :-) It is still to hackerish to use btw. There are some really nasty delays for example. I need to find some time to polish this. S. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Christian Essl ___ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
#: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 3:51 PM :# I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it: 1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor) If a component implements protected Object readResolve() throws ObjectStreamException, as specified in Serializable class, I think this could be handled, what do you think? Yes - or at least this is what is supposed to be the correct way to handle it. 2. The component itself would do lookups (Alexandru). Yes, but it would be a base class, and as a user you would never see as your component doing the lookup. Otherwise, as said in a previous thread, there could be a phase in the RequestCycle responsible for injecting things, and that would also solve the issue (1). The idea of the RequestCycle doing also injection is one that I like. Unfortunately it will not be able to solve the page/component injection. Wicket is encouragging the usage of normal Java constructors for adding pages, components, etc. For having automatic injection on these I really don't see any good solution other than aop ;-). ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. 3. You should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor (Eelco). Make it final? 2005/10/27, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:15:37 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, you should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor. You are right. It must be commented to not be dependent on any state set of the constructors below this magic helper class. Apart of this overriding is generaly a bit dangerous if you don't read the comment well and don't know when it is called. Anyway it was just an idea. I like this 'injection' thing just not AOP. Christian Eelco On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #: Christian Essl changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/28/2005 12:54 AM :# Is AOP realy needed for that? Propably I do not understand the problem but why can't you just write a special Panel, Page etc which calls an overrideable injectDependencies() method in the constructor. The default implementation of injectDependencies() does basicly read the annotations, lookup the services and inject them? Because in this case the component itself does the lookup. And this is not what you really want. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. I think this way you could on an instance by instance basis fine-grain control what gets injected. And during testing you just inject the mocks in this overriden method. Just my two cents. Thanks, Christian On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:50:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Sven Meier wrote: BTW rather than letting panels pull service from the page, I'd prefer the page to push services into its panels (i.e. the page injects dependencies into its panels). I don't want my panels to be dependent on the containing page. Yup. That is exactly what I do. But. I just moved the aspect from WebPage to Component and guess what, the annotation and bean resolving works fine in Panels and WebComponents too now :-) It is still to hackerish to use btw. There are some really nasty delays for example. I need to find some time to polish this. S. -- Christian Essl --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Allow forcing of PageMap where Page will be added on creation?
Hi,
I'm doing some AJAX-stuff, and because there is not yet real support of
rendering single components (and having a URL for a Component) I'm doing
all this stuff with a AjaxWrapperPage like
public class AjaxWrapperPage extends WebPage {
public AjaxFieldResult(Component component) {
add(component);
}
}
and markup which only results the component..
span wicket:id=result/span
My implementation is a little more complex, so I don't have to care
about the component naming and other stuff, anyway..
I have a interface like IAjaxListener which extends IRequestListener:
public interface IAjaxRequestListener extends IRequestListener {
void onAjaxRequest();
}
And I use all this stuff with:
protected void onAjaxRequest(){
RequestCycle.get().setResponsePage(new
AjaxWrapperPage(component));
}
Everything works fine, but I have a problem with PageMaps.. Since I
can't set the PageMap when creating a Page, these AjaxWrapperPages go to
default PageMap, and cause expired pages. And I wouldn't really want to
add these pages to any pagemap at all, since I know they will be
rendered only once, ever.
This whole thing is not really too slick and clean, but it allows me to
do nice AJAX-stuff with wicket.
Something like this would solve my problems on Page.java
private final void init()
{
// All Pages are born dirty so they get clustered right away
setDirty(true);
// set the pagemap
setPageMap(getDefaultPageMap());
setId(getPageMap().getNextId());
// Set versioning of page based on default
setVersioned(Application.get().getSettings().getVersionPagesByDefault());
}
protected String getDefaultPageMap(){
return getRequestCycle() != null ?
getRequestCycle().getRequest().getParameter(pagemap) : null;
}
This would allow me to force my WrapperPages to go to another PageMap..
Any ideas?
--
Janne Hietamäki
Cemron Ltd
http://www.cemron.com/
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
2005/11/6, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]: #: Eduardo Rocha changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 3:51 PM :# I think Christian's idea is nice, and I saw at least three comments against it: 1. It is necessary to call injectDependencies on deserialization (Igor) If a component implements protected Object readResolve() throws ObjectStreamException, as specified in Serializable class, I think this could be handled, what do you think? Yes - or at least this is what is supposed to be the correct way to handle it. 2. The component itself would do lookups (Alexandru). Yes, but it would be a base class, and as a user you would never see as your component doing the lookup. Otherwise, as said in a previous thread, there could be a phase in the RequestCycle responsible for injecting things, and that would also solve the issue (1). The idea of the RequestCycle doing also injection is one that I like. Unfortunately it will not be able to solve the page/component injection. Wicket is encouragging the usage of normal Java constructors for adding pages, components, etc. For having automatic injection on these I really don't see any good solution other than aop ;-). It could be a setter injection. Personally I think that using a service in the constructor is not the way to go, I prefer to delay the use of a service when is really needed. So the calls to the service should be in one of onBeginXXX, when the RequestCycle should already have injected the service. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. 3. You should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor (Eelco). Make it final? 2005/10/27, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:15:37 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, you should never ever call a overridable method in a constructor. You are right. It must be commented to not be dependent on any state set of the constructors below this magic helper class. Apart of this overriding is generaly a bit dangerous if you don't read the comment well and don't know when it is called. Anyway it was just an idea. I like this 'injection' thing just not AOP. Christian Eelco On 10/27/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #: Christian Essl changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 10/28/2005 12:54 AM :# Is AOP realy needed for that? Propably I do not understand the problem but why can't you just write a special Panel, Page etc which calls an overrideable injectDependencies() method in the constructor. The default implementation of injectDependencies() does basicly read the annotations, lookup the services and inject them? Because in this case the component itself does the lookup. And this is not what you really want. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. I think this way you could on an instance by instance basis fine-grain control what gets injected. And during testing you just inject the mocks in this overriden method. Just my two cents. Thanks, Christian On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:50:02 +0200, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 27, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Sven Meier wrote: BTW rather than letting panels pull service from the page, I'd prefer the page to push services into its panels (i.e. the page injects dependencies into its panels). I don't want my panels to be dependent on the containing page. Yup. That is exactly what I do. But. I just moved the aspect from WebPage to Component and guess what, the annotation and bean resolving works fine in Panels and WebComponents too now :-) It is still to hackerish to use btw. There are some really nasty delays for example. I need to find some time to polish this. S. -- Christian Essl --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Re: wicket:body and Border component
That's why you wrap the border calls:http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Consistent_page_layout_using_borders On 11/6/05, Johan Maasing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem is that the message-label does not belong to the pageanymore. It belongs to the border so you have to add the message tothe border and not the page.
