[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T92270: Wikidata activities at the Wikimedia Hackathon 2015

2015-03-29 Thread Tarrow
Tarrow added a subscriber: Tarrow.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92270

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lydia_Pintscher, Tarrow
Cc: Tarrow, Ricordisamoa, Ladsgroup, Tpt, Bene, Multichill, WMDE-Fisch, 
Tobi_WMDE_SW, hoo, daniel, Lucie, thiemowmde, JanZerebecki, aude, Qgil, 
Aklapper, Sylvain_WMFr, AlexWang, Wikidata-bugs, Daniel_Mietchen



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Updated] T88950: Migrate all relevant Lua modules from mw.wikibase.getEntity to mw.wikibase.getEntityObject

2015-03-29 Thread Ricordisamoa
Ricordisamoa added a project: user-notice.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88950

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lucie, Ricordisamoa
Cc: Sjoerddebruin, gpaumier, Ricordisamoa, Lydia_Pintscher, aude, Aklapper, 
hoo, Wikidata-bugs, GWicke, Se4598, Jay8g, Quiddity



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Project Column] T88950: Migrate all relevant Lua modules from mw.wikibase.getEntity to mw.wikibase.getEntityObject

2015-03-29 Thread Ricordisamoa
Ricordisamoa moved this task to Archive on the user-notice workboard.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88950

WORKBOARD
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/1097/

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lucie, Ricordisamoa
Cc: Sjoerddebruin, gpaumier, Ricordisamoa, Lydia_Pintscher, aude, Aklapper, 
hoo, Wikidata-bugs, GWicke, Se4598, Jay8g, Quiddity



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T92270: Wikidata activities at the Wikimedia Hackathon 2015

2015-03-29 Thread Addshore
Addshore added a subscriber: Addshore.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92270

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lydia_Pintscher, Addshore
Cc: Addshore, Tarrow, Ricordisamoa, Ladsgroup, Tpt, Bene, Multichill, 
WMDE-Fisch, Tobi_WMDE_SW, hoo, daniel, Lucie, thiemowmde, JanZerebecki, aude, 
Qgil, Aklapper, Sylvain_WMFr, AlexWang, Wikidata-bugs, Daniel_Mietchen



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T93451: Data format updates for RDF export

2015-03-29 Thread gerritbot
gerritbot added a comment.

Change 200119 merged by jenkins-bot:
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93451: ontology fixes - namespace the value 
predicates

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/200119


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93451

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, gerritbot
Cc: gerritbot, Denny, mkroetzsch, daniel, Manybubbles, Aklapper, Smalyshev, 
jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke, JanZerebecki



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T92505: Wikidata architecture review and feedback

2015-03-29 Thread Addshore
Addshore added a subscriber: Addshore.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T92505

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Lydia_Pintscher, Addshore
Cc: Addshore, JeroenDeDauw, adrianheine, kaldari, MaxSem, Smalyshev, Catrope, 
brion, tstarling, RobLa, Aklapper, Qgil, aude, JanZerebecki, thiemowmde, Lucie, 
daniel, hoo, Tobi_WMDE_SW, WMDE-Fisch, Multichill, Bene, Tpt, Ladsgroup, 
Sylvain_WMFr, AlexWang, Wikidata-bugs, Daniel_Mietchen



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T94064: Date of +0000-01-01 is allowed but undefined in wikibase but is not allowed in xsd:dateTime as implemented by blazegraph

2015-03-29 Thread JanZerebecki
JanZerebecki added a comment.

@mkroetzsch Do you know of some widely used software that implements XSD 1.1 
handling of BCE dates?

 Dates without years should not be allowed by the time datatype.




 what dates in Wikidata mean


I think the best way forward is to leave the lexical 0 in the year fraction as 
undefined in Wikidata. Yes its used, but AFAIK it was always undefined.

 If this is an important use case, then we should develop a day-of-year 
 datatype that supports this, or suggest the community to use dedicated 
 properties/qualifiers to encode this. However, other datatype extensions 
 would be much more important than this rare case (e.g., units of measurement).


I agree.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, JanZerebecki
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, 
JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T94064: Date of +0000-01-01 is allowed but undefined in wikibase but is not allowed in xsd:dateTime as implemented by blazegraph

2015-03-29 Thread mkroetzsch
mkroetzsch added a comment.

@Smalyshev @Lydia_Pintscher Dates without years should not be allowed by the 
time datatype. They are impossible to order, almost impossible to query, and 
they do not have any meaning whatsoever in combination with a preferred 
calendar model. All the arguments @Denny has already given elsewhere for why we 
should unify dates to Proleptic Gregorian internally apply here too. My 
suspicion is that the existing dates of this form are simply a glitch in the 
UI, where users got the impression that dates without years are recognized and 
pressing save silently set the year to zero without them seeing the change in 
meaning. If this is an important use case, then we should develop a day-of-year 
datatype that supports this, or suggest the community to use dedicated 
properties/qualifiers to encode this. However, other datatype extensions would 
be much more important than this rare case (e.g., units of measurement).

The above proposal of @Smalyshev is simply to use RDF 1.0 for export and to 
assume XSD 1.0 (non-ISO) dates to be used in Wikidata. After all the discussion 
here, I am completely baffled by this proposal. It goes against all current 
standards, and against the view of the SPARQL working group. The additional 
proposal to revert to the dates are just strings view for deep values ignores 
the original design and documentation, and dismisses the recommendations that 
Denny and I have been making via email. It seems we have reached an impasse 
here.

**I suggest to freeze the RDF-time encoding discussions now** until we have 
established a joint understanding what dates in Wikidata mean. As soon as we 
export dates to RDF, we are defining their meaning indirectly via the RDF 
semantics, and this bug report is not the right place for doing this.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, mkroetzsch
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, 
JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Project Column] T88478: dvwiki link (font) causes page to crash in chrome 40.* and doesn't render in firefox

2015-03-29 Thread Krenair
Krenair moved this task to Patch merged on the Upstream workboard.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88478

WORKBOARD
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/153/

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: MaxSem, Krenair
Cc: MaxSem, aude, Aklapper, Wikidata-bugs, Nikerabbit, Arrbee, santhosh, 
KartikMistry, Krenair



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Project Column] T76854: N-Triples encoding for RDF output uses invalid escaping

2015-03-29 Thread Krenair
Krenair moved this task to Patch merged on the Upstream workboard.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T76854

WORKBOARD
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/153/

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Tobi_WMDE_SW, Krenair
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Smalyshev, Aklapper, daniel, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Krenair



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T93885: Implement a limit for entities accessed via arbitrary access features and mark as expensive

2015-03-29 Thread Multichill
Multichill added a comment.

The most difficult use case will probably be lists. We love our lists on 
Wikipedia. Lists generally contain redundant information. Would be great to 
store at least part of this data in Wikidata items and grab it from there.

Take for example 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_North_Dakota
 . This list has 235 items. Wikibase should be able to support lists this size.

This is the current output from the page:

  NewPP limit report
  Parsed by mw1009
  CPU time usage: 4.687 seconds
  Real time usage: 5.003 seconds
  Preprocessor visited node count: 115649/100
  Preprocessor generated node count: 0/150
  Post‐expand include size: 1575267/2097152 bytes
  Template argument size: 143301/2097152 bytes
  Highest expansion depth: 12/40
  Expensive parser function count: 1/500
  Lua time usage: 0.942/10.000 seconds
  Lua memory usage: 3.47 MB/50 MB
  
  Transclusion expansion time report (%,ms,calls,template)
  100.00% 3425.845  1 - -total
   78.69% 2695.839226 - Template:NRHP_row
   19.35%  662.903418 - Template:First_word
   19.19%  657.334270 - Template:Designation/color
   18.88%  646.960566 - Template:NRHP_color
   14.03%  480.707192 - Template:Coord
   11.31%  387.481209 - Template:NRHP_Focus
   10.84%  371.255 43 - Template:NRHP_header
9.11%  312.093234 - Template:Dts
5.52%  189.245234 - Template:Dts/out0

So if each item is one expensive call that would be about 235 out of 500 
possible calls.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93885

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: hoo, Multichill
Cc: gerritbot, Anomie, hoo, Danmichaelo, daniel, Ltrlg, zhuyifei1999, Stryn, 
MF-Warburg, Lydia_Pintscher, Laddo, Chmarkine, Ainali, Pietrodn, Florian, 
Liuxinyu970226, Snipre, Multichill, Yann, geraki, Mvolz, Ash_Crow, Hkjacksonhk, 
Aklapper, MZMcBride, Jarekt, Ricordisamoa, Aubrey, Cwek, matej_suchanek, Qgil, 
aude, Micru, Denny, jayvdb, Bennylin, Filceolaire, ValterVB, Daniel_Mietchen, 
He7d3r, mxn, Addshore, HenkvD, Jasper, JulesWinnfield-hu, Abraham, Kersti, 
greg, Rical, Wikidata-bugs, -jem-, RP88, jeremyb, Dr_Brains, Pengo, Reaper35, 
Eloquence, adrianheine, Candalua, Rschen7754



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T93885: Implement a limit for entities accessed via arbitrary access features and mark as expensive

2015-03-29 Thread daniel
daniel added a comment.

@Multichill for lists, the plan is to have pre-defined queries in wikidata, and 
cache the result (and update it periodically). So far, the idea was to just 
cache the list of entities the query finds, but I'm getting around to believing 
we should allow users to specify which properties they are interested in, and 
cache the values of those as part of the materialized result set.

A list page on wikipedia would then not be accessing Items at all, but a single 
QueryResult object. The original plan of providing just the list of IDs and let 
the client wiki do the rest via Lua does not seem feasible, considering the 
performance implications.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93885

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: hoo, daniel
Cc: gerritbot, Anomie, hoo, Danmichaelo, daniel, Ltrlg, zhuyifei1999, Stryn, 
MF-Warburg, Lydia_Pintscher, Laddo, Chmarkine, Ainali, Pietrodn, Florian, 
Liuxinyu970226, Snipre, Multichill, Yann, geraki, Mvolz, Ash_Crow, Hkjacksonhk, 
Aklapper, MZMcBride, Jarekt, Ricordisamoa, Aubrey, Cwek, matej_suchanek, Qgil, 
aude, Micru, Denny, jayvdb, Bennylin, Filceolaire, ValterVB, Daniel_Mietchen, 
He7d3r, mxn, Addshore, HenkvD, Jasper, JulesWinnfield-hu, Abraham, Kersti, 
greg, Rical, Wikidata-bugs, -jem-, RP88, jeremyb, Dr_Brains, Pengo, Reaper35, 
Eloquence, adrianheine, Candalua, Rschen7754



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Project Column] T67698: Under HHVM: Call to a member function getGuid() on a non-object

2015-03-29 Thread Krenair
Krenair moved this task to Patch merged on the Upstream workboard.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T67698

WORKBOARD
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/board/153/

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Krenair
Cc: Wikidata-bugs, greg, ori, adrianheine, aude, tstarling, aaron, MaxSem, 
Lydia_Pintscher, hoo, Krenair, wikidata-bugs



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T93976: WikiPage: Could not find text for current revision

2015-03-29 Thread MZMcBride
MZMcBride added a subscriber: MZMcBride.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93976

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: aaron, MZMcBride
Cc: MZMcBride, gerritbot, Aklapper, Legoktm, Lydia_Pintscher, aude, aaron, hoo, 
Wikidata-bugs, Jdforrester-WMF



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T93866: Rollback diff causes error

2015-03-29 Thread MZMcBride
MZMcBride added a subscriber: MZMcBride.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T93866

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: hoo, MZMcBride
Cc: MZMcBride, Matiia, matej_suchanek, mmodell, greg, gerritbot, hoo, Aklapper, 
Lydia_Pintscher, Wikidata-bugs, aude



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T94064: Date of +0000-01-01 is allowed but undefined in wikibase but is not allowed in xsd:dateTime as implemented by blazegraph

2015-03-29 Thread mkroetzsch
mkroetzsch added a comment.

 @mkroetzsch Do you know of some widely used software that implements XSD 1.1 
 handling of BCE dates?


Many applications that process dates are based on ISO rather than on XSD. 
Java's SimpleDateFormat class, for example, is based on ISO and thus interprets 
year numbers like XSD 1.1. I would assume that most time-processing 
applications, e.g., JavaScript timelines, use the same. Only XSD-based 
implementations tend to have legacy handling. For many RDF tools it is really 
hard to tell without digging into their code (usually they don't document this 
detail, and they use own implementations rather than relying on any XSD 
library). But I think it is fair to assume that ISO has a much larger market 
share, and that XSD 1.0 implementations will be updated at some point.

 I think the best way forward is to leave the lexical 0 in the year fraction 
 as undefined in Wikidata. Yes its used, but AFAIK it was always undefined.


Our original specification of Wikidata said: The calendar model used for 
saving the data is always the proleptic Gregorian calendar according to ISO 
8601. This is the specification that Denny and I support, but there have been 
changes recently. WMDE is currently in the process of reviewing these changes 
to gauge the impact they have had in the data over time, and to come up with 
ideas how to recover to a consistent state. We have to await their report and 
suggestions before deciding what to do in RDF.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, mkroetzsch
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, 
JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T86517: add a new datatype for multilingual text

2015-03-29 Thread Ricordisamoa
Ricordisamoa added a subscriber: Ricordisamoa.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T86517

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Ricordisamoa
Cc: Ricordisamoa, Rits, Liuxinyu970226, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, 
Wikidata-bugs, aude



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T85560: inconsistent edit summary between item and property

2015-03-29 Thread Ricordisamoa
Ricordisamoa added a subscriber: Ricordisamoa.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T85560

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Ricordisamoa
Cc: Ricordisamoa, Aklapper, Lucie, Lydia_Pintscher, Wikidata-bugs, aude



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Changed Subscribers] T88451: Provide a mechanism for registering new data types.

2015-03-29 Thread Ricordisamoa
Ricordisamoa added a subscriber: Ricordisamoa.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T88451

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Ricordisamoa
Cc: Ricordisamoa, Liuxinyu970226, Lydia_Pintscher, despens, Aklapper, daniel, 
Wikidata-bugs, aude



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T94064: Date of +0000-01-01 is allowed but undefined in wikibase but is not allowed in xsd:dateTime as implemented by blazegraph

2015-03-29 Thread JanZerebecki
JanZerebecki added a comment.

All the software I checked that handles XSD types implement XSD 1.0 BCE years. 
Together we know of nothing that implements XSD 1.1 BCE years. I'd suggest we 
produce output for the RDF tools that exist.

 The calendar model used for saving the data is always the proleptic 
 Gregorian calendar according to ISO 8601.


And that does not refer to the 2000 version, so  is an invalid year. I'm 
not aware of any changes there. It is just not rejected during validation, like 
a Feb 31.

 We have to await their report and suggestions before deciding what to do in 
 RDF.


The only review I'm aware of is related to dates in Julian calendar only.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, JanZerebecki
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, 
JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs


[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T94064: Date of +0000-01-01 is allowed but undefined in wikibase but is not allowed in xsd:dateTime as implemented by blazegraph

2015-03-29 Thread daniel
daniel added a comment.

I agree that we should gather more data before continuing the discussion about 
the interpretation of dates stored in wikidata.

In https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064#1160748, @mkroetzsch wrote:

  @mkroetzsch Do you know of some widely used software that implements XSD 
  1.1 handling of BCE dates?


 Many applications that process dates are based on ISO rather than on XSD.


Which version of ISO 8901, though?

From Wikipedia: //ISO 8601:2004 (and previously ISO 8601:2000, but not ISO 
8601:1988) explicitly uses astronomical year numbering in its date reference 
systems.// https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0_%28year%29#ISO_8601

ISO doesn't save us, since they made the same breaking change, just a few years 
earlier. If the spec or library docs don't explicitly say whether they use 
8901:2000 or later, we might think they use ISO 8601:1988, which does the same 
as XSD 1.0: it does not allow year zero, and counts -1 as 1 BC.


TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T94064

REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS
  Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign 
username.

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Smalyshev, daniel
Cc: Lydia_Pintscher, Denny, Manybubbles, daniel, mkroetzsch, Smalyshev, 
JanZerebecki, Aklapper, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, GWicke



___
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs