Re: [Wien] new mBJ parameters (PHYSICAL REVIEW B99, 035139 (2019))

2019-11-08 Thread Tran, Fabien
Hi,

Don't use these parameters with WIEN2k, because they were

proposed to be used with pseudo-potentials codes and are not adapted

for all-electron codes like WIEN2k. If you want to study perovskites, then

use the parameters of Jishi et al. (option 4) that you already know.


FT



From: Wien  on behalf of Dr. K. C. 
Bhamu 
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 1:36 PM
To: A Mailing list for WIEN2k users
Subject: [Wien] new mBJ parameters (PHYSICAL REVIEW B99, 035139 (2019))

Dear Dr. Tran,

I found a RRB paper [1] where the authors have re-parameterized the c parameter.

cfit=2.2507?0.03376L (L=0 for 3D systems).

As we need A,B,e and c to do a mBJ calculation.
Could you please estimate and tell us (or add one more mBJ option in Wien2K) 
the values of above parameters from this paper?
[1]. https://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035139

regards
Bhamu

___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


[Wien] new mBJ parameters (PHYSICAL REVIEW B99, 035139 (2019))

2019-11-08 Thread Dr. K. C. Bhamu
Dear Dr. Tran,

I found a RRB paper [1] where the authors have re-parameterized the c
parameter.

cfit=2.2507−0.03376L (L=0 for 3D systems).

As we need A,B,e and c to do a mBJ calculation.
Could you please estimate and tell us (or add one more mBJ option in
Wien2K) the values of above parameters from this paper?
[1]. https://journals.aps.org/prb/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035139

regards
Bhamu
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html