Re: [Wicket-user] Adding Support for optgroup
Sounds and looks good to me. On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the way to go would be to have a set of components that work like CheckGroup/Check we can have a Select component that acts like the CheckGroup component, and a SelectChoices component that works like the dropdownchoice with the exception of rendering select tags. We also have a SelectChoicesGroup which is a simple webmarkupcotainer with a builtin label attr modifier. that way you have all the flexibility, the java code can look like this: Select select=new Select(sel); Choices nogroup=new Choices(nogroup, mylistofchoices, choicerenderer); select.add(nogroup); ChoiceGroup group1=new ChoiceGroup(group1, this is group 1 choices); select.add(group1); group1.add(new Choices(group1choices, mylistofchoices2, choicerenderer)); and html will look like this select wicket:id=select option wicket:id=nogroup/option optgroup wicket:id=group1 option wicket:id=group1choices/option /optgroup /select what do you think? -Igor -Igor On 11/4/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes my bad, I meant the label attribute, I got it confused with the label tag's for attribute. I'm not sure what the best solution is either. Passing a string in definitely works, but it's not really consistent with the rest of the Wicket components (except Label which just takes the string and creates a new model with it). Nevertheless, I use i18n in my app and I use the getString(...) method all over the place, so passing in a String is, IMHO, not a bad thing. Ok, what if we made OptGroup a component just like DropDownChoice, as you mentioned. Then couldn't we just do a test in the DropDownChoice/MultiChoice constructors to see if the list/model contains OptGroups? The only problem is what does the ChoiceRenderer passed into the DropDownChoice refer to at that point? How to display the optgroup or display the options? Should optgroup take in a ChoiceRenderer? --AndrewOn 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unless of course we just pass in a string instead of imodel and leave i18n to the user... -Igor On 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean for the label attribute? Optgroup in this case wouldnt be a component so the IModel provided needs to be attached to some component so that it is detached properly, so the user needs to worry about attaching it somewhere, and the more optgroups you have the trickier that gets. -Igor On 11/4/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor, why wouldn't the model be attached to the OptGroup object? Each OptGroup takes a model which is used for the for attribute.On 11/4/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the other choice objects (The singleselectchoice, dropdownchoice) we could have a list of optgroups and the optgroup has a list of its choices So you are just makeing one line with choices and optgroups (with again a list of choices) johan On 11/4/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: havent decided what the best way to do this is. one problem i see with passing a list of optgroups is that the optgroup will have to have an IModel for its label in case someone wants to i18n it, but then how do we handle attaching and detaching that model since its not attached to any component. maybe separate components like check and checkbox are the best way, and have an optgroup that works exactly like dropdown choice to simplify things. still thinking, thoughts? -Igor On 11/3/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah sorry, think of it as pseudo html :) -Igor On 11/3/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would be similar to Check/CheckGroup because you could create a Select object, which is like the CheckGroup object, and an Option object, which is similar to the Check object. By doing that, then I can manually insert the optgroup tag either directly in the HTML or using a WebMarkupContainer in the JavaCode if the label needs to be dynamic. However, your thought about having an OptGroup object and extending the current DropDownChoice (and it makes sense to do the ListMultipleChoice too as you can use OptGroup with a select box that allows multiple choices) intrigues me. Maybe that is the smoothest way to go because it will reuse what's already available and would only add the one OptGroup component. I like it. By the way, your html should look like below, your HTML above is not correct:select wicket:id=selectGroup optgroup label=Label 1 option/option option/option /optgroup optgroup label=Label 2 option/option option/option /optgroup/select--AndrewOn 11/3/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I dont really understant what you mean. If you want to do it like the Check/CheckGroup is done you would have a SelectGroup and Select components that you would put into your html and then you can manually insert optgroup ie select wicket:id=selectGroup optgroupwicket doesnt care/optgroup select wicked:id=choice1 select wicket:id=choice2
Re: [Wicket-user] eclipse refactoring plugin
Definitely would be nice.On 11/6/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H YEAH!MartijnOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html I created a small plugin for eclispe that does the renaming of all non-java resources when you rename a class that extends wicket.MarkupContainer.Essentially if you have a page called SomePage class and you rename it to SomeOtherPage all resources SomePage.* in the same package will be renamed to SomeOtherPage.*If there is any interest i can make it available as a wicket-stuff project. keeping in mind that it was my first forray into eclipse, so i cannot guarantee it works 100%.-Igor--Living a wicket life...Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1---SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very ownSony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
Or how about a simple solution:
public MyApplication extends WebApplication {
public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...;
return object;
}
}
public MyPage extends Page {
public transient SomeService service;
public SomeService getService() {
if (service==null) {
service=getApplication().lookup(SomeService.class.getName());
}
return service;
}
I know its not quiete as elegant as ioc but it has none of the
performance hits an automatic injection would cause if it would be done
on deserialization of every component. Also its a lazy lookup so you
dont do it until its needed, and its only done once per page (until it
gets deserialized).
-Igor
[Wicket-user] Re: Re: Wicket 1.1 line endings bug?
I use DiffUtil. The extension may help. You don't have troubles with it? Jan Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you using DiffPrint which we use for core unit tests? May be we just have to extend this class Juergen On 11/5/05, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know what is the best solutions. For me the pain is in JUnit tests when I compare byte to byte the rendered results with expected results. It should not break because of changed line endings. I have to write comparator that will take different line endings into account. Jan --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
you are right, this is not ioc. but are pages/components managed by an ioc container?
-Igor
On 11/6/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on11/6/2005 7:06 PM :# Or how about a simple solution: public MyApplication extends WebApplication { public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...; return object; } } public MyPage extends Page { public transient SomeService service;
public SomeService getService() { if (service==null) { service=getApplication().lookup(SomeService.class.getName()); } return service; } I know its not quiete as elegant as ioc but it has none of the performance
hits an automatic injection would cause if it would be done on deserialization of every component. Also its a lazy lookup so you dont do it until its needed, and its only done once per page (until it gets
deserialized). -IgorBut this was exactly what I was suggesting to avoid ;-). Lookups and factories are not ioc/di../alex--.w( the_mindstorm )p.---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very ownSony(tm)PSP.Click here to play:
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
And... for this whole discussion: if you like one approach... go
implement it now! Create your own component factory, annotations
processor, aop, and please contribute when you've got something nice
working. Or let us know when you need specific changes to Wicket to
support your needs. We'll most probably honor such requests if they
are reasonable as we've done in the past.
Eelco
On 11/6/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005
7:06 PM :#
Or how about a simple solution:
public MyApplication extends WebApplication {
public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...;
return object;
}
}
public MyPage extends Page {
public transient SomeService service;
public SomeService getService() {
if (service==null) {
service=getApplication().lookup(SomeService.class.getName());
}
return service;
}
I know its not quiete as elegant as ioc but it has none of the performance
hits an automatic injection would cause if it would be done on
deserialization of every component. Also its a lazy lookup so you dont do it
until its needed, and its only done once per page (until it gets
deserialized).
-Igor
But this was exactly what I was suggesting to avoid ;-). Lookups and
factories are not ioc/di.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Re: Wicket 1.1 line endings bug?
No, but I work wih CVS only. I don't download the jars. And I modify project.xmll to use the snapshot jar which I build myself. Juergen On 11/6/05, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use DiffUtil. The extension may help. You don't have troubles with it? Jan Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you using DiffPrint which we use for core unit tests? May be we just have to extend this class Juergen On 11/5/05, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know what is the best solutions. For me the pain is in JUnit tests when I compare byte to byte the rendered results with expected results. It should not break because of changed line endings. I have to write comparator that will take different line endings into account. Jan --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Servlet forward to a JSP
I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] eclipse refactoring plugin
got access to a laptop, and just checked it in. its in wicket-stuff/wicketeer as i said this is my first go at an eclipse plugin so im sure the code isnt as elegant as it could be right now it handles all basic cases, like renaminga class that inherits from markup container and renaming an inner class that inherits from the markup container. one case that is not handled is renaming files for a class that does not inherit from the markup container but has inner classes that do. i would like this to be a community driven effort because i do not have a ton of time to put into this, so any contributions are welcome. And if someone has eclipse experience and wouldnt mind looking over it and giving pointers that would be great too. -Igor On 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i will check it in tonight.-Igor On 11/6/05, Andrew Berman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Definitely would be nice. On 11/6/05, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H YEAH!MartijnOn 11/6/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, ive been doing some refactoring lately and got really tired of renaming the .html and .properties file after i renamed the page or panel class. This sucks especially when you have inner classes and you have to rename all inner resources like SomePage$SomeInnerPanel.html I created a small plugin for eclispe that does the renaming of all non-java resources when you rename a class that extends wicket.MarkupContainer .Essentially if you have a page called SomePage class and you rename it to SomeOtherPage all resources SomePage.* in the same package will be renamed to SomeOtherPage.*If there is any interest i can make it available as a wicket-stuff project. keeping in mind that it was my first forray into eclipse, so i cannot guarantee it works 100%.-Igor--Living a wicket life...Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___ Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Servlet forward to a JSP
Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit rough, so if you need better support on that one, please contribute ;) Eelco On 11/6/05, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration
#: Eelco Hillenius changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005
9:38 PM :#
I see absolutely nothing wrong with lookups at that level. It's less
code than you would need for any component configuration and it's more
efficient too. And there are just no disadvantages, are there?
And... for this whole discussion: if you like one approach... go
implement it now! Create your own component factory, annotations
processor, aop, and please contribute when you've got something nice
working. Or let us know when you need specific changes to Wicket to
support your needs. We'll most probably honor such requests if they
are reasonable as we've done in the past.
Eelco
My single contribution to this discussion was not to proove something is bad, but rather to
understand others points of view and also to feedback my understanding regarding ioc/di. Considering
this, I would probably still be able to point you that lookup is not bad per se, but it is not
ioc/di. Sure, there are a few disadvantages when compairing these 2, and iirc these are presented in
Spring discussions.
As regards implementing it: when reaching the point where I would need them, if nothing is available
I will definitely come out with something. As, maybe some of the people here are aware, I am
involved in oss projects for quite a while, so if this will be the case I will do my best to
contribute them back to the community.
cheers,
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 11/6/05, Alexandru Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#: Igor Vaynberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/6/2005 7:06
PM :#
Or how about a simple solution:
public MyApplication extends WebApplication {
public Object lookup(String name) {
Object=...do a lookup from somewhere like spring context or app object...;
return object;
}
}
public MyPage extends Page {
public transient SomeService service;
public SomeService getService() {
if (service==null) {
service=getApplication().lookup(SomeService.class.getName());
}
return service;
}
I know its not quiete as elegant as ioc but it has none of the performance
hits an automatic injection would cause if it would be done on
deserialization of every component. Also its a lazy lookup so you dont do it
until its needed, and its only done once per page (until it gets
deserialized).
-Igor
But this was exactly what I was suggesting to avoid ;-). Lookups and factories
are not ioc/di.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Servlet forward to a JSP
If I come up with anything useful I'd be happy to contribute. The JSP I need to forward to requires request attributes, so I don't think the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component will work as from what I understand it is a separate request whose output is then included into the markup? In this case, the result of RedirectPage would be the same as it is a fresh browser request and I need to populate a request with request.setAttribute() and have the JSP be able to retrieve the request attributes. What I'm looking for is a way in Wicket to tell it to finish its processing, not output any markup, and then forward the request to another servlet, not include or redirect. Thanks. On 2005-11-06 15:38:06 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit rough, so if you need better support on that one, please contribute ;) Eelco On 11/6/05, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downl oad it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Re: Servlet forward to a JSP
Ah, yes. True. It used to resolve local includes using javax.servlet.RequestDispatcher, i which case including request attributes would work. However, that proved to be quite problametic and we changed it to always use the absolute requests. What you need shouldn't be too hard however. But it is not something Wicket supports out-of-the-box (and I'm not sure whether that would be in Wicket's scope either). You don't need Wicket to tell stopping any processing, as that is already part of the idea of component orientation. What you need (to build) is a component that gets the content you want to include during it's rendering process. E.g. by letting your component extend from WebComponent and overriding method onComponentTagBody to do the work. In this method, you'll probably want to use the request processor: RequestDispatcher dispatcher = ((ServletWebRequest)getRequest()).getHttpServletRequest() .getRequestDispatcher(*path-to-jsp*); For the including. Eelco Eelco On 11/6/05, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I come up with anything useful I'd be happy to contribute. The JSP I need to forward to requires request attributes, so I don't think the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component will work as from what I understand it is a separate request whose output is then included into the markup? In this case, the result of RedirectPage would be the same as it is a fresh browser request and I need to populate a request with request.setAttribute() and have the JSP be able to retrieve the request attributes. What I'm looking for is a way in Wicket to tell it to finish its processing, not output any markup, and then forward the request to another servlet, not include or redirect. Thanks. On 2005-11-06 15:38:06 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit rough, so if you need better support on that one, please contribute ;) Eelco On 11/6/05, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downl oad it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
