Report 2.1
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.1 is now
colored, red means no source for the statement in Wikidata, yellow means
source is P143 (probably Wikipedia), and otherwise it's green. I also
published version Report 2.2
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.2 which
is version 2.1 but imprecise dates are filtered out. And Report 2.3
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.3 which
is version 2 with filtered out imprecise dates. i.e.
Version Colored? Wikidata against 3 WPs With imprecise dates? Report 2
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2 No
No Yes Report
2.1 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.1 Yes
Yes Yes Report 2.2
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.2 Yes Yes
No Report 2.3
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.3 Yes No
No
Best
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I have two options, I can just skip them or I can mark them in
another color like pink or something else.
What do you think? and what color if you recommend the latter.
Best
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for this.
You might want to filter it, though: For example
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q85256 states born in 1606 (no month or
day given), but your report at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2/26 gives
it as 1606-01-01, which then conflicts with the date given in Wikipedias
(1606-03-18).
Wikidata is less precise than Wikipedia here, but not actually wrong.
Maybe these cases should be treated separately from the potential errors.
Cheers,
Magnus
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I started this report, you can find it here
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2.
Best
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's possible and rather easy to add them .just several regexes and
list of months in that language are needed. but the issue is no major wikis
except these three are using a person data template (Almost all of them
have the template but almost none of them are using it widely) If any other
wiki is using a person data template widely, I would be happy to implement
it.
Best
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Can we join more Wikipedias to the comparison?
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2014-08-19 10:38 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
:
Hoi,
Amir has created functionality that compares data from en.wp de.wp and
it.wp. It is data about humans and it only shows differences where
they
exist. It compares those four Wikipedias with information in Wikidata.
The idea is that the report will be updated regularly.
The problem we face is: what should it actually look like. Should it
just
splatter the info on a page or is more needed. At this time we just
have
data [1].
Please help us with something that works easily for now. Once we have
something, it can be prettified and more functional.
Thanks,
GerardM
[1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/8079742/
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Amir
--
Amir
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
___
Wikidata-tech mailing list
wikidata-t...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
--
Amir
--
Amir
___
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l