https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63847
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://code.google.com/p/g
||errit/issues/list?can=1q=l
||abel%3AFixedIn-2.8.4+OR+lab
||el%3AFixedIn-2.8.3+OR+label
||%3AFixedIn-2.8.2+OR+label%3
||AFixedIn-2.8.5+OR+label%3AF
||ixedIn-2.8.6colspec=ID+Typ
||e+Stars+Milestone+Status+Pr
||iority+Owner+Summarycells=
||tiles
Summary|Upgrade gerrit to 2.8.5+|Upgrade gerrit to 2.8.6
--- Comment #6 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
I understand that Chad is busy/fed up with gerrit and I think ops should take
care of gerrit, but I don't understand what condemns us to reach the day of
phabricator migration with a 15+ months old release of gerrit.
2.8.2–6 include benefits for all users, like a race condition fix,
group/project list pagination, respect of MySQL hard limit, replication plugin,
sshd; countless fixes for those who are using the new change screen
(disclosure: I am, for performance reasons); and no changes for those who
don't, AFAICS.
Unless release notes lie,
* there are no schema changes,
* a config may need to be tweaked if we relied on default
https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/issues/detail?id=2557,
* no DB support is lost unless we're using MyISAM,
* Bouncycastle would need to be updated if we're using it.
Doesn't sound painful at first sight, though of course I'm not an op etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
