Re: [Wien] Ghost Band error

2022-05-19 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Prof. Blaha,

  Thank you for your advice Sir. Its running fine now.

with regards,

On Thu, 19 May 2022 at 21:55, Peter Blaha 
wrote:

> If you do it spin-polarized, create a proper case.inst file with
> non-magnetic Li, Sb and O, and only Co should be magnetic.
>
> instgen -ask
> init -sp -b ...
>
> Am 19.05.2022 um 10:56 schrieb shamik chakrabarti:
> > Dear Wien2k users,
> >
> >  I am trying to simulate the material as attached to
> > the email. I encountered Ghost Band error at the 2nd cycle. I have tried
> > to modify the case.in1 with the information obtained from case.scf2 up,
> > however without success. Please respond with the remedy.
> >
> > with regards,
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
> > Research Fellow
> > Department of Physics
> > Indian Institute of Technology Patna
> > Bihta-801103
> > Patna
> > Bihar, India
> >
> > ___
> > Wien mailing list
> > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
> --
> --
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
> Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
> WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
> -
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>


-- 
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Question about WIEN2k and paramagnetic system

2022-05-19 Thread xavier rocquefelte
In addition to the comments of Lyudmila and Peter I would add few 
questions:


- is your system intermetallic? (is your system both involving localized 
and delocalized states?)


- is the magnetic element based on 4f or 5f states? (require more than a 
single-determinant treatment but in some cases can be treated 
approximately using DFT+SO+U)


- which states are near the Fermi level?  (states of NM elements?)

- which simulated properties do not agree with experiments? (optical?)

Best regards
Xavier


On 19/05/2022 18:44, Lyudmila Dobysheva wrote:

19.05.2022 19:22, Tenzin, K. wrote:
I have a crystal system composed of three heavy atoms (minimum atomic 
number of 60), one of which has quite a large magnetic moment (about 
10) while the other two are non-magnetic.  Experimentally, the 
overall crystal is found to be paramagnetic but with quite large 
magnetic moments (about 10 as well) and it is speculated to be a weyl 
semimetal.
I performed DFT calculation for the crystal using wien2k (non 
spin-polarized with MBJLDA) and some calculated properties (such as 
quantum oscillation) do agree with experiments. But there are also 
some properties that do not agree with experiments.
So my question is how do I correctly model such a crystal system, 
paramagnetic with relatively large magnetic moment? Should I perform 
non spin-polarized calculation and later add external magnetic field, 
to mimic intrinsic magnetic moment, via -orb scheme?  Is it even 
possible to run_lapw -orb for non spin polarization calculation?


I'd say that making the common spin-polarized calculation should give 
you the magnetic moments, in ferromagnetic structure. To simulate 
paramagnetic, I'd construct antiferromagnetic arrangement and compare 
three energies: FM, AFM, and nonmagnetic NM which you have obtained. 
If the FM and AFM are closer to each other, as compared to the NM, you 
can think about this. For some systems the AFM is a good simulation of 
paramagnetism.


Best wishes
Lyudmila Dobysheva
--
http://ftiudm.ru/content/view/25/103/lang,english/
Institute of Physics and Technology,
Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Br. of Rus.Ac.Sci.
426000 Izhevsk Kirov str. 132
Russia
---
Tel. +7 (34I2)43-24-59 (office), +7 (9I2)OI9-795O (home)
Skype: lyuka18 (office), lyuka17 (home)
E-mail: lyuk...@mail.ru (office), lyuk...@gmail.com (home)
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--

Professeur des Universités de Rennes 1
Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes (ISCR)
Univ Rennes - CNRS - UMR6226, France
https://iscr.univ-rennes1.fr/xavier-rocquefelte


___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Question about WIEN2k and paramagnetic system

2022-05-19 Thread Peter Blaha

In addition to what Lyudmilla wrote:

heavy atoms:  spin-orbit could be very important.

TBmBJ: is usually for insulators, not for metals. In addition, its 
effect on 4f electrons is too weak.
You may consider   GGA+U or eventually mBJ+U, but since we have no 
details, 



Am 19.05.2022 um 18:44 schrieb Lyudmila Dobysheva:

19.05.2022 19:22, Tenzin, K. wrote:
I have a crystal system composed of three heavy atoms (minimum atomic 
number of 60), one of which has quite a large magnetic moment (about 
10) while the other two are non-magnetic.  Experimentally, the overall 
crystal is found to be paramagnetic but with quite large magnetic 
moments (about 10 as well) and it is speculated to be a weyl semimetal.
I performed DFT calculation for the crystal using wien2k (non 
spin-polarized with MBJLDA) and some calculated properties  (such as 
quantum oscillation) do agree with experiments. But there are also 
some properties that do not agree with experiments.
So my question is how do I correctly model such a crystal system, 
paramagnetic with relatively large magnetic moment? Should I perform 
non spin-polarized calculation and later add external magnetic field, 
to mimic intrinsic magnetic moment, via -orb scheme?  Is it even 
possible to run_lapw -orb for non spin polarization calculation?


I'd say that making the common spin-polarized calculation should give 
you the magnetic moments, in ferromagnetic structure. To simulate 
paramagnetic, I'd construct antiferromagnetic arrangement and compare 
three energies: FM, AFM, and nonmagnetic NM which you have obtained. If 
the FM and AFM are closer to each other, as compared to the NM, you can 
think about this. For some systems the AFM is a good simulation of 
paramagnetism.


Best wishes
Lyudmila Dobysheva
--
http://ftiudm.ru/content/view/25/103/lang,english/
Institute of Physics and Technology,
Udmurt Federal Research Center, Ural Br. of Rus.Ac.Sci.
426000 Izhevsk Kirov str. 132
Russia
---
Tel. +7 (34I2)43-24-59 (office), +7 (9I2)OI9-795O (home)
Skype: lyuka18 (office), lyuka17 (home)
E-mail: lyuk...@mail.ru (office), lyuk...@gmail.com (home)
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Ghost Band error

2022-05-19 Thread Peter Blaha
If you do it spin-polarized, create a proper case.inst file with 
non-magnetic Li, Sb and O, and only Co should be magnetic.


instgen -ask
init -sp -b ...

Am 19.05.2022 um 10:56 schrieb shamik chakrabarti:

Dear Wien2k users,

                     I am trying to simulate the material as attached to 
the email. I encountered Ghost Band error at the 2nd cycle. I have tried 
to modify the case.in1 with the information obtained from case.scf2 up, 
however without success. Please respond with the remedy.


with regards,

--
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300 FAX: +43-1-58801-165982
Email: bl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Question about WIEN2k and paramagnetic system

2022-05-19 Thread Tenzin, K.
Hello Experts
I am using WIEN2k_21.1 on the slurm cluster (intel) system.  I have a
question with regard to using WIEN2k and paramagnetic system as described
below:

I have a crystal system composed of three heavy atoms (minimum atomic
number of 60), one of which has quite a large magnetic moment (about 10)
while the other two are non-magnetic.  Experimentally, the overall crystal
is found to be paramagnetic but with quite large magnetic moments (about 10
as well) and it is speculated to be a weyl semimetal.
I performed DFT calculation for the crystal using wien2k (non
spin-polarized with MBJLDA) and some calculated properties  (such as
quantum oscillation) do agree with experiments. But there are also some
properties that do not agree with experiments.

So my question is how do I correctly model such a crystal system,
paramagnetic with relatively large magnetic moment? Should I perform non
spin-polarized calculation and later add external magnetic field, to mimic
intrinsic magnetic moment, via -orb scheme?  Is it even possible to
run_lapw -orb for non spin polarization calculation?

Your experience and suggestion will be highly valuable here.

Karma, PhD student
University of Groningen, Netherlands
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Ghost Band error

2022-05-19 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Wien2k users,

I am trying to simulate the material as attached to the
email. I encountered Ghost Band error at the 2nd cycle. I have tried to
modify the case.in1 with the information obtained from case.scf2 up,
however without success. Please respond with the remedy.

with regards,

-- 
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India


LiCo2SbO6_V.struct
Description: Binary data
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html