Original-Nachricht
Betreff:Resign due to COI and Application to the ED position
Datum: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:45:31 +0200
Von:Ting Chen tc...@wikimedia.org
An: Board list boar...@lists.wikimedia.org
Dear board,
after intensive consideration and some sleepless nights I have decided
to apply for the ED job of the Wikimedia Foundation. Due to obvious
conflict of interest I will resign from the Board of Trustees of the
Wikimedia Foundation, in effect at May 5th.
In the past five years I have worked with you on our first strategic
planning, together and especially with the help of the current ED Sue we
saw the organization leave its infancy. We saw it grow into the innocent
childhood. And yet we are still facing a lot of challenges. And for me
the following three are the biggest and most critical for the coming years:
We know that our active editor community is in overall decline. In many
ways our community is biased, there is the famous gender gap, but there
are also other gaps. Last year on Wikimania in Washington I wondered if
I was the only one who noticed that there were almost no African
Americans attending the conference, when according to the official
census more than half of the citizen of the city is black. When
attending community events in Germany I notice every time that I never
met a single Turkish migrant there, while about 5% of the German have a
Turkish background. We generally failed to attract minority groups to
join and actively take part of our community. While the Foundation took
a lot of effort to provide technical support for new users we also need,
and need to strengthen our effort on the social aspect of this
challenge. Technology alone cannot solve social problems. We will be
able to resolve some of the problems by carefully and consistently
adjusting our policies and rules, other problems need a mind change and
a cultural change in the broad society outside of the digital world. To
gather and share the total knowledge of the mankind we not only need
academic knowledge but also the daily live wisdom. To keep our
neutrality we only need to motivate the minority inside of the society
to join our community. I believe the ability of our community to adjust
itself, I believe the ability of our movement in changing the society,
and I believe the Foundation need to play a key role in this process.
And I want the Foundation to take this challenge.
While our communities often show a bias in their own geographical
regions, we also see a large global bias of our movement and in our
projects. For me the revamp of the catalyst program does not mean that
the Foundation should give up its global south effort. For me it means
that we need to take this challenge with a new approach. Instead of
trying to plant seed in the region we should strengthen our effort by
providing as much support as we can to the seedlings that are already
there. Unlike mature communities like in western Europe or in northern
America, small communities in places such as Kenya or Cambodia, but also
in regions like China or Uzbekistan see active recruitment of editors as
an essential necessity to make themselves sustainable. My believe is
that the right approach is to provide support to these communities,
instead of trying to build a parallel structure beside of them. In
regions of the world, where hunger and poverty is still an acute and
real threat to the people, the challenge to establish a culture of
sharing is a very big challenge. But nevertheless, where ever I
traveled, I also encounter people who are attached and admired by this
approach of a society. Knowledge sharing and prosperity, freedom and
peace can be a self strengthening positive feedback loop, but as every
positive feedback loop, especially at the beginning it is important to
have impulses to get the loop started and get stronger, until it can
sustain itself. I think the Foundation should play an important role in
this mechanism. Because without the part of the world with the largest
majority of the human being we are far away from gathering and sharing
the entirety of the human knowledge.
The third challenge that I see for the Foundation is to provide a
consistent, long lasting relationship concept with the partner groups
and organizations as defined in the movement roles document. In the past
years the relation between the Foundation and the partner organizations
are more defined by things that failed or that may fail. There were
quite a few emergency measurements taken to react on crises or to
mitigate emerging crises. I believe this cannot be a longtime approach.
We need the local communities and the partner organizations to take the
first two challenges I mentioned above. And we need to establish a long
term, more trustful relation with them so that we can really rely on
each other. We need to minimize frictions and turbulence. We need to
