Re: [Wikimedia-l] fiction: WMF policy of paying less than market
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 8:46 AM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote: Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote: Finally I find the idea of restraining people to talk about salary almost comical Would you post the text of the non-disparagement clause referred to at http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Minutes/April_5-7,_2008#Non-disparagement_and_confidentiality_agreement and http://uk.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Water_coolerdiff=19657oldid=19653 please, so we can see exactly what it says? At least in the U.S., per the National Labor Relations Act, employees are always allowed to discuss wages without fear of reprisal from their employers. So even if such a clause were to exist prohibiting such discussion, it would have no legal effect. -Madman/ea ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation's support of OTRS
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:02 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: This also isn't a criticism of the Wikimedia Foundation engineering folks. They've got plenty on their plate as well, of course. But _somebody_ has to be supporting the technical portion of OTRS. If the Wikimedia Foundation can't/won't, someone else has to step in. That's where I thought the chapters or another movement player might be an option. Does anyone know what the status is of the OTRS project on Labs? Given a contact, I'd be happy to do what I can to help; I have some limited experience configuring/deploying OTRS (up until the end of the 3.0 branch last year, nothing with 3.1 or 3.2 unfortunately). I think opportunities for *volunteer* help have to consciously be maximized, especially for volunteers who are or are willing to be agents and/or identified to the Foundation. It's not going to get done otherwise. -Madman/ea ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
