Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

2019-04-19 Thread Wien2k User
that's exactly what I need as information, thank you very much

Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 18:07, delamora  a écrit :

> Free electrons do not contribute to the magnetic moment, this magnetic
> moment is due to localized electrons around atoms, but go out of the MT
> sphere.
>
> --
> *De:* Wien  en nombre de Wien2k
> User 
> *Enviado:* viernes, 19 de abril de 2019 07:01 a. m.
> *Para:* A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
> *Asunto:* Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment
>
> i have a metal but I also want to interpret the value of the interstitial
> moment and say that it is because of the mettalic behavior? is it true or
> not? otherwise I have verfier the strcture of band and I have a metal.
>
> Thank you
>
> Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 13:34, Laurence Marks  a
> écrit :
>
> No it does not.
>
> To work out what is going on *you* (note bold) should look at the DOS
> and/or the output files, in particular case.scf2up/dn and case.scfm.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Wien2k User 
> wrote:
>
> Dear WIEN2k users;
>
> does a relatively large value (1muB-2muB) of the interstitial magnetic
> moment mean a metallic behavior of the material as a result of the presence
> of electrons in this region? if it is no, what is the origin of this value?
>
>
>
> --
> Professor Laurence Marks
> "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
> else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
> www.numis.northwestern.edu ; Corrosion in 4D:
> MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
> Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, www.cfw.org/100-percent
> Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

2019-04-19 Thread delamora
Free electrons do not contribute to the magnetic moment, this magnetic moment 
is due to localized electrons around atoms, but go out of the MT sphere.


De: Wien  en nombre de Wien2k User 

Enviado: viernes, 19 de abril de 2019 07:01 a. m.
Para: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Asunto: Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

i have a metal but I also want to interpret the value of the interstitial 
moment and say that it is because of the mettalic behavior? is it true or not? 
otherwise I have verfier the strcture of band and I have a metal.

Thank you

Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 13:34, Laurence Marks 
mailto:l-ma...@northwestern.edu>> a écrit :
No it does not.

To work out what is going on you (note bold) should look at the DOS and/or the 
output files, in particular case.scf2up/dn and case.scfm.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Wien2k User 
mailto:wien2k.u...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear WIEN2k users;

does a relatively large value (1muB-2muB) of the interstitial magnetic moment 
mean a metallic behavior of the material as a result of the presence of 
electrons in this region? if it is no, what is the origin of this value?


--
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else 
has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu<http://www.numis.northwestern.edu> ; Corrosion in 
4D: MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu<http://MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu>
Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, 
www.cfw.org/100-percent<http://www.cfw.org/100-percent>
Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at<mailto:Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at>
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

2019-04-19 Thread Wien2k User
i have a metal but I also want to interpret the value of the interstitial
moment and say that it is because of the mettalic behavior? is it true or
not? otherwise I have verfier the strcture of band and I have a metal.

Thank you

Le ven. 19 avr. 2019 à 13:34, Laurence Marks  a
écrit :

> No it does not.
>
> To work out what is going on *you* (note bold) should look at the DOS
> and/or the output files, in particular case.scf2up/dn and case.scfm.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Wien2k User 
> wrote:
>
>> Dear WIEN2k users;
>>
>> does a relatively large value (1muB-2muB) of the interstitial magnetic
>> moment mean a metallic behavior of the material as a result of the presence
>> of electrons in this region? if it is no, what is the origin of this value?
>>
>
>
> --
> Professor Laurence Marks
> "Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
> else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
> www.numis.northwestern.edu ; Corrosion in 4D:
> MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
> Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, www.cfw.org/100-percent
> Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
> ___
> Wien mailing list
> Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
> http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
> SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html
>
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

2019-04-19 Thread Laurence Marks
No it does not.

To work out what is going on *you* (note bold) should look at the DOS
and/or the output files, in particular case.scf2up/dn and case.scfm.

On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Wien2k User  wrote:

> Dear WIEN2k users;
>
> does a relatively large value (1muB-2muB) of the interstitial magnetic
> moment mean a metallic behavior of the material as a result of the presence
> of electrons in this region? if it is no, what is the origin of this value?
>


-- 
Professor Laurence Marks
"Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody
else has thought", Albert Szent-Gyorgi
www.numis.northwestern.edu ; Corrosion in 4D: MURI4D.numis.northwestern.edu
Partner of the CFW 100% program for gender equity, www.cfw.org/100-percent
Co-Editor, Acta Cryst A
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] Interstitial magnetic moment

2019-04-19 Thread Wien2k User
Dear WIEN2k users;

does a relatively large value (1muB-2muB) of the interstitial magnetic
moment mean a metallic behavior of the material as a result of the presence
of electrons in this region? if it is no, what is the origin of this value?
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] interstitial magnetic moment in AFM calculations

2015-04-15 Thread Yin, Weiguo
Dear WIEN developers and users:

[Questions] 
Why wasn't the interstitial magnetic moment (MMINT) constrained to zero in 
runafm_lapw calculations?
Is this a bug in runafm_lapw or something else?

[Symptoms]
- I am running wien2k_14.2 on a linux cluster with ifort_12.1.3 compiler plus 
MKL.
- All my calculations converged to -cc 0.0001 and -ec 0.5. 
- The purpose of my calculations is to test runafm_lapw.
- During init_lapw, afminput was run successfully and a correct case.inclmcopy 
was generated.

Test 1:
- After runafm_lapw, all atomic magnetic moments meet the AFM requirement, 
e.g., 
MMI001=3, MMI002=-3, MMI003=0...   So far, it seems perfect. 
- The problem is the existence of substantial interstitial magnetic moment:
   MMINT=-1,ENE= -43408.62068 
- runsp_lapw *subsequently* converged to a metastable ferrimagnetic state:
   MMI001=1.9, MMI002=-2.3, MMINT=0.1,   ENE= -43407.99546

Test 2:
- runsp_lapw from A to Z (without runafm_lapw) converged to a nearly true AFM 
state with
   MMI001=1.43896, MMI002=-1.43882, MMINT=0.5,ENE=-43408.34858
  which is about 30meV per magnetic atom lower in energy than the nonmagnetic 
state (ENE=-43408.33109).

Test 3:
- Then, runafm_lapw starting from the nearly true AFM state obtained in Test 2, 
the results of Test 1 were reproduced.

Regards,
Weiguo Yin
Condensed Matter Theory Group
Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, New York 11973-5000
USA
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] interstitial magnetic moment in AFM calculations

2015-04-15 Thread Peter Blaha

Seems your case.inclmcopy file is NOT correct.

In some cases the opposite can happen, namely that runsp yields a 
ferrimagnetic state, but runafm must yield :MMTOT=0 (when the inclmcopy 
file is correct).


However, I do not really understand your messages about MMI001=3 (it is 
never integer inside the atomic spheres) and you did not report :MMTOT.


Am 15.04.2015 um 21:07 schrieb Yin, Weiguo:

Dear WIEN developers and users:

[Questions]
Why wasn't the interstitial magnetic moment (MMINT) constrained to zero in 
runafm_lapw calculations?
Is this a bug in runafm_lapw or something else?

[Symptoms]
- I am running wien2k_14.2 on a linux cluster with ifort_12.1.3 compiler plus 
MKL.
- All my calculations converged to -cc 0.0001 and -ec 0.5.
- The purpose of my calculations is to test runafm_lapw.
- During init_lapw, afminput was run successfully and a correct case.inclmcopy 
was generated.

Test 1:
- After runafm_lapw, all atomic magnetic moments meet the AFM requirement, e.g.,
 MMI001=3, MMI002=-3, MMI003=0...   So far, it seems perfect.
- The problem is the existence of substantial interstitial magnetic moment:
MMINT=-1,ENE= -43408.62068
- runsp_lapw *subsequently* converged to a metastable ferrimagnetic state:
MMI001=1.9, MMI002=-2.3, MMINT=0.1,   ENE= -43407.99546

Test 2:
- runsp_lapw from A to Z (without runafm_lapw) converged to a nearly true AFM 
state with
MMI001=1.43896, MMI002=-1.43882, MMINT=0.5,ENE=-43408.34858
   which is about 30meV per magnetic atom lower in energy than the nonmagnetic 
state (ENE=-43408.33109).

Test 3:
- Then, runafm_lapw starting from the nearly true AFM state obtained in Test 2, 
the results of Test 1 were reproduced.

Regards,
Weiguo Yin
Condensed Matter Theory Group
Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, New York 11973-5000
USA
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html



--
Peter Blaha
Inst.Materials Chemistry
TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9
A-1060 Vienna
Austria
+43-1-5880115671
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html