Re: [Wicket-user] AuthenticatedWebApplication only working when deployed in real server
No idea. Most of us (people that I know around here) run their Wicket apps straight from the IDE. And there's nothing magical going on in wicket-auth-roles-examples either... Eelco On 6/19/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a really odd problem here. I'm working on a simple application that is based on the authentication sample from wicket-auth-roles-examples. It works fine when I deploy in JBoss, but when I either start Jetty by hand from main() (like in the examples) or run it from the command line with mvn jetty6:run or jetty6:run-war it doesn't work. The thing that is happening is that I can submit the SignIn form but nothing happens. In my authenticate() I print the username/password but they are always empty strings. I was thinking of a class loader issue, but the apps works and code from both my side and the wicket side is loaded fine, otherwise it would not work at all I guess. Does anyone have an idea what is going on here? I would really prefer to just run my Wicket app from the IDE. S. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] AuthenticatedWebApplication only working when deployed in real server
Found it! The problem is: !-- Does not work! -- servlet-mapping servlet-namewicket/servlet-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping vs !-- Does work fine! -- servlet-mapping servlet-namewicket/servlet-name url-pattern/foo/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping That took a while to figure out :-/ Eelco told me that this will be solved when the Listener is backported to 1.2. I might take a stab at that today if I can find some time. S. On 6/19/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a really odd problem here. I'm working on a simple application that is based on the authentication sample from wicket-auth-roles-examples. It works fine when I deploy in JBoss, but when I either start Jetty by hand from main() (like in the examples) or run it from the command line with mvn jetty6:run or jetty6:run-war it doesn't work. The thing that is happening is that I can submit the SignIn form but nothing happens. In my authenticate() I print the username/password but they are always empty strings. I was thinking of a class loader issue, but the apps works and code from both my side and the wicket side is loaded fine, otherwise it would not work at all I guess. Does anyone have an idea what is going on here? I would really prefer to just run my Wicket app from the IDE. S. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] AuthenticatedWebApplication only working when deployed in real server
As far as I understand it, all root mapping problems are solved when we use the servlet filter we have in 2.0 instead of the wicket servlet of pre-2.0. It's probably easy to back port, but the only problem is that it breaks the API in some places (like WebApplication.getWicketServlet will be replaced by alternatives). That means we can't put it in the 1.2 branch, but have to wait until we start working on 1.3 (and we won't do that until we feel we can EOL 1.2). Eelco On 6/20/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found it! The problem is: !-- Does not work! -- servlet-mapping servlet-namewicket/servlet-name url-pattern/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping vs !-- Does work fine! -- servlet-mapping servlet-namewicket/servlet-name url-pattern/foo/*/url-pattern /servlet-mapping That took a while to figure out :-/ Eelco told me that this will be solved when the Listener is backported to 1.2. I might take a stab at that today if I can find some time. S. On 6/19/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a really odd problem here. I'm working on a simple application that is based on the authentication sample from wicket-auth-roles-examples. It works fine when I deploy in JBoss, but when I either start Jetty by hand from main() (like in the examples) or run it from the command line with mvn jetty6:run or jetty6:run-war it doesn't work. The thing that is happening is that I can submit the SignIn form but nothing happens. In my authenticate() I print the username/password but they are always empty strings. I was thinking of a class loader issue, but the apps works and code from both my side and the wicket side is loaded fine, otherwise it would not work at all I guess. Does anyone have an idea what is going on here? I would really prefer to just run my Wicket app from the IDE. S. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Allow nested components in VelocityPanel
I'll look into it tomorrow (going to bed now). Cheers, Eelco On 6/20/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm new to the mailing-list, and very interested in Wicket. I designed recently an application that generates user interface based on a RDF schema. To make it work, the VelocityPanel needs to not allow nested Wicket components, ie request Wicket to process the merged template. If you are interested, the patch is in the SF tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485704group_id=119783atid=684977 However this also requires a change in Wicket core: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485695group_id=119783atid=684977 I'd be happy to provide updated patches if there are still issues with the ones submitted. I had but limited feedback until now. There's a whole lot of new possibilities to work with Wicket, and «I hope this is the beginning of a long relationship». All the best, -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] wicket emailaddress validation incorrect
hi,In wicket.markup.html.form.validation.EmailAddressPatternValidator.java the validation-_expression_ is incorrect.the regular _expression_ reads:^[_a-z0-9-]+(\\.[_a-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\\.[a-z]{2,3})$
According to this _expression_ the TLD is 2 or 3 characters, but that's incorrect.Nowadays it can exceed the limit of 3 characters (for example: .aero or .travel. Source:
http://www.iana.org/gtld/gtld.htm ).Michiel
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket emailaddress validation incorrect
Thats right.. In our company we use the (crazy) regex pattern taken from http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html String emailPattern = (?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?: + \\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:( + ?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ + \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\0 + 31]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\ + ](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+ + (?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?: + (?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z + |(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n) + ?[ \\t])*)*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\ + r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ + \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n) + ?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ + \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])* + )(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*) + *:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+ + |\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r + \\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?: + \\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t + ]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031 + ]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\]( + ?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(? + :(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(? + :\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(? + :(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)? + [ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] + \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]| + .|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^() + @,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\ + (?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;: + \.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(? + :[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[ + \\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000- + \\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|( + ?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()@,; + :\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([ + ^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\ + .\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket emailaddress validation incorrect
I am currently working on my graduation(project) @ Topicus with another student (Ronald Hemmink). We are new to Wicket and before we saw the wicket-build-in validator we came up with our own _expression_:^[_A-Za-z0-9-]+(\\.[_A-Za-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[A-Za-z0-9-]+)*((\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}){1}$)
the Wicket _expression_:^[_a-z0-9-]+(\\.[_a-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\\.[a-z]{2,3})$almost identical, but 'large TLD compatible' (the pattern in wicket has the argument 'Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE
' and therefore they don't need to define the upper-case charcters).your pattern looks a bit too complicated for the job :PMichielOn 6/20/06,
Frank Bille Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats right.. In our company we use the (crazy) regex pattern taken fromhttp://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.htmlString emailPattern = [...]
Would anyone in the wicket team like to use this as the emailvalidationpattern instead, I would be happy to submit a patch (for both 1.2 or 2.0if thats the case).RegardsFrank BilleAvaleo
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:08 +0200, Michiel Korthuis wrote: hi, In wicket.markup.html.form.validation.EmailAddressPatternValidator.java the validation-_expression_ is incorrect.
the regular _expression_ reads: ^[_a-z0-9-]+(\\.[_a-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\ \.[a-z]{2,3})$ According to this _expression_ the TLD is 2 or 3 characters, but that's incorrect.
Nowadays it can exceed the limit of 3 characters (for example: .aero or .travel. Source: http://www.iana.org/gtld/gtld.htm ).
Michiel ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket emailaddress validation incorrect
Yeah I know. The regex is really frightening to most people (my self
included), but AFAIK it should actually be the only one which truly
validates the full RFC; for what it's worth.
Regards
Frank Bille
Avaleo
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:37 +0200, Michiel Korthuis wrote:
I am currently working on my graduation(project) @ Topicus with
another student (Ronald Hemmink). We are new to Wicket and before we
saw the wicket-build-in validator we came up with our own expression:
^[_A-Za-z0-9-]+(\\.[_A-Za-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\
\.[A-Za-z0-9-]+)*((\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}){1}$)
the Wicket expression:
^[_a-z0-9-]+(\\.[_a-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\
\.[a-z]{2,3})$
almost identical, but 'large TLD compatible' (the pattern in wicket
has the argument 'Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE ' and therefore they don't
need to define the upper-case charcters).
your pattern looks a bit too complicated for the job :P
Michiel
On 6/20/06, Frank Bille Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats right.. In our company we use the (crazy) regex pattern
taken from
http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.html
String emailPattern = [...]
Would anyone in the wicket team like to use this as the
emailvalidation
pattern instead, I would be happy to submit a patch (for both
1.2 or 2.0
if thats the case).
Regards
Frank Bille
Avaleo
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:08 +0200, Michiel Korthuis wrote:
hi,
In
wicket.markup.html.form.validation.EmailAddressPatternValidator.java
the validation-expression is incorrect.
the regular expression reads:
^[_a-z0-9-]+(\\.[_a-z0-9-]+)[EMAIL PROTECTED](\\.[a-z0-9-]+)*(\
\.[a-z]{2,3})$
According to this expression the TLD is 2 or 3 characters,
but that's
incorrect.
Nowadays it can exceed the limit of 3 characters (for
example: .aero
or .travel. Source: http://www.iana.org/gtld/gtld.htm ).
Michiel
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Cache control for shared resources
You can override Resource.configureResponse or WebResource.setHeaders. Additionally, you could consider using Resource.setCacheable(false), and then the IResourceStream's (or actually IModifiable's) lastModifiedTime result is used. Eelco On 6/19/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, how can I add response.setHeader(Pragma, no-cache) to some shared resources? I have upload area/folder and when resource is uploaded I want to see the new resource instead of cached old resource. Thanks, Jan ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Changing the Link innerHTML
I just started to learn the Wicket Framework, so sorry for a trivial
question... (I couldn't find the solution on the forum):
How can I change the innerHTML of the Link component dynamically?
For instance in the following code:
lt;a href=# wicket:id=navLinkPage1lt;/a
new Link(navLink) {
public void onClick() {
setResponsePage(Page1.class);
}
}
I would like to change the Page1 value to something else
How can I do that?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Changing-the-Link-innerHTML-t1816416.html#a4951617
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Changing the Link innerHTML
a href=# wicket:id=linkspan wicket:id=content/span/a
Link link = new Link(link) { public void onClick() {} };
link.add(new Label(content, Hello, World!));
Martijn
On 6/20/06, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just started to learn the Wicket Framework, so sorry for a trivial
question... (I couldn't find the solution on the forum):
How can I change the innerHTML of the Link component dynamically?
For instance in the following code:
lt;a href=# wicket:id=navLinkPage1lt;/a
new Link(navLink) {
public void onClick() {
setResponsePage(Page1.class);
}
}
I would like to change the Page1 value to something else
How can I do that?
Thank you!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Changing-the-Link-innerHTML-t1816416.html#a4951617
Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
Download Wicket 1.2 now! Write Ajax applications without touching JavaScript!
-- http://wicketframework.org
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Spring 2.0 Domain object dependency injection
On 6/16/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, there are no problems with wicket-spring poject other then some people dont think its a true way to integrate with spring. sigh. I have some more concrete issues with the current spring integration code. First, it is intrusive. Instead of using hooks or interceptors it requires a new class hierarchy. This is generally not a big deal but it makes it difficult to pick 'extensions' and put them together. As a concrete example; we have two great extensions available: wicket-spring-annot and wicket-auth-roles. However since these are both implemented in the Spring class hierarchy as subclasses of WebApplication there is no way to put these together in one project. You end up copy/pasting code to merge them in your own implementation. This is rather silly. The second problem I have with the current Spring code is that it just works in a subset of Wicket objects. For example, I have just merged auth-roles and spring-annot together for my current app and I discovered that the @SpringBean annotation does not work inside my subclass of the AuthenticatedWebSession. This is of course rather silly because that is *the* place to talk to Spring and retrieve user info through a DAO of some sort. This is something that AOP could solve pretty well without the need of a whole Injector infrastructure in the Wicket code. What I really hope is that 2.0 will include strong support for AOP and some kind of interceptor chain in the right place so that we can add functionality like Spring and Authentication annotations more easily. As I understand it the 2.0 release will be JSE 5 only, so a lot more interesting things will be possible then. S. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Spring 2.0 Domain object dependency injection
The application issue is known (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1458736group_id=119783atid=684975) and won't be fixed in 1.2 as it will break backwards compatibility. Could you file a RFE for the Session injector? Martijn On 6/20/06, Stefan Arentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/16/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, there are no problems with wicket-spring poject other then some people dont think its a true way to integrate with spring. sigh. I have some more concrete issues with the current spring integration code. First, it is intrusive. Instead of using hooks or interceptors it requires a new class hierarchy. This is generally not a big deal but it makes it difficult to pick 'extensions' and put them together. As a concrete example; we have two great extensions available: wicket-spring-annot and wicket-auth-roles. However since these are both implemented in the Spring class hierarchy as subclasses of WebApplication there is no way to put these together in one project. You end up copy/pasting code to merge them in your own implementation. This is rather silly. The second problem I have with the current Spring code is that it just works in a subset of Wicket objects. For example, I have just merged auth-roles and spring-annot together for my current app and I discovered that the @SpringBean annotation does not work inside my subclass of the AuthenticatedWebSession. This is of course rather silly because that is *the* place to talk to Spring and retrieve user info through a DAO of some sort. This is something that AOP could solve pretty well without the need of a whole Injector infrastructure in the Wicket code. What I really hope is that 2.0 will include strong support for AOP and some kind of interceptor chain in the right place so that we can add functionality like Spring and Authentication annotations more easily. As I understand it the 2.0 release will be JSE 5 only, so a lot more interesting things will be possible then. S. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Download Wicket 1.2 now! Write Ajax applications without touching JavaScript! -- http://wicketframework.org ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Cache control for shared resources
Thanks Eelco, Additionally, you could consider using Resource.setCacheable(false), and then the IResourceStream's (or actually IModifiable's) lastModifiedTime result is used. Actually (in wicket 1.2), the Resource.setCacheable(false) will call response.setLastModifiedTime(Time.valueOf(-1)) and that will not append the Last-Modified header at all. Jan ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] link cannot be resolved
Nili Adoram wrote: Hi all, I have a problem resolving a stylesheet link as follows: This is the markup: link wicket:id=globalCss href=../include/global_en.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css/link why is globalCss needed? the servlet gets a request for a url, which is mounted, so it can just request the resource locator of the mount to locate this file This is the component: add(new StyleSheetReference(globalCss,new PackageResourceReference(Application.get(), RssSettings.class, include/global_en.css))); The PackageResourceReference indeed exists but the rendering fails. In MarkupContainer.renderNext(), no component resolver is able to resolve this tag ( AutoLinkResolver is unable to resolve it since it has a wicket:id attribute and WicketLinkResolver is unable to resolve it since it is not defined as wicket:link) so I get the markup exception: 'Unable to find component with id globalCss' Please advise, Thanks, Nili ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- === Ittay Dror, Chief architect, openQRM TL, RD, Qlusters Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-3-6081994 Fax: +972-3-6081841 http://www.openQRM.org - Keeps your Data-Center Up and Running ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Cache control for shared resources
My resource is static file, so naturaly I want to use PackageResource. But I cannot override the configureResponse() or setHeaders() because PackageResource has private contructor. I cannot resue this class. Thanks Jan Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can override Resource.configureResponse or WebResource.setHeaders. Additionally, you could consider using Resource.setCacheable(false), and then the IResourceStream's (or actually IModifiable's) lastModifiedTime result is used. Eelco On 6/19/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, how can I add response.setHeader(Pragma, no-cache) to some shared resources? I have upload area/folder and when resource is uploaded I want to see the new resource instead of cached old resource. Thanks, Jan ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Its confirmed - Another !!Wicket Book!!
Thank you all! .Eelco Hey, competition :)Eelco No! I dont think it exists :) and even if it does am definitely not a part of it :) Wicket probably has competition from Tapestry, Echo, Facelets and the like :). It is turning out to be great fun (and quite a challenge) writing the book as Nick mentioned. I hope it will be in a good shape by Aug/Sept time frame. thanks!karthik ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Its confirmed - Another !!Wicket Book!!
Is Eelco's book in English, and where can I find it? Thanks, karthik Guru wrote: Thank you all! . Eelco Hey, competition :) Eelco No! I dont think it exists :) and even if it does am definitely not a part of it :) Wicket probably has competition from Tapestry, Echo, Facelets and the like :). It is turning out to be great fun (and quite a challenge) writing the book as Nick mentioned. I hope it will be in a good shape by Aug/Sept time frame. thanks! karthik ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Michael Welter Telecom Matters Corp. Denver, Colorado US +1.303.414.4980 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.TelecomMatters.net ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Its confirmed - Another !!Wicket Book!!
Thanks to both karthik eelco ! But despite the excitement, I'm always worried that the wicket books turn out to be some sort of reference manual which wicket is missing. What I like about books like 'Hibernate in Action', etc. is that they show you how to build real world apps, various design patterns, architecture issues, etc. I hope both wicket authors take this in mind. Iman ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Plan to develop a portal
Yeah...I could use some bookmarkable pages but just didn't. Since we're doing paid advertising and not worry so much about indexing on google it wasn't a huge concern to get one or two pages in the entire cart indexed - the snakeriverfarms.com site is more of a brochure site and they'd probably target that before the cart, which sits behind the site. I know the portal would be a big project but it's definitely something I'm interested in doing...though I'm going to research all options before any real work gets done there...want to be sure it gets done right. I'm not too familiar w/ the portlets spec but from what I've read, it's going in the direction of being closely tied to JSF, especially in future implementations. If that's the case, I'd be interested in avoiding it altogether - I'm not real impressed by what I see in JSF today...even the good implementations. However, if there were a way to somehow tie Wicket into the spec...I'd definitely look at it! On 6/14/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for sharing and congrats. Tiny remark: wouldn't you want to work with bookmarkable pages more, especially for things like contact details, terms of use, etc? You shouldn't really need to be in a session to access those pages (you probably want google to index them) and if you mount the urls to those pages, that will look even better! About the portal... that's a non-trivial task. Depending on how many services you actually want to develop of course. Wouldn't it be a better idea to look at JSR168 portal servers and see how Wicket can be fit in? Janne still has the idea of working on Wicket support for 2.0; maybe you can tickle him a bit ;) Eelco On 6/14/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, I finally completed our first Wicket experiment - the infamous storefront I've been blathering about endlessly: http://www.snakeriverfarms.com/ - click the animated gif on the bottom-left of the page. I'm hoping it leads to more Wicket-based projects for me here at work but I've got definite plans of my own - the first of which is a Portal based on Wicket. We have a really crappy portal here at work that was quite expensive...and I'd really like to build something better myself w/ Wicket EJB 3.0. As far as I know, there's nothing out there like that currently, is there? I was looking at JSR-286 but it looks like it's geared toward JSF, am I correct? If that were the case I'd have no interest in conforming to it - but please correct me if I'm wrong. I'd like to begin planning it right away but I thought I'd take some feedback from the good folks behind Wicket first since you've all been so helpful so far! I've never built anything quite as modular as a portal before and I'm not sure where to begin as far as making portlets dynamically loadable modular while keeping performance acceptable. I'd like to build an initial, rough, alpha-quality base to release as an open source project and work from there. I've never created my own open source project either, so any input there would be helpful! Thanks all! -v ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] wicket emailaddress validation incorrect
i wonder how big the created state machine is for this beast :)-IgorOn 6/20/06, Frank Bille Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thats right.. In our company we use the (crazy) regex pattern taken from http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pdw/Mail-RFC822-Address.htmlString emailPattern = (?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:+ \\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:( + ?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ + \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\0 + 31]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\+ ](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+ + (?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:+ (?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z + |(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)+ ?[ \\t])*)*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\ + r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[+ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n) + ?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]+ )*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ + \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*+ )(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)+ *:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+ + |\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r+ \\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?: + \\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t+ ]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031 + ]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](+ ?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(? + :(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?+ :\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(? + :(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?+ [ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:(?:(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] + \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|+ .|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^() + @,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\+ (?:[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t] + )*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:+ \.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(? + :[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[+ \\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*|(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000- + \\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|.|(+ ?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)*\\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:@(?:[^()@,; + :\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([+ ^\\[\\]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\ + .\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\+ ]\\r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*(?:,@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\ + [\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\+ r]|.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] + \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\\[([^\\[\\]\\r]+ |.)*\\](?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*)*:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)?(?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\0 + 00-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?:[^\r]|+ .|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*)(?:\\.(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*(?:[^()@, + ;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])+|\\Z|(?=[\\[\()@,;:\\\.\\[\\]]))|\(?+ :[^\r]|.|(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t]))*\(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])*))*@(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[ \\t])* + (?:[^()@,;:\\\.\\[\\] \\000-\\031]+(?:(?:(?:\\r\\n)?[
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax Panel Include
Has this problem been fixed yet? This is becoming a major problem in my project. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-Panel-Include-t1606490.html#a4957969 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] errors on servlet init
i get this stack trace the first time i try to access a page. the page is a simple form (no ajax/upload) javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet wicket threw exception Stack Trace: * Message: javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet wicket threw exception at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1146) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:757) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:130) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:432) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) * Message: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: EXTENSION_JS at wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.form.upload.UploadProgressBar$ComponentInitializer.init(UploadProgressBar.java:83) at wicket.extensions.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:41) at wicket.Application.initialize(Application.java:621) at wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:684) at wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:661) at wicket.Application.internalInit(Application.java:589) at wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.internalInit(WebApplication.java:391) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.init(WicketServlet.java:270) at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:757) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:130) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:432) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) -- === Ittay Dror, Chief architect, openQRM TL, RD, Qlusters Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-3-6081994 Fax: +972-3-6081841 http://www.openQRM.org - Keeps your Data-Center Up and Running ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Its confirmed - Another !!Wicket Book!!
It's not out yet, and it will take some more months to write. It will be published by Manning as part of the ... In Action series (Wicket In Action). Eelco On 6/20/06, Michael Welter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is Eelco's book in English, and where can I find it? Thanks, karthik Guru wrote: Thank you all! . Eelco Hey, competition :) Eelco No! I dont think it exists :) and even if it does am definitely not a part of it :) Wicket probably has competition from Tapestry, Echo, Facelets and the like :). It is turning out to be great fun (and quite a challenge) writing the book as Nick mentioned. I hope it will be in a good shape by Aug/Sept time frame. thanks! karthik ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- Michael Welter Telecom Matters Corp. Denver, Colorado US +1.303.414.4980 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.TelecomMatters.net ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Its confirmed - Another !!Wicket Book!!
