Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread Cenarium sysop
10 days is a bit short for preparation, as most people didn't get involved
until a launch date was fixed. It would have been nice if we had had a bit
more time, but we should broadly be ready. It's also not impossible that we
request some configuration changes before or during the trial.

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:31 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Rob Lanphier ro...@wikimedia.org wrote:
  On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:54 AM, FT2 ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  One thing needed - can someone reply to this thread with a list of all
  Flagged Revs related pages (whether RFCs, proposals, or major threads)
 so
  we
  can see what's out there?

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Searchfulltext=Searchns0=1ns1=1ns2=1ns3=1ns4=1ns5=1ns6=1ns7=1ns8=1ns9=1ns10=1ns11=1ns12=1ns13=1ns14=1ns15=1ns100=1ns101=1ns108=1ns109=1redirs=0search=WP%3AFlagged

 Will get most of the pages (in the WP ns at least).

 -Peachey

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread William Pietri
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people 
have preferred that we launched later?

We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit 
a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people 
wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could have announced a later date.

If in the future the community would like X weeks of cushion to prepare 
for a feature change, I think that's a very reasonable thing to ask for. 
The time wouldn't be wasted; there's plenty of good stuff left to do.

William

On 06/12/2010 06:59 AM, Cenarium sysop wrote:
 10 days is a bit short for preparation, as most people didn't get involved
 until a launch date was fixed. It would have been nice if we had had a bit
 more time, but we should broadly be ready. It's also not impossible that we
 request some configuration changes before or during the trial.

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:31 AM, K. Peacheyp858sn...@yahoo.com.au  wrote:


 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Rob Lanphierro...@wikimedia.org  wrote:
  
 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:54 AM, FT2ft2.w...@gmail.com  wrote:


 One thing needed - can someone reply to this thread with a list of all
 Flagged Revs related pages (whether RFCs, proposals, or major threads)
  
 so
  
 we
 can see what's out there?
  
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Searchfulltext=Searchns0=1ns1=1ns2=1ns3=1ns4=1ns5=1ns6=1ns7=1ns8=1ns9=1ns10=1ns11=1ns12=1ns13=1ns14=1ns15=1ns100=1ns101=1ns108=1ns109=1redirs=0search=WP%3AFlagged

 Will get most of the pages (in the WP ns at least).

 -Peachey

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

  
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l



___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread William Pietri
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people 
have preferred that we launched later?

We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit 
a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people 
wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could have announced a later date.

If in the future the community would like X weeks of cushion to prepare 
for a feature change, I think that's a very reasonable thing to ask for. 
The time wouldn't be wasted; there's plenty of good stuff left to do.

William

On 06/12/2010 06:59 AM, Cenarium sysop wrote:
 10 days is a bit short for preparation, as most people didn't get involved
 until a launch date was fixed. It would have been nice if we had had a bit
 more time, but we should broadly be ready. It's also not impossible that we
 request some configuration changes before or during the trial.

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:31 AM, K. Peacheyp858sn...@yahoo.com.au  wrote:


 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Rob Lanphierro...@wikimedia.org  wrote:
  
 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:54 AM, FT2ft2.w...@gmail.com  wrote:


 One thing needed - can someone reply to this thread with a list of all
 Flagged Revs related pages (whether RFCs, proposals, or major threads)
  
 so
  
 we
 can see what's out there?
  
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Searchfulltext=Searchns0=1ns1=1ns2=1ns3=1ns4=1ns5=1ns6=1ns7=1ns8=1ns9=1ns10=1ns11=1ns12=1ns13=1ns14=1ns15=1ns100=1ns101=1ns108=1ns109=1redirs=0search=WP%3AFlagged

 Will get most of the pages (in the WP ns at least).

 -Peachey

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

  
 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l



___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread George Herbert
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:13 AM, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
 Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
 have preferred that we launched later?

 We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
 a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people
 wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could have announced a later date.

 If in the future the community would like X weeks of cushion to prepare
 for a feature change, I think that's a very reasonable thing to ask for.
 The time wouldn't be wasted; there's plenty of good stuff left to do.

 William

 On 06/12/2010 06:59 AM, Cenarium sysop wrote:
 10 days is a bit short for preparation, as most people didn't get involved
 until a launch date was fixed. It would have been nice if we had had a bit
 more time, but we should broadly be ready. It's also not impossible that we
 request some configuration changes before or during the trial.

 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:31 AM, K. Peacheyp858sn...@yahoo.com.au  wrote:


 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Rob Lanphierro...@wikimedia.org  wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:54 AM, FT2ft2.w...@gmail.com  wrote:


 One thing needed - can someone reply to this thread with a list of all
 Flagged Revs related pages (whether RFCs, proposals, or major threads)

 so

 we
 can see what's out there?

 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Searchfulltext=Searchns0=1ns1=1ns2=1ns3=1ns4=1ns5=1ns6=1ns7=1ns8=1ns9=1ns10=1ns11=1ns12=1ns13=1ns14=1ns15=1ns100=1ns101=1ns108=1ns109=1redirs=0search=WP%3AFlagged

 Will get most of the pages (in the WP ns at least).

 -Peachey


Honestly?  We could have picked any delay and there would still be
some people it will suprise when it hits.  The Vector skin change had
been in the header for months and still suprised people.

It's been announced and discussed in advance to an adequate degree, IMHO.


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread Amory Meltzer
There was always going to be a bit of Damned if you do, Damned if you
don't; It's just unavoidable in a community this large.

~A

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread Cenarium sysop
As I'm actively involved in the preparation of the trial, I assure 10 days
is short. Most people don't get involved until a launch date is fixed,
especially in this situation where we had to wait for a year with nothing
coming so people just waited for something consistent to get involved. And
now we need to quickly find consensus on remaining policy issues, write
documentation, etc. So I wouldn't have preferred that it be launched later,
because we've waited enough, but that the launch date be given at least 3
weeks in advance.

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Amory Meltzer amorymelt...@gmail.comwrote:

 There was always going to be a bit of Damned if you do, Damned if you
 don't; It's just unavoidable in a community this large.

 ~A

 ___
 WikiEN-l mailing list
 WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread Kwan Ting Chan
On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:
 Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
 have preferred that we launched later?

 We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
 a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people
 wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could have announced a later date.

 If in the future the community would like X weeks of cushion to prepare
 for a feature change, I think that's a very reasonable thing to ask for.
 The time wouldn't be wasted; there's plenty of good stuff left to do.

 William


Personally, just launch the damn thing already!

KTC

-- 
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
 - Heinrich Heine

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread David Gerard
On 12 June 2010 22:04, Kwan Ting Chan k...@ktchan.info wrote:
 On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:

 Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
 have preferred that we launched later?

 Personally, just launch the damn thing already!


+1


- d.

___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread William Pietri
On 06/12/2010 01:27 PM, Cenarium sysop wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Amory Meltzeramorymelt...@gmail.comwrote:

 There was always going to be a bit of Damned if you do, Damned if you
 don't; It's just unavoidable in a community this large.
 As I'm actively involved in the preparation of the trial, I assure 10 days
 is short. Most people don't get involved until a launch date is fixed,
 especially in this situation where we had to wait for a year with nothing
 coming so people just waited for something consistent to get involved. And
 now we need to quickly find consensus on remaining policy issues, write
 documentation, etc. So I wouldn't have preferred that it be launched later,
 because we've waited enough, but that the launch date be given at least 3
 weeks in advance.


If that were an available option, I surely would have done that.

However, pursuing the fastest possible schedule pushes against 
predictability. If you want greater predictability, you either have to 
invest more resources in trying to see the future, or you add cushion to 
your schedule, to increase the chance the actual release date matches 
your guess. The former means less effort in actually making things, 
which slows down the project. The latter tends to push back the launch date.

So for future projects, the community should definitely keep in mind 
that asking for something ASAP means lowered schedule predictability, as 
well as increased project risk, greater chance of bugs, and minimal 
feature sets. As in so many realms, with software you can get anything 
you want, but not everything you want.

William


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


Re: [WikiEN-l] Community ready for Pending Changes (nee Flagged Protection)?

2010-06-12 Thread William Pietri
On 06/12/2010 02:22 PM, David Gerard wrote:
 On 12 June 2010 22:04, Kwan Ting Chank...@ktchan.info  wrote:

 On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:
  
 Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
 have preferred that we launched later?

 Personally, just launch the damn thing already!
  
 +1


Great! That is certainly how I feel about it, so I'm relieved the 
community feels likewise.

For those similarly enthusiastic, there is, as Cenarium points out, 
still some community work that needs to be done:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Flagged_revisions_trial

One thing that definitely needs sorting out is when the limit of 2000 
Pending Changes articles gets raised. We'll get some numbers on 
performance impact after it has been in use for a bit, but there has 
been some talk that we shouldn't raise the number purely because the 
servers can handle it. It'd be nice to have a clear signal on that by 
the time the technical issues are sorted.


William


___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l