Re: [Wikidata-l] less hard-core version of the data model

2012-06-23 Thread Bináris
I like it and I think it will be readable for many non-technical
Wikipedians.

-- 
Bináris
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l


Re: [Wikidata-l] Provenance tracking on the Web with NIF-URIs

2012-06-23 Thread Dan Brickley
On 22 Jun 2012, at 17:20, Denny Vrandečić denny.vrande...@wikimedia.de wrote:

 Here's the use case:
 
 Every statement in Wikidata will have a URI. Every statement can have
 one more references.
 In many cases, the reference might be text on a website.

As an aside, a growing number of such pages may come with some basic 
machine-readable data. For example IMDB actor pages may expose basic background 
facts, or e-govt sites may publish data geo/demographic/etc data. 

I hope schema.org (augmented with Wikidata-derrived vocab) will help encourage 
this. I'm not sure Wikidata's provenance machinery needs to worry about such 
things, although the lurking problem of cycles in the provenance/source graph 
may eventually be an issue here. For example, if some BBC music site is built 
from -say- MusicBrainz + Wikipedia data, should their embedded rdfa expose this 
sourcing so that someone citing it in support of a Wikidata factoid can be made 
aware of the circularity?

Dan
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l