I haven't seen Karthik's content, so I can't speak for him. As for the book Martijn and me are writing: we have a bunch of Manning editors and proofreaders making sure we don't make a mess of the book. Wicket In Action will not only explain you how to do things, but also why and tries to give you a good context on the framework. Eelco On 6/20/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to both karthik eelco ! But despite the excitement, I'm always worried that the wicket books turn out to be some sort of reference manual which wicket is missing. What I like about books like 'Hibernate in Action', etc. is that they show you how to build real world apps, various design patterns, architecture issues, etc. I hope both wicket authors take this in mind. Iman ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax Panel Include
juergen is there an easy way to capture the wicket:head output from an ajax render into the ajax target? i think we can just dump it as part of ajax response via document.write or something like that.-Igor On 6/20/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has this problem been fixed yet? This is becoming a major problem in myproject.--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-Panel-Include-t1606490.html#a4957969 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com.___Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Spring 2.0 Domain object dependency injection
so far we only targetted the components being injected because that is what users asked for. its trivial to inject any object you wantclass MySession extends WebSession() {@SpringBean Foo bar; MySession() {
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); ... }}-IgorOn 6/20/06, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The application issue is known(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1458736group_id=119783atid=684975
)and won't be fixed in 1.2 as it will break backwards compatibility.Could you file a RFE for the Session injector?MartijnOn 6/20/06, Stefan Arentz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/16/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, there are no problems with wicket-spring poject other then some people
dont think its a true way to integrate with spring. sigh. I have some more concrete issues with the current spring integration code. First, it is intrusive. Instead of using hooks or interceptors it
requires a new class hierarchy. This is generally not a big deal but it makes it difficult to pick 'extensions' and put them together. As a concrete example; we have two great extensions available:
wicket-spring-annot and wicket-auth-roles. However since these are both implemented in the Spring class hierarchy as subclasses of WebApplication there is no way to put these together in one project.
You end up copy/pasting code to merge them in your own implementation. This is rather silly. The second problem I have with the current Spring code is that it just works in a subset of Wicket objects. For example, I have just merged
auth-roles and spring-annot together for my current app and I discovered that the @SpringBean annotation does not work inside my subclass of the AuthenticatedWebSession. This is of course rather
silly because that is *the* place to talk to Spring and retrieve user info through a DAO of some sort. This is something that AOP could solve pretty well without the need of a whole Injector infrastructure
in the Wicket code. What I really hope is that 2.0 will include strong support for AOP and some kind of interceptor chain in the right place so that we can add functionality like Spring and Authentication annotations more easily.
As I understand it the 2.0 release will be JSE 5 only, so a lot more interesting things will be possible then.S. ___
Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--Download Wicket 1.2 now! Write Ajax applications without touching _javascript_!-- http://wicketframework.org___
Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Spring 2.0 Domain object dependency injection
or since we do use a factory for creating application/session objects you can write a factory that pulls the session out of spring context where it is declared as a prototype bean.-Igor
On 6/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so far we only targetted the components being injected because that is what users asked for. its trivial to inject any object you wantclass MySession extends WebSession() {@SpringBean Foo bar; MySession() {
InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this); ... }}-Igor
On 6/20/06, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The application issue is known(
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1458736group_id=119783atid=684975
)and won't be fixed in 1.2 as it will break backwards compatibility.Could you file a RFE for the Session injector?MartijnOn 6/20/06, Stefan Arentz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/16/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, there are no problems with wicket-spring poject other then some people
dont think its a true way to integrate with spring. sigh. I have some more concrete issues with the current spring integration code. First, it is intrusive. Instead of using hooks or interceptors it
requires a new class hierarchy. This is generally not a big deal but it makes it difficult to pick 'extensions' and put them together. As a concrete example; we have two great extensions available:
wicket-spring-annot and wicket-auth-roles. However since these are both implemented in the Spring class hierarchy as subclasses of WebApplication there is no way to put these together in one project.
You end up copy/pasting code to merge them in your own implementation. This is rather silly. The second problem I have with the current Spring code is that it just works in a subset of Wicket objects. For example, I have just merged
auth-roles and spring-annot together for my current app and I discovered that the @SpringBean annotation does not work inside my subclass of the AuthenticatedWebSession. This is of course rather
silly because that is *the* place to talk to Spring and retrieve user info through a DAO of some sort. This is something that AOP could solve pretty well without the need of a whole Injector infrastructure
in the Wicket code. What I really hope is that 2.0 will include strong support for AOP and some kind of interceptor chain in the right place so that we can add functionality like Spring and Authentication annotations more easily.
