[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
When the EF WARNING occurs during the scf cycle, but not at the end, this is no problem. However, your lines: lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w are suspicious. You get only 25% of the CPU. lapw1 should finish after 14 min, but took almost one hour. Either 3 other jobs are running on this single cpu machine, or you run out of memory (you have very large system times !) and the machine pages. (Check with the top command during execution. If memory is all used, either reduce RKMAX or go to a different machine. I have tried again to run a regular LDA calculations. Again as in the LDA+U case, lapw2 takes very long time (calculating like 2 days already), and there is an interesting error: dayfile *** 0.461365296892454 211.90982969 212.16483888 lapw2 (15:34:45) WARNING: EF not accurate, new emin,emax,NE-min,NE-max 0.461365291265349 lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w cycle 1 (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) (1/99 to go) start (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) with lapw0 (1/99 to go) *** I have seen it before for this compound during earlier trials. In general, somehow this compound Gd5Si4 takes maybe 10 times longer to go through the initial lapw0, lapw1 cycles than other transition metal containing compounds I was calculating with about 10 times finer k-mesh! And sizes of the unit cells are roughly comparable. I have attached a scf2 file from this cycle. Gd5Si4_np_2nd.scf2 *** :GMA : POTENTIAL AND CHARGE CUT-OFF 12.00 Ry**.5 Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy: :BAN00204: 204 0.457469 0.458922 2. :BAN00205: 205 0.458380 0.459246 2. :BAN00206: 206 0.458579 0.459997 2. :BAN00207: 207 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00208: 208 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00209: 209 0.459929 0.460891 2. :BAN00210: 210 0.459944 0.460891 2. :BAN00211: 211 0.460551 0.461480 1.89644048 :BAN00212: 212 0.460552 0.461646 1.73748489 :BAN00213: 213 0.460552 0.462067 0.30738641 :BAN00214: 214 0.461259 0.462270 0.05869553 :BAN00215: 215 0.461611 0.462536 0. :BAN00216: 216 0.461611 0.462545 0. :BAN00217: 217 0.461923 0.462744 0. :BAN00218: 218 0.461923 0.462895 0. :BAN00219: 219 0.462510 0.463225 0. Energy to separate low and high energystates: 0.02312 :NOE : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS = 424.000 :FER : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)= 0.46137 *** Looking forward to your advises and ideas, Thank you, Volodymyr ___ Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien -- Peter Blaha Inst.Materials Chemistry TU Vienna Getreidemarkt 9 A-1060 Vienna Austria +43-1-5880115671
[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
Dear Prof. Blaha, Where can I find timings for parallel running programs? In my calculations I usually get such strings in case.dayfile: Summary of lapw1para: node-09-07k=0 user=0 wallclock=0 0.692u 1.028s 14:50.98 0.1% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w But this 'time' command output is for lapw1para script, not for actual lapw1c_mpi programs. The same situation is for lapw0/2. Thank you. Best regards, Maxim Rakitin Email: rms85 at physics.susu.ac.ru Web: http://www.susu.ac.ru 01.11.2010 11:48, Peter Blaha ?: When the EF WARNING occurs during the scf cycle, but not at the end, this is no problem. However, your lines: lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w are suspicious. You get only 25% of the CPU. lapw1 should finish after 14 min, but took almost one hour. Either 3 other jobs are running on this single cpu machine, or you run out of memory (you have very large system times !) and the machine pages. (Check with the top command during execution. If memory is all used, either reduce RKMAX or go to a different machine. I have tried again to run a regular LDA calculations. Again as in the LDA+U case, lapw2 takes very long time (calculating like 2 days already), and there is an interesting error: dayfile *** 0.461365296892454 211.90982969 212.16483888 lapw2 (15:34:45) WARNING: EF not accurate, new emin,emax,NE-min,NE-max 0.461365291265349 lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w cycle 1 (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) (1/99 to go) start (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) with lapw0 (1/99 to go) *** I have seen it before for this compound during earlier trials. In general, somehow this compound Gd5Si4 takes maybe 10 times longer to go through the initial lapw0, lapw1 cycles than other transition metal containing compounds I was calculating with about 10 times finer k-mesh! And sizes of the unit cells are roughly comparable. I have attached a scf2 file from this cycle. Gd5Si4_np_2nd.scf2 *** :GMA : POTENTIAL AND CHARGE CUT-OFF 12.00 Ry**.5 Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy: :BAN00204: 204 0.457469 0.458922 2. :BAN00205: 205 0.458380 0.459246 2. :BAN00206: 206 0.458579 0.459997 2. :BAN00207: 207 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00208: 208 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00209: 209 0.459929 0.460891 2. :BAN00210: 210 0.459944 0.460891 2. :BAN00211: 211 0.460551 0.461480 1.89644048 :BAN00212: 212 0.460552 0.461646 1.73748489 :BAN00213: 213 0.460552 0.462067 0.30738641 :BAN00214: 214 0.461259 0.462270 0.05869553 :BAN00215: 215 0.461611 0.462536 0. :BAN00216: 216 0.461611 0.462545 0. :BAN00217: 217 0.461923 0.462744 0. :BAN00218: 218 0.461923 0.462895 0. :BAN00219: 219 0.462510 0.463225 0. Energy to separate low and high energystates: 0.02312 :NOE : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS = 424.000 :FER : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)= 0.46137 *** Looking forward to your advises and ideas, Thank you, Volodymyr ___ Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/attachments/20101101/2d206f58/attachment.htm
[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
case.output1_1 or similar (depending on spin,...) Am 01.11.2010 09:40, schrieb Maxim Rakitin: Dear Prof. Blaha, Where can I find timings for parallel running programs? In my calculations I usually get such strings in case.dayfile: Summary of lapw1para: node-09-07 k=0 user=0 wallclock=0 0.692u 1.028s 14:50.98 0.1% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w But this 'time' command output is for lapw1para script, not for actual lapw1c_mpi programs. The same situation is for lapw0/2. Thank you. Best regards, Maxim Rakitin Email:rms85 at physics.susu.ac.ru Web:http://www.susu.ac.ru 01.11.2010 11:48, Peter Blaha ?: When the EF WARNING occurs during the scf cycle, but not at the end, this is no problem. However, your lines: lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w are suspicious. You get only 25% of the CPU. lapw1 should finish after 14 min, but took almost one hour. Either 3 other jobs are running on this single cpu machine, or you run out of memory (you have very large system times !) and the machine pages. (Check with the top command during execution. If memory is all used, either reduce RKMAX or go to a different machine. I have tried again to run a regular LDA calculations. Again as in the LDA+U case, lapw2 takes very long time (calculating like 2 days already), and there is an interesting error: dayfile *** 0.461365296892454 211.90982969 212.16483888 lapw2 (15:34:45) WARNING: EF not accurate, new emin,emax,NE-min,NE-max 0.461365291265349 lapw1 (14:40:19) 800.850u 14.192s 54:24.88 24.