Re: [Wikidata-tech] vandalism

[Джон Д .]

Hello
 
Someone took a page I have been working on for months and removed most of 
my work.
 
?
 
Is it wrong to include more than one Q. in a P131
 
where you have an instance of a settlement, village etc. within the city 
limits and that city being within a district oblast etc.
 
and within that village as in P31, are your  Q131596,  Q11451 , 
and  Q10480682, which makes it a  Q570116) as 
well.
 
and in 
that location is also a  Q27603105.
 
is it 
wrong to include all this 
stuff.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech

Re: [Wikidata] vandalism

[Джон Д .]

Hello
 
Someone took a page I have been working on for months and removed most of 
my work.
 
?
 
Is it wrong to include more than one Q. in a P131
 
where you have an instance of a settlement, village etc. within the city 
limits and that city being within a district oblast etc.
 
and within that village as in P31, are your  Q131596,  Q11451 , 
and  Q10480682, which makes it a  Q570116) as 
well.
 
and in 
that location is also a  Q27603105.
 
is it 
wrong to include all this 
stuff.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Re: [Wikidata-bugs] vandalism

[Джон Д .]

Hello
 
Someone took a page I have been working on for months and removed most of 
my work.
 
?
 
Is it wrong to include more than one Q. in a P131
 
where you have an instance of a settlement, village etc. within the city 
limits and that city being within a district oblast etc.
 
and within that village as in P31, are your  Q131596,  Q11451 , 
and  Q10480682, which makes it a  Q570116) as 
well.
 
and in 
that location is also a  Q27603105.
 
is it 
wrong to include all this 
stuff.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs