Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising updates?

2012-12-13 Thread Itzik Edri
Indeed, a good start, that I already checked.

The statistics shows only WMF data. Last year we had google docs file that
the chapters shared their numbers every day also.

And there is no indication to which banners running and their performance,
things that I'll like to see.

The fundraising team did some interesting changes this year, which will
be interesting to know their performances.

Itzik.

2012/12/13 Till Mletzko till.mlet...@wikimedia.de

 and: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_2012

 Till


 Am 13.12.2012 15:12, schrieb Theo10011:
  On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Itzik Edri it...@infra.co.il wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
  Could we get some updates (or that I missed them?) about how the
  fundraising goes? WMF and Chapters will be great. Since we only focus on
  few countries this year, the discussions regarding it is very low, but
 it
  still very interesting to know how much we collect and how the banners
  works (and which one of them)
 
  http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserStatistics  - is a
  good start.
 
  -Theo
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


 --
 Mit freundlichen Grüßen

 Till Mletzko
 Fundraiser
 -
 Wikimedia Fördergesellschaft
 Obentrautstr. 72
 10963 Berlin

 Telefon 030 - 219 158 26 -19
 www.wikimedia.de

 Helfen Sie mit, dass WIKIPEDIA von der UNESCO als erstes digitales
 Weltkulturerbe anerkannt wird.
 Unterzeichnen Sie die Online-Petition unter
 https://wke.wikimedia.de/wke/Main_Page!

 Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch freien Zugang zu der
 Gesamtheit des Wissens der Menschheit hat. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
 http://spenden.wikimedia.de/

 Gemeinnützige Wikimedia Fördergesellschaft mbH.
 Eingetragen beim Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 130183
 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I
 Berlin, Steuernummer 27/603/54814.


 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


Re: [Wikimedia-l] And you thought the Amazon Wikipedia books were bad

2012-12-13 Thread Mathias Schindler
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:25 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://singularityhub.com/2012/12/13/patented-book-writing-system-lets-one-professor-create-hundreds-of-thousands-of-amazon-books-and-counting/

 He's patented the method, too. Hopefully he will enforce the patent.

Noam Cohen wrote about him in 2008:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/worldbusiness/14iht-14link.11952478.html?pagewanted=all_r=0
Little has changed since then.

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


Re: [Wikimedia-l] And you thought the Amazon Wikipedia books were bad

2012-12-13 Thread Sage Ross
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Mathias Schindler
mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:25 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://singularityhub.com/2012/12/13/patented-book-writing-system-lets-one-professor-create-hundreds-of-thousands-of-amazon-books-and-counting/

 He's patented the method, too. Hopefully he will enforce the patent.

 Noam Cohen wrote about him in 2008:
 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/worldbusiness/14iht-14link.11952478.html?pagewanted=all_r=0
 Little has changed since then.


This, if I recall correctly, is some Wikimedians geeking out over how
cool his methods were:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aaron,_SJ_and_Mako_at_Boston_Wikipedia_Meetup,_2009-08-18.jpg

:-)

-Sage

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


Re: [Wikimedia-l] And you thought the Amazon Wikipedia books were bad

2012-12-13 Thread Marie-Antoine Rieu
Extraordinaire...

2012/12/13 Sage Ross ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.com

 On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Mathias Schindler
 mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:25 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 http://singularityhub.com/2012/12/13/patented-book-writing-system-lets-one-professor-create-hundreds-of-thousands-of-amazon-books-and-counting/
 
  He's patented the method, too. Hopefully he will enforce the patent.
 
  Noam Cohen wrote about him in 2008:
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/14/business/worldbusiness/14iht-14link.11952478.html?pagewanted=all_r=0
  Little has changed since then.
 

 This, if I recall correctly, is some Wikimedians geeking out over how
 cool his methods were:

 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aaron,_SJ_and_Mako_at_Boston_Wikipedia_Meetup,_2009-08-18.jpg

 :-)

 -Sage

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l




-- 
Marie-antoine RIEU

50 rue Offenbach
31500 Toulouse France
00(33) 5 61 48 90 55
00(33) 6 61 98 86 42
Mail : marie.r...@gmail.com
Merci de me confirmer bonne réception des fichiers attachés le cas échéant
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l


[Wikimedia-l] WikiSym 2013: Wikipedia Research Track CFP

2012-12-13 Thread Heather Ford
WikiSym 2013: Wikipedia Research Track Call for Papers
=

WikiSym, the 9th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
OpenSym, the 2013 International Symposium on Open Collaboration
August 5-7, 2013 | Hong Kong, China

About the Conference

The 2013 Joint International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym 
+ OpenSym) is the premier conference on open collaboration research, including 
wiki and social media, Wikipedia, open source, open access, open data and open 
government research. WikiSym is in its 9th year and will be complemented by 
OpenSym, a new conference on open collaboration research and an adjunct to the 
successful WikiSym conference series.

WikiSym + OpenSym 2013 will be held jointly in Hong Kong, China on August 5-7, 
2013.

The joint conference will contain peer-reviewed research tracks on

• Wikis, social media, and open collaboration research (WikiSym 2013)
• Wikipedia research (WikiSym 2013)
• Open source research (OpenSym 2013)
• Open access, open data, and open government research (OpenSym 2013)

You are looking at the call for papers for the Wikipedia research track. For 
the other call for papers, please see http://www.wikisym.org/email

In addition, the conference will provide open space (“unconference meetings”), 
experience reports, tutorials, workshops, panels, demos as well as a Doctoral 
Symposium. For community track information as well as the Doctoral Symposium 
please see http://www.wikisym.org/email

The open space track is a key ingredient of the event that distinguishes 
WikiSym + OpenSym 2013 from other conferences. It is an integral part of the 
program that makes it easy to talk to other researchers and stretch your 
imagination and conversations beyond the limits of your own subdiscipline, 
exposing you to the full breadth of open collaboration research. The open space 
track is entirely participant-organized, is open for everyone, and requires no 
submission or review. For more information please see 
http://www.wikisym.org/openspace/

Finally, the conference will feature exciting invited speakers and a social 
program in Hong Kong, one of the most interesting cities on this planet. For 
more please see http://www.wikisym.org/email

Submissions Sought

Topics of interest to the Wikipedia research track include, but are not limited 
to:

• What do particular articles or groups or articles tell us about the norms, 
governance and architecture of Wikipedia and its impact on media, politics and 
the social sphere? How is information on Wikipedia being shaped by the 
materiality of Wikipedia infrastructure?

• What is the impact of all/some of Wikipedia’s 211 language editions having on 
achieving the project’s goal to represent the “sum of all human knowledge”? Do 
smaller language editions follow the same development path as larger language 
editions? Can different representations in different languages tell us anything 
about cultural, national or regional differences?

• What are the gendered dimensions of Wikipedia editing? How are issues around 
power, knowledge and representation drawn into focus by gender, geography and 
other gaps and imbalances in Wikipedia editing?

• What skills/competencies/connections/world views are required to become an 
empowered member of the Wikimedia community? What does a Wikipedia literate 
person look like? How are those skills/competencies/connections/world views 
obtained and enacted?

• Does Wikipedia enact an open source of authoritative knowledge that impacts 
learning in formal and informal settings? For instance, how do students employ 
Wikipedia as a covert/overt source in their papers or as a generative site for 
problem formulation? Or how is Wikipedia being used as a serendipitous 
experience of knowledge acquisition? What methods can be employed to understand 
these varied utilizations?

• What is the effect of outreach initiatives involving the growing 
institutionalisation of Wikipedia activities? As galleries, libraries, archives 
and museums hire Wikipedians-in-residence to digitize, showcase and/or 
represent their collections, is Wikipedia able to fill some its key knowledge 
gaps? Or are there unintended effects of this institutionalization of knowledge?

• What are the methodological challenges to studying Wikipedia? How are 
researchers engaging with innovative methodologies to solve some of these 
problems? How are other researchers using traditional or well-established 
methods to study Wikipedia?

• How are wiki projects other than Wikipedia evolving? What are the benefits to 
studying other wiki projects and can comparisons and generalisations be made 
from our observations of these systems?

• How does information contained in Wikipedia shape our understanding of 
broader social, economic, and political practices and processes? What 
theoretical frameworks in social, economic, legal and other relevant 
theoretical traditions can be