[Wiki-research-l] Wiki Workshop 2016 @ ICWSM: deadline extended to March 3

2016-02-23 Thread Dario Taraborelli
Hi all – heads up that we extended the submission deadline for the Wiki
Workshop at ICWSM '16 to *Wednesday, March 3, 2016*. (The second deadline
remains unchanged: March 11, 2016).

You can check the workshop's website
 for submission instructions or
follow us at @wikiworkshop16  for live
updates.

Looking forward to your contributions.

Dario
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


[Wiki-research-l] Please provide feedback on suggested improvements to the Code of Conduct

2016-02-23 Thread Matthew Flaschen

Thanks to everyone who’s helped work on the Code of Conduct so far.

People have brought up issues they feel were missed when working on 
"Unacceptable behavior" ( 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Unacceptable_behavior 
) and "Report a problem" ( 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Report_a_problem ). 
 Consultants have also suggested changes in these same sections.


These are important sections, so please take a look at the proposed 
changes ( 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_Conduct/Draft#Suggested_changes). 
 I apologize that this feedback arrived later than planned, but I think 
this will create a better document.


If you prefer to give your opinion privately, feedback via e-mail is 
welcome at conduct-discuss...@wikimedia.org.


Thanks,

Matt Flaschen

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


[Wiki-research-l] citing female academics

2016-02-23 Thread Heather Ford
There's an interesting discussion going on right now on the Association of
Internet Researchers mailing list about the citing of women (and women of
colour) in academia that I thought might be interesting. The comments are
also really (as Gabriella Coleman noted) 'lively' so they're worth a read
too. I'd be curious to learn more about how we as a Wikipedia research
community fare here too...

https://merylalper.com/2016/02/22/please-read-the-article-please-cite-women-academics/

Best,
Heather.

Dr Heather Ford
University Academic Fellow
School of Media and Communications , The
University of Leeds
w: hblog.org / EthnographyMatters.net  / t:
@hfordsa 
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] "Quick" request

2016-02-23 Thread Marco Fossati

Hi Bruno,

I have been using the WikiExtractor for this task:
https://github.com/attardi/wikiextractor

Hope this helps.
Cheers,

Marco

On 2/22/16 23:32, wiki-research-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:

Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:12:08 +0100
From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)"
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities

Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] "Quick" request
Message-ID:<56cb87b8.9050...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Bruno Goncalves, 22/02/2016 22:58:

>There used to be official HTML dumps
>https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/static_html_dumps/  but they haven't
>been updated in almost a decade:)

The job is effectively done by Kiwix now.
http://download.kiwix.org/zim/wikipedia/
For instance:
wikipedia_en_all_nopic_2015-05.zim17-May-2015 10:27   15G

There are several tools to extract the HTML from a ZIM file:
http://www.openzim.org/wiki/Readers

Nemo


___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l