Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-13 Thread Peter Blaha
You are absolutely correct, also the magnetic field breaks periodic 
symmetry. In addition, it is even much MORE complicated than an electric 
field, because it is gauge-dependent, (origin) 


The magnetic field acts an both, the spins (via Vxc up/dn, and this is 
included correctly), and on the orbitals, introducing an orbital current 
and a resulting magnetic field.
The latter is included in this option only in a single site central 
field (atomic) approximation in a VERY crude way.


I don't know if this approximation is good enough to give you at least 
roughly the effect you are looking for. Don't expect quantitative 
agreement at all.


PS: In the new NMR code, we apply a magnetic field rigorously, but I'm 
afraid only the effect on the wavefunctions (and the resulting current) 
is calculated, but not a change of eigenvalues.


Robert: can you comment on that ??



--
Dears Prof. Blaha and Martin Pieper

Thanking you for your reply again

Sorry, my mistake. I thought you are using an electric field.

I studied the PRB. 63 165205 (2001) paper, that is about the electric 
field case.


In this paper has been noticed that:

“A general problem in calculating crystal properties in an external 
electric field is that the total potential V =V_int +V_ext  in the 
Hamiltonian” (equation 1)” is no longer periodic. V_int  is the periodic 
potential caused by all charged particles within the crystal, while 
V_ext is the external potential from external charges (outside the 
crystal). The translational symmetry of the wave function is broken and 
from this point of view the solid is no longer an ideal crystal. A 
locally homogeneous external electric field may be simulated by 
introducing a potential with a period several times the lattice 
parameters of the crystal”




And in the section V (DFT CALCULATIONS)

We can see that a supercell and periodic potential to maintain periodic 
boundary condition have been used as V_ext where its Fourier summation 
is Eq.12.


My questions are

Does the external magnetic field change the periodic boundary conditions 
similar to the electric field?


If it does, why do we use the unit cell ?

If it doesn’t, what is the difference between electric and magnetic field?


--
Peter Blaha
Inst.Materials Chemistry
TU Vienna
Getreidemarkt 9
A-1060 Vienna
Austria
+43-1-5880115671
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:  
http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html


Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-11 Thread Peter Blaha

Sorry, my mistake. I thought you are using an electric field.

As was said before, you need bigger fields

Am 10.07.2013 19:12, schrieb majid yazdani:

Dears Prof. Blaha and Martin Pieper

Thanks for your reply

I use the unit cell for my calculations. Is this similar to the electric field?

When I grep the MMTOT see that it changes. But I want to see the electronic 
structure changes.

When I use this method for other cases in both FM and AFM phases that according 
to the experimental results their Fermi surfaces and DOS’s must be changed in 
the presence
of the magnetic field I don’t see any change.

Thanking you

M. Yazdani

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Majid Yazdani Kachoei,

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,

University of Isfahan (UI), Hezar Gerib Avenue,

81744 Isfahan, Iran.



On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Peter Blaha pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at 
mailto:pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote:

And:  did you use a supercell ???

The field is of zig-zag shape to have periodic boundary conditions.


On 07/10/2013 05:06 PM, pieper wrote:

Dear Majid Yazdani,

since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic
field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess
is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are
VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T
field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment?
(grep :MMI *.scf)

Best regards

Martin Pieper



Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:

Dear WIEN2k authors and users

I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
the electronic structure of my case.

I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for 
the
orb program:

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

3  1  0 nmod, natorb, ipr

PRATT  1.0  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

1 1 3   iatom nlorb, lorb

60.

0. 0. 1.

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

-9.  Emin cutoff energy

  1   number of atoms for which density matrix 
is
calculated

  1  1  3  index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

  0 0   r-index, (l,s)index

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

And the section of the  log:

(runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006 (x) lapw0 -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -up

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -dn

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) mixer -orb

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

output files of the orb are:

  [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

  Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up

  Type of potential:Interaction with Bext

  Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

   end of OP input

 Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

  STRUCT file read



  Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

  angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 
deg



   natom   1

   No old potential found



  Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

  angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg





   Atom   1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
-0.00026   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0  -0.00051   0.0

 

Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-10 Thread pieper

Dear Majid Yazdani,

since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic 
field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess 
is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are 
VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T 
field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment? 
(grep :MMI *.scf)


Best regards

Martin Pieper



Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:

Dear WIEN2k authors and users

I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
the electronic structure of my case.

I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for the
orb program:

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

3  1  0 nmod, natorb, ipr

PRATT  1.0  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

1 1 3   iatom nlorb, lorb

60.

0. 0. 1.

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

-9.  Emin cutoff energy

 1   number of atoms for which density matrix is 
calculated


 1  1  3  index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

 0 0   r-index, (l,s)index 

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

And the section of the  log:

   (runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006 (x) lapw0 -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -up

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -dn

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) mixer -orb

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

output files of the orb are:

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up 

 Type of potential:    Interaction with Bext   

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

    Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read

 

 Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg

 

  natom   1

  No old potential found

 

 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg

 

 

  Atom   1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0 
-0.00026   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0  -0.00051   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0  -0.00077

 

  Potential imaginary part (Ry)

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbdn

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: down

 Type of potential:    Interaction with Bext    

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

    Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read

 

 Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg

 

  natom   1

  No old potential found

 

 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg

 

 

  Atom   1  spin down potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0  
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   

Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-10 Thread Peter Blaha

And:  did you use a supercell ???

The field is of zig-zag shape to have periodic boundary conditions.

On 07/10/2013 05:06 PM, pieper wrote:

Dear Majid Yazdani,

since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic
field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess
is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are
VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T
field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment?
(grep :MMI *.scf)

Best regards

Martin Pieper



Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:

Dear WIEN2k authors and users

I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
the electronic structure of my case.

I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for the
orb program:

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

3  1  0 nmod, natorb, ipr

PRATT  1.0  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

1 1 3   iatom nlorb, lorb

60.

0. 0. 1.

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

-9.  Emin cutoff energy

 1   number of atoms for which density matrix is
calculated

 1  1  3  index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

 0 0   r-index, (l,s)index

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

And the section of the  log:

   (runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006 (x) lapw0 -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -up

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -dn

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) mixer -orb

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

output files of the orb are:

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up

 Type of potential:Interaction with Bext

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read



 Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg



  natom   1

  No old potential found



 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg





  Atom   1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
-0.00026   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0  -0.00051   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0  -0.00077



  Potential imaginary part (Ry)

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbdn

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: down

 Type of potential:Interaction with Bext

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read



 Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg



  natom   1

  No old potential found



 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg





  Atom   1  spin down potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_-1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   

Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-10 Thread majid yazdani
Dears Prof. Blaha and Martin Pieper

Thanks for your reply

I use the unit cell for my calculations. Is this similar to the electric
field?

When I grep the MMTOT see that it changes. But I want to see the electronic
structure changes.

When I use this method for other cases in both FM and AFM phases that
according to the experimental results their Fermi surfaces and DOS’s must
be changed in the presence of the magnetic field I don’t see any change.

Thanking you

M. Yazdani

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Majid Yazdani Kachoei,

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,

University of Isfahan (UI), Hezar Gerib Avenue,

81744 Isfahan, Iran.


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Peter Blaha
pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.atwrote:

 And:  did you use a supercell ???

 The field is of zig-zag shape to have periodic boundary conditions.


 On 07/10/2013 05:06 PM, pieper wrote:

 Dear Majid Yazdani,

 since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic
 field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess
 is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are
 VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T
 field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment?
 (grep :MMI *.scf)

 Best regards

 Martin Pieper



 Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:

 Dear WIEN2k authors and users

 I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
 the electronic structure of my case.

 I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
 magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for the
 orb program:

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

 3  1  0 nmod, natorb, ipr

 PRATT  1.0  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

 1 1 3   iatom nlorb, lorb

 60.

 0. 0. 1.

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

 -9.  Emin cutoff energy

  1   number of atoms for which density matrix is
 calculated

  1  1  3  index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

  0 0   r-index, (l,s)index

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$

 And the section of the  log:

(runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006 (x) lapw0 -p

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -up -p

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -dn -p

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -up -p

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -dn -p

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -up

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -dn

 Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) mixer -orb

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$

 output files of the orb are:

  [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

  Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up

  Type of potential:Interaction with Bext

  Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

   end of OP input

 Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

  STRUCT file read



  Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

  angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg



   natom   1

   No old potential found



  Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

  angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg





   Atom   1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 -0.00026   0.0   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0  -0.00051   0.0

 :VORBr  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0  -0.00077



   Potential imaginary part (Ry)

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M= -3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 :VORBi  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 0.0   0.0   0.0

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbdn

  Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: down

  Type of potential:Interaction with Bext

  Vorb 

Re: [Wien] extrnal magnetic field effect

2013-07-10 Thread pieper

Dear Majid Yazdani.

As for the unit cell: I never did the Ce example, but you should 
consider how the field you applied fits into local symmetries.


As for the electronic structure changes: Apply a field B0 large enough 
to have g*mu_B*B0  E_convergence of your SCF. When you calculate the 
field you might want to thank Peter Blaha that fields of that size are 
so cheap in Wien2k. Then blow up the resolution in your DOS-plot when 
you look for field effects.


As for the changes in the DOS of FM and AFM phases I am not sure what 
exactly you mean. Experimental results or DFT calculations? Materials 
with a field induced magnetic transition?


Good luck

Martin Pieper


Am 10.07.2013 19:12, schrieb majid yazdani:

Dears Prof. Blaha and Martin Pieper

Thanks for your reply

I use the unit cell for my calculations. Is this similar to the 
electric field?


When I grep the MMTOT see that it changes. But I want to see the
electronic structure changes.

When I use this method for other cases in both FM and AFM phases that
according to the experimental results their Fermi surfaces and DOS’s
must be changed in the presence of the magnetic field I don’t see any
change.

Thanking you

M. Yazdani

/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Majid Yazdani Kachoei,

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,

University of Isfahan (UI), Hezar Gerib Avenue,

81744 Isfahan, Iran.

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Peter Blaha
pbl...@theochem.tuwien.ac.at wrote:

And:  did you use a supercell ???

The field is of zig-zag shape to have periodic boundary conditions.

On 07/10/2013 05:06 PM, pieper wrote:
Dear Majid Yazdani,

since you indicate that you are looking for effects of the magnetic
field in the DOS, or maybe in a spaghetti band structure plot, my guess
is that you are looking in the wrong place. The energy differences are
VERY small (calculate the energy of a moment of 1 Bohr magneton in 60 T
field in Ry units). Do you see an effect in, say, the local Ce-moment?
(grep :MMI *.scf)

Best regards

Martin Pieper

Am 10.07.2013 15:54, schrieb majid yazdani:
Dear WIEN2k authors and users

I’m trying to calculate the effect of the external magnetic filed on
the electronic structure of my case.

I follow section 7.2 of the users guide and apply the 60 T external
magnetic field on the gamma-Ce as test with these input files for the
orb program:

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.inorb

3  1  0                     nmod, natorb, ipr

PRATT  1.0                  BROYD/PRATT, mixing

1 1 3                       iatom nlorb, lorb

60.

0. 0. 1.

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.indm

-9.                      Emin cutoff energy

 1                       number of atoms for which density matrix is
calculated

 1  1  3      index of 1st atom, number of L's, L1

 0 0           r-index, (l,s)index

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

And the section of the  log:

   (runsp_lapw) options: -p -i 400 -in1ef -orb -cc 0.0001

Mon Jan  2 05:14:02 IRST 2006 (x) lapw0 -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:06 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -up -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:08 IRST 2006 (x) lapw1 -dn -p -orb

Mon Jan  2 05:14:09 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:10 IRST 2006 (x) lapw2 -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -up -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:11 IRST 2006 (x) lapwdm -dn -p

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -up

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) lcore -dn

Mon Jan  2 05:14:12 IRST 2006 (x) mixer -orb

[yazdani@cm4 test2]$

output files of the orb are:

 [yazdani@cm4 test2]$ cat test2.outputorbup

 Calculation of orbital potential for spin block: up

 Type of potential:            Interaction with Bext

 Vorb applied to atom   1 orbit. numbers   3

  end of OP input

        Bext=  60.0 T; muB*Bext= 0.25526E-03 Ry

 STRUCT file read

 Bext in global crystal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angles in global orthogonal system (M,z)=   0.000 (M,x)=   0.000 deg

  natom           1

  No old potential found

 Bext in local orthogonal system   0.0   0.0   1.0

 angle (M,zloc)=   0.000 angle (M,xloc)=   0.000 deg

  Atom           1  spin up   potential real part (Ry)

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -3   0.00077   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.00051   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M= -1   0.0   0.0   0.00026   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  1   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
-0.00026   0.0   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0  -0.00051   0.0

:VORBr  1_ 1   M=  3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0  -0.00077

  Potential imaginary part (Ry)

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -3   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1   M= -2   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
0.0   0.0   0.0

:VORBi  1_ 1