Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Amir Ladsgroup
Oh, Thanks :)

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:03 AM Gnangarra  wrote:

> reserve submission are there at
> https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Reserve_submissions
>
> On 15 February 2016 at 06:43, Mike Peel  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 14 Feb 2016, at 22:40, Federico Leva (Nemo) 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Mike Peel, 14/02/2016 23:24:
>> >> It looks like only the first sentence/paragraph of the submitted
>> abstracts have been posted onto the wiki too, not the complete ones, which
>> is a shame.
>> >
>> > Ah, that explains why they were shorter than I expected! ;-)
>> > Thanks for pointing it out, it's fixed now.
>>
>> Thanks for fixing it. :-)
>>
>> Mike
>> ___
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>
>
>
> --
> GN.
> President Wikimedia Australia
> WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
>
> ___
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l


Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Lodewijk
maybe not a shame, but a matter of import? Or are the line breaks missing?

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Mike Peel  wrote:

> It looks like only the first sentence/paragraph of the submitted abstracts
> have been posted onto the wiki too, not the complete ones, which is a shame.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> > On 14 Feb 2016, at 22:07, Federico Leva (Nemo) 
> wrote:
> >
> > See https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Submissions
> >
> > The committee decided not to publish the detailed reviews. It's still a
> wiki and the talk pages are open as usual!
> >
> > I also added categories for the keywords proposed by the submitters, so
> you'll soon be able to create a wonderful category tree with the help of
> https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WantedCategories (once
> the cache is updated).
> >
> > Nemo
> >
> > P.s.: As you noticed, I addressed the doubts about the time required for
> copy-and-pasting and did the import by bot. This means that if you want to
> augment/change the imported data and practise http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/
> you can do so with a patch:
> https://github.com/nemobis/bots/blob/master/easychair-submissions-scraper.py
> >
> > ___
> > Wikimania-l mailing list
> > Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
> ___
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l


Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Amir Ladsgroup
Also, Reserved submissions hasn't been published too.

Best

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:58 AM Lodewijk 
wrote:

> maybe not a shame, but a matter of import? Or are the line breaks missing?
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Mike Peel  wrote:
>
>> It looks like only the first sentence/paragraph of the submitted
>> abstracts have been posted onto the wiki too, not the complete ones, which
>> is a shame.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>> > On 14 Feb 2016, at 22:07, Federico Leva (Nemo) 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > See https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Submissions
>> >
>> > The committee decided not to publish the detailed reviews. It's still a
>> wiki and the talk pages are open as usual!
>> >
>> > I also added categories for the keywords proposed by the submitters, so
>> you'll soon be able to create a wonderful category tree with the help of
>> https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WantedCategories (once
>> the cache is updated).
>> >
>> > Nemo
>> >
>> > P.s.: As you noticed, I addressed the doubts about the time required
>> for copy-and-pasting and did the import by bot. This means that if you want
>> to augment/change the imported data and practise
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/ you can do so with a patch:
>> https://github.com/nemobis/bots/blob/master/easychair-submissions-scraper.py
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Wikimania-l mailing list
>> > Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>> ___
>> Wikimania-l mailing list
>> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>>
>
> ___
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
>
___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l


[Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Federico Leva (Nemo)

See https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Submissions

The committee decided not to publish the detailed reviews. It's still a 
wiki and the talk pages are open as usual!


I also added categories for the keywords proposed by the submitters, so 
you'll soon be able to create a wonderful category tree with the help of 
https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WantedCategories (once 
the cache is updated).


Nemo

P.s.: As you noticed, I addressed the doubts about the time required for 
copy-and-pasting and did the import by bot. This means that if you want 
to augment/change the imported data and practise 
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/ you can do so with a patch: 
https://github.com/nemobis/bots/blob/master/easychair-submissions-scraper.py


___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l


Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Mike Peel
It looks like only the first sentence/paragraph of the submitted abstracts have 
been posted onto the wiki too, not the complete ones, which is a shame.

Thanks,
Mike

> On 14 Feb 2016, at 22:07, Federico Leva (Nemo)  wrote:
> 
> See https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Submissions
> 
> The committee decided not to publish the detailed reviews. It's still a wiki 
> and the talk pages are open as usual!
> 
> I also added categories for the keywords proposed by the submitters, so 
> you'll soon be able to create a wonderful category tree with the help of 
> https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:WantedCategories (once the 
> cache is updated).
> 
> Nemo
> 
> P.s.: As you noticed, I addressed the doubts about the time required for 
> copy-and-pasting and did the import by bot. This means that if you want to 
> augment/change the imported data and practise http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/ you 
> can do so with a patch: 
> https://github.com/nemobis/bots/blob/master/easychair-submissions-scraper.py
> 
> ___
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l

___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l


Re: [Wikimania-l] Wikimania "critical issues" submissions published

2016-02-14 Thread Mike Peel


> On 14 Feb 2016, at 22:40, Federico Leva (Nemo)  wrote:
> 
> Mike Peel, 14/02/2016 23:24:
>> It looks like only the first sentence/paragraph of the submitted abstracts 
>> have been posted onto the wiki too, not the complete ones, which is a shame.
> 
> Ah, that explains why they were shorter than I expected! ;-)
> Thanks for pointing it out, it's fixed now.

Thanks for fixing it. :-)

Mike
___
Wikimania-l mailing list
Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l