Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-27 Thread Tim Landscheidt
(anonymous) wrote:

 [...]

 Broadly, I don't think many people appreciate how important mailing lists
 have been and continue to be to Wikimedia. Both in terms of providing a(n)
 historical record and in terms of day-to-day workflow. It would not be a
 bad investment on the part of the Wikimedia Foundation or a Wikimedia
 chapter to improve (or replace) mailman. Perhaps Flow or Echo or some
 other four-letter communication tool... one day. :-)

 One idea I had was to have a bot or script post the full messages to wiki
 pages on Meta-Wiki (e.g., Mailing lists/wikimedia-l/foo). This would
 provide for much more stable links and provide a few other benefits. But
 it didn't quite seem worth it.

I don't think that's necessary.  Gmane provides stable links
and is probably better maintained while WMF neither has to
pay for administration nor servers.  And Lars' blog posts
about requests for archive tampering are much more enter-
taining :-) (and they /exist/ compared to WMF Legal's clan-
destine behaviour that makes something like
http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/ unthinkable).

The only major problem with Gmane and wikimedia-l is that
someone has set the archives to encrypt, so for proper
quotes of mail addresses you still have to search the WMF
archives or subscribe to a folder with auto-expire.

Tim


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Alexandros Kosiaris


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Huib Laurens
What the fuck are you doing?


On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris 
akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote:



 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




-- 
Met vriendelijke groet,

Huib Laurens
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Peel
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61917

Thanks,
Mike

On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:32, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:

 What the fuck are you doing?
 
 
 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris 
 akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 
 
 
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Met vriendelijke groet,
 
 Huib Laurens
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe


___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Lodewijk
please hold your tongue and be civil. Even if you don't understand
something. Thanks! (and thanks Mike for the link!)


2014-02-25 22:32 GMT+01:00 Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com:

 What the fuck are you doing?


 On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Alexandros Kosiaris 
 akosia...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia-l mailing list
  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
  mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe




 --
 Met vriendelijke groet,

 Huib Laurens
 ___
 Wikimedia-l mailing list
 Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
 mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread Nathan
So the lesson here is that list archives should not be messed with. I don't
think that is news, I seem to remember hearing about the havoc potentially
caused by selectively editing list archives many years ago and once in
awhile ever since.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [Wikimedia-l] Plz ignore again

2014-02-25 Thread MZMcBride
Nathan wrote:
So the lesson here is that list archives should not be messed with.

Yes. A thousand times yes.

I don't think that is news, I seem to remember hearing about the havoc
potentially caused by selectively editing list archives many years ago
and once in awhile ever since.

It goes something like this:

* an important enough person makes a reasonable enough request for archive
tampering;

* a root (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/root) tries to rewrite history;

* there are various side effects, almost always including broken links.

In this particular case, we seem to have possibly permanently damaged the
February 2014 archive. The typical side effect is every historical link
being reindexed so that links largely continue to function, but lead to
the entirely wrong post. I think we were fortunate to avoid that this time.

To be clear, this isn't operations' fault, per se, this is largely mailman
being awful. Perhaps mailman intentionally wants to prevent this type of
behavior, though there's a lot more evidence to suggest that mailman is
simply outdated, unloved, and awful. We may also be running an old version
of it, for better or worse.

The operations team is the only group capable of taking any action on
incoming requests such as this, as I understand it, so they get stuck
deciding whether or not to act. What feeds the cycle is that there's
typical staff turnover among operations and the requests are infrequent
enough. The people who do decide to act almost always immediately regret
it and vow not to repeat the mistake, but there's still a (rotating) pool
of people yet to be scarred by the experience.

Broadly, I don't think many people appreciate how important mailing lists
have been and continue to be to Wikimedia. Both in terms of providing a(n)
historical record and in terms of day-to-day workflow. It would not be a
bad investment on the part of the Wikimedia Foundation or a Wikimedia
chapter to improve (or replace) mailman. Perhaps Flow or Echo or some
other four-letter communication tool... one day. :-)

One idea I had was to have a bot or script post the full messages to wiki
pages on Meta-Wiki (e.g., Mailing lists/wikimedia-l/foo). This would
provide for much more stable links and provide a few other benefits. But
it didn't quite seem worth it.

MZMcBride



___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe