date:20051108

I think Eelco fixed it already in HEAD

Juergen

On 11/8/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That would, ofcourse, be the perfect solution. Do I have to report a bug
 for this?

 I guess it would make sense to provide just a single implementation to
 be used by both components, avoiding problems while trying to keep
 them in sync.
 
 Juergen
 
 On 11/7/05, Ruud Booltink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 I think adding this code to WebComponent's renderHead() would solve this
 problem.
 
String stmt =
 ((IBodyOnloadContributor)handlers[i]).getBodyOnload();
if (stmt != null)
{
((WebPage)getPage()).appendToBodyOnLoad(stmt);
}
 Maby one of the core developers could look at this
 
 Ruud
 
 
 Marco van de Haar wrote:
 
 
 
 I dived into the wicket core code and I ended up in
 WebComponent.renderHead().
 Since I noticed that getBodyOnLoad() was only called for
 FormComponents and WebMarkupContainers I expected a difference in
 renderHead() for WebComponent and WebMarkupContainer... and I
 found it.
 
 Webcomponent.renderHead()
 
/**
 * THIS IS NOT PART OF WICKETS PUBLIC API. DO NOT CALL IT YOURSELF
 * Print to the web response what ever the component wants
 * to contribute to the head section. Does nothing by default.
 *
 * @param container The HtmlHeaderContainer
 * @see
 wicket.markup.html.IHeaderContributor#renderHead(wicket.markup.html.HtmlHeaderContainer)
 
 */
public void renderHead(final HtmlHeaderContainer container)
{
AjaxHandler[] handlers = getAjaxHandlers();
if (handlers != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i  handlers.length; i++)
{
handlers[i].renderHead(container);
}
}
}
 
 and WebMarkupContainer.renderHead():
 public void renderHead(final HtmlHeaderContainer container)
{
 
 .
// get head and body contributions in one loop
AjaxHandler[] handlers = getAjaxHandlers();
if (handlers != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i  handlers.length; i++)
{
((IHeaderContributor)handlers[i]).renderHead(container);
 
String stmt =
 ((IBodyOnloadContributor)handlers[i]).getBodyOnload();
if (stmt != null)
{
((WebPage)getPage()).appendToBodyOnLoad(stmt);
}
}  }
}
 
 I believe that getBodyOnload() is not called in WebComponent. And thus
 any bodyonload contributions made in AjaxHandlers bound to
 WebComponents are ignored. Is this a bug? If so, it must be easy to fix.
 
 Marco
 
 
 
 That should work. Might be a bug. Could you pls try to step into it?
 
 Eelco
 
 On 11/4/05, Marco van de Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 I encountered somewhat unexpected behavior when I tried using
 getBodyOnloadContribution().
 When adding custom Ajaxhandlers to components I noticed that the
 getBodyOnloadContribution() is not called when I added the handler
 to an
 Image or a Label. It was however called upon loading the page when I
 added my handler to a WebMarkupContainer.
 
 Is this method meant to hehave this way? If so, I did not find it in
 the
 documentation. I think it is logical that the method is also called for
 Components like Label and Image. I am not really familliar with
 AjaxHandler's internal code however.
 
 Marco
 
 
 
 
 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
 Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
 Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
 Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 
 
 
 ---
 SF.Net email

Re: [Wicket-user] Strange wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected exception

2005-11-08 Thread Ralf Ebert


Hi,


Which version of Wicket are you using? Lastest HEAD? You're not using
the component re-render feature, do you?

no, Wicket 1.1.


It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
Well, I rechecked all the header contributing components and couldn't  
find anything... The strange thing is, that the exception is not  
about the markup of the rendered page but about that of the page I  
come from. I have DocumentPage and PositionPage and go from  
PositionPage - DocumentPage. I get:
Unexpected runtime exception [page = [Page class = DocumentPage, id =  
3]]
wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected [markup =  
file:PositionPage.html, index = 120, current = [Raw markup]]


Unfortunately I don't have Tomcat debugging set up at the moment but  
I will see if I can debug it as suggested.


Regards,
Ralf


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strange wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected exception

Try using jetty and the jetty-launcher plugin for eclipse. That is realy easy.

Juergen

On 11/8/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  Which version of Wicket are you using? Lastest HEAD? You're not using
  the component re-render feature, do you?
 no, Wicket 1.1.

  It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
  stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
 Well, I rechecked all the header contributing components and couldn't
 find anything... The strange thing is, that the exception is not
 about the markup of the rendered page but about that of the page I
 come from. I have DocumentPage and PositionPage and go from
 PositionPage - DocumentPage. I get:
 Unexpected runtime exception [page = [Page class = DocumentPage, id =
 3]]
 wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected [markup =
 file:PositionPage.html, index = 120, current = [Raw markup]]

 Unfortunately I don't have Tomcat debugging set up at the moment but
 I will see if I can debug it as suggested.

 Regards,
 Ralf


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strange wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected exception

You may not even need Jetty or Tomcat. Take a look at the unit tests
which make use of WicketTester. It provides all the mock objects and
wireing required.

Juergen

On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Try using jetty and the jetty-launcher plugin for eclipse. That is realy easy.

 Juergen

 On 11/8/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
   Which version of Wicket are you using? Lastest HEAD? You're not using
   the component re-render feature, do you?
  no, Wicket 1.1.
 
   It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
   stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
  Well, I rechecked all the header contributing components and couldn't
  find anything... The strange thing is, that the exception is not
  about the markup of the rendered page but about that of the page I
  come from. I have DocumentPage and PositionPage and go from
  PositionPage - DocumentPage. I get:
  Unexpected runtime exception [page = [Page class = DocumentPage, id =
  3]]
  wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected [markup =
  file:PositionPage.html, index = 120, current = [Raw markup]]
 
  Unfortunately I don't have Tomcat debugging set up at the moment but
  I will see if I can debug it as suggested.
 
  Regards,
  Ralf
 
 
  ---
  SF.Net email is sponsored by:
  Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
  it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
  Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strange wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected exception

yet another way would be to enable debug logs on
wicket.Component=DEBUG. You should see messages like Begin render
... and End render  The last Begin render .. should be of
interest.

Juergen

On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You may not even need Jetty or Tomcat. Take a look at the unit tests
 which make use of WicketTester. It provides all the mock objects and
 wireing required.

 Juergen

 On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Try using jetty and the jetty-launcher plugin for eclipse. That is realy 
  easy.
 
  Juergen
 
  On 11/8/05, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi,
  
Which version of Wicket are you using? Lastest HEAD? You're not using
the component re-render feature, do you?
   no, Wicket 1.1.
  
It is a redirect you do and the response gets rendered. Based on the
stack trace something is wrong in one of the headers. Within
   Well, I rechecked all the header contributing components and couldn't
   find anything... The strange thing is, that the exception is not
   about the markup of the rendered page but about that of the page I
   come from. I have DocumentPage and PositionPage and go from
   PositionPage - DocumentPage. I get:
   Unexpected runtime exception [page = [Page class = DocumentPage, id =
   3]]
   wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected [markup =
   file:PositionPage.html, index = 120, current = [Raw markup]]
  
   Unfortunately I don't have Tomcat debugging set up at the moment but
   I will see if I can debug it as suggested.
  
   Regards,
   Ralf
  
  
   ---
   SF.Net email is sponsored by:
   Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. 
   Download
   it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
   Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
 



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Strange wicket.markup.MarkupException: Tag expected exception

2005-11-08 Thread Ralf Ebert


Hi,


yet another way would be to enable debug logs on
wicket.Component=DEBUG. You should see messages like Begin render
... and End render  The last Begin render .. should be of
interest.
thanks for your help, that helped me fix it. I saved a  
StyleSheetReference static in my base page. Maybe Wicket should allow  
this or throw an exception? (because the error didn't help me finding  
the problem and I fear I'm not the only one getting the idea that a  
thing like a css reference could be stored static in a base page)


Regards,
Ralf


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] redirect to previous url

2005-11-08 Thread pepone pepone

I take a look at WebRequestCrawlerSaver and this can be what i loking for

what is the way to plug this in a wicket application

thanks in advantage

On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If you are sure that you are realy not interested in path=xxx, may be
 it worth if you create your own WebRequest/WebResponse (see
 WebRequestCrawlerSaver for an example what can be done)

 Juergen

 On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In my current aplication all links are bookmarkables or redirects to a
  bookmarkable pagte and i only want this for the SingInForm user that
  are not signedin can only access tow forms RegisterForm and SignIn
  form the register form redirect allways to a page that show the result
  of regitration or error in registration if any
 
  path=x is clean but if a user is read and article in this page with a
  bookmarkable url sigin for be able tos post a coment then it is in a
  url that it can bookmarkat and this can be confused for user.
 
  for example you are reading and article at
 
  http://domain.com/app?bookmarakblePage=ArticleViewnodePath=/wicket/intro
 
  you sing in to post a coment and your url is now
 
  http://domain.com/app?path=x
 
  the user make a bookmark to remenber this article later
 
  ops this bookmark is broken
 
  how can i prevent user for not make bookmarks when a url is no bookmarkable
  i think that i can´t
 
  this is the problem that i see for the rest path=x is clean for me
 
  On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   then you have to make sure that you always redirect to a bookmarkable url 
   at
   all places!
(form submits, link clicks)
A form submit will always be a path=x thing
So if that form submit is the page before youre redirectToIntercept
(so a user submits a form but should login first)
Then it will be hard to know the bookmarkable url because there is 
   none a
   form always submits to path=x
  
Personally i find the path=x very very clean. I would use bookmarkable 
   urls
   only for outside entry points inside my application.
  
johan
  
  
  
   On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
What i trying to do is maintain the clean url that i have before form
   submit
i don´t want that my app has not bookmarkable urls wiht path o version 
in
   it
   
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 what i don´t understand is when i must call redirectToInterceptPage
 beacause my sigin panel is allways in the border and documentation
 says that continueToOriginal only works with a previous call to
 redirectToInterceptPage



 On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We are redirecting to the real url:
 
   final void redirectToInterceptPage(final Page page)
   {
   interceptContinuationURL =
  page.getResponse().encodeURL(page.getRequest().getURL());
 
 
   But i think this url is already changed because of a client side
   redirect.
   (changed to: path=0 or something like that)
 
   But that shouldn't matter because it will redirect to the same
   instance as
  it was on is that not the case or not the desired behaviour?
 
   johan
 
 
 
  On 11/7/05, pepone pepone  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I read singin2 to example but i think that this don´t solve the
   problem that i expresed
  
   Sigin2 use
   redirectToInterceptPage(SingIn2.class);
  
   and later calls getPage().continueToOriginal();
  
   but in my case i haven´t a separte page for sigin my sigin panel 
   is
   allways present in the border
  
   if a user is at this url
  
  
 
   http://domain.com/app?bookmarkablePage=FileViewnodePath=/test-001.html
  
   when i submit form  continue in same page but url is not
   bookmarkable
  
   what i want is keep the previous bookmarkable Url
  
   continueToOriginal not make sense here because i haven´t a 
   separted
   singin page that i redirect to using void
   redirectToInterceptPage(Page
   page)
  
  
   On 11/7/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see the signin2 example.
   
Juergen
   
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello i have a form in my border to do login/logout

 I wan to redirect user to same url before login the url that i
   use
 are allways bookmarkable and i wan to mantain the url whith 
 the
   same
 parameters

 i thinking in same thing like

 void onSubmit()
 {
 //Form logic goes here

 //before is procesed redirect user to the previous url

 
   setResponsePage(getPage().class,getPreviousRequest().getParams());
 }
 any ideas?

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

Wow great job Igor. Thanks for doing it. I think that's the proper way to 
go.


Regarding cglib I think you should use spring AOP (it is already a 
dependency and generalization can wait a bit). Spring AOP handles all that 
and a bit more and is easy to use. Ie for cglib like in the current 
implementation you would also have to do something for serializing the 
proxy (http://cglib.sourceforge.net/howto.html) and maybe there are other 
things. With spring AOP:



final Class proxyClass = //class/interface needed to inject
ProxyFactory fact = new ProxyFactory();
fact.setTargetSource(new TargetSource(){
private transient _target;
public Class getTargetClass(){return proxyClass;}
public boolean isStatic(){return false;}
public Object getTarget() throws Exception
{
   if(_target == null)
_target = loadTheTarget();
   return _target;
}
public void releaseTarget(Object arg0) throws Exception{}
});

if(!proxyClass.isInterface())
   fact.setProxyTargetClass(true); //will use cglib

Object proxy = fact.getProxy();
//inject the proxy (done)

Just of my head two further suggestions:
1.) If a field is not null than do not inject anything. This way custom 
injections could be done
2.) If a Compnoent implements Initializable than call init(). So setter 
injection can be done and the componetn can do its full setup in the init 
method - basically like in the constructor.


What I'm working on now is an ApplicationContext which wrapps the 'real' 
ApplicationContext and does create for getBean() etc automatically the 
proxies. I think this way I'll never have to worry about the serialization 
problem for such beans.


Christian




On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:07:30 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



heh
why do i only get to work on this stuff when i can barely keep my eyes 
open?


works great when i use a dynamic proxy - ie the dependency is an 
interface.

there is some class cast exception with cglib when the dependency is a
concrete class, maybe someone can take a look.

basically what this is does is this:
traverses the class hierarchy and looks for any fields that are annotated
with a SpringBean annotation, for any field it creates a proxy that will
load the dependency on first method invocation and sets the proxy as the
field value. the proxy does not replace the field value with the 
dependency

when its loaded, but instead forwards the invocations itself. this allows
the proxy to remain as the field value and be serialized and deserialized
instead of the dependency and thus solves the deserialization problem
because the proxy keeps enough information to be able to lookup the
dependency on its own.

this approach allows pages or components to carry spring references and
there is very low overhead because everything is lazy, and the hierarchy 
is

only traversed once.

right now the impl is jdk5 because that's the easiest, but this will work
just fine with jdk4, just need a way to store the metadata elsewhere - 
like

wicket metadata store in 1.2. it can also be easily extended to pull out
dependencies from places other then spring - the principle is the same.

the code (which needs to be refactored a lot) is in wicket-contrib-spring
project in wicket-stuff. see the wicket.contrib.spring.injection for code
and tests (examples :) )

this can work automatically for pages, just create a constructor like 
this:


SpringEnabledPage extends WebPage {
public SpringEnabledPage() {
super();
SpringInitailizer.initialize(this, getSpringContextLocator());
}
}

and then any page that extends the current page gets the proxies created
automatically

does this sound good to people and will any one actually use it? or is 
this

not ioc enough and i am just wasting my time?

Good night,
-Igor



On 11/7/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


or a JNDIAnnotation, anything is possible with this approach.

Let me try and get some of it going tonight and we can move from there.

-Igor


On 11/7/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I think there should be both of your implementations.

 IMO the constructor based impl should have the protected doInject
 method,
 because to me it seems to be the easiest way to inject manually 
services

 in the constructor without the need to manually proxy them.

 Yes with cglib we'll hit the final problem. I think - don't know - 
we'll

 need also a default constructor. Anyway spring runs into the same
 problem
 if it uses ie transaction proxies because spring does also use cglib 
for


 non interface based AOP. Maybe use spring AOP directly, which is well
 tested and performend.

 To me it would be fine to only use interfaces, because in the end 
those

 things are services I want to replace for mocking, remoting or
 whatsoever.
 So interfaces are a good (recomended) practice.

 By the way we could also create an EJBInjection annotation.

 Christian



 On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:22:02 -0800, Igor Vaynberg 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 wrote:

Re: [Wicket-user] redirect to previous url

please see http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Obfuscating_urls

Jürgen

On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I take a look at WebRequestCrawlerSaver and this can be what i loking for

 what is the way to plug this in a wicket application

 thanks in advantage

 On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If you are sure that you are realy not interested in path=xxx, may be
  it worth if you create your own WebRequest/WebResponse (see
  WebRequestCrawlerSaver for an example what can be done)
 
  Juergen
 
  On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In my current aplication all links are bookmarkables or redirects to a
   bookmarkable pagte and i only want this for the SingInForm user that
   are not signedin can only access tow forms RegisterForm and SignIn
   form the register form redirect allways to a page that show the result
   of regitration or error in registration if any
  
   path=x is clean but if a user is read and article in this page with a
   bookmarkable url sigin for be able tos post a coment then it is in a
   url that it can bookmarkat and this can be confused for user.
  
   for example you are reading and article at
  
   http://domain.com/app?bookmarakblePage=ArticleViewnodePath=/wicket/intro
  
   you sing in to post a coment and your url is now
  
   http://domain.com/app?path=x
  
   the user make a bookmark to remenber this article later
  
   ops this bookmark is broken
  
   how can i prevent user for not make bookmarks when a url is no 
   bookmarkable
   i think that i can´t
  
   this is the problem that i see for the rest path=x is clean for me
  
   On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then you have to make sure that you always redirect to a bookmarkable 
url at
all places!
 (form submits, link clicks)
 A form submit will always be a path=x thing
 So if that form submit is the page before youre redirectToIntercept
 (so a user submits a form but should login first)
 Then it will be hard to know the bookmarkable url because there is 
none a
form always submits to path=x
   
 Personally i find the path=x very very clean. I would use bookmarkable 
urls
only for outside entry points inside my application.
   
 johan
   
   
   
On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What i trying to do is maintain the clean url that i have before form
submit
 i don´t want that my app has not bookmarkable urls wiht path o 
 version in
it

 On 11/7/05, pepone pepone  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  what i don´t understand is when i must call redirectToInterceptPage
  beacause my sigin panel is allways in the border and documentation
  says that continueToOriginal only works with a previous call to
  redirectToInterceptPage
 
 
 
  On 11/7/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   We are redirecting to the real url:
  
final void redirectToInterceptPage(final Page page)
{
interceptContinuationURL =
   page.getResponse().encodeURL(page.getRequest().getURL());
  
  
But i think this url is already changed because of a client side
redirect.
(changed to: path=0 or something like that)
  
But that shouldn't matter because it will redirect to the same
instance as
   it was on is that not the case or not the desired behaviour?
  
johan
  
  
  
   On 11/7/05, pepone pepone  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
I read singin2 to example but i think that this don´t solve the
problem that i expresed
   
Sigin2 use
redirectToInterceptPage(SingIn2.class);
   
and later calls getPage().continueToOriginal();
   
but in my case i haven´t a separte page for sigin my sigin 
panel is
allways present in the border
   
if a user is at this url
   
   
  
http://domain.com/app?bookmarkablePage=FileViewnodePath=/test-001.html
   
when i submit form  continue in same page but url is not
bookmarkable
   
what i want is keep the previous bookmarkable Url
   
continueToOriginal not make sense here because i haven´t a 
separted
singin page that i redirect to using void
redirectToInterceptPage(Page
page)
   
   
On 11/7/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Please see the signin2 example.

 Juergen

 On 11/7/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello i have a form in my border to do login/logout
 
  I wan to redirect user to same url before login the url 
  that i
use
  are allways bookmarkable and i wan to mantain the url whith 
  the
same
  parameters
 
  i thinking in same thing

[Wicket-user] Question about AJAX and Wicket

2005-11-08 Thread Nick Heudecker

Hi,I've been looking at the Dojo and Scriptaculous extensions for Wicket and haven't seen what I'm looking for. Essentially, I want to have a master-detail display where the details are retrieved from the server and displayed in a div. Also, I'd like to be able to request a Form object from the server and have it displayed in the Page, like if the user clicks Edit, for instance. 
Any pointers on this? Can the extensions, or even Wicket, support this yet?

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

2005-11-08 Thread Jeff Miller



Howare thebase url's different? In all cases, aren't the base url's the following?
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template
My desire is to have url's that are as simple as possible. Long url's are problems for nontechnical users (for example in emails, whenbookmarking, on written publications, describing verbally say over phone, or when typing in address bar of browser.).

When something like "bookmarkablePage" is added to the url, a simple url becomes complicated. Especially sinceurl is case sensitive where only "P" is capital and all other characters are lower case. This may sound trivial to us technical people since we understand what happens with case-sensitive string compares. However,complicated url's complicate acompany's ability for goodcustomer servicefor web-related things.

Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is currently not possibleAlso with these kind of urls you suddenly have all kind of url problems (other resources like images/css/js files) because the base dir is different.You have to use a url rewriter for that currently.johan
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 


putClassAlias is close to what I was suggesting but it does not remove all of the implementation details from the url. It eliminates the package name but the url still contains "?bookmarkablePage=" which is an implementation detail for Wicket butis not related to thesemantic value of the url.

No alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 

With putClassAlias(Page2.class, "Page2"):
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=Page2 

Desired alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2



Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ApplicationPages is just a configuration object you can set properties that are used for pages (Error pages etc)For aliasses see wicket-examples, we use there as an example a few page aliasses. Just put youre bookmarkable page class as a allias:putClassAlias(MyPage.class, "mypage");
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

Where would I find an example? I could not find any on wiki, wicket.sourceforge.net, or in examples. 

The javadoc isnot clear how to use ApplicationPages except that I need to use putClassAlias method. What object, if any, needs reference to the ApplicationPages object with the aliases?

Thanks,
Jeff 
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

there is already support for page aliasses see ApplicationPages
On 11/4/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 




Is there a way to create bookmarkable page without embedding any of the Wicket implementation details in the url? For example, the template example page 2 url is:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 

However,"bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template" is a Wicket implementation detail thatis used because Wicket needs itand not because it is relevant to theurl. It would begood if the url could be simpler like:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2

Now I realize that Wicket needs to knowhow to map "Page2" to "wicket.examples.template.Page2". One wayto accomplish this could beto add a method to WebApplicationlike addAlias(String alias, Class page). For example:

public class TemplateApplication extends WicketExampleApplication{ public TemplateApplication() { getPages().setHomePage(Page1.class);
addAlias("Page1", Page1.class);
addAlias("Page2", Page2.class); }}

Here are some articles that recommend keeping implementation details outof urls:
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html

Thanks,
JeffJeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 




Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 

Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 
Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED]
		 Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

2005-11-08 Thread Johan Compagner

We could also support:

page=wicket (instead of bookmarkablePage=wicket)

the base in this:
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template


is
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/


but with:
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template
/page

it is:

www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template
/


johan

On 11/8/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Howare thebase url's different? In all cases, aren't the base url's the following?
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template

My desire is to have url's that are as simple as
possible. Long url's are problems for nontechnical users (for
example in emails, whenbookmarking, on written publications,
describing verbally say over phone, or when typing in address bar of
browser.).

When something like bookmarkablePage is added to the url, a
simple url becomes complicated. Especially sinceurl is case
sensitive where only P is capital and all other characters are lower
case. This may sound trivial to us technical people since we
understand what happens with case-sensitive string compares.
However,complicated url's complicate acompany's ability for
goodcustomer servicefor web-related things.

Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is currently not possibleAlso
with these kind of urls you suddenly have all kind of url problems
(other resources like images/css/js files) because the base dir is
different.You have to use a url rewriter for that currently.johan
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote: 


putClassAlias is close to what I was suggesting but it does not
remove all of the implementation details from the url. It
eliminates the package name but the url still contains
?bookmarkablePage= which is an implementation detail for Wicket
butis not related to thesemantic value of the url.

No alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 


With putClassAlias(Page2.class, Page2):
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=Page2 


Desired alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2



Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ApplicationPages is just a configuration object you can set properties that are used for pages (Error pages etc)For aliasses see wicket-examples, we use there as an example a few page aliasses. 
Just put youre bookmarkable page class as a allias:putClassAlias(MyPage.class, mypage);
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote: 

Where would I find an example? I could not find any on wiki, wicket.sourceforge.net, or in examples. 


The javadoc isnot clear how to use ApplicationPages except
that I need to use putClassAlias method. What object, if any,
needs reference to the ApplicationPages object with the aliases?

Thanks,
Jeff 
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

there is already support for page aliasses see ApplicationPages
On 11/4/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote: 




Is there a way to create bookmarkable page without embedding any
of the Wicket implementation details in the url? For example, the
template example page 2 url is:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 


However,bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template
is a Wicket implementation detail thatis used because Wicket
needs itand not because it is relevant to theurl. It
would begood if the url could be simpler like:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2

Now I realize that Wicket needs to knowhow to map Page2 to
wicket.examples.template.Page2. One wayto accomplish this
could beto add a method to WebApplicationlike
addAlias(String alias, Class page). For example:

public class TemplateApplication extends WicketExampleApplication{ public TemplateApplication() { getPages().setHomePage(Page1.class);
addAlias(Page1, Page1.class);
addAlias(Page2, Page2.class); }}

Here are some articles that recommend keeping implementation details outof urls:
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html

Thanks,
JeffJeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 




Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 

Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 
Jeff Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
		 
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration


Yes you are right!

I was now more thinking of Igors proposal todo the 'injection' from the 
outside:


MyComponent comp = new MyComponent(id);
//set this and that
SpringInitializer.initialize(comp,locator);

If you'd do it from the inside (as the original code) it is a different 
story.


I don't know what is better. What do you think?

Christian


On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:36:51 +0100, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



Just of my head two further suggestions:
1.) If a field is not null than do not inject anything. This way custom
injections could be done




Fields are always null because they are not initialized yet by the sub 
class


(when having a super class that does the injections)




--
Christian Essl 






___ 
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

What I'm working on now is an ApplicationContext which wrapps the 'real'ApplicationContext and does create for getBean() etc automatically the
proxies. I think this way I'll never have to worry about the serializationproblem for such beans.
but what will inject your pages?

-Igor

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

On 11/8/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How are the base url's different?  In all cases, aren't the base url's the
 following?
 www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template

 My desire is to have url's that are as simple as possible.  Long url's are
 problems for nontechnical users (for example in emails, when bookmarking, on
 written publications, describing verbally say over phone, or when typing in
 address bar of browser.).

 When something like bookmarkablePage is added to the url, a simple url
 becomes complicated.  Especially since url is case sensitive where only P
 is capital and all other characters are lower case.  This may sound trivial
 to us technical people since we understand what happens with case-sensitive
 string compares.  However, complicated url's complicate a company's ability
 for good customer service for web-related things.


Yes, base url remains the same, of course. But everything behind it
can be whatever you want to. A single name, a number, a path, with or
without parameters.

Juergen


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Question about AJAX and Wicket

2005-11-08 Thread Nick Heudecker

I'll give it a shot. To be honest, I'd really like some more docs about the AJAX stuff. I've looked at the examples and they don't really provide the high-level overview I need to get my head around it.
On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the HEAD (1.2 dev) version of Wicket we now have beta support forpartial rendering (e.g. rendering of 1 panel). You probably need thatto elegantly build what you want.It's still working on the frontier (though some simpler ajax
components are available now), but please try and implement. That'sthe only way we can know whether our Ajax support is good enough/ bugfree.EelcoOn 11/8/05, Nick Heudecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been looking at the Dojo and Scriptaculous extensions for Wicket and haven't seen what I'm looking for.Essentially, I want to have a master-detail display where the details are retrieved from the server and
displayed in a div.Also, I'd like to be able to request a Form object from the server and have it displayed in the Page, like if the user clicks Edit, for instance. Any pointers on this?Can the extensions, or even Wicket, support this yet?
---SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration


It is more for components:
//constructor
public OrderPage(){
 add(new 
CustomerPanel(customer,getWrappingContext().getBean(customerDAO,CustomerDAO.class));

}

Just for normal DI in code.

Christian

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:31:47 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:




What I'm working on now is an ApplicationContext which wrapps the 'real'
ApplicationContext and does create for getBean() etc automatically the
proxies. I think this way I'll never have to worry about the 
serialization

problem for such beans.



but what will inject your pages?

-Igor




--
Christian Essl 






___ 
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Question about AJAX and Wicket

2005-11-08 Thread Eelco Hillenius

Well, the ajax support in Wicket is quite basic really. Just take a
look at Behaviour/ AjaxHandler/ one of the concrete AjaxHandlers like
DojoAjaxHandler. Generally, what they do is provide the means to let
handlers cooperate with components (due to suggestions earlier this
week, this was generalized into behaviours) and let them contribute
header and body onload code.

The hardest part you have to learn is how each individual library
(like Dojo or Scriptaculous) takes care of ajax handling. And of
course, how to put things together in a nice way. The more people give
this a try, the better our understanding will be of how we can support
best. I think when we reach a level that we have done more complex
ajax stuff (like what you want to do) and agree on the taken
approaches, we can go on and create some more high level documentation
on Ajax.

Eelco


On 11/8/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'll give it a shot.  To be honest, I'd really like some more docs about the
 AJAX stuff.  I've looked at the examples and they don't really provide the
 high-level overview I need to get my head around it.


  On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  In the HEAD (1.2 dev) version of Wicket we now have beta support for
  partial rendering (e.g. rendering of 1 panel). You probably need that
  to elegantly build what you want.
 
  It's still working on the frontier (though some simpler ajax
  components are available now), but please try and implement. That's
  the only way we can know whether our Ajax support is good enough/ bug
  free.
 
  Eelco
 
 
 
  On 11/8/05, Nick Heudecker  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Hi,
  
   I've been looking at the Dojo and Scriptaculous extensions for Wicket
 and
   haven't seen what I'm looking for.  Essentially, I want to have a
   master-detail display where the details are retrieved from the server
 and
   displayed in a div.  Also, I'd like to be able to request a Form object
 from
   the server and have it displayed in the Page, like if the user clicks
   Edit, for instance.
  
   Any pointers on this?  Can the extensions, or even Wicket, support this
 yet?
  
 
 
  ---
  SF.Net email is sponsored by:
  Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
 Download
  it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
  Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play:
 http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Question about AJAX and Wicket

2005-11-08 Thread Martijn Dashorst

In the mean time, I think Jessy Sightler has got some ajax writing on
his blog. Google for scriptaculous, wicket and autocomplete.

Martijn


On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, the ajax support in Wicket is quite basic really. Just take a
 look at Behaviour/ AjaxHandler/ one of the concrete AjaxHandlers like
 DojoAjaxHandler. Generally, what they do is provide the means to let
 handlers cooperate with components (due to suggestions earlier this
 week, this was generalized into behaviours) and let them contribute
 header and body onload code.

 The hardest part you have to learn is how each individual library
 (like Dojo or Scriptaculous) takes care of ajax handling. And of
 course, how to put things together in a nice way. The more people give
 this a try, the better our understanding will be of how we can support
 best. I think when we reach a level that we have done more complex
 ajax stuff (like what you want to do) and agree on the taken
 approaches, we can go on and create some more high level documentation
 on Ajax.

 Eelco


 On 11/8/05, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'll give it a shot.  To be honest, I'd really like some more docs about the
  AJAX stuff.  I've looked at the examples and they don't really provide the
  high-level overview I need to get my head around it.
 
 
   On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   In the HEAD (1.2 dev) version of Wicket we now have beta support for
   partial rendering (e.g. rendering of 1 panel). You probably need that
   to elegantly build what you want.
  
   It's still working on the frontier (though some simpler ajax
   components are available now), but please try and implement. That's
   the only way we can know whether our Ajax support is good enough/ bug
   free.
  
   Eelco
  
  
  
   On 11/8/05, Nick Heudecker  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
   
I've been looking at the Dojo and Scriptaculous extensions for Wicket
  and
haven't seen what I'm looking for.  Essentially, I want to have a
master-detail display where the details are retrieved from the server
  and
displayed in a div.  Also, I'd like to be able to request a Form object
  from
the server and have it displayed in the Page, like if the user clicks
Edit, for instance.
   
Any pointers on this?  Can the extensions, or even Wicket, support this
  yet?
   
  
  
   ---
   SF.Net email is sponsored by:
   Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
  Download
   it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
   Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play:
  http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
 
 


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



--
Living a wicket life...

Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst

Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

Im still getting a class cast exception using cglib directly. im
probably doing something dumb, you want to take a look?
SpringInitializer line 61 is commented out, thats where proxies are
created for concrete objects.

By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements
Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable since
its a subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface
into the created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you
think?