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw0 (14:37:49) 34.906u 4.344s 2:28.51 26.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w cycle 1 (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) (1/99 to go) start (Thu Oct 28 14:37:49 EDT 2010) with lapw0 (1/99 to go) *** I have seen it before for this compound during earlier trials. In general, somehow this compound Gd5Si4 takes maybe 10 times longer to go through the initial lapw0, lapw1 cycles than other transition metal containing compounds I was calculating with about 10 times finer k-mesh! And sizes of the unit cells are roughly comparable. I have attached a scf2 file from this cycle. Gd5Si4_np_2nd.scf2 *** :GMA : POTENTIAL AND CHARGE CUT-OFF 12.00 Ry**.5 Bandranges (emin - emax) and occupancy: :BAN00204: 204 0.457469 0.458922 2. :BAN00205: 205 0.458380 0.459246 2. :BAN00206: 206 0.458579 0.459997 2. :BAN00207: 207 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00208: 208 0.459122 0.460319 2. :BAN00209: 209 0.459929 0.460891 2. :BAN00210: 210 0.459944 0.460891 2. :BAN00211: 211 0.460551 0.461480 1.89644048 :BAN00212: 212 0.460552 0.461646 1.73748489 :BAN00213: 213 0.460552 0.462067 0.30738641 :BAN00214: 214 0.461259 0.462270 0.05869553 :BAN00215: 215 0.461611 0.462536 0. :BAN00216: 216 0.461611 0.462545 0. :BAN00217: 217 0.461923 0.462744 0. :BAN00218: 218 0.461923 0.462895 0. :BAN00219: 219 0.462510 0.463225 0. Energy to separate low and high energystates: 0.02312 :NOE : NUMBER OF ELECTRONS = 424.000 :FER : F E R M I - ENERGY(TETRAH.M.)= 0.46137 *** Looking forward to your advises and ideas, Thank you, Volodymyr ___ Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien ___ Wien mailing list Wien at zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien -- Peter Blaha Inst.Materials Chemistry TU Vienna Getreidemarkt 9 A-1060 Vienna Austria +43-1-5880115671
[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
The scf1 files look absolutely ok. However, previously you reported: the calculations freeze; now you report a: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred Stack trace terminated abnormally. without any further debugging output. (Did you compile with -traceback ??) I'd suggest tocheck compilation run x kgen and use fewer k-points for debugging start another scf cycle and ckeck if the problem happens again. maybe a problem with an overloaded NFS-filesystem ? -- P.Blaha -- Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna Phone: +43-1-58801-15671 FAX: +43-1-58801-15698 Email: blaha at theochem.tuwien.ac.atWWW: http://info.tuwien.ac.at/theochem/ --
[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
If the program hangs in lapw2, the program before lapw2 should be checked, i.e. scf1(up/dn) files should be examined. Are there reasonable eigenvalues ? Are the energy parameters reasonable ? To get an idea how far lapw2 comes: Edit uplapw2.def and change unit 6 to 66. Then run: lapw2 uplapw2.def This will direct the output2 file (unit 6) to your screen (without buffering), so you may find out where the program hangs. Am 23.10.2010 22:04, schrieb Volodymyr Svitlyk: Dear Wien2k community, With respect to my last question: http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/pipermail/wien/2010-October/013805.html I think it may be useful if I add struct and scf files. For spin-polarized case: Gd5Si4_sp.struct *** Gd5Si4_sp P LATTICE,NONEQUIV.ATOMS: 662_Pnma MODE OF CALC=RELA unit=ang 14.124386 27.878952 14.631021 90.00 90.00 90.00 ATOM -1: X=0.02881000 Y=0.59724000 Z=0.18263000 MULT= 8 ISPLIT= 8 -1: X=0.97119000 Y=0.40276000 Z=0.81737000 -1: X=0.52881000 Y=0.59724000 Z=0.31737000 -1: X=0.47119000 Y=0.40276000 Z=0.68263000 -1: X=0.47119000 Y=0.09724000 Z=0.68263000 -1: X=0.52881000 Y=0.90276000 Z=0.31737000 -1: X=0.97119000 Y=0.09724000 Z=0.81737000 -1: X=0.02881000 Y=0.90276000 Z=0.18263000 Gd1 NPT= 781 R0=0.1000 RMT= 2.5000 Z: 64.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 ATOM -2: X=0.31646000 Y=0.12238000 Z=0.17964000 MULT= 8 ISPLIT= 8 -2: X=0.68354000 Y=0.87762000 Z=0.82036000 -2: X=0.81646000 Y=0.12238000 Z=0.32036000 -2: X=0.18354000 Y=0.87762000 Z=0.67964000 -2: X=0.18354000 Y=0.62238000 Z=0.67964000 -2: X=0.81646000 Y=0.37762000 Z=0.32036000 -2: X=0.68354000 Y=0.62238000 Z=0.82036000 -2: X=0.31646000 Y=0.37762000 Z=0.17964000 Gd2 NPT= 781 R0=0.1000 RMT= 2.5000 Z: 64.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 ATOM -3: X=0.1444 Y=0.2500 Z=0.51113000 MULT= 4 ISPLIT= 8 -3: X=0.8556 Y=0.7500 Z=0.48887000 -3: X=0.6444 Y=0.2500 Z=0.98887000 -3: X=0.3556 Y=0.7500 Z=0.01113000 Gd3 NPT= 781 R0=0.1000 RMT= 2.5000 Z: 64.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 ATOM -4: X=0.1439 Y=0.0400 Z=0.4723 MULT= 8 ISPLIT= 8 -4: X=0.8561 Y=0.9600 Z=0.5277 -4: X=0.6439 Y=0.0400 Z=0.0277 -4: X=0.3561 Y=0.9600 Z=0.9723 -4: X=0.3561 Y=0.5400 Z=0.9723 -4: X=0.6439 Y=0.4600 Z=0.0277 -4: X=0.8561 Y=0.5400 Z=0.5277 -4: X=0.1439 Y=0.4600 Z=0.4723 Si1 NPT= 781 R0=0.0001 RMT= 2.3300 Z: 14.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 ATOM -5: X=0.0214 Y=0.2500 Z=0.0996 MULT= 4 ISPLIT= 8 -5: X=0.9786 Y=0.7500 Z=0.9004 -5: X=0.5214 Y=0.2500 Z=0.4004 -5: X=0.4786 Y=0.7500 Z=0.5996 Si2 NPT= 781 R0=0.0001 RMT= 2.3300 Z: 14.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 ATOM -6: X=0.2590 Y=0.2500 Z=0.8753 MULT= 4 ISPLIT= 8 -6: X=0.7410 Y=0.7500 Z=0.1247 -6: X=0.7590 Y=0.2500 Z=0.6247 -6: X=0.2410 Y=0.7500 Z=0.3753 Si3 NPT= 781 R0=0.0001 RMT= 2.3300 Z: 14.0 LOCAL ROT MATRIX: 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 8 NUMBER OF SYMMETRY OPERATIONS -1 0 0 0. 0-1 0 0. 0 0-1 0. 1 1 0 0 0. 0 1 0 0. 0 0 1 0. 2 -1 0 0 0.5000 0-1 0 0. 0 0 1 0.5000 3 -1 0 0 0. 0 1 0 0.5000 0 0-1 0. 4 -1 0 0 0.5000 0 1 0 0.5000 0 0 1 0.5000 5 1 0 0 0.5000 0-1 0 0.5000 0 0-1 0.5000 6 1 0 0 0. 0-1 0 0.5000 0 0 1 0. 7 1 0 0 0.5000 0 1 0 0. 0 0-1 0.5000 8 *** Gd5Si4_sp.scf file just has three labels with a folder name, time and a path to the Wien2k program Gd5Si4_sp.scf0 *** - :ITE001: 1. ITERATION - :NATO : 6 INDEPENDENT AND 36 TOTAL ATOMS IN UNITCELL SUBSTANCE: Gd5Si4_sp LATTICE = P :POT : POTENTIAL OPTION 13 :LAT : LATTICE CONSTANTS= 14.12439 27.87895 14.63102 1.571 1.571 1.571 :VOL : UNIT CELL VOLUME = 5761.30219 MODE OF CALCULATION IS = RELA SPINPOLARIZED CALCULATION :IFFT : FFT-parameters: 108 216 120 Factor: 2.00 ATOMNUMBER= 1 Gd1 VCOUL-ZERO = 0.33143E+00 :EFG001: EFG = -0.01719 *10**21 V / m**2 V20 TOT/SRF= 0.00069 0.00327 V22 TOT/SRF= 0.8 -0.00068 V22M TOT/SRF= -0.00231 -0.00731 V21 TOT/SRF= -0.01531
[Wien] Gd5Si4 calculations freeze
Dear Wien2k community, I have been trying to perform spin-polarized and non-spin-polarized calculations for the ferromagnetic Gd5Si4. No success in either case, calculations freeze. I use WIEN2k_10.1 (Release 7/6/2010) For the spin-polarized case I use LDA+U, input values are default: Gd5Si4_sp.in1 WFFIL EF= 0.5 (WFFIL, WFPRI, ENFIL, SUPWF) 7.00 104 (R-MT*K-MAX; MAX L IN WF, V-NMT 0.306 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 0 -3.43 0.001 STOP 1 1 -1.67 0.002 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 30.30 0.005 CONT 1 20.30 0.005 CONT 1 0.306 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 0 -3.43 0.001 STOP 1 1 -1.67 0.002 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 30.30 0.005 CONT 1 20.30 0.005 CONT 1 0.306 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 0 -3.43 0.001 STOP 1 1 -1.67 0.002 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 30.30 0.005 CONT 1 20.30 0.005 CONT 1 0.302 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 0.302 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 0.302 0 (GLOBAL E-PARAMETER WITH n OTHER CHOICES, global APW/LAPW) 00.30 0.000 CONT 1 10.30 0.000 CONT 1 K-VECTORS FROM UNIT:4 -9.0 2.5 853 emin/emax/nband Gd5Si4_sp.in2 TOT (TOT,FOR,QTL,EFG,FERMI) -12.0 424.0 0.50 0.05EMIN, NE, ESEPERMIN, ESEPER0 TETRA0.000 (GAUSS,ROOT,TEMP,TETRA,ALL eval) 0 0 1 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 1 -2 1 2 2 -2 2 3 0 3 1 -3 1 3 2 -3 2 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 1 -4 1 4 2 -4 2 4 3 -4 3 4 4 -4 4 5 0 5 1 -5 1 5 2 -5 2 5 3 -5 3 5 4 -5 4 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 1 -6 1 6 2 -6 2 6 3 -6 3 6 4 -6 4 6 5 -6 5 6 6 -6 6 0 0 1 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 1 -2 1 2 2 -2 2 3 0 3 1 -3 1 3 2 -3 2 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 1 -4 1 4 2 -4 2 4 3 -4 3 4 4 -4 4 5 0 5 1 -5 1 5 2 -5 2 5 3 -5 3 5 4 -5 4 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 1 -6 1 6 2 -6 2 6 3 -6 3 6 4 -6 4 6 5 -6 5 6 6 -6 6 0 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 2 -2 2 3 1 -3 1 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 2 -4 2 4 4 -4 4 5 1 -5 1 5 3 -5 3 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 2 -6 2 6 4 -6 4 6 6 -6 6 0 0 1 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 1 -2 1 2 2 -2 2 3 0 3 1 -3 1 3 2 -3 2 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 1 -4 1 4 2 -4 2 4 3 -4 3 4 4 -4 4 5 0 5 1 -5 1 5 2 -5 2 5 3 -5 3 5 4 -5 4 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 1 -6 1 6 2 -6 2 6 3 -6 3 6 4 -6 4 6 5 -6 5 6 6 -6 6 0 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 2 -2 2 3 1 -3 1 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 2 -4 2 4 4 -4 4 5 1 -5 1 5 3 -5 3 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 2 -6 2 6 4 -6 4 6 6 -6 6 0 0 1 1 -1 1 2 0 2 2 -2 2 3 1 -3 1 3 3 -3 3 4 0 4 2 -4 2 4 4 -4 4 5 1 -5 1 5 3 -5 3 5 5 -5 5 6 0 6 2 -6 2 6 4 -6 4 6 6 -6 6 12.00 GMAX NOFILEFILE/NOFILE write recprlist and the custom files: Gd5Si4_sp.inorb 1 3 0 nmod, natorb, ipr PRATT, 1.0 mixmod, amix 1 1 3 iatom nlorb, lorb 2 1 3 iatom nlorb, lorb 3 1 3 iatom nlorb, lorb 1 nsic 0.44 0.0 U J 0.44 0.0 U J 0.44 0.0 U J Gd5Si4_sp.indm -9. Emin cutoff energy 3 number of atoms for which density matrix is calculated 1 1 3 index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1 2 1 3 dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times 3 1 3 dtto for 2nd atom, repeat NATOM times 0 0 r-index, (l,s)index no spin-orbit coupling was activated. Calculation freeze (stays about 24 hours) at lapw2, had to kill the process. dayfile: lapw2 -up (13:39:31)lapw1 -dn -orb (12:29:19) 4080.727u 128.440s 1:10:11.36 99.9%0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w lapw1 -up -orb (11:19:58) 4017.419u
