Re: [Wicket-user] Issue about working with designer
In fact I've using this, but look like if I use Border for this case, then I need to wrap that border wherever I going to add a panel. Is that what you mean? Of course I can do that, may be better than extending Panel, but I wish there is something more elegant On 12/7/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Carfield, Did you already look whether Border fits your need? Regards, Erik. Carfield Yim schreef: One issue I encounter now is the designer have problem of locating HTML template that he like to edit so everytime he need to ask me where is the template is. As most the the component I use is Panel, so I've thought of extending Panel to a custom BasePanel and just add one label at the top to show the classname for development mode. However, if I doing that I have to modify every templates to have that label. Which don't sound like a good approach. By the way I would like to wrap the panel with outlines so the designer can see region of that panel taken. Just wonder if wicket already support this kind of debug mode? Or will anyone have any better suggestion? -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] ListChoice changes appearance from dropdown to listbox
For 1st example, the size attribute is size=8 . Johan Compagner wrote: hmm we don't seem to set the default max rows in every constructor strange thing is that in the first example you give we also don't do it. So max rows is still 0 Can you check what is exactly generated (what the size attribute is) johan On 12/6/06, TH Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I came to the same conclusion as Nino. What I have observed was this, 1. For, ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection, new Model(), disciplines) , a list box is created in the web page. 2. For, ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection, disciplines) , a dropdown box is created in the web page. 3. For, ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection, disciplines);selection.setMaxRow(8); , a list box is created in the web page. I find it strange because I used ListChoice instead of DropDownChoice but yet it shows a dropdown box instead of a list box for case no. 2. Is it a bug or am I missing something? Btw, there are 2 items in my discipline list. Thanks Johan Compagner wrote: A ListChoice should always be a List instead of a DropDown (for a drop down we have the DropDownChoice) I don't know why you see a difference it shouldn't look at all to the model that holds the selection. It only looks at the choices: tag.put(size, Math.min(maxRows, getChoices().size())); so i guess if maxRows of size() == 1 then it becomes a dropdown? johan On 5/9/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Im not sure if this is the intended functionality, but I belive I've discovered an oddity or featureJ. When I use the constructor which also takes a model (ListChoice(dropdown_job, new Model(),myList, new myRenderer)) my listchoice is no longer displayed as a dropdown but as a listbox. If I instead of using the constructor with the model property call the set model method (listChoice_job.setModel(new Model())) then it remains displayed as a dropdown Code snipplet: // this gives a listbox listChoice_job = new ListChoice(dropdown_job,new Model(),jobcenter.toArray().getList(), new DataItemRenderer()) //this gives a dropdown listChoice_job = new ListChoice(dropdown_job, jobcenter.toArray().getList(), new DataItemRenderer()) listChoice_job.setModel(new Model()); Code snipplet end It's that latter I want displayed. -regards Nino -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7714179 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7736244 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] ListChoice changes appearance from dropdown to listbox
thats the default yes. Strange that it is set somehow i don't see that in
that constructor
/**
* @see wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractChoice#AbstractChoice(String,
IModel,IModel)
*/
public ListChoice(String id, IModel model, IModel choices)
{
super(id, model, choices);
}
can you check why that works for you on what place the maxRows is set?
i will change all the constructors so that they do set the default max rows.
On 12/7/06, TH Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1st example, the size attribute is size=8 .
Johan Compagner wrote:
hmm we don't seem to set the default max rows in every constructor
strange thing is that in the first example you give we also don't do it.
So
max rows is still 0
Can you check what is exactly generated (what the size attribute is)
johan
On 12/6/06, TH Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came to the same conclusion as Nino. What I have observed was this,
1. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection, new
Model(),
disciplines)
, a list box is created in the web page.
2. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection,
disciplines)
, a dropdown box is created in the web page.
3. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection,
disciplines);selection.setMaxRow(8);
, a list box is created in the web page.
I find it strange because I used ListChoice instead of DropDownChoice
but
yet it shows a dropdown box instead of a list box for case no. 2. Is it
a
bug or am I missing something? Btw, there are 2 items in my discipline
list.
Thanks
Johan Compagner wrote:
A ListChoice should always be a List instead of a DropDown (for a
drop
down
we have the DropDownChoice)
I don't know why you see a difference it shouldn't look at all to the
model
that holds the selection.
It only looks at the choices:
tag.put(size, Math.min(maxRows, getChoices().size()));
so i guess if maxRows of size() == 1 then it becomes a dropdown?
johan
On 5/9/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Im not sure if this is the intended functionality, but I belive I've
discovered an oddity or featureJ.
When I use the constructor which also takes a model
(ListChoice(dropdown_job, new Model(),myList, new myRenderer)) my
listchoice is no longer displayed as a dropdown but as a listbox.
If I instead of using the constructor with the model property call
the
set
model method (listChoice_job.setModel(new Model())) then it remains
displayed as a dropdown
Code snipplet:
// this gives a listbox
listChoice_job = new
ListChoice(dropdown_job,new Model(),jobcenter.toArray().getList(),
new
DataItemRenderer())
//this gives a dropdown
listChoice_job = new
ListChoice(dropdown_job, jobcenter.toArray().getList(), new
DataItemRenderer())
listChoice_job.setModel(new
Model());
Code snipplet end
It's that latter I want displayed.
-regards Nino
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7714179
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7736244
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Re: [Wicket-user] ListChoice changes appearance from dropdown to listbox
ahh found the constructor that did set the max rows.
I will sync it completely.
johan
On 12/7/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thats the default yes. Strange that it is set somehow i don't see that in
that constructor
/**
* @see wicket.markup.html.form.AbstractChoice#AbstractChoice(String,
IModel,IModel)
*/
public ListChoice(String id, IModel model, IModel choices)
{
super(id, model, choices);
}
can you check why that works for you on what place the maxRows is set?
i will change all the constructors so that they do set the default max
rows.
On 12/7/06, TH Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1st example, the size attribute is size=8 .
Johan Compagner wrote:
hmm we don't seem to set the default max rows in every constructor
strange thing is that in the first example you give we also don't do
it.
So
max rows is still 0
Can you check what is exactly generated (what the size attribute is)
johan
On 12/6/06, TH Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came to the same conclusion as Nino. What I have observed was this,
1. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection, new
Model(),
disciplines)
, a list box is created in the web page.
2. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection,
disciplines)
, a dropdown box is created in the web page.
3. For,
ListChoice selection = new ListChoice(disciplineSelection,
disciplines);selection.setMaxRow(8);
, a list box is created in the web page.
I find it strange because I used ListChoice instead of DropDownChoice
but
yet it shows a dropdown box instead of a list box for case no. 2. Is
it a
bug or am I missing something? Btw, there are 2 items in my
discipline
list.
Thanks
Johan Compagner wrote:
A ListChoice should always be a List instead of a DropDown (for a
drop
down
we have the DropDownChoice)
I don't know why you see a difference it shouldn't look at all to
the
model
that holds the selection.
It only looks at the choices:
tag.put(size, Math.min(maxRows, getChoices().size()));
so i guess if maxRows of size() == 1 then it becomes a dropdown?
johan
On 5/9/06, Nino Wael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Im not sure if this is the intended functionality, but I belive
I've
discovered an oddity or featureJ.
When I use the constructor which also takes a model
(ListChoice(dropdown_job, new Model(),myList, new myRenderer))
my
listchoice is no longer displayed as a dropdown but as a listbox.
If I instead of using the constructor with the model property call
the
set
model method (listChoice_job.setModel(new Model())) then it
remains
displayed as a dropdown
Code snipplet:
// this gives a listbox
listChoice_job = new
ListChoice(dropdown_job,new Model(),jobcenter.toArray
().getList(),
new
DataItemRenderer())
//this gives a dropdown
listChoice_job = new
ListChoice(dropdown_job, jobcenter.toArray().getList(), new
DataItemRenderer())
listChoice_job.setModel(new
Model());
Code snipplet end
It's that latter I want displayed.
-regards Nino
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7714179
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn
cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ListChoice-changes-appearance-from-dropdown-to-listbox-tf1583106.html#a7736244
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn
Re: [Wicket-user] SortableDataProvider, size() iterator(int first, int count), Correct execution order?
Well, I just do two queries the first time... retrieving total count on size() call (just once), and then retrieve iteration on iterator(...) call (every navigation event)... so, in steady-state is only one call... On 12/5/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well in the example i gave you there should only be one query to the database -igor On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I have already followed your sample, doing two queries to database... ;) On 12/5/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no its not possible there is logic that ties the return call of size() to a few things that need to happen before the call to iterator() all it takes is your own subclass that i have shown you, i dont think its a big deal. -igor On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question is, nevertheless, would it be a significant implementation change to swap calls order from to current to iterator(...) first and size() later? then adding support for both cases in a SortableDataProvider (Case 1: Big databases - 2 Calls, Case 2: Small databases - 1 Call)... From my point of view, if supporting both cases, just by swapping those method calls (if so easy is it...), then it would be great, no worries to look for another impl... all-in-one... Just wondering... ;) Thank you for all your answers... - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Help:Dynamic Form Elements
In an application where one needs to make users create dynamic elements. For example, in our back end model we have a ListSchools and then a user may have 2 schools, another user may have 5 schools and another may have 1 school We intend to create a control such that when you click it, it will use ajax to auto insert a new textfield for another entry. Now how do I do this. And somehow i think in wicket ajax, a component that must be ajaxed must have been created prior to page rendering. So should I create a pool of textfield objects and then use the Ajax control to unhide them one by one or what other technique can be used to solve this kind of problem Thanks - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Application must implement Serializable?
I still have to test it some more. But as I was playing with it, when the Application object was NOT serialized, it would fail the first time I hit one of my data pages; but if I hit the same page again, it worked fine. I also had a problem when using the ModalWindow to load a Page where it was trying to serialize StringResponse, but I believe there are already posts on the mailing list for that, so I will try and find those posts first before going to far. Chuck Johan Compagner wrote: that is something wrong in your code Or maybe a bug in wicket somewhere but more people should see that then Application object should never be serialized. At what point do you have to serialize it? I think you hold on to it somewhere in your code. johan On 12/7/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in 1.3, should Application implement Serializable? I am in the process of switching to the 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT builds and I needed to implement Serializable on my APplication object. I checked the Wiki (Migrating from 1.2 to 1.3) and this wasn't mentioned. Is this required for 1.3 or have I got something wrong with my code? Everything was peachy with the latest 1.2-SNAPSHOT. Chuck -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7730054 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7738634 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] wicket ajax problem: cannot find resources (wicket-ajax.js ect.)
Hello,
The past few days I've been working with wicket, trying to get to know
it more. But, i've stumbled upon a problem when I tried to use an
AjaxLink. The page containing the AjaxLink renders, but the javascript
files (wicket-ajax.js ect.) cannot be found. Coping the URL to wicket-
ajax.js in the browser results in a statuscode 404. The link is:
/wicket-testapp1/welcome/resources/wicket.ajax.
AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/wicket-ajax.js
wicket-testapp1 is indeed the name of my project.
/welcome is my servlet
Can anyone tell me where i went wrong and how to fix this?
I've got the following code:
---
package wicket.schooltime.ajax;
import wicket.markup.html.WebPage;
import wicket.PageParameters;
import wicket.markup.html.basic.Label;
import wicket.model.PropertyModel;
import wicket.ajax.markup.html.AjaxLink;
import wicket.ajax.*;
public class Ajax extends WebPage {
private int counter1 = 0;
public Ajax(PageParameters parameters)
{
final Label c1 = new Label(counter1, new PropertyModel(this,
counter1));
add(c1);
add(new AjaxLink(optellen)
{
public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target)
{
System.out.println(AjAX thAtS thE StUff!!);
counter1++;
target.addComponent(c1);
}
});
}
public int getCounter1()
{
return counter1;
}
}
---
And in the Ajax.html file:
---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
titleAJAX/title
/head
body
a href=# wicket:id=optellen[optellen]/a
span wicket:id=counter1label1 goes here/span
/body
/html
---
Thanks in advance,
Niels Hardeman
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] SortableDataProvider, size() iterator(int first, int count), Correct execution order?
i guess if you are certain the size never changes this works ok -igor On 12/7/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I just do two queries the first time... retrieving total count on size() call (just once), and then retrieve iteration on iterator(...) call (every navigation event)... so, in steady-state is only one call... On 12/5/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well in the example i gave you there should only be one query to the database -igor On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I have already followed your sample, doing two queries to database... ;) On 12/5/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no its not possible there is logic that ties the return call of size() to a few things that need to happen before the call to iterator() all it takes is your own subclass that i have shown you, i dont think its a big deal. -igor On 12/5/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question is, nevertheless, would it be a significant implementation change to swap calls order from to current to iterator(...) first and size() later? then adding support for both cases in a SortableDataProvider (Case 1: Big databases - 2 Calls, Case 2: Small databases - 1 Call)... From my point of view, if supporting both cases, just by swapping those method calls (if so easy is it...), then it would be great, no worries to look for another impl... all-in-one... Just wondering... ;) Thank you for all your answers... - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net 's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Application must implement Serializable?
afaik the patch was reversed. string response should never be serialized, if it is you have a bug somewhere in your code. -igor On 12/7/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at the other post that references StringResponse and serializable and it was specifically for 2.0. But it looks like you put a fix in that codebase for it. Did not patch get applied to the 1.3 branch? ChuckDeal wrote: I still have to test it some more. But as I was playing with it, when the Application object was NOT serialized, it would fail the first time I hit one of my data pages; but if I hit the same page again, it worked fine. I also had a problem when using the ModalWindow to load a Page where it was trying to serialize StringResponse, but I believe there are already posts on the mailing list for that, so I will try and find those posts first before going to far. Chuck Johan Compagner wrote: that is something wrong in your code Or maybe a bug in wicket somewhere but more people should see that then Application object should never be serialized. At what point do you have to serialize it? I think you hold on to it somewhere in your code. johan On 12/7/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in 1.3, should Application implement Serializable? I am in the process of switching to the 1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT builds and I needed to implement Serializable on my APplication object. I checked the Wiki (Migrating from 1.2 to 1.3) and this wasn't mentioned. Is this required for 1.3 or have I got something wrong with my code? Everything was peachy with the latest 1.2-SNAPSHOT. Chuck -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7730054 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Application-must-implement-Serializable--tf2771344.html#a7742172 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Help:Dynamic Form Elements
you have a markup container called parent in that container you have a repeater such as listview/repeatingview/etc when your page loads the repeater is empty so nothing is shown once the ajax link is clicked you add the components to the repeater and then repaint the parent markup container via ajax -igor On 12/7/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In an application where one needs to make users create dynamic elements. For example, in our back end model we have a ListSchools and then a user may have 2 schools, another user may have 5 schools and another may have 1 school We intend to create a control such that when you click it, it will use ajax to auto insert a new textfield for another entry. Now how do I do this. And somehow i think in wicket ajax, a component that must be ajaxed must have been created prior to page rendering. So should I create a pool of textfield objects and then use the Ajax control to unhide them one by one or what other technique can be used to solve this kind of problem Thanks - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] FormElement cookies not set when called using AJAX
this might be a bug, file an issue and someone will have a looksee -igor On 12/7/06, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I have a DropDownChoice with wantOnSelectionChangedNotifications returning true and persistent set to true. Unfortunately the cookie is not set when the submit is done through Ajax. Is this on purpose? Is there a known workaround? Regards, Erik. -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Application must implement Serializable?
I am not directly doing anything with StringResponse, it is just the class that was reported. But even before that, I am still having trouble with the framework attempting to put the Application object into the session. I do use DataBinder (1.1-SNAPSHOT) and extend both AuthDataApplication as well as AuthDataSession. I also use the cookieSignIn code provided by DataBinder. If I remove my cookie, and therefore get presented with the Login screen, I can log in and go to the Main page and navigate to the page in question with no attempt to serialize the Application. If I keep the cookie and restart the app, I get auto-logged in directly to the Main page, and when I click on the link to go to the same page, the exception is thrown. 12:56:23,518 ERROR RequestCycle:852 - there was an error updating the session [EMAIL PROTECTED] wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependent objects implement Serializable. Class: com.csc.aims.framework.AIMSSession at wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute(HttpSessionStore.java:69) at wicket.protocol.http.SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.setAttribute(SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.java:218) at wicket.protocol.http.AbstractHttpSessionStore.bind(AbstractHttpSessionStore.java:176) at wicket.Session.setAttribute(Session.java:1024) at wicket.Session.update(Session.java:1050) at wicket.protocol.http.WebSession.update(WebSession.java:126) at wicket.RequestCycle.detach(RequestCycle.java:848) at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1118) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:243) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:122) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:202) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.valves.FastCommonAccessLogValve.invoke(FastCommonAccessLogValve.java:495) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException: com.csc.aims.framework.AIMSApplication at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1081) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:302) at wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute(HttpSessionStore.java:63) ... 25 more Wicket presents me with a page that I can click a link to go back to the HomePage. If I immediately click on the same link that produced the error, I don't receive an error this time and the page loads fine. This appears to be some kind of lazy initialization error, but I'm not sure where to begin looking. I put a breakpoint on the onClick for the link I was using, but the
Re: [Wicket-user] Application must implement Serializable?
make sure your session class is not an inner non-static class of the applicaiton because then they are tied. you might also want to try the databinder mailing list -igor On 12/7/06, ChuckDeal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not directly doing anything with StringResponse, it is just the class that was reported. But even before that, I am still having trouble with the framework attempting to put the Application object into the session. I do use DataBinder (1.1-SNAPSHOT) and extend both AuthDataApplication as well as AuthDataSession. I also use the cookieSignIn code provided by DataBinder. If I remove my cookie, and therefore get presented with the Login screen, I can log in and go to the Main page and navigate to the page in question with no attempt to serialize the Application. If I keep the cookie and restart the app, I get auto-logged in directly to the Main page, and when I click on the link to go to the same page, the exception is thrown. 12:56:23,518 ERROR RequestCycle:852 - there was an error updating the session [EMAIL PROTECTED] wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Internal error cloning object. Make sure all dependent objects implement Serializable. Class: com.csc.aims.framework.AIMSSession at wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute(HttpSessionStore.java :69) at wicket.protocol.http.SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.setAttribute( SecondLevelCacheSessionStore.java:218) at wicket.protocol.http.AbstractHttpSessionStore.bind( AbstractHttpSessionStore.java:176) at wicket.Session.setAttribute(Session.java:1024) at wicket.Session.update(Session.java:1050) at wicket.protocol.http.WebSession.update(WebSession.java:126) at wicket.RequestCycle.detach(RequestCycle.java:848) at wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1118) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:454) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:243) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java :122) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter( ApplicationFilterChain.java:202) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter( ApplicationFilterChain.java:173) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke( StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke( StandardContextValve.java:178) at org.apache.catalina.valves.FastCommonAccessLogValve.invoke( FastCommonAccessLogValve.java:495) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java :126) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java :105) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke( StandardEngineValve.java:107) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java :148) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:869) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection (Http11BaseProtocol.java:664) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket( PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt( LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run( ThreadPool.java:684) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException: com.csc.aims.framework.AIMSApplication at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java :1081) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java :1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData( ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java :1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java :1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java :1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData( ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java :1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java :1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java :1375) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData( ObjectOutputStream.java:1347) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java :1290) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java :1079) at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java :302) at wicket.protocol.http.HttpSessionStore.setAttribute(HttpSessionStore.java :63) ... 25 more Wicket presents me with a page that I can click a link to go back to the HomePage. If I immediately click on the same link that
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this: table wicket:id=container tbody tr wicket:id=campaignDV tdinput wicket:id=name/td /tr /tbody tfoot tr td wicket:id=navigator/td /tr /tfoot /table I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might be because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution to this though. try putting the dataview into a markupcontainer -igor On 12/6/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I searched the forums and found one question about AjaxPagingNavigator not working with DataView - but there was no response to it. Is the DataView unable to work with AjaxPagingNavigator or do I need to do something else to get it to work? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7745724 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
yes, ie doesnt let you use outerhtml on table elements, simply replace the table wicket:id=container with div wicket:id=containertable... -igor On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this: table wicket:id=container tbody tr wicket:id=campaignDV tdinput wicket:id=name/td /tr /tbody tfoot tr td wicket:id=navigator/td /tr /tfoot /table I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might be because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution to this though. try putting the dataview into a markupcontainer -igor On 12/6/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I searched the forums and found one question about AjaxPagingNavigator not working with DataView - but there was no response to it. Is the DataView unable to work with AjaxPagingNavigator or do I need to do something else to get it to work? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7745724 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
tried that and I still get the same error message. igor.vaynberg wrote: yes, ie doesnt let you use outerhtml on table elements, simply replace the table wicket:id=container with div wicket:id=containertable... -igor On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this: table wicket:id=container tbody tr wicket:id=campaignDV tdinput wicket:id=name/td /tr /tbody tfoot tr td wicket:id=navigator/td /tr /tfoot /table I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might be because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution to this though. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7746194 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
well in that case just do
new AjaxPagingNavigator() { onajaxevent(target) { target.add(dataviewparent);
}}
-igor
On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tried that and I still get the same error message.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
yes, ie doesnt let you use outerhtml on table elements, simply replace
the
table wicket:id=container with div wicket:id=containertable...
-igor
On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this:
table wicket:id=container
tbody
tr wicket:id=campaignDV
tdinput wicket:id=name/td
/tr
/tbody
tfoot
tr
td wicket:id=navigator/td
/tr
/tfoot
/table
I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might
be
because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution
to
this though.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7746194
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
I think ie does permit replacing a table element, but not tr td th tbody tfoot thead col colgroup So you have to add the markup container (don't forget to setOutputMarkupId(true) on it) to the ajax request target instead of the dataview. Martijn On 12/7/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, ie doesnt let you use outerhtml on table elements, simply replace the table wicket:id=container with div wicket:id=containertable... -igor On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this: table wicket:id=container tbody tr wicket:id=campaignDV tdinput wicket:id=name/td /tr /tbody tfoot tr td wicket:id=navigator/td /tr /tfoot /table I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might be because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution to this though. try putting the dataview into a markupcontainer -igor On 12/6/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I searched the forums and found one question about AjaxPagingNavigator not working with DataView - but there was no response to it. Is the DataView unable to work with AjaxPagingNavigator or do I need to do something else to get it to work? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7745724 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] DataView and Ajax
well the thing is that the paging navigator tries to do this automagically in onajaxevent() maybe that should just be made abstract -igor On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think ie does permit replacing a table element, but not tr td th tbody tfoot thead col colgroup So you have to add the markup container (don't forget to setOutputMarkupId(true) on it) to the ajax request target instead of the dataview. Martijn On 12/7/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yes, ie doesnt let you use outerhtml on table elements, simply replace the table wicket:id=container with div wicket:id=containertable... -igor On 12/7/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I put the data view into a markupcontainerso the html looks like this: table wicket:id=container tbody tr wicket:id=campaignDV tdinput wicket:id=name/td /tr /tbody tfoot tr td wicket:id=navigator/td /tr /tfoot /table I get an Unknown runtime error. I dug around and found that this might be because of IE and some troubles with tr tags? didn't find a solution to this though. try putting the dataview into a markupcontainer -igor On 12/6/06, carbonbasednerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I searched the forums and found one question about AjaxPagingNavigator not working with DataView - but there was no response to it. Is the DataView unable to work with AjaxPagingNavigator or do I need to do something else to get it to work? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DataView-and-Ajax-tf2771602.html#a7745724 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] Drag and drop
I think Dojo has that available. see wicket-contrib-dojo on wicket-stuff. Martijn On 12/8/06, Francis Amanfo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Guys, Anyone has a drag and drop wicket component to share? I need that stuff but want to first ask if anyone has that before I start getting my hands dirty :-). -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth I don't make predictions. I never have, and I never will. -Tony Blair - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user -- a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket;Vote/a for a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket;Wicket/a at the a href=http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/;Best Stuff in the World!/a - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] FormElement cookies not set when called using AJAX
Ok, thanks Igor. Done that. Erik. Igor Vaynberg wrote: this might be a bug, file an issue and someone will have a looksee -igor -- Erik van Oosten http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
