[Wicket-user] Forms/Models

2006-09-26 Thread Patrick Angeles

I wrote the following code with Forms and Models... is there a more compact
way of doing this? Would it be a bad idea to combine the form class and the
model class into one and have it reference itself as a Model object?

Also, since I am not so concerned about holding on to the model's state
(logins are usually just one-time requests and the form is always reset on
failure), what's a simple way of doing this without storing the LoginModel
in the session?

Thanks in advance!

public class Login
  extends
BasePage
{
  // TODO Add any page properties or variables here

  public Login ()
  {
super (Login);
add (new LoginForm (loginForm)) ;
  }
}

class LoginForm
{
  LoginModel loginModel = null ;
  
  public LoginForm (final String componentName)
  {
super (componentName) ;
loginModel = new LoginModel () ;
this.setModel (new CompoundPropertyModel (loginModel)) ;
add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));
add (new PasswordTextField (password));
  }
  
  public void onSubmit ()
  {
String loginName = loginModel.getLoginName () ;
if (asdfasdf.equals (loginModel.getPassword ())) {
  MySession session = 
  session.setLoginName (loginName) ;
  this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;
}
else {
  log.warn (Login failure for  + loginName) ;
  this.setResponsePage (getPage ()) ;
}
  }
}

class LoginModel
  implements Serializable
{
  private String loginName ;
  private String password ;

  public String getLoginName ()
  {
return loginName;
  }
  
  public void setLoginName (String loginName)
  {
this.loginName = loginName;
  }
  
  public String getPassword ()
  {
return password;
  }
  
  public void setPassword (String password)
  {
this.password = password;
  }  
}

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Forms-Models-tf2341262.html#a6516020
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Forms/Models

2006-09-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
it really depends on the reusability you want.do you want loginform to be reusable?do you want loginmodel to be reusable?if the answer to both is no then you can just doclass Login extends WebPage {
 private String login; private String password; public Login() { Form form=new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(this)) {public void onSubmit (){ if (asdfasdf.equals (password)) {
MySession session = session.setLoginName (loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;}else {log.error(Login failure for  + login) ; }}
 }; form.add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));   form.add (new PasswordTextField (password));}and call it a day :)-Igor
On 9/26/06, Patrick Angeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote the following code with Forms and Models... is there a more compactway of doing this? Would it be a bad idea to combine the form class and themodel class into one and have it reference itself as a Model object?
Also, since I am not so concerned about holding on to the model's state(logins are usually just one-time requests and the form is always reset onfailure), what's a simple way of doing this without storing the LoginModel
in the session?Thanks in advance!public class LoginextendsBasePage{// TODO Add any page properties or variables herepublic Login (){super (Login);
add (new LoginForm (loginForm)) ;}}class LoginForm{LoginModel loginModel = null ;public LoginForm (final String componentName){super (componentName) ;
loginModel = new LoginModel () ;this.setModel (new CompoundPropertyModel (loginModel)) ;add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));add (new PasswordTextField (password));
}public void onSubmit (){String loginName = loginModel.getLoginName () ;if (asdfasdf.equals (loginModel.getPassword ())) {MySession session = session.setLoginName
 (loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;}else {log.warn (Login failure for  + loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (getPage ()) ;}}}
class LoginModelimplements Serializable{private String loginName ;private String password ;public String getLoginName (){return loginName;}public void setLoginName (String loginName)
{this.loginName = loginName;}public String getPassword (){return password;}public void setPassword (String password){this.password = password;}
}--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forms-Models-tf2341262.html#a6516020Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Forms/Models

2006-09-26 Thread Patrick Angeles
Thanks... that's exactly what I was looking for ;)So I take it, CompoundPropertyModel does not require get/set methods to access/mutate properties? (I think I have to make login public, in this case?)
On 9/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it really depends on the reusability you want.do you want loginform to be reusable?do you want loginmodel to be reusable?if the answer to both is no then you can just doclass Login extends WebPage {
 private String login; private String password; public Login() { Form form=new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(this)) {public void onSubmit (){ if (asdfasdf.equals (password)) {
MySession session = session.setLoginName (loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;}else {log.error(Login failure for  + login) ;
 }}
 }; form.add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));   form.add (new PasswordTextField (password));}and call it a day :)-Igor

On 9/26/06, Patrick Angeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I wrote the following code with Forms and Models... is there a more compactway of doing this? Would it be a bad idea to combine the form class and themodel class into one and have it reference itself as a Model object?
Also, since I am not so concerned about holding on to the model's state(logins are usually just one-time requests and the form is always reset onfailure), what's a simple way of doing this without storing the LoginModel
in the session?Thanks in advance!public class LoginextendsBasePage{// TODO Add any page properties or variables herepublic Login (){super (Login);
add (new LoginForm (loginForm)) ;}}class LoginForm{LoginModel loginModel = null ;public LoginForm (final String componentName){super (componentName) ;
loginModel = new LoginModel () ;this.setModel (new CompoundPropertyModel (loginModel)) ;add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));add (new PasswordTextField (password));
}public void onSubmit (){String loginName = loginModel.getLoginName () ;if (asdfasdf.equals (loginModel.getPassword ())) {MySession session = session.setLoginName

 (loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;}else {log.warn (Login failure for  + loginName) ;this.setResponsePage (getPage ()) ;}}}

class LoginModelimplements Serializable{private String loginName ;private String password ;public String getLoginName (){return loginName;}public void setLoginName (String loginName)
{this.loginName = loginName;}public String getPassword (){return password;}public void setPassword (String password){this.password = password;
}
}--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Forms-Models-tf2341262.html#a6516020
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-- Patrick Angeles | VP of Technology | Direct:646.643.2607 | Fax:800.366.2303 | Support:800.819.0325 | Inertia - Powering the Wine REvolution | 
www.inertiabev.com
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


Re: [Wicket-user] Forms/Models

2006-09-26 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I thought this is in his private 1.3 branch

On 9/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 we have been talking about letting it access private fields directly so you
 dont have to implement the pesky getters/setters.

 not sure if that has been committed yet. johan?


 -Igor


  On 9/26/06, Patrick Angeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks... that's exactly what I was looking for ;)
 
  So I take it, CompoundPropertyModel does not require get/set methods to
 access/mutate properties? (I think I have to make login public, in this
 case?)
 
 
 
  On 9/26/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
   it really depends on the reusability you want.
  
   do you want loginform to be reusable?
   do you want loginmodel to be reusable?
  
   if the answer to both is no then you can just do
  
   class Login extends WebPage {
 private String login;
 private String password;
  
 public Login() {
Form form=new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(this)) {
public void onSubmit ()
 {
   if (asdfasdf.equals (password)) {
 MySession session = 
 session.setLoginName (loginName) ;
 this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;
   }
   else {
 log.error(Login failure for  + login) ;
   }
 }
};
   form.add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));
   form.add (new PasswordTextField (password));
   }
  
   and call it a day :)
  
   -Igor
  
  
  
  
   On 9/26/06, Patrick Angeles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
I wrote the following code with Forms and Models... is there a more
 compact
way of doing this? Would it be a bad idea to combine the form class
 and the
model class into one and have it reference itself as a Model object?
   
Also, since I am not so concerned about holding on to the model's
 state
(logins are usually just one-time requests and the form is always
 reset on
failure), what's a simple way of doing this without storing the
 LoginModel
in the session?
   
Thanks in advance!

public class Login
  extends
BasePage
{
  // TODO Add any page properties or variables here
   
  public Login ()
  {
super (Login);
add (new LoginForm (loginForm)) ;
  }
}
   
class LoginForm
{
  LoginModel loginModel = null ;
   
  public LoginForm (final String componentName)
  {
super (componentName) ;
loginModel = new LoginModel () ;
this.setModel (new CompoundPropertyModel (loginModel)) ;
add (new RequiredTextField (loginName));
add (new PasswordTextField (password));
  }
   
  public void onSubmit ()
  {
String loginName = loginModel.getLoginName () ;
if (asdfasdf.equals (loginModel.getPassword ())) {
  MySession session = 
  session.setLoginName (loginName) ;
  this.setResponsePage (Home.class) ;
}
else {
  log.warn (Login failure for  + loginName) ;
  this.setResponsePage (getPage ()) ;
}
  }
}
   
class LoginModel
  implements Serializable
{
  private String loginName ;
  private String password ;
   
  public String getLoginName ()
  {
return loginName;
  }
   
  public void setLoginName (String loginName)
  {
this.loginName = loginName;
  }
   
  public String getPassword ()
  {
return password;
  }
   
  public void setPassword (String password)
  {
this.password = password;
  }
}
   
--
View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Forms-Models-tf2341262.html#a6516020
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
   
   
   
 -
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
 share your
opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
 cash
   
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
   
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
   
  
  
  
 -
   Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
   Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
 your
   opinions on IT  business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
  
 http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
  
   ___
   Wicket-user mailing list
   Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
  
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  Patrick Angeles | VP of Technology | Direct:646.643.2607 |
 Fax:800.366.2303 |