Re: [Wicket-user] Changing validation rules on the fly
> I wondered why there appears to be no way to remove one or all validators? We have talked about it, but not yet decided whether we were going to add a remove option. I'm one of the people who isn't sure whether we really need it. Why not instead of removing validators make their execution optional? You can code that directly in your validators right now. Maybe you can tell us more about your case? Eelco - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] Changing validation rules on the fly
I have a complex form split into panels in a wizard and some validation requirements in a panel change depend ing on changes in the model made by previous panels. I was expecting to be able to remove one type of validator previously added and add a new one that covers the changed circumstances but there seems to be no remove() method only add(). I wondered why there appears to be no way to remove one or all validators? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Changing-validation-rules-on-the-fly-tf3847201.html#a10896255 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
