[Wiki-research-l] New user retention on Zooniverse

2015-01-06 Thread Jonathan Morgan
This from Ars[1]. Sound familiar?





* - The top 10 percent of contributors end up supplying an average of
about 80 percent of the total effort put into these projects. - Most
people who show up to check out a project never return. The most compelling
projects still saw 60 percent of their users stop by for a single visit and
never come back; the worst case was an 83-percent rate. - The topic of
the project also seemed to have some effect [on participation rates]. The
biggest project... lets users sift through Kepler telescope data to search
for exoplanets; that attracted almost 30,000 users in its first 180 days.
The smallest, Galaxy Zoo Supernova (which is no longer active) only drew a
bit over 3,000.*
Original manuscript [2] (paywalled). Anyone have subscription access?

1.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/01/most-participants-in-citizen-science-projects-give-up-almost-immediately/
2. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/01/02/1408907112


-- 
Jonathan T. Morgan
Community Research Lead
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF) https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)
jmor...@wikimedia.org
___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


Re: [Wiki-research-l] New user retention on Zooniverse

2015-01-06 Thread Brian Butler
These same patterns have been noted for decades in studies of volunteerism, 
charitable giving, community association, face-to-face support groups, and 
voluntary religious organizations.  They are a consequences of the interaction 
of human interests/motivations and competition for limited attention/effort 
playing out at a population level.

Is there really any reason to expect that they wouldn't still work that way?
(or actually be made worse -- because online environments make the costs of 
exploration lower, switching from one activity/group to another lower, and the 
number of alternatives higher).

Brian Butler
UMD, iSchool


On Jan 6, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:

This from Ars[1]. Sound familiar?


  *   The top 10 percent of contributors end up supplying an average of about 
80 percent of the total effort put into these projects.
  *   Most people who show up to check out a project never return. The most 
compelling projects still saw 60 percent of their users stop by for a single 
visit and never come back; the worst case was an 83-percent rate.
  *   The topic of the project also seemed to have some effect [on 
participation rates]. The biggest project... lets users sift through Kepler 
telescope data to search for exoplanets; that attracted almost 30,000 users in 
its first 180 days. The smallest, Galaxy Zoo Supernova (which is no longer 
active) only drew a bit over 3,000.

Original manuscript [2] (paywalled). Anyone have subscription access?

1.  
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/01/most-participants-in-citizen-science-projects-give-up-almost-immediately/
2. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2015/01/02/1408907112


--
Jonathan T. Morgan
Community Research Lead
Wikimedia Foundation
User:Jmorgan (WMF)https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)
jmor...@wikimedia.orgmailto:jmor...@wikimedia.org

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

___
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l