[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #15 from Dan Jacobson --- Indeed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #14 from Andre Klapper --- Likely nobody will ever work on that part if it's hidden in a comment in some bug report, instead of a clear and separate bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #13 from Dan Jacobson --- Instead of me reporting more bugs, the whole statistics page needs to be rethought from the point of view of the man in the street. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #12 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) --- Sorry, I meant [[mw:Manual:$wgArticleCountMethod]]. The definition is meant to exclude stubs from wikipedia (Like most things MediaWiki, especially features that go way back, its a bit wikipedia centric). I would be fine with having explanatory text (I would suggest just having it small under the words Content pages). File a separate bug for that. > > 3) Nowhere else on the statistics page do we find anything close to 67! > Therefore the most important statistic is not presented. You're right, and that's obviously wrong. I notice some of those pages date back from 2005 - hard to know if its some old bug or what. It should also be noted that some import scripts like the java dump importer (probably) don't update the count properly. Or perhaps there are other bugs with the statistics counter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #11 from Dan Jacobson --- P.S., I clicked [[Manual:$wgArticleCountMethod]] and it said no such page, and suggested "Did you mean: Manual:$articlecountupdate" which upon clicking doesn't exist either. (Bug: it shouldn't suggest things that it knows don't exist.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 --- Comment #10 from Dan Jacobson --- Well, 1) No user could have ever guessed such a definition, therefore please add a mouseover, explaining such definition. 2) A speech by Abraham Lincoln might not contain any links, but will still contain content, whereas a spamfarm page might be totally links, but most would agree devoid of content. Therefore the wording is misleading. 3) Nowhere else on the statistics page do we find anything close to 67! Therefore the most important statistic is not presented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 Bawolff (Brian Wolff) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bawolff...@gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, but why we cannot calculate it by different why? > > For example as SELECT MAX(cur_id) FROM cur. It will be more accurate value > than > COUNT(*) FROM revision. cur is no longer the name of that table, but for your general point, that would include pages that have since been deleted since id numbers do not generally get reused. (In reply to comment #8) > On http://abj.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Special:Statistics > which uses super fresh up to date Mediawiki, > we note > Content pages14 > Pages > (All pages in the wiki, including talk pages, redirects, etc.)21 > > Now we click > http://abj.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Special:AllPages > which is linked to the words "Content pages", > and lo and behold, there are three columns of 22 items each. > Actually the first column is 23 items. > That makes 23+22+22, which is very much more than 14. > This is a blatant bug, no? Content pages are only pages with links on them in main namespace (See [[Manual:$wgArticleCountMethod]]). Perhaps some of your pages do not meet that definition of a content page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 Dan Jacobson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |1.23-git -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 Dan Jacobson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jida...@jidanni.org --- Comment #8 from Dan Jacobson --- On http://abj.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Special:Statistics which uses super fresh up to date Mediawiki, we note Content pages14 Pages (All pages in the wiki, including talk pages, redirects, etc.)21 Now we click http://abj.jidanni.org/index.php?title=Special:AllPages which is linked to the words "Content pages", and lo and behold, there are three columns of 22 items each. Actually the first column is 23 items. That makes 23+22+22, which is very much more than 14. This is a blatant bug, no? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
[Bug 38085] Statistic page not entirely correct
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38085 Andre Klapper changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Unprioritized |Low Summary|Statistic page seems|Statistic page not entirely ||correct -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. ___ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
