Re: [Wikimedia-l] The British Library releases 1 million images

2013-12-19 Thread Jane Darnell
I like the stray text around the images - it  shows that the picture
is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or
engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases. The
problematic images are the ones of letterheads and margin decorations,
which, though perhaps interesting for articles on publishing or
printing, are not really useful in the quantities available unless
Wikisource is able to ingest the books in such a way that they use
those too. As I understand it however, you cannot recycle a Commons
image in a djvu file (yet). I do think some of the more encyclopedic
books would be great to have in their entirety on Wikisource.

2013/12/18, geni geni...@gmail.com:
 On 17 December 2013 20:08, Matthew Flaschen
 matthew.flasc...@gatech.eduwrote:


 As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community
 can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.


 Even if we could a lot of the images could do with some preprocessing to
 remove things like stray text.

 --
 geni
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Ombudsman Commission applications

2013-12-19 Thread Maggie Dennis
With thanks to those who have already submitted applications, I wanted to
just push out a reminder here.

The deadline for applications is January 1, any timezone. With major
holidays coming for many parts of the world, I didn't want people to
overlook the opportunity. If you are interested in serving on the ombudsman
commission, please drop me a note detailing your experience on the
projects, your thoughts on the commission, and what you hope to bring to
the role.

Thanks!

Maggie


On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Maggie Dennis mden...@wikimedia.orgwrote:

 Hi

 It's coming close to time for annual appointments of community members
 to serve on the Ombudsman commission. This commission works on all
 Wikimedia projects to investigate complaints about violations of the
 privacy policy, especially in use of CheckUser tools, and to mediate
 between the complaining party and the individual whose work is being
 investigated. They may also assist the General Counsel, the Executive
 Director or the Board of Trustees in investigations of these issues. For
 more on their duties and roles, see
 http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ombudsman_commission

 This is a call for community members interested in volunteering
 for appointment to this commission. Commissioners should be
 experienced Wikimedians, active on any project, who have previously used
 the CheckUser tool OR who have the technical ability to understand the
 CheckUser tool and the willingness to learn it. They are expected to be
 able to engage neutrally in investigating these concerns and to know when
 to recuse when other roles and relationships may cause conflict. (In the
 past, commissioners have turned in other roles that could cause conflict.)

 Commissioners are required to identify to the Wikimedia Foundation and
 must be willing to comply with the appropriate board policies (such as
 the access to non-public data policy and the privacy policy). This is
 a position that requires a high degree of discretion and trust.

 If you are interested in serving on this commission, please drop me a
 note detailing your experience on the projects, your thoughts on the
 commission and what you hope to bring to the role. The commission is
 deliberately quite small, so slots are limited, but all applications are
 appreciated. The deadline for applications is January 1. Any timezone. :)

 Please feel free to pass this invitation along to any users who you
 think may be interested.

 Thank you!

 Maggie



 --
 Maggie Dennis
 Senior Community Advocate
 Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.




-- 
Maggie Dennis
Senior Community Advocate
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The British Library releases 1 million images

2013-12-19 Thread Andrew Gray
I did put a few of the books up in the past (as PDFs provided by the
BL, then manually converted to DjVu):

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kennedy,_Robert_John_-_A_Journey_in_Khorassan_(1890).djvu
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kennedy,_Robert_John_-_A_Journey_in_Khorassan_(1890).pdf
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Journey_in_Khorassan_and_Central_Asia

I kept running into size limits  wasn't quite sure how best to get
the right material to Wikisource, but if there's particular titles,
let me know  I'll see what can be done.

On 19 December 2013 09:07, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
 I like the stray text around the images - it  shows that the picture
 is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or
 engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases. The
 problematic images are the ones of letterheads and margin decorations,
 which, though perhaps interesting for articles on publishing or
 printing, are not really useful in the quantities available unless
 Wikisource is able to ingest the books in such a way that they use
 those too. As I understand it however, you cannot recycle a Commons
 image in a djvu file (yet). I do think some of the more encyclopedic
 books would be great to have in their entirety on Wikisource.

 2013/12/18, geni geni...@gmail.com:
 On 17 December 2013 20:08, Matthew Flaschen
 matthew.flasc...@gatech.eduwrote:


 As Andrew said, the interesting question is whether the Commons community
 can effectively help curate/add metadata for this unidentified content.


 Even if we could a lot of the images could do with some preprocessing to
 remove things like stray text.

 --
 geni
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] The British Library releases 1 million images

2013-12-19 Thread geni
On 19 December 2013 09:07, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:

 I like the stray text around the images - it  shows that the picture
 is from a book, rather than a separate unattached file like a photo or
 engraving, and the captions are necessary in most cases.



Not for use in articles. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eaton_Socon_Castle


-- 
geni
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe