Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-04-01 Thread rupert THURNER
Hi mike,

many of us experienced and still experience challenges with community
outreach in regions where digital literacy is not the same level known from
home. But the ones there in the beginning of wikipedia know how long it
took to get all the rules in place. People had a chance to influence the
rules and grow with them.

Today is a completely different beast. While the wikimedia beginners
attitude did not change, there are numerous people facing the newbies with
so much experience, and there are paid persons beeing able to dedicate all
their attention to special cases, and shut new people down or out. Its good
that these people do exist, as long this growing into it, imperfections
allowed.

Therefor this was imo handled properly. Because wmuk is now the second
chapter and community supporting the Ghana movement. Because the support
did not patronize the Ghana community but was on an advisory level, letting
the people there grow and see for themselves. Actively involve the Ghana
community might have been better than trusting some of them are subscribed
to the wmuk list though. But too much perfection has two undesirable
effects: it gives no chance to learn.  And it demoralizes volunteers which
we than loose forever.

Up to now the Ghana community has been exemplary imo. In the years i
participated a little in the discussions i saw A good feeling for what is
important: edit or write software. A good feeling for conflicts of
interest. A good feeling for usage of money. A nicely implemented strategy
to slowly grow, involving different and new persons on the way. I saw
things which i d handled differently, but hey, it is their community, and
they need to be happy in it.

You can be pretty sure that this involvement is another cornerstone in the
experience Ghana wikimedia people make, and will put to use later on.

So, wmuk, do it again, many thanks for this involvement.

Rupert
Am 01.04.2014 00:04 schrieb Michael Peel michael.p...@manchester.ac.uk:

 This strikes me as an excuse rather than a reason. Fæ's questions/points
 here don't seem to have been answered. :-(

 Thanks,
 Mike

 On 31 Mar 2014, at 08:10, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

  Apologies for delay in replying but I have been away.
 
  As previously stated our relationship as a chapter in this isntance is
 with Kwaku as a volunteer.
 
  We organised an editathon last year with BTWSC/BBM as you know. Not
 funding was involved.
 
  And for those who may be interested my 'private' email was at the
 request of Kwaku asking Fae to contact him directly to have any questions
 answered and including his contact details.
 
 
 
  On 27 March 2014 14:12, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
  After a week of silence on basic questions, in response to a different
  volunteer, the UK chapter has confirmed that it is supporting the
  BritishBlackMusic.com event in Ghana with money and official
  merchandising. The precise amount has not been specified.[1] It was
  not clear to me that the event was in Ghana rather than the UK, until
  another volunteer found an Eventbrite page with details. This was
  apparently unknown to the UK Chapter as no mention was made of it when
  promoting the event.[3]
 
  In the light of the fact that Kwaku is making public presentations
  officially supported by Wikimedia UK, I have raised Kwaku's COI issues
  on the English Wikipedia noticeboard so that he can be advised by
  project volunteers as to policy and best practice.[2] Since creating
  his account on the English Wikipedia ten months ago, Kwaku has made a
  total of 10 edits with several others being deleted, apparently due to
  them promoting his organization, some remaining edits promote his
  writing for Billboard.[4]
 
  Kwaku was funded by Wikimedia UK last year with a full scholarship for
  a weekend in Berlin to take part in a Wikimedia Conference, the amount
  of the charity's money this cost has not been made public.
 
  With regard to Jon Davies' email to this thread that BBM are supported
  by Lottery Funding, this appears an exaggeration of the facts. I have
  had a response from the Brent Archives, a named 2006 project partner,
  who confirmed the project happened but were unable to produce a
  report; they took no responsibility for the funds. After an interim
  reply, am waiting on a full response from the Heritage Lottery Fund
  (HLF). A HLF project was funded 8 years ago in 2006 with BTWSC named
  as running the project, intended to produce a guide. There is no
  evidence of any lottery funding for BTWSC since that date, the BBM
  appears to have never been the recipient of lottery funding.
 
  No evidence has been found that BTWSC or BBM are registered
  organizations, consequently it is unlikely that financial accounts
  have ever been published or put on record.
 
  Note, I was privately emailed by Jon Davies a few days ago but no
  additional information was provided at that time.
 
  Link
  1.
 

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-31 Thread Jon Davies
Apologies for delay in replying but I have been away.

As previously stated our relationship as a chapter in this isntance is with
Kwaku as a volunteer.

We organised an editathon last year with BTWSC/BBM as you know. Not funding
was involved.

And for those who may be interested my 'private' email was at the request
of Kwaku asking Fae to contact him directly to have any questions answered
and including his contact details.



On 27 March 2014 14:12, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 After a week of silence on basic questions, in response to a different
 volunteer, the UK chapter has confirmed that it is supporting the
 BritishBlackMusic.com event in Ghana with money and official
 merchandising. The precise amount has not been specified.[1] It was
 not clear to me that the event was in Ghana rather than the UK, until
 another volunteer found an Eventbrite page with details. This was
 apparently unknown to the UK Chapter as no mention was made of it when
 promoting the event.[3]

 In the light of the fact that Kwaku is making public presentations
 officially supported by Wikimedia UK, I have raised Kwaku's COI issues
 on the English Wikipedia noticeboard so that he can be advised by
 project volunteers as to policy and best practice.[2] Since creating
 his account on the English Wikipedia ten months ago, Kwaku has made a
 total of 10 edits with several others being deleted, apparently due to
 them promoting his organization, some remaining edits promote his
 writing for Billboard.[4]

 Kwaku was funded by Wikimedia UK last year with a full scholarship for
 a weekend in Berlin to take part in a Wikimedia Conference, the amount
 of the charity's money this cost has not been made public.

 With regard to Jon Davies' email to this thread that BBM are supported
 by Lottery Funding, this appears an exaggeration of the facts. I have
 had a response from the Brent Archives, a named 2006 project partner,
 who confirmed the project happened but were unable to produce a
 report; they took no responsibility for the funds. After an interim
 reply, am waiting on a full response from the Heritage Lottery Fund
 (HLF). A HLF project was funded 8 years ago in 2006 with BTWSC named
 as running the project, intended to produce a guide. There is no
 evidence of any lottery funding for BTWSC since that date, the BBM
 appears to have never been the recipient of lottery funding.

 No evidence has been found that BTWSC or BBM are registered
 organizations, consequently it is unlikely that financial accounts
 have ever been published or put on record.

 Note, I was privately emailed by Jon Davies a few days ago but no
 additional information was provided at that time.

 Link
 1.
 https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Water_coolerdiff=54770oldid=54768
 2.
 http://www.lottery.culture.gov.uk/GrantDetails.aspx?ID=YH-05-01416DBID=HM
 3.
 http://web.archive.org/web/20140327135842/http://www.eventbrite.com/e/talking-wikipedia-in-ghana-tickets-10971368659?aff=es2
 4.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboardcurid=8634849diff=601495199oldid=601426585

 On 20 March 2014 13:18, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 20 March 2014 11:49, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 20 March 2014 11:31, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
  We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon.
  ...
 
  I have checked with Companies House. There are no registered companies
  that relate to:
  * British Black Music (run by Kwaku)
  * BtWsc or MusicWrite Plus (run by K Kaywrite)
 
  I have confirmed with the Department for Culture Media  Sport, that
  eight years ago (2006) a lottery grant of £35,000 was paid for the
  Brent Black Music History Project. This project was in partnership
  with Brent Archives. It is not yet clear which legal organization
  received the funds, was responsible for reporting on the project
  outcomes or publishing financial accounts for the monies. As an unpaid
  volunteer for Wikimedia UK with no authority, I have written to Brent
  Archives and the Heritage Lottery Fund for confirmation and any
  available reports.
 
  Fae
  --
  fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae



 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
 Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk




-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who

[Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-31 Thread
On 31 March 2014 08:10, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 Apologies for delay in replying but I have been away.

 As previously stated our relationship as a chapter in this isntance is with
 Kwaku as a volunteer.

 We organised an editathon last year with BTWSC/BBM as you know. Not funding
 was involved.

It might be an idea to let one of your employees handle international
events and answer questions like these when you are on holiday rather
than leaving a silence. Questions were raised as far back as 20th
March, which is a long time in advance of the event for there to be no
answers on basic logistics or matters of governance and reputation.[1]

I am puzzled by your statement that WMUK ran an editathon last year in
partnership with BritishBlackMusic.com without offering to support
with any expenses. For the workshop on Saturday in Accra, the UK did
provide funding and official merchandizing though the amount paid or
promised has not been published.

I am concerned that your statement that there was no relationship with
BTWSC or BritishBlackMusic.com for Saturday's workshop in Ghana as you
are retrospectively contradicting the published advertizing:
* Wikimedia UK's events page listed the workshop with a link of
BritishBlackMusic.com_in_assn_with_BTWSC/Wikimedia_UK which is an
unambiguous claim that BritishBlackMusic.com were providing it in
association with Wikimedia UK.[2]
* The official Eventbrite listing states that the workshop in Accra
was organized by BritishBlackMusic.com and that this was officially
supported by Wikimedia UK.[3]

Wikimedia UK was alerted to these questions well in advance of the
workshop. Why did you take no corrective action before the wokshop if
the advertising by BritishBlackMusic.com falsely claimed a partnership
with Wikimedia UK?

Wikimedia UK did not contact the local Wikimedian community in Ghana,
a significant failure to use the opportunity to create positive
relationships with the proto-chapter there, or to ask them for help to
ensure that the money the UK chapter was spending was put to best use.
Luckily, the local community took the initiative to coordinate their
own attendance and response.[4] However there are serious questions
about the UK charity's management and support of this workshop:
* I'm not being jealous or envious here for the Wikimedia UK
'empowering' Kwaku, but the question is, on what basis was he given
such a privilege? The less than 50 edits? Or because he's
black-skinned and says verbally he comes from Ghana?
* Even after your asking, [no] email has *officially* come in from
[Wikimedia UK]. We're just negligible in their eyes.

As you have a personal interest in inter-chapter relations, you may
wish to follow-up to ameliorate this damage to the reputation of the
charity. As you took time to remind me 11 days ago, it is up to you
what you wish to spend your time on.

[Adding wikimedia-gh as I have quoted statements on that public list
in this email.]

Links:
1. 
https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Water_coolerdiff=54401oldid=54324
2. https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Eventsoldid=54679
3. 
http://web.archive.org/web/20140327135842/http://www.eventbrite.com/e/talking-wikipedia-in-ghana-tickets-10971368659?aff=es2
4. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-gh/2014-March/001510.html

Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-31 Thread Michael Peel
This strikes me as an excuse rather than a reason. Fæ's questions/points here 
don't seem to have been answered. :-(

Thanks,
Mike

On 31 Mar 2014, at 08:10, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:

 Apologies for delay in replying but I have been away.
 
 As previously stated our relationship as a chapter in this isntance is with 
 Kwaku as a volunteer.
 
 We organised an editathon last year with BTWSC/BBM as you know. Not funding 
 was involved.
 
 And for those who may be interested my 'private' email was at the request of 
 Kwaku asking Fae to contact him directly to have any questions answered and 
 including his contact details.
 
 
 
 On 27 March 2014 14:12, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
 After a week of silence on basic questions, in response to a different
 volunteer, the UK chapter has confirmed that it is supporting the
 BritishBlackMusic.com event in Ghana with money and official
 merchandising. The precise amount has not been specified.[1] It was
 not clear to me that the event was in Ghana rather than the UK, until
 another volunteer found an Eventbrite page with details. This was
 apparently unknown to the UK Chapter as no mention was made of it when
 promoting the event.[3]
 
 In the light of the fact that Kwaku is making public presentations
 officially supported by Wikimedia UK, I have raised Kwaku's COI issues
 on the English Wikipedia noticeboard so that he can be advised by
 project volunteers as to policy and best practice.[2] Since creating
 his account on the English Wikipedia ten months ago, Kwaku has made a
 total of 10 edits with several others being deleted, apparently due to
 them promoting his organization, some remaining edits promote his
 writing for Billboard.[4]
 
 Kwaku was funded by Wikimedia UK last year with a full scholarship for
 a weekend in Berlin to take part in a Wikimedia Conference, the amount
 of the charity's money this cost has not been made public.
 
 With regard to Jon Davies' email to this thread that BBM are supported
 by Lottery Funding, this appears an exaggeration of the facts. I have
 had a response from the Brent Archives, a named 2006 project partner,
 who confirmed the project happened but were unable to produce a
 report; they took no responsibility for the funds. After an interim
 reply, am waiting on a full response from the Heritage Lottery Fund
 (HLF). A HLF project was funded 8 years ago in 2006 with BTWSC named
 as running the project, intended to produce a guide. There is no
 evidence of any lottery funding for BTWSC since that date, the BBM
 appears to have never been the recipient of lottery funding.
 
 No evidence has been found that BTWSC or BBM are registered
 organizations, consequently it is unlikely that financial accounts
 have ever been published or put on record.
 
 Note, I was privately emailed by Jon Davies a few days ago but no
 additional information was provided at that time.
 
 Link
 1. 
 https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Water_coolerdiff=54770oldid=54768
 2. http://www.lottery.culture.gov.uk/GrantDetails.aspx?ID=YH-05-01416DBID=HM
 3. 
 http://web.archive.org/web/20140327135842/http://www.eventbrite.com/e/talking-wikipedia-in-ghana-tickets-10971368659?aff=es2
 4. 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboardcurid=8634849diff=601495199oldid=601426585
 
 On 20 March 2014 13:18, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 20 March 2014 11:49, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 20 March 2014 11:31, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
  We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon.
  ...
 
  I have checked with Companies House. There are no registered companies
  that relate to:
  * British Black Music (run by Kwaku)
  * BtWsc or MusicWrite Plus (run by K Kaywrite)
 
  I have confirmed with the Department for Culture Media  Sport, that
  eight years ago (2006) a lottery grant of £35,000 was paid for the
  Brent Black Music History Project. This project was in partnership
  with Brent Archives. It is not yet clear which legal organization
  received the funds, was responsible for reporting on the project
  outcomes or publishing financial accounts for the monies. As an unpaid
  volunteer for Wikimedia UK with no authority, I have written to Brent
  Archives and the Heritage Lottery Fund for confirmation and any
  available reports.
 
  Fae
  --
  fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
 
 
 
 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
 Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.
 
 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
 
 
 
 -- 
 Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
 tweet @jonatreesdavies 
 
 Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and 
 Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity 

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-27 Thread
After a week of silence on basic questions, in response to a different
volunteer, the UK chapter has confirmed that it is supporting the
BritishBlackMusic.com event in Ghana with money and official
merchandising. The precise amount has not been specified.[1] It was
not clear to me that the event was in Ghana rather than the UK, until
another volunteer found an Eventbrite page with details. This was
apparently unknown to the UK Chapter as no mention was made of it when
promoting the event.[3]

In the light of the fact that Kwaku is making public presentations
officially supported by Wikimedia UK, I have raised Kwaku's COI issues
on the English Wikipedia noticeboard so that he can be advised by
project volunteers as to policy and best practice.[2] Since creating
his account on the English Wikipedia ten months ago, Kwaku has made a
total of 10 edits with several others being deleted, apparently due to
them promoting his organization, some remaining edits promote his
writing for Billboard.[4]

Kwaku was funded by Wikimedia UK last year with a full scholarship for
a weekend in Berlin to take part in a Wikimedia Conference, the amount
of the charity's money this cost has not been made public.

With regard to Jon Davies' email to this thread that BBM are supported
by Lottery Funding, this appears an exaggeration of the facts. I have
had a response from the Brent Archives, a named 2006 project partner,
who confirmed the project happened but were unable to produce a
report; they took no responsibility for the funds. After an interim
reply, am waiting on a full response from the Heritage Lottery Fund
(HLF). A HLF project was funded 8 years ago in 2006 with BTWSC named
as running the project, intended to produce a guide. There is no
evidence of any lottery funding for BTWSC since that date, the BBM
appears to have never been the recipient of lottery funding.

No evidence has been found that BTWSC or BBM are registered
organizations, consequently it is unlikely that financial accounts
have ever been published or put on record.

Note, I was privately emailed by Jon Davies a few days ago but no
additional information was provided at that time.

Link
1. 
https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Water_coolerdiff=54770oldid=54768
2. http://www.lottery.culture.gov.uk/GrantDetails.aspx?ID=YH-05-01416DBID=HM
3. 
http://web.archive.org/web/20140327135842/http://www.eventbrite.com/e/talking-wikipedia-in-ghana-tickets-10971368659?aff=es2
4. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboardcurid=8634849diff=601495199oldid=601426585

On 20 March 2014 13:18, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 20 March 2014 11:49, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 20 March 2014 11:31, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon.
 ...

 I have checked with Companies House. There are no registered companies
 that relate to:
 * British Black Music (run by Kwaku)
 * BtWsc or MusicWrite Plus (run by K Kaywrite)

 I have confirmed with the Department for Culture Media  Sport, that
 eight years ago (2006) a lottery grant of £35,000 was paid for the
 Brent Black Music History Project. This project was in partnership
 with Brent Archives. It is not yet clear which legal organization
 received the funds, was responsible for reporting on the project
 outcomes or publishing financial accounts for the monies. As an unpaid
 volunteer for Wikimedia UK with no authority, I have written to Brent
 Archives and the Heritage Lottery Fund for confirmation and any
 available reports.

 Fae
 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae



-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread Jon Davies
They are an independent organisation with whom we have worked and hope to
continue to work.

We are not currently funding them in any way. We do have an active member
of the chapter associated with them, (who has declared any potential
conflicts of interest) who is working with us to promote Wikimedia projects
in line with our programme.

As to their status on their website they state:

BritishBlackMusic.com (BBM) is an online resource providing information
about music, music business, and music business education with a bias
towards British and black music. Its off-line activities include cultural
industries research, consultancy, music business courses, and it organises
seminars, conferences, and the Black Music Congress (BMC) debates.

If you want to know more I suggest you contact them.

Jon.



On 19 March 2014 22:36, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 Could someone explain if there is a partnership agreement on record
 with BBM or BTWSC and whether these are registered commercial or
 non-profit organizations?

 Links:
 1.
 http://britishblackmusic.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=29Itemid=37
 2.
 https://wikimedia.org.uk/w/index.php?title=Main_Pagediff=54372oldid=54325rcid=curid=315
 3.
 http://britishblackmusic.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=34Itemid=41
 4. http://www.btwsc.com/
 5.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_African_diaspora/Black_British_Music_Editathon

 Thanks,
 Fae
 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk




-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.

Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread
On 20 March 2014 10:39, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 They are an independent organisation with whom we have worked and hope to
 continue to work.

 We are not currently funding them in any way. We do have an active member of
 the chapter associated with them, (who has declared any potential conflicts
 of interest) who is working with us to promote Wikimedia projects in line
 with our programme.
...

This would appear a significant reputational risk to the charity and a
failure in governance if no attempt has been made to do basic checks
before promoting joint events with commercial organizations.

I believe neither organization is registered currently with Companies
House, and and may be for-profit unregistered organizations enjoying
direct benefit from commercial advertising. As well as BBM working to
promote Wikimedia projects, the reverse is true as Wikimedia UK, as
a national registered charity, is directly promoting the website,
http://www.britishblackmusic.com, making it a more valuable internet
property. As a past Chairman of the charity, I find it disappointing
that Wikimedia UK and its current board of trustees has chosen to
perfer uncertainty with regard to its public partnerships and has left
it to unpaid volunteers to ask the most basic questions.

As you suggest, sometime this week I shall take the responsibility of
writing to Mr. Kwaku (Black Music Congress) the owner of BBM,[1] and K
Kaywrite (MusicWrite Plus) the owner of BTWSC[2] and confirm their
status.

I believe they already follow this email list, however as an early
head's up, I have copied WMF Legal into this email.

Links:
1. http://whois.domaintools.com/britishblackmusic.com
2. http://whois.domaintools.com/btwsc.com

Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread Jon Davies
We checked their bona fides before we first worked with them and found no
risk. They are funded by the National Lottery Heritage Lottery Fund and
promoted by Brent Council and have some prominent supporters such as Paul
Boateng.

This would indicate that, as we believe, they are a legitimate
orgnasisation and a proper one for us to work with.

Jon





On 20 March 2014 11:04, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 20 March 2014 10:39, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
  They are an independent organisation with whom we have worked and hope to
  continue to work.
 
  We are not currently funding them in any way. We do have an active
 member of
  the chapter associated with them, (who has declared any potential
 conflicts
  of interest) who is working with us to promote Wikimedia projects in line
  with our programme.
 ...

 This would appear a significant reputational risk to the charity and a
 failure in governance if no attempt has been made to do basic checks
 before promoting joint events with commercial organizations.

 I believe neither organization is registered currently with Companies
 House, and and may be for-profit unregistered organizations enjoying
 direct benefit from commercial advertising. As well as BBM working to
 promote Wikimedia projects, the reverse is true as Wikimedia UK, as
 a national registered charity, is directly promoting the website,
 http://www.britishblackmusic.com, making it a more valuable internet
 property. As a past Chairman of the charity, I find it disappointing
 that Wikimedia UK and its current board of trustees has chosen to
 perfer uncertainty with regard to its public partnerships and has left
 it to unpaid volunteers to ask the most basic questions.

 As you suggest, sometime this week I shall take the responsibility of
 writing to Mr. Kwaku (Black Music Congress) the owner of BBM,[1] and K
 Kaywrite (MusicWrite Plus) the owner of BTWSC[2] and confirm their
 status.

 I believe they already follow this email list, however as an early
 head's up, I have copied WMF Legal into this email.

 Links:
 1. http://whois.domaintools.com/britishblackmusic.com
 2. http://whois.domaintools.com/btwsc.com

 Fae
 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
 Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote.

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk




-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.

Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread
On 20 March 2014 11:13, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 We checked their bona fides before we first worked with them and found no
 risk. They are funded by the National Lottery Heritage Lottery Fund and
 promoted by Brent Council and have some prominent supporters such as Paul
 Boateng.

 This would indicate that, as we believe, they are a legitimate orgnasisation
 and a proper one for us to work with.

 Jon

Sorry, your statement is confusing. Your last email appeared to
indicate that no checks had been made and that I should do it myself
if I had any questions. Apart from looking at the BBM and BTWSC
websites (which appear unmaintained for several years), precisely what
checks did Wikimedia UK ensure before holding a joint event in 2013
and promoting another in 2014. For example did you or one of your
employees check whether they are registered at Companies House or ask
whether the two organizations comply with UK regulations for not for
profits?

I would like to know before duplicating your work.

Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread Jon Davies
We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon. They were. If
they ever applied for something like a Wikimedian in Residence we would
institute checks at an appropriate level.

It is up to you what you wish to spend your time on.





On 20 March 2014 11:21, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 20 March 2014 11:13, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
  We checked their bona fides before we first worked with them and found no
  risk. They are funded by the National Lottery Heritage Lottery Fund and
  promoted by Brent Council and have some prominent supporters such as Paul
  Boateng.
 
  This would indicate that, as we believe, they are a legitimate
 orgnasisation
  and a proper one for us to work with.
 
  Jon

 Sorry, your statement is confusing. Your last email appeared to
 indicate that no checks had been made and that I should do it myself
 if I had any questions. Apart from looking at the BBM and BTWSC
 websites (which appear unmaintained for several years), precisely what
 checks did Wikimedia UK ensure before holding a joint event in 2013
 and promoting another in 2014. For example did you or one of your
 employees check whether they are registered at Companies House or ask
 whether the two organizations comply with UK regulations for not for
 profits?

 I would like to know before duplicating your work.

 Fae
 --
 fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk




-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.

Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread
On 20 March 2014 11:31, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon. They were. If
 they ever applied for something like a Wikimedian in Residence we would
 institute checks at an appropriate level.

Thank you for the clarification. I believe this is fair to read as
official confirmation from the CEO that Wikimedia UK has run no checks
on these event partners before publicly promoting the partnership,
apart from looking at the self-created out of date websites.

 It is up to you what you wish to spend your time on.

Thank you for confirming my independence, that is kind of you to say.

Should Wikimedia UK now be choose to put effort into running
background checks on these organizations, I would appreciate it if
they were publicly shared. I would rather not use my limited unpaid
volunteer time to duplicate the work of paid employees.

Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk

Re: [Wikimediauk-l] BritishBlackMusic.com

2014-03-20 Thread
On 20 March 2014 11:49, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 20 March 2014 11:31, Jon Davies jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 We felt that they were a suitable partner for an editathon.
...

I have checked with Companies House. There are no registered companies
that relate to:
* British Black Music (run by Kwaku)
* BtWsc or MusicWrite Plus (run by K Kaywrite)

I have confirmed with the Department for Culture Media  Sport, that
eight years ago (2006) a lottery grant of £35,000 was paid for the
Brent Black Music History Project. This project was in partnership
with Brent Archives. It is not yet clear which legal organization
received the funds, was responsible for reporting on the project
outcomes or publishing financial accounts for the monies. As an unpaid
volunteer for Wikimedia UK with no authority, I have written to Brent
Archives and the Heritage Lottery Fund for confirmation and any
available reports.

Fae
-- 
fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk