Re: [Wien] Query regarding settings of Rmt*Kmax

2024-03-11 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Thank you Sir. I got it! I should put 4.98 for LiAB2.

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 19:21, Peter Blaha  wrote:

> Putting RKmax=5 is almost right. Actually you should even put it
> accurately to 2 digits after the comma.
>
> Am 11.03.2024 um 14:15 schrieb shamik chakrabarti:
> > Dear Wien2k users,
> >
> >  I am trying to calculate lithiation voltage
> > of AB2 compound. For that I have two optimized structures of AB2 &
> > LiAB2. Now, the minimum Rmt at AB2 is 1.8 & hence if I put Rmt*Kmax=7,
> > it would give Kmax 3.89. Again, the minimum Rmt of Li in LiAB2 is 1.28.
> > Hence, with Rmt*Kmax=7 this would give Kmax 5.46, a huge mismatch with
> > AB2. However, if I put Rmt*Kmax=5 I will get comparative Kmax 3.91.
> >
> > Hence, my query, is it proper that I use Rmt*Kmax 7 for AB2 while use
> > Rmt*Kmax 5 or LiAB2 for simulating lithiation voltage?
> >
> > Eagerly waiting for a response,
> >
> > with regards,
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
> > Research Fellow
> > Department of Physics
> > Indian Institute of Technology Patna
> > Bihta-801103
> > Patna
> > Bihar, India
> >
> > ___
> > Wien mailing list
> > Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> > http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> > SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
> --
> --
> Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
> Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
> Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
> WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
> -
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>


-- 
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Query regarding settings of Rmt*Kmax

2024-03-11 Thread Peter Blaha
Putting RKmax=5 is almost right. Actually you should even put it 
accurately to 2 digits after the comma.


Am 11.03.2024 um 14:15 schrieb shamik chakrabarti:

Dear Wien2k users,

     I am trying to calculate lithiation voltage 
of AB2 compound. For that I have two optimized structures of AB2 & 
LiAB2. Now, the minimum Rmt at AB2 is 1.8 & hence if I put Rmt*Kmax=7, 
it would give Kmax 3.89. Again, the minimum Rmt of Li in LiAB2 is 1.28. 
Hence, with Rmt*Kmax=7 this would give Kmax 5.46, a huge mismatch with 
AB2. However, if I put Rmt*Kmax=5 I will get comparative Kmax 3.91.


Hence, my query, is it proper that I use Rmt*Kmax 7 for AB2 while use 
Rmt*Kmax 5 or LiAB2 for simulating lithiation voltage?


Eagerly waiting for a response,

with regards,

--
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


--
--
Peter BLAHA, Inst.f. Materials Chemistry, TU Vienna, A-1060 Vienna
Phone: +43-1-58801-165300
Email: peter.bl...@tuwien.ac.atWIEN2k: http://www.wien2k.at
WWW:   http://www.imc.tuwien.ac.at
-
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Query regarding settings of Rmt*Kmax

2024-03-11 Thread shamik chakrabarti
Dear Wien2k users,

I am trying to calculate lithiation voltage of
AB2 compound. For that I have two optimized structures of AB2 & LiAB2. Now,
the minimum Rmt at AB2 is 1.8 & hence if I put Rmt*Kmax=7, it would give
Kmax 3.89. Again, the minimum Rmt of Li in LiAB2 is 1.28. Hence, with
Rmt*Kmax=7 this would give Kmax 5.46, a huge mismatch with AB2. However, if
I put Rmt*Kmax=5 I will get comparative Kmax 3.91.

Hence, my query, is it proper that I use Rmt*Kmax 7 for AB2 while use
Rmt*Kmax 5 or LiAB2 for simulating lithiation voltage?

Eagerly waiting for a response,

with regards,

-- 
Dr. Shamik Chakrabarti
Research Fellow
Department of Physics
Indian Institute of Technology Patna
Bihta-801103
Patna
Bihar, India
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html