[Wicket-user] Avoid session reuse on login page when previous user doesn't log out
Wicket 1.2.3 User A and B share a computer at an office. User A logs in. Session is setup with account info. User A doesn't log out. User B clicks on his login bookmark, and logs in using the same session (as it wasn't invalidated with a logout) -- the same session is reused. The login process would then need to manually clear any of the user-specific objects that may have been stored in the session (eg, user preferences, whatever was set in the custom session object). A way around this would be for the login page to invalidate the session, but then a submit would have a page expired error. Any graceful way around this in wicket 1.2.3? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] 1 app, 2 HomePages. 1 public, 1 logged-in
I have an app that has a public section and a logged-in section. If the session expires for a logged-in user, I'd like to direct him to the login. If a page expires for a public user, I'd like to direct him to the / page. Any thoughts on how to handle this efficently? One easy way would be to break the app into 2 apps, 2 separate WicketServlets, each with its own HomePage defined, but that may use too many resources just to accomplish this. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] TinyMCE issues with resources
I'm using wicket 1.2 jar and wicket-contrib-tinymce-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar (built in maven from checking out 1.2 branch of wicket-stuff) I've added TinyMCEPanel to my page via add(new TinyMCEPanel(tinyMCE)); When I click on the page (I'm using Fire Fox 1.5.0.6 under OS X), the following javascript errors are reported in the console: Error: this.contentWindow has no properties Source File: http://localhost:9092/car/loads/resources/wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js Line: 2395 Error: editorTemplate has no properties Source File: http://localhost:9092/car/loads/resources/wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js Line: 3372 When I look at the java console, the following is reported: 15 Aug 2006 10:18:26,317 ERROR resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget - shared resource wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/themes/simple/editor_template_src.js not found 15 Aug 2006 10:18:26,331 ERROR resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget - shared resource wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/langs/en.js not found 15 Aug 2006 10:18:26,351 ERROR resource.SharedResourceRequestTarget - shared resource wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/themes/simple/css/editor_ui.css not found So it appears not to have issues requesting http://localhost:9092/car/loads/resources/wicket.contrib.tinymce.TinyMCEPanel/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js, but the other resources are failing. Any ideas? Thanks. - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Wicket Include vs. RequestDispatcher.include
I posted a very similar component to the group a while back -- search
for Servlet forward to a JSP. It could be used as a starting point
for a nice component, as it definitely needs polishing.
On 2006-03-29 23:54:57 -0700, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How about extending Include as follows:
public class LightInclude extends Include {
public LightInclude(String id, String model, ServletRequest
request, ServletResponse response) {
this.request = request;
this.response = response;
}
protected String importUrl(String url) {
//create a buffer
Writer writer = new BufferedWriter(new CharArratWriter());
//create some mockup response
ServletResponse mockupResponse = new ServletResponse() {
//implement all interface methods by delegating to the
original response except for this:
public PrintWriter getWriter(){
return new PrintWriter(writer);
}
};
//call RequestDispatcher with the mockup response
//this will write the response to our buffer
request.getrequestDispatcher(url).include(request, mockupResponse);
//return the content of the buffer
return writer.toString();
}
}
I guess some additional polish is required..
Nili
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
That's what I did in the first version(s) of Include. There were
issues with it, which I unfortunately forgot. I never use this
component myself, but if you have good ideas in the form of patches,
I'd be happy to look at them.
Eelco
On 3/29/06, Nili Adoram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there an option to use utilize wicket Include without opening a new
connection?
I would like to include the contents of a URL like
RequestDispatcher.include() does, directly into a wicket component.
10x
Nili
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=kkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Back button, setVisible, isVisible, Submit Button is not Visible
I'm writing a simple Upload File/View File/Delete File panel. It has 3 buttons. 1. Upload - Only visible when no file is stored permissions are correct via isVisible() override. 2. View File - Only visible when a file is already stored via isVisible() override. 3. Delete File - Only visible when a file is already stored permissions are correct via isVisible() override. When I upload a file, the upload button is hidden, the view and delete buttons are visible. However, if I hit back and click upload again I get wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Submit Button is not visible. What I'd like to do is say a file is already uploaded and ignore their file (I think). For remove I'd say No file to remove. Etc. Or just do nothing and render the current display. Maybe if it threw a named exception? Or do I need to use state changes explicitly and call setVisible so that it rolls the page back to that state. Using setVisible is much less convenient that using isVisible for this kind of logic. Thanks! --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Back button, setVisible, isVisible, Submit Button is not Visible
Perhaps a flag on the component to specify whether it handles clicks when it is invisible? That would fix the issue and the component would get the click, could check if it whether it is visible / invisible and then act accordingly. I tried turning on versioning and then using setVisible explicitly but it isn't working (at least the way I'd expect it) The version numbers are incrementing but the visibility isn't changing. I am of course many levels deep in panels.. For now I may choose to have the buttons available at all times and that will get around the problem for the present. Thanks. On 2006-03-22 12:16:18 -0700, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: problem with approach like that in this case is that when you go back the upload button should indeed be hidden because youve already uploaded a file= . so in your case it would be better to call setvisible isntead of overriding isvisible because your condition does not work well across requests. -Igor On 3/22/06, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm writing a simple Upload File/View File/Delete File panel. It has 3 buttons. 1. Upload - Only visible when no file is stored permissions are correct via isVisible() override. 2. View File - Only visible when a file is already stored via isVisible() override. 3. Delete File - Only visible when a file is already stored permissions are correct via isVisible() override. When I upload a file, the upload button is hidden, the view and delete buttons are visible. However, if I hit back and click upload again I get wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Submit Button is not visible. What I'd like to do is say a file is already uploaded and ignore their file (I think). For remove I'd say No file to remove. Etc. Or just do nothing and render the current display. Maybe if it threw a named exception? Or do I need to use state changes explicitly and call setVisible so that it rolls the page back to that state. Using setVisible is much less convenient that using isVisible for this kind of logic. Thanks! --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnkkid=3D110944bid=3D241720dat= =3D121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user problem with approach like that in this case is that when you go back the u= pload button should indeed be hidden because youve already uploaded a file.= so in your case it would be better to call setvisible isntead of overridin= g isvisible because your condition does not work well across requests. brbr-Igorbrbrbrdivspan class=3Dgmail_quoteOn 3/22/06, b cl= ass=3Dgmail_sendernameRobert McClay/b lt;a href=3Dmailto:montecrist= [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; wrote:/spanblockquote cla= ss=3Dgmail_quote style=3Dborder-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); marg= in: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; I'm writing a simple Upload File/View File/Delete File panel. It has 3 butt= ons.brbr1. Upload - Only visible when no file is stored amp; permissio= ns arebrcorrect via isVisible() override.br2. View File - Only visible = when a file is already stored via brisVisible() override.br3. Delete File - Only visible when a file is a= lready stored amp;brpermissions are correct via isVisible() override.br= brWhen I upload a file, the upload button is hidden, the view and delete brbuttons are visible. However, if I hit back and click upload again Ibr= get quot;wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Submit Button is not visiblequot= ;. WhatbrI'd like to do is say a file is already uploaded and ignore thei= r file br(I think). For remove I'd say quot;No file to removequot;. Etc. Or ju= st dobrnothing and render the current display. Maybe if it threw a named= brexception?brbrOr do I need to use state changes explicitly and call = setVisible so brthat it rolls the page back to that state. Using setVisible is muchbr= less convenient that using isVisible for this kind of logic.brbrThanks!= brbrbrbrbr--- brThis SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lang= uagebrthat extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the liv= e webcastbrand join the prime developer group breaking into this new codi= ng territory! bra href=3Dhttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnkamp;kid=3D110944a= mp;bid=3D241720amp;dat=3D121642http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk= amp;kid=3D110944amp;bid=3D241720amp;dat=3D121642/abr= ___ brWicket-user mailing listbra href=3Dmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] orge.netWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net/abra href=3Dhttps://lists= .sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo
[Wicket-user] Upload, multipart form, Resin
Resin has an option that handles parsing multipart forms automatically. http://www.caucho.com/products/resin/ref/app-config.xtp#multipart-form ...an uploaded file with a form name of foo, the parameter value contains the path name to a temporary file containing the uploaded file. foo.filename contains the uploaded filename, and foo.content-type contains the content-type of the uploaded file. To use this option with Wicket, my workaround was to remove final/private from Form.handleMultiPart() and override it to return true. I then use a custom FileUploadField that gets the file information from the parameters instead of the built-in-wicket multipart form handling. Rob --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Upload, multipart form, Resin
Specific to the Resin container I think. It handles multipart forms automatically and puts the file path in the request parameters. So the form needs to be specified as multipart/form-data but Wicket shouldn't handle it as a multipart form. A less intrusive fix to get it working is I explicitly specific enctype=multipart/form-data in the markup and I override Form.onComponentTag, call its super, and then call setMultiPart(false) so wicket doesn't handle it as a multipart form. On 2006-03-21 10:26:54 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Is this specific to Resin, or is it something more general? Eelco On 3/21/06, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Resin has an option that handles parsing multipart forms automatically. http://www.caucho.com/products/resin/ref/app-config.xtp#multipart-form ...an uploaded file with a form name of foo, the parameter value contains the path name to a temporary file containing the uploaded file. foo.filename contains the uploaded filename, and foo.content-type contains the content-type of the uploaded file. To use this option with Wicket, my workaround was to remove final/private from Form.handleMultiPart() and override it to return true. I then use a custom FileUploadField that gets the file information from the parameters instead of the built-in-wicket multipart form handling. Rob --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua ge that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc ast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor y! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat =121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Porting to 1.2 -- using getSession().invalidate()
In 1.1, given a runtime exception of type SecurityException, I'd forward to a special error page that then calls getSession().invalidate() to log the user out. The special error page would render and then the session would be invalidated, causing additional clicks to forward to the login page. In 1.2 my page no longer renders -- it jumps straight to the Page Expired page if I call getSession().invalidate(). I'm using the default render strategy. Is there a preferred way to implement this type of behavior in 1.2? I want to invalidate the session so that the user can't repeatedly request resources that throw SecurityExceptions, but I'd like a page to be rendered prior to the session being invalidated. Thanks. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Page Versioning Problem
I'm using Wicket 1.1. I have a page with 1 constructor (no default constructor): public ChoiceListDetailPage(final Page backPage, final ChoiceList detail) I construct and then go to the page from a bookmarkable list page. The new page doesn't handle versioning correctly though. It is the same as its parent page but it isn't bookmarkable. It contains a ListView that needs to be versioned, but even though I say listView.setVersioned(true) the version number for the list is never incremented. The listview's model is a LoadableDetachableModel generated from database records fresh each time. Any ideas? Why does it work on a bookmarkable page but not on one that isn't? Thanks. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Page Versioning Problem
My mistake, my listview was accidentally in a form, which caused the issue. All is resolved. Thanks. On 2006-02-25 15:33:16 -0700, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: first of all a page has a version number not the listview. And when must the version be bumped up one? When the model of the listview changes? See the modelChanging can modelChanged() events. That will up the version number. johan On 2/25/06, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Wicket 1.1. I have a page with 1 constructor (no default constructor): public ChoiceListDetailPage(final Page backPage, final ChoiceList detail) I construct and then go to the page from a bookmarkable list page. The new page doesn't handle versioning correctly though. It is the same as its parent page but it isn't bookmarkable. It contains a ListView that needs to be versioned, but even though I say listView.setVersioned(true) the version number for the list is never incremented. The listview's model is a LoadableDetachableModel generated from database records fresh each time. Any ideas? Why does it work on a bookmarkable page but not on one that isn't? Thanks. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnkkid=3D110944bid=3D241720dat= =3D121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user first of all a page has a version number not the listview.brAnd when must= the version be bumped up one?brWhen the model of the listview changes?b= rSee the modelChanging can modelChanged() events. That will up the version= number. brbrjohanbrbrbrdivspan class=3Dgmail_quoteOn 2/25/06, b cl= ass=3Dgmail_sendernameRobert McClay/b lt;a href=3Dmailto:montecrist= [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt; wrote:/spanblockquote cla= ss=3Dgmail_quote style=3Dborder-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); marg= in: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; I'm using Wicket 1.1. I have a page with 1 constructor (no defaultbrconst= ructor):brbrpublic ChoiceListDetailPage(final Page backPage, final Choi= ceList detail)brbrI construct and then go to the page from a bookmarkab= le list page. The brnew page doesn't handle versioning correctly though. It is the same as= brits parent page but it isn't bookmarkable. It contains a ListView thatb= rneeds to be versioned, but even though I saybrlistView.setVersioned (true) the version number for the list is neverbrincremented. The listvie= w's model is a LoadableDetachableModelbrgenerated from database records f= resh each time.brbrAny ideas? Why does it work on a bookmarkable page b= ut not on one that isn't? brbrThanks.brbrbrbrbr= ---brThis SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking= scripting languagebrthat extends applications into web and mobile media.= Attend the live webcast brand join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territ= ory!bra href=3Dhttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnkamp;kid=3D1109= 44amp;bid=3D241720amp;dat=3D121642http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd= =3Dlnkamp;kid=3D110944amp;bid=3D241720amp;dat=3D121642 /abr___brWicket-user mail= ing listbra href=3Dmailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net;Wicket-use= [EMAIL PROTECTED]/abra href=3Dhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lis= ts/listinfo/wicket-user https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user/abr/blockquot= e/divbr --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: DatePicker wicket 1.1 IE 6.0 with HTTPS synchronization / blocking issues
I haven't tried it with 1.2 yet, but will. Thanks. On 2006-01-28 12:30:43 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It's sounds really nasty. Sorry we haven't been able to help you with it directly. Did you test it with the current version of 1.2 at all? It would certainly be reasuring if that is fixed in that version. Eelco On 1/28/06, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I modified my copy of DatePicker.java and DatePicker.html to reference resources (images, javascript, and css) from the web server directly and everything works great now. Hopefully I can throw it out when 1.2 is released. It appears that IE / https / wicket combination causes some threads to get stuck when lots of images are requested simultaneously. Has anyone else experienced this? On 2006-01-27 12:57:11 -0700, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Can you see the requests stalling in the server logs? As for 1.2: the resource requests will not pass a blocking section. Thi s is hard to achieve in Wicket 1.1, which is one of the reasons we (mainly E elco ) replaced the internal request processing in Wicket 1.2 Martijn --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: DatePicker wicket 1.1 IE 6.0 with HTTPS synchronization / blocking issues
I modified my copy of DatePicker.java and DatePicker.html to reference resources (images, javascript, and css) from the web server directly and everything works great now. Hopefully I can throw it out when 1.2 is released. It appears that IE / https / wicket combination causes some threads to get stuck when lots of images are requested simultaneously. Has anyone else experienced this? On 2006-01-27 12:57:11 -0700, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Can you see the requests stalling in the server logs? As for 1.2: the resource requests will not pass a blocking section. This is hard to achieve in Wicket 1.1, which is one of the reasons we (mainly Eelco= ) replaced the internal request processing in Wicket 1.2 Martijn --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] DatePicker wicket 1.1 IE 6.0 with HTTPS synchronization / blocking issues
Users of our https site using IE 6 have reported that pages that use a DatePicker seem to stall on downloading the images for the datepicker. I've verified and it happens when the images aren't in the browser cache -- sometimes it takes forever to download the images. Haven't noticed the same behavior when not using https with IE, and of course Safari and Firefox work well. When the datepicker is stalled downloading the images, and I click on another page in the app, it behaves as if it is blocked and doesn't respond to my session until all of the images datepicker images have finished downloading (which can take forever). Does 1.1.1 or 1.2 allow static image resources or .css files to be requested by the browser without synchronization/blocking? I've also noticed that IE will request the images again if I mouseover the datepicker window if they haven't downloaded yet, adding to the delay. Of course, the problem can only be replicated under IE -- maybe it requests all of the images at once and causes some sort of strange blocking phenomenon? Any ideas? Does serving up static resources / images in a package cause the session to block? If so, does it need to? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: DatePicker wicket 1.1 IE 6.0 with HTTPS synchronization / blocking issues
When the session times out I can get a boat load of these exceptions (1 per stalled thread I assume), which leads me to believe the thread stalls when the resource is requested, if they're all requested simultaneously. I'm going to hunt for a quick way to adjust DatePicker to get its resources directly from the web server as opposed to going through a PackageResource. Thanks. == Exception Data == java.lang.IllegalStateException: Can't call removeAttribute(String) when session is no longer valid. at com.caucho.http.session.SessionImpl.removeAttribute(SessionImpl.java:389) at wicket.protocol.http.WebSession.removeAttribute(WebSession.java:188) at wicket.Session.touch(Session.java:804) at wicket.Page.doRender(Page.java:225) at wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.redirectTo(WebRequestCycle.java:218) at wicket.RequestCycle.redirectToExceptionErrorPage(RequestCycle.java:847) at wicket.RequestCycle.internalOnRuntimeException(RequestCycle.java:745) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:428) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:197) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:162) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:103) at com.caucho.server.http.FilterChainServlet.doFilter(FilterChainServlet.java:96) at com.bci.car.servlets.gzip.GzipFilter.doFilter(GzipFilter.java:127) at com.caucho.server.http.FilterChainFilter.doFilter(FilterChainFilter.java:88) at com.caucho.server.http.Invocation.service(Invocation.java:315) at com.caucho.server.http.CacheInvocation.service(CacheInvocation.java:135) at com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest.handleRequest(HttpRequest.java:253) at com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest.handleConnection(HttpRequest.java:170) at com.caucho.server.TcpConnection.run(TcpConnection.java:139) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595) On 2006-01-27 12:57:11 -0700, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Can you see the requests stalling in the server logs? As for 1.2: the resource requests will not pass a blocking section. This is hard to achieve in Wicket 1.1, which is one of the reasons we (mainly Eelco= ) replaced the internal request processing in Wicket 1.2 Martijn On 1/27/06, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Users of our https site using IE 6 have reported that pages that use a DatePicker seem to stall on downloading the images for the datepicker. I've verified and it happens when the images aren't in the browser cache -- sometimes it takes forever to download the images. Haven't noticed the same behavior when not using https with IE, and of course Safari and Firefox work well. When the datepicker is stalled downloading the images, and I click on another page in the app, it behaves as if it is blocked and doesn't respond to my session until all of the images datepicker images have finished downloading (which can take forever). Does 1.1.1 or 1.2 allow static image resources or .css files to be requested by the browser without synchronization/blocking? I've also noticed that IE will request the images again if I mouseover the datepicker window if they haven't downloaded yet, adding to the delay. Of course, the problem can only be replicated under IE -- maybe it requests all of the images at once and causes some sort of strange blocking phenomenon? Any ideas? Does serving up static resources / images in a package cause the session to block? If so, does it need to? Thanks. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnkkid=3D103432bid=3D230486dat= =3D121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] No version manager available exception instead of Page Expired on second click to versioned page
