Ok,
in Italian Wikimedia there was only a problem (they have used
Mediawiki) when the features have required to have pages with
restricted access. Usually blogger and/or wiki hasn't controlled
access: the login allows the access to all pages. It's possible to use
another configuration with restricted group and restricted login but
it isn't easy to implement. You should verify this open point.
Regards
Ilario
On 5/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
uuh - i'd need training for typo3 - which is one of the most feature
rich cms (content management systems) i know, hehe ...
i would strongly suggest to take wordpress. it looks good and does
exactly what we want it to do: news for the first page.
for coordination/group edit, i would suggest to stay with wiki and
choose one which has user-rights on page level and allows to make
groups, like moinmoin.
otherwise we should not be wikimedia ch but cmsmedia ch :)
rupi.
--
you already know? wikipedia tried to let prof. bertrand meyer die. but
people don't die that easy, in contrary: he is coming to our wikipedia
day ... go and see what he says about that the 2006-06-17, eth zürich,
details on http://wikimedia.ch.
On 5/2/06, Ilario Valdelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I reply you after some days, but I think it could be useful.
I know Wordpress and I'm approaching to Typo3. The problem is that
Wordpress is a blog factory whereas typo3 is a standard CMS.
This difference is considerable because a blogger has no workflow (or
smaller workflow) and a simple management of users. It's also
difficult to create domains with owners.
If you should manage different domains, different owners, different
users with complex rights or workflows (i.e. editing, approving,
publishing with editor, approver, etc.) more complex than a wiki or a
blog, Typo3 is a good choice.
In any case if you need some help to modiy PHP pages or to manage or
modify MySQL tables, I'm available.
Ilario
On 5/1/06, Manuel Schneider [Everything Open]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi together,
I just installed two wikis:
- board.wikimedia.ch
- members.wikimedia.ch
ch.wikimedia.org should later be redirected to www.wikimedia.ch.
For www.wikimedia.ch we should decide what kind of page we'd like to
install
there. Wikimedia Deutschland uses Wordpress in a MediaWiki-look. I would
prefer Typo3 to present current news and dates. Typo3 has (as Wordpress)
the
ability to work with different users as redacteurs and groups. It's quite
complicated to administrate as it can nearly do anything (if you know how
to
realise) but it's also very nice and easy to use for redacteurs.
www.wikipedia.ch will show the common portal we already use which
redirects to
the specific languages of wikipedia.org.
___
www.wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
___
www.wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
___
www.wikimedia.ch Wikimedia CH website
Wikimediach-l mailing list
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediach-l
