[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature (rc_patrolled, rc_bot in revision: rv_bot, rv_patrolled)

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Daniel Kinzler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.
   ||org/show_bug.cgi?id=47415

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature (rc_patrolled, rc_bot in revision: rv_bot, rv_patrolled)

2013-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Daniel Kinzler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugzilla.wikimedia.
   ||org/show_bug.cgi?id=25799

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature (rc_patrolled, rc_bot in revision: rv_bot, rv_patrolled)

2013-05-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Krinkle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de
   ||, tstarl...@wikimedia.org

--- Comment #6 from Krinkle  ---
Progress from Amsterdam Hackathon 2013:


* Move rc_patrolled and rc_bot from recentchanges to revision.
* Make rev_patrolled 0/1/2 instead of 0/1. The value 2 would represent
autopatrolled.
* We no longer need logging for autopatrol because author/timestamp is the same
as the author. this solves two bugs:


Bug 25799 (Allow Special:Log to show separate autopatrol from human patrol)
BUg 47415 (Logging of autopatrol does not scale for Wikidata)

+1 from Daniel Kinzler, Tim Starling and Timo Tijhof.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature (rc_patrolled, rc_bot in revision: rv_bot, rv_patrolled)

2012-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Krinkle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Better integration of   |Better integration of
   |patrol feature  |patrol feature
   |(rc_patrolled, rc_bot in|(rc_patrolled, rc_bot in
   |revisions rv_bot,   |revision: rv_bot,
   |rv_patrolled)   |rv_patrolled)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature (rc_patrolled, rc_bot in revisions rv_bot, rv_patrolled)

2012-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Krinkle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Better integration of   |Better integration of
   |patrol feature  |patrol feature
   ||(rc_patrolled, rc_bot in
   ||revisions rv_bot,
   ||rv_patrolled)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2012-08-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Krinkle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|General/Unknown |Patrolling

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2011-03-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

p858snake  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||16012
 Depends on|16012   |

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2010-11-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237

Krinkle  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||krinklem...@gmail.com

--- Comment #5 from Krinkle  2010-11-16 21:14:22 UTC ---
One thing to not forget is wgRCMaxAge, the patrols expire after wgRCMaxAge. If
moving this into recentchanges:
* the rev_patrolled needs to be NULL'ed if 0 after wgRCMaxAge (or introduce a
new variable wgMaxPatrolAge which by default is equal to wgRCMaxAge)
* when patrolling an edit the markpatrolled action need to update both revision
and recentchanges

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237


^demon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com
 Depends on||16012




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237


Roan Kattouw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||12394




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237


Roan Kattouw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||need-review, patch, schema-
   ||change




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-02-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237





--- Comment #4 from Roan Kattouw   2009-02-02 15:26:32 
UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=5768)
 --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=5768)
Proposed patch

Attached patch that:
* adds the rev_bot and rev_patrolled fields to the revision table
* adds the populateRevBotPatrolled.php script that populates them
(automatically run from update.php)
* adds support for the fields in the Revision class
** deprecates isUnpatrolled() which seems to be unused in core
* sets rev_bot and rev_patrolled appropriately when creating new revision
entries

This patch doesn't synchronize rev_bot and rc_bot for new moves, deletions and
protections, because the interface for moving/deleting/protecting with the bot
flag sucks (I intend to fix that) and doesn't sync them for old ones either
because the recentchanges entry and the associated null revision aren't linked
in any way (rc_this_oldid == 0 for these entries). It also doesn't use the
newly added fields in any way.

I intend to address the concerns mentioned above in a new patch, but in the
meantime, some review would be nice.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237





--- Comment #3 from Roan Kattouw   2009-01-30 11:37:15 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I just looked at bug 17215 again and there's talk of adding an index, 
> something
> I have only a very vague understanding of, but I assume has the same intention
> of making revision/recentchanges queries easier. I guess that would be easier
> than a schema change.
> 
The basic idea of that index is that it makes it possible to retrieve the
recentchanges entry for a certain revision efficiently, which semi-fixes this.
Adding the bot and patrol flags to the revisions table makes more sense IMO,
since, as Aryeh said on that bug, recentchanges serves just to summarize other
tables, and as such should not contain 'new' information (i.e. information that
isn't present in any other table).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237





--- Comment #2 from Gurch   2009-01-29 23:29:44 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I agree, let's put the patrol flag (and the bot flag too, for that matter) in
> the revisions table as well.

Bot flag kind of makes sense where it is, given that its purpose (at least its
original purpose) is to keep bulk edits out of recentchanges. (The somewhat
fuzzy relationship between bot accounts and bot edits always confuses me.)
Though having said that, I guess patrol flag kind of makes sense where it is
too, if its purpose is to review new edits.

I just looked at bug 17215 again and there's talk of adding an index, something
I have only a very vague understanding of, but I assume has the same intention
of making revision/recentchanges queries easier. I guess that would be easier
than a schema change.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l


[Bug 17237] Better integration of patrol feature

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17237


Roan Kattouw  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||roan.katt...@home.nl




--- Comment #1 from Roan Kattouw   2009-01-29 23:04:25 
UTC ---
I agree, let's put the patrol flag (and the bot flag too, for that matter) in
the revisions table as well.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l