Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
Could you define a few months? We're about to start a new project that may or may not use wicket 2.0 depending on the timetable. The first release is scheduled in september. Is that to soon for a reasonably stable wicket 2.0? Are there any simple issues that a non wicket export could help out with? /Mats On 5/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we did communicate this... See Martijns mails and my replies on it over branching.. Ok, my email was explicitly about it though, AND additionally to wicket-user. Doesn't matter, it is communicated now for sure :) And if develop now something to get it into production in a few months you should stick to 1.2 But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related and that is no behaviour change.. So that shouldn't affect at all. as far as i can see now there is only one big code change: Converters that would affect the compile of code. Well, even the Java 5 stuff breaks code, and as we're also just half way implementing that, I suspect there will be a lot of bugs in it currently. And wicket-extensions and wicket-examples don't even compile currently. But that's hopefully fixed in a couple of days? For the rest only the default change of another kind of pagemap/session store is what needs to be tested but there are people that already tested that when it was in a branch (the clientsidestate branch) Also, I'd like to get rid of the pre-registration of package resources. And maybe backport that if that is done. Eelco --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
that is a bit of a problem. Because currently my workspace i have done the constructor change.It is not completely finished yet. I hope to commit this by the end of the week.And this will have a big impact on everything. If the constructor change sits in cvs. I think we need 1 month to stabilize that and make it robust.I think we can have a release of 2.0 somewhere in september. Or if it is not a release it will be pretty stable. But 2.0 is pretty much this:Java5 and Parent in Constructor changeAnd other fixes like Converter change, PageMap refactor.I guess we can backport some features (like pagemap or converter) to 1.2.x We will maintain the 2 branches for a while (1.2.x and 2.0) because 2.0 is a big changethat some projects at this time will not convert to.If you start it right now. It is a bit difficult to choose what to do at the moment. Because trunk will under go a lot of changes the comming month (i think)johanOn 5/23/06, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Could you define a few months? We're about to start a new project that may or may not use wicket 2.0 depending on the timetable. Thefirst release is scheduled in september. Is that to soon for areasonably stable wicket 2.0?Are there any simple issues that a non wicket export could help out with? /MatsOn 5/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we did communicate this... See Martijns mails and my replies on it over branching.. Ok, my email was explicitly about it though, AND additionally to wicket-user. Doesn't matter, it is communicated now for sure :) And if develop now something to get it into production in a few months you should stick to 1.2 But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related and that is no behaviour change.. So that shouldn't affect at all. as far as i can see now there is only one big code change: Converters that would affect the compile of code. Well, even the Java 5 stuff breaks code, and as we're also just half way implementing that, I suspect there will be a lot of bugs in it currently. And wicket-extensions and wicket-examples don't even compile currently. But that's hopefully fixed in a couple of days? For the rest only the default change of another kind of pagemap/session store is what needs to be tested but there are people that already tested that when it was in a branch (the clientsidestate branch) Also, I'd like to get rid of the pre-registration of package resources. And maybe backport that if that is done. Eelco --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ---Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
Johan Compagner schrieb: But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related [...] Yay! Generics and Covariant Return Types!! No more Castings! !WOOOT --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
And as always, ideas/ contributions/ patches of the brave are welcome! Eelco On 5/23/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Johan Compagner schrieb: But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related [...] Yay! Generics and Covariant Return Types!! No more Castings! !WOOOT --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
[Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
Hi all, We made a branch about two days ago for Wicket 1.2, which we'll use for maintaining 1.2. Trunk/ Head will be used for Wicket 2.0, and will be highly experimental for a while. What's currently in there can't even be used at all until we finish converting to generics. So, if you were working on head/ trunk, it's probably a good idea to either start working with distributions or on the 1.2. branch from now on. Sorry we didn't communicate this earlier. Regards, Eelco --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
we did communicate this... See Martijns mails and my replies on it over branching..And if develop now something to get it into production in a few months you should stick to 1.2But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related and that is no behaviour change.. So that shouldn't affect at all.as far as i can see now there is only one big code change: Converters that would affect the compile of code. For the rest only the default change of another kind of pagemap/session store is what needs to be testedbut there are people that already tested that when it was in a branch (the clientsidestate branch) So currently the changes looks big, but when we do the constructor change the effect will be much bigger.Who is going to do that?johanOn 5/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,We made a branch about two days ago for Wicket 1.2, which we'll usefor maintaining 1.2. Trunk/ Head will be used for Wicket 2.0, and willbe highly experimental for a while. What's currently in there can't even be used at all until we finish converting to generics.So, if you were working on head/ trunk, it's probably a good idea toeither start working with distributions or on the 1.2. branch from nowon. Sorry we didn't communicate this earlier. Regards,Eelco---Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimohttp://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
Re: [Wicket-user] WARNING: head/ trunk is highly experimental for a while
On 5/20/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we did communicate this... See Martijns mails and my replies on it over branching.. Ok, my email was explicitly about it though, AND additionally to wicket-user. Doesn't matter, it is communicated now for sure :) And if develop now something to get it into production in a few months you should stick to 1.2 But if it does take longer you could use trunk. It is now a fast moving target. But many of those changes are java 5 related and that is no behaviour change.. So that shouldn't affect at all. as far as i can see now there is only one big code change: Converters that would affect the compile of code. Well, even the Java 5 stuff breaks code, and as we're also just half way implementing that, I suspect there will be a lot of bugs in it currently. And wicket-extensions and wicket-examples don't even compile currently. But that's hopefully fixed in a couple of days? For the rest only the default change of another kind of pagemap/session store is what needs to be tested but there are people that already tested that when it was in a branch (the clientsidestate branch) Also, I'd like to get rid of the pre-registration of package resources. And maybe backport that if that is done. Eelco --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