-Igor
On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects referenced fromsession attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec doesnot speak about writeReplace()and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if you rely
on these.Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the cglibhowto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so untiltomorrow.Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces?
ChristianOn Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead end
 unfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects. in their howto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and reconstructing the proxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard
 serialization is used. not sure where to go from here -Igor

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

2005-11-08 Thread Jeff Miller

I considered recommending "page=". It would be better than "bookmarkablePage=". Allowing "page=" in conjunction with alias would certainly allow simpler urls. 

When browsing to bookmarkable page,wouldthe urlshow in browser as "page=alias"? I would prefer that to "bookmarkablePage=com.mycompany.app.myapp" or "bookmarkablePage=alias" even though "page" is understood by Wicket. In other words, ifmy applicationis configured to use "page", I wouldnever want "bookmarkablePage" toshow in browser address during navigation. 

JeffJohan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also support:page=wicket (instead of bookmarkablePage=wicket)the base in this:www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template iswww.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ 
but with:www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template /pageit is:www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template /johanOn 11/8/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Howare thebase url's different? In all cases, aren't the base url's the following?
www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template 
My desire is to have url's that are as simple as possible. Long url's are problems for nontechnical users (for example in emails, whenbookmarking, on written publications, describing verbally say over phone, or when typing in address bar of browser.).

When something like "bookmarkablePage" is added to the url, a simple url becomes complicated. Especially sinceurl is case sensitive where only "P" is capital and all other characters are lower case. This may sound trivial to us technical people since we understand what happens with case-sensitive string compares. However,complicated url's complicate acompany's ability for goodcustomer servicefor web-related things.


Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that is currently not possibleAlso with these kind of urls you suddenly have all kind of url problems (other resources like images/css/js files) because the base dir is different.You have to use a url rewriter for that currently.johan
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 


putClassAlias is close to what I was suggesting but it does not remove all of the implementation details from the url. It eliminates the package name but the url still contains "?bookmarkablePage=" which is an implementation detail for Wicket butis not related to thesemantic value of the url.

No alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 

With putClassAlias(Page2.class, "Page2"):
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=Page2 

Desired alias:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2



Jeff
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ApplicationPages is just a configuration object you can set properties that are used for pages (Error pages etc)For aliasses see wicket-examples, we use there as an example a few page aliasses. Just put youre bookmarkable page class as a allias:putClassAlias(MyPage.class, "mypage");
On 11/7/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 

Where would I find an example? I could not find any on wiki, wicket.sourceforge.net, or in examples. 

The javadoc isnot clear how to use ApplicationPages except that I need to use putClassAlias method. What object, if any, needs reference to the ApplicationPages object with the aliases?

Thanks,
Jeff 
Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

there is already support for page aliasses see ApplicationPages
On 11/4/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote: 




Is there a way to create bookmarkable page without embedding any of the Wicket implementation details in the url? For example, the template example page 2 url is:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template?bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template.Page2 

However,"bookmarkablePage=wicket.examples.template" is a Wicket implementation detail thatis used because Wicket needs itand not because it is relevant to theurl. It would begood if the url could be simpler like:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/template/Page2

Now I realize that Wicket needs to knowhow to map "Page2" to "wicket.examples.template.Page2". One wayto accomplish this could beto add a method to WebApplicationlike addAlias(String alias, Class page). For example:

public class TemplateApplication extends WicketExampleApplication{ public TemplateApplication() { getPages().setHomePage(Page1.class);
addAlias("Page1", Page1.class);
addAlias("Page2", Page2.class); }}

Here are some articles that recommend keeping implementation details outof urls:
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html

Thanks,
JeffJeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 






Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 

Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 

Jeff Miller[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Yahoo! FareChase -

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



Im still getting a class cast exception using cglib directly. im probably
doing something dumb, you want to take a look? SpringInitializer line 61 
is

commented out, thats where proxies are created for concrete objects.


I think the problem is in the SpringLazyLookupInterceptor.intercept() 
method you should at the
end call proxy.invoke(target, args) instead of proxy.invokeSuper(). 
invokeSuper expects that the given argument is the enhanced instance. You 
need it to call methods on the super (original) class.




By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements
Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable since 
its a

subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface into the
created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you think?


That seems reasonable. I'll post a question on the spring list and see 
what they say.


Christian



-Igor


On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects referenced 
from

session attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec does
not speak about writeReplace()
and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if you 
rely

on these.

Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the cglib
howto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so until
tomorrow.

Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces?

Christian

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

wrote:

 got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead end
 unfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects. in
their
 howto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and reconstructing
the
 proxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard
 serialization is used. not sure where to go from here

 -Igor








--
Christian Essl 






___ 
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

I would rather weave it in using cglib and stay away from a
spring-specific proxy impl, becuase this thing can easily be
generalized to things beyound spring, like jndi lookups, etc.

-Igor
On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Im still getting a class cast exception using cglib directly. im probably
doing something dumb, you want to take a look? SpringInitializer line 61 is commented out, thats where proxies are created for concrete objects.I think the problem is in the SpringLazyLookupInterceptor.intercept
()method you should at theend call proxy.invoke(target, args) instead of proxy.invokeSuper().invokeSuper expects that the given argument is the enhanced instance. Youneed it to call methods on the super (original) class.
By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable since its a subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface into the
created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you think?That seems reasonable. I'll post a question on the spring list and seewhat they say.Christian -Igor
On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects referenced
from session attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec does not speak about writeReplace() and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if you
rely on these. Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the cglib howto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so until tomorrow.
Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces? Christian On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead end unfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects. in
their howto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and reconstructing the proxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard serialization is used. not sure where to go from here
-Igor --Christian Essl___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de---SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very ownSony(tm)PSP.Click here to play:
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

2005-11-08 Thread Dan Gould


Jeff Miller wrote:

I considered recommending page=.  It would be better than
bookmarkablePage=.  Allowing page= in conjunction with alias would
certainly allow simpler urls.


+1


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

ok, got the pure cglib solution working.
just had to call enhancer.setInterfaces(new Class[] { Serializable.class}) to weave in the serializable interface.

now it appears everything is working. sweet.
i am going to do a lot of refactoring today. maybe you can make your
wrappingcontext use the same proxies as this thing so we can keep it
all in one place.

-Igor
On 11/8/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would rather weave it in using cglib and stay away from a
spring-specific proxy impl, becuase this thing can easily be
generalized to things beyound spring, like jndi lookups, etc.