In Wicket 1.1 if the session expires and you click on a versioned page, the first time it will take you to the Page Expired page. If you then hit back and click the link again, it'll throw an exception. Is that a bug? java.lang.IllegalStateException: No version manager available to retrieve requested versionNumber 2 at wicket.Page.getVersion(Page.java:387) at wicket.Session.getPage(Session.java:271) at wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.callComponentListener(WebRequestCycle.java:425) at wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycle.parseRequest(WebRequestCycle.java:140) at wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:418) at wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:197) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:126) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:103) at com.caucho.server.http.FilterChainServlet.doFilter(FilterChainServlet.java:96) at com.bci.car.servlets.gzip.GzipFilter.doFilter(GzipFilter.java:127) at com.caucho.server.http.FilterChainFilter.doFilter(FilterChainFilter.java:88) at com.caucho.server.http.Invocation.service(Invocation.java:315) at com.caucho.server.http.CacheInvocation.service(CacheInvocation.java:135) at com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest.handleRequest(HttpRequest.java:253) at com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest.handleConnection(HttpRequest.java:170) at com.caucho.server.TcpConnection.run(TcpConnection.java:139) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=103432bid=230486dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Security / Page Access / Page Construction / IAuthorizationStrategy
I would like to enable page level security in my application. I don't want my page to be constructed unless a certain security requirement is met as at present I do a lot of data loading / etc in page constructors (as featured in the wicket examples). It seems a new security policy is in the works to handle this -- IAuthorizationStrategy. In the meantime, what would be a good way to prevent a bookmarkable page from being constructed? Should I provide a new IPageFactory implementation that checks the session for authorization prior to returning a new page, and perhaps swap the page to a denied access or login page if access isn't available? Or should I check out the latest CVS sources and try IAuthorization strategy if it is implemented? Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Servlet forward to a JSP
I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Servlet forward to a JSP
If I come up with anything useful I'd be happy to contribute. The JSP I need to forward to requires request attributes, so I don't think the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component will work as from what I understand it is a separate request whose output is then included into the markup? In this case, the result of RedirectPage would be the same as it is a fresh browser request and I need to populate a request with request.setAttribute() and have the JSP be able to retrieve the request attributes. What I'm looking for is a way in Wicket to tell it to finish its processing, not output any markup, and then forward the request to another servlet, not include or redirect. Thanks. On 2005-11-06 15:38:06 -0700, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Sure. Use wicket.markup.html.pages.RedirectPage for server-side redirecting to a non-wicket locations. If you want to inlcude things likes JSP pages into Wicket pages, you can use the wicket.markup.html.include.Include component. The latter is a bit rough, so if you need better support on that one, please contribute ;) Eelco On 11/6/05, Robert McClay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm exploring the possibility of integrating Wicket into a JSP application. Is it possible to tell Wicket to do a servlet forward to a JSP? I would like to add a few request attributes and then forward to a JSP. The reason I'd like to do a forward VS include is I need to be able to populate request attributes prior to the JSP running. The login page is currently implemented in JSP. Another option would be to refactor the login page, but I'm curious if it is feasibile to attempt the former as I want to use as much of the existing system as possible. Thanks. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Downl oad it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42 plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Re: Multiple checkboxes, table columns how-to in Wicket?
Within a form I'm using a detachable model for a ListView that contains business objects loaded directly via JDBC, each of which has a selected flag, rendered in the ListItem as a checkbox. However, when I get to onSubmit in the form, the model is still detached, and therefore the state hasn't been transferred from the form to the model. Therefore, when it renders, it reattaches but the model hasn't changed. What is the best way to fix this? In onSubmit I'd like to delete the records. The reason I use a detachable model is I want each render to have fresh results from the database via JDBC, but perhaps is there is better way? I haven't set optimizedItemRemoval to true because I don't need anything to be validated. Thanks On 2005-08-16 23:48:08 -0600, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Note that if you are using detachable models (e.g. your list), if you don't do anything in the form's submit method (like persisting your changes), the next time the list renders it will use the same old value, which could give you the idea nothing happened. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