As I understand it the 2.0 release will be JSE 5 only, so a lot more interesting things will be possible then.S. ___
Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--Download Wicket 1.2 now! Write Ajax applications without touching _javascript_!--
http://wicketframework.org___
Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Ajax Panel Include
Without having tested it. IHeaderContributor is the major interface and it has one method void renderHead(final Response response); The Page calls visitChildren to iterate over all components and the components iterate over all there behaviors. Hence, if an ajax response should include the header contributions as well the only thing you need to do is to call Component.renderHead() for all components involved in the ajax request. But first you need to change Component.renderHead(HtmlHeaderContainer) to Component.renderHead(Response). One more thing to consider. HtmlHeaderContainer makes sure that headers are not printed more than once etc.. Is that required for ajax responses as well? If yes, than we probably need some more changes. Juergen On 6/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: juergen is there an easy way to capture the wicket:head output from an ajax render into the ajax target? i think we can just dump it as part of ajax response via document.write or something like that. -Igor On 6/20/06, samyem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has this problem been fixed yet? This is becoming a major problem in my project. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ajax-Panel-Include-t1606490.html#a4957969 Sent from the Wicket - User forum at Nabble.com. ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Cache control for shared resources
I changed PackageResource so that the constructor is protected instead of private now. Having a private constructor in a non final class doesn't make sense anyway. Could you try if extending that class and overriding setHeaders does the job for you? Eelco On 6/20/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My resource is static file, so naturaly I want to use PackageResource. But I cannot override the configureResponse() or setHeaders() because PackageResource has private contructor. I cannot resue this class. Thanks Jan Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You can override Resource.configureResponse or WebResource.setHeaders. Additionally, you could consider using Resource.setCacheable(false), and then the IResourceStream's (or actually IModifiable's) lastModifiedTime result is used. Eelco On 6/19/06, jan_bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, how can I add response.setHeader(Pragma, no-cache) to some shared resources? I have upload area/folder and when resource is uploaded I want to see the new resource instead of cached old resource. Thanks, Jan ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] errors on servlet init
Looks to me like you have some classpath problems. Try cleaning up your projects and make sure you don't have duplicate entries etc. Eelco On 6/20/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i get this stack trace the first time i try to access a page. the page is a simple form (no ajax/upload) javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet wicket threw exception Stack Trace: * Message: javax.servlet.ServletException: Servlet.init() for servlet wicket threw exception at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1146) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:757) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:130) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:432) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) * Message: java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: EXTENSION_JS at wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.form.upload.UploadProgressBar$ComponentInitializer.init(UploadProgressBar.java:83) at wicket.extensions.Initializer.init(Initializer.java:41) at wicket.Application.initialize(Application.java:621) at wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:684) at wicket.Application.initializeComponents(Application.java:661) at wicket.Application.internalInit(Application.java:589) at wicket.protocol.http.WebApplication.internalInit(WebApplication.java:391) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.init(WicketServlet.java:270) at javax.servlet.GenericServlet.init(GenericServlet.java:211) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:757) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:130) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:432) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) -- === Ittay Dror, Chief architect, openQRM TL, RD, Qlusters Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-3-6081994 Fax: +972-3-6081841 http://www.openQRM.org - Keeps your Data-Center Up and Running ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Allow nested components in VelocityPanel
I see there is some disagreement on http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485695group_id=119783atid=684977 but that Johan basically wants to adopt the change in a slightly different manner. I think he is currently in Germany watching soccer matches, but hopefully he'll look into it when he is back. I increased the priority a bit so that it won't slip our attention. Eelco On 6/20/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll look into it tomorrow (going to bed now). Cheers, Eelco On 6/20/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm new to the mailing-list, and very interested in Wicket. I designed recently an application that generates user interface based on a RDF schema. To make it work, the VelocityPanel needs to not allow nested Wicket components, ie request Wicket to process the merged template. If you are interested, the patch is in the SF tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485704group_id=119783atid=684977 However this also requires a change in Wicket core: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1485695group_id=119783atid=684977 I'd be happy to provide updated patches if there are still issues with the ones submitted. I had but limited feedback until now. There's a whole lot of new possibilities to work with Wicket, and «I hope this is the beginning of a long relationship». All the best, -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