()method you should at theend call proxy.invoke(target, args) instead of proxy.invokeSuper().invokeSuper expects that the given argument is the enhanced instance. Youneed it to call methods on the super (original) class.
By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable since its a subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface into the
created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you think?That seems reasonable. I'll post a question on the spring list and seewhat they say.Christian -Igor

On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects referenced

from session attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec does not speak about writeReplace() and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if you
rely on these. Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the cglib howto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so until tomorrow.
Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces? Christian On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead end unfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects. in
their howto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and reconstructing the proxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard serialization is used. not sure where to go from here
-Igor --Christian Essl___

Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very ownSony(tm)PSP.Click here to play:

http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

you know you can have that today by implementing it yourself? Take a
look WebRequestCrawlerSave and you'll see that you can easily change
bookmarkablePage to page; you can make it case insensitive etc.

Juergen

On 11/8/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jeff Miller wrote:
  I considered recommending page=.  It would be better than
  bookmarkablePage=.  Allowing page= in conjunction with alias would
  certainly allow simpler urls.

 +1


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

or use a url rewriting filter like http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/

-Igor
On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you know you can have that today by implementing it yourself? Take alook WebRequestCrawlerSave and you'll see that you can easily changebookmarkablePage to page; you can make it case insensitive etc.Juergen
On 11/8/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Miller wrote:  I considered recommending page=.It would be better than  bookmarkablePage=.Allowing page= in conjunction with alias would
  certainly allow simpler urls. +1 --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___
 Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

2005-11-08 Thread Jeff Miller

Thanks.  I'll take a look.  With the proper regular expression, I may
be able to affect any url.  I don't want to program a rule for each
url.

I was hoping you Wicket developers would tell me that my proposal was
faily simple to add to Wicket.  I was looking for the simple url's to
be as easy and automatic as other Wicket features [no XML
configuration :) ]

Jeff

--- Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 or use a url rewriting filter like http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
 
 -Igor
 
 
 On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  you know you can have that today by implementing it yourself?
 Take a
  look WebRequestCrawlerSave and you'll see that you can easily
 change
  bookmarkablePage to page; you can make it case insensitive etc.
 
  Juergen
 
  On 11/8/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Jeff Miller wrote:
I considered recommending page=. It would be better than
bookmarkablePage=. Allowing page= in conjunction with
 alias would
certainly allow simpler urls.
  
   +1
  
  
   ---
   SF.Net email is sponsored by:
   Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App
 Server.
  Download
   it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your
 very own
   Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play:
 http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
 
 
  ---
  SF.Net email is sponsored by:
  Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App
 Server.
  Download
  it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very
 own
  Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play:
 http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 
 


Jeff Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




__ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

Very good. I am still playing around with the writeReplace thing.

Regarding the refactoring what do you thing about this:

Instead of the ISpringContextLocator have a

interface ObjectResolverFactory{
ObjectResolver getObjectResolver(Field field);
}

interface ObjectResolver{
Object resolve();
}

The (Spring)Initializer than calls for *each* field the
ObjectResolverFactory. If the ObjectResolverFactory thinks the field is
suitable for injection (ie has a SpringBean Annotation or JNDI Annotation)
it returns an ObjectResolver otherwise null.

And the code which creates the proxy could than be
ProxyCreator.create(Class proxyType, ObjectResolver res).

This would than make my wrapping context very simple.

Thanks,
Christian

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:45:31 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

ok, got the pure cglib solution working.
just had to call enhancer.setInterfaces(new Class[]
{ Serializable.class})

to weave in the serializable interface.

now it appears everything is working. sweet.
i am going to do a lot of refactoring today. maybe you can make your
wrappingcontext use the same proxies as this thing so we can keep it all
in

one place.

-Igor

On 11/8/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I would rather weave it in using cglib and stay away from a
spring-specific proxy impl, becuase this thing can easily be
generalized to

things beyound spring, like jndi lookups, etc.

-Igor

On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Im still getting a class cast exception using cglib directly. im
probably
doing something dumb, you want to take a look? SpringInitializer
line

61
is
commented out, thats where proxies are created for concrete objects.

I think the problem is in the SpringLazyLookupInterceptor.intercept ()
method you should at the
end call proxy.invoke(target, args) instead of proxy.invokeSuper().
invokeSuper expects that the given argument is the enhanced instance.
You
need it to call methods on the super (original) class.

By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements
Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable
since

its a
subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface
into

the
created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you think?

That seems reasonable. I'll post a question on the spring list and see
what they say.

Christian

-Igor

On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects
referenced

from
session attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec
does
not speak about writeReplace()
and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if
you

rely
on these.

Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the
cglib
howto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so until
tomorrow.

Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces?

Christian

On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead
end
unfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects.
in

their
howto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and
reconstructing
the
proxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard
serialization is used. not sure where to go from here

-Igor

--
Christian Essl

___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier
anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de

---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

--
Christian Essl

___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de

---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: Re: [Wicket-user] My take on Spring integration

thats pretty much exactly what i was thinking.
-Igor
On 11/8/05, Christian Essl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good. I am still playing around with the writeReplace thing.Regarding the refactoring what do you thing about this:Instead of the ISpringContextLocator have ainterface ObjectResolverFactory{
ObjectResolver getObjectResolver(Field field);}interface ObjectResolver{ Object resolve();}The (Spring)Initializer than calls for *each* field theObjectResolverFactory. If the ObjectResolverFactory thinks the field is
suitable for injection (ie has a SpringBean Annotation or JNDI Annotation)it returns an ObjectResolver otherwise null.And the code which creates the proxy could than beProxyCreator.create(Class proxyType, ObjectResolver res).
This would than make my wrapping context very simple.Thanks,ChristianOn Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:45:31 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: ok, got the pure cglib solution working. just had to call enhancer.setInterfaces(new Class[] { Serializable.class}) to weave in the serializable interface. now it appears everything is working. sweet.
i am going to do a lot of refactoring today. maybe you can make your wrappingcontext use the same proxies as this thing so we can keep it all in one place. -Igor
On 11/8/05, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would rather weave it in using cglib and stay away from a spring-specific proxy impl, becuase this thing can easily be
generalized to things beyound spring, like jndi lookups, etc. -Igor On 11/8/05, Christian Essl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:59:22 -0800, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im still getting a class cast exception using cglib directly. im probably doing something dumb, you want to take a look? SpringInitializer
line 61 is commented out, thats where proxies are created for concrete objects. I think the problem is in the SpringLazyLookupInterceptor.intercept
() method you should at the end call proxy.invoke(target, args) instead of proxy.invokeSuper(). invokeSuper expects that the given argument is the enhanced instance.
You need it to call methods on the super (original) class. By the way, the spring one works fine IF the dependency implements
Serializable, because then the proxy itself becomes serializable since its a subclass. so im wondering if we can just weave in that interface into
the created subclass and that will solve our problem. what do you think? That seems reasonable. I'll post a question on the spring list and see
what they say. Christian -Igor On 11/8/05, Christian Essl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not know wheter read/writeObject is called on objects referenced from
session attributes (full serialization closure). However the spec does not speak about writeReplace() and readResolve() so 'legaly' you should be on the right side if
you rely on these. Enclosed is some code which I guess does what is described on the cglib
howto page. I have not tested the code yet. I'll try to do so until tomorrow. Anyway is it so important to inject objects without interfaces?
Christian On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:07:24 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: got the proxies for concrete objects working, but another dead endunfortunately. seems cglib proxies are not serializable objects.
intheirhowto they recommend overriding read/write resolve and reconstructing theproxy, but those are not guaranteed to be called when nonstandard
serialization is used. not sure where to go from here -Igor
-- Christian Essl ___
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
--- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --Christian Essl
___Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
---SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] simple bookmarkable url

you can create a regular _expression_ to go from page=name to bookmarkablePage=name
that along with page aliases whill get you where you want to go

we are concentrating our efforts on 1.2. your request is pretty simple
to implement, but we are trying to figure out how to create pluggable
and flexible url handlers for 1.2 so that you will be able to do that
yourself. everyone has a different idea of how they want their urls to
look. today we add page=name, tomorrow someone asks for
p=name and so on and so forth. so instead of doing this case by
case we are figuring out how to have something general that is easy to
customize.

-Igor
On 11/8/05, Jeff Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.I'll take a look.With the proper regular _expression_, I maybe able to affect any url.I don't want to program a rule for eachurl.I was hoping you Wicket developers would tell me that my proposal was
faily simple to add to Wicket.I was looking for the simple url's tobe as easy and automatic as other Wicket features [no XMLconfiguration :) ]Jeff--- Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or use a url rewriting filter like http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ -Igor On 11/8/05, Juergen Donnerstag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you know you can have that today by implementing it yourself? Take a look WebRequestCrawlerSave and you'll see that you can easily
change bookmarkablePage to page; you can make it case insensitive etc. Juergen On 11/8/05, Dan Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Jeff Miller wrote:I considered recommending page=. It would be better thanbookmarkablePage=. Allowing page= in conjunction with
alias wouldcertainly allow simpler urls. +1 ---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your
very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___
Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App
Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play:
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user Jeff Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]__Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005http://mail.yahoo.com---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downloadit for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very ownSony(tm)PSP.Click here to play:
http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] remove jsessionid in first page

2005-11-08 Thread pepone pepone

Hello all

when i load the firs page browser is redirected to a url that is like

/app;jsessionid=12324?path=1

there are any way to be redirected to samething like

 bookmarkablePage=HomePage

thanks in advantage


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] remove jsessionid in first page

2005-11-08 Thread Eelco Hillenius

There is no way for Wicket to remove jsessionid (at least no legal
way). It's your servlet container that appends it. When you support
cookies however, there should be no need to encode this id in the url,
and I think some servlet engines don't append it if this is the case.

Eelco


On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all

 when i load the firs page browser is redirected to a url that is like

 /app;jsessionid=12324?path=1

 there are any way to be redirected to samething like

  bookmarkablePage=HomePage

 thanks in advantage


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] remove jsessionid in first page

2005-11-08 Thread Michael Jouravlev

No, I am not sure for all appservers, so I decided to abandon the
attempts for the most perfect URL ;-)) Because there will be only one
address which is screwed up after all, so I really don't care much (or
so I convinced myself).

I would say to pepone, forgeddaboudid ;-)

Michael.

On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Are you sure that's for all appservers though? I think some don't do
 it, and I don't see any reason for doing it either (as they can send
 the cookie right away, right?

 Eelco

 On 11/8/05, Michael Jouravlev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The very first time one accesses an application, session ID is in the
  address. So, for the first bookmarkable page you have two addresses,
  which screws up the browser history navigation.
 
  The simple answer: do one more redirect on first request. The more
  complex answer: do one more redirect when you see that jsessionid in
  in the URL. The hardest thing: to distinguish that jsessionid is in
  the URL. See this discussion for relevant information:
 
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-userm=111886657513840w=2
 
  Michael.
 
  On 11/8/05, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   There is no way for Wicket to remove jsessionid (at least no legal
   way). It's your servlet container that appends it. When you support
   cookies however, there should be no need to encode this id in the url,
   and I think some servlet engines don't append it if this is the case.
  
   Eelco
  
  
   On 11/8/05, pepone pepone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
   
when i load the firs page browser is redirected to a url that is like
   
/app;jsessionid=12324?path=1
   
there are any way to be redirected to samething like
   
 bookmarkablePage=HomePage
   
thanks in advantage
 
 
  ---
  SF.Net email is sponsored by:
  Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
  it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
  Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
  ___
  Wicket-user mailing list
  Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
 


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

[Wicket-user] PageableGridDataView and IDataProvider

2005-11-08 Thread Gili


Hi,

	I'm trying to use recompile code that uses PageableGridDataView which 
used to work. The problem is that PageableGridDataView has a constructor 
which takes in wicket.contrib.dataview.IDataProvider in its constructor 
but HibernateDataProvider now extends 
wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.IDataProvider. The two are 
not compatible.


	Did you guys plan on dropping wicket.contrib.dataview.IDataProvider in 
favor of the extensions one? If so, can someone please update 
PageableGridDataView so this will work?


Thank you,
Gili
--
http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] PageableGridDataView and IDataProvider

2005-11-08 Thread Eelco Hillenius

I don't know much about that package, but afaik the dataview project
will be dropped in favor of the extensions project.

Eelco


On 11/8/05, Gili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 I'm trying to use recompile code that uses PageableGridDataView which
 used to work. The problem is that PageableGridDataView has a constructor
 which takes in wicket.contrib.dataview.IDataProvider in its constructor
 but HibernateDataProvider now extends
 wicket.extensions.markup.html.repeater.data.IDataProvider. The two are
 not compatible.

 Did you guys plan on dropping wicket.contrib.dataview.IDataProvider in
 favor of the extensions one? If so, can someone please update
 PageableGridDataView so this will work?

 Thank you,
 Gili
 --
 http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/


 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by:
 Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
 it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
 Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
 ___
 Wicket-user mailing list
 Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] PageableGridDataView and IDataProvider