Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-31 Thread Stevie Benton
Thanks Andreas and John. I'll get corrections made ASAP.

Stevie
On Jan 31, 2013 7:59 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 Freopedia is spelt wrong.

 John Vandenberg.
 sent from Galaxy Note
 On Jan 31, 2013 6:34 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is an article on Wales Online today, Wikipedia: How a project
 launched in Monmouth has gone global, that requires some corrections.

 ---o0o---

 Roger Bamkin is director of Wikimedia UK. Wikimedia is the body that
 operates Wikipedia.

 Read more: Wales Online
 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/need-to-read/2013/01/31/wikipedia-how-a-project-launched-in-monmouth-has-gone-global-91466-32713327/#ixzz2JXIb7GFQ

 ---o0o---

 Andreas




 On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Joe Filceolaire 
 filceola...@gmail.comwrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to
 an acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.comwrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 __**_
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-31 Thread John Vandenberg
Thanks Stevie.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Stevie Benton
stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 Thanks Andreas and John. I'll get corrections made ASAP.

 Stevie

 On Jan 31, 2013 7:59 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 Freopedia is spelt wrong.

 John Vandenberg.
 sent from Galaxy Note

 On Jan 31, 2013 6:34 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is an article on Wales Online today, Wikipedia: How a project
 launched in Monmouth has gone global, that requires some corrections.

 ---o0o---

 Roger Bamkin is director of Wikimedia UK. Wikimedia is the body that
 operates Wikipedia.

 Read more: Wales Online
 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/need-to-read/2013/01/31/wikipedia-how-a-project-launched-in-monmouth-has-gone-global-91466-32713327/#ixzz2JXIb7GFQ

 ---o0o---

 Andreas




 On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to
 an acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com
 wrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org




-- 
John Vandenberg

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-31 Thread Roger Bamkin
Just seen the story, well done for getting those corrections. Thanks

Roger

On 31 January 2013 10:15, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks Stevie.

 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Stevie Benton
 stevie.ben...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
 Thanks Andreas and John. I'll get corrections made ASAP.

 Stevie

 On Jan 31, 2013 7:59 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:

 Freopedia is spelt wrong.

 John Vandenberg.
 sent from Galaxy Note

 On Jan 31, 2013 6:34 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is an article on Wales Online today, Wikipedia: How a project
 launched in Monmouth has gone global, that requires some corrections.

 ---o0o---

 Roger Bamkin is director of Wikimedia UK. Wikimedia is the body that
 operates Wikipedia.

 Read more: Wales Online
 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/need-to-read/2013/01/31/wikipedia-how-a-project-launched-in-monmouth-has-gone-global-91466-32713327/#ixzz2JXIb7GFQ

 ---o0o---

 Andreas




 On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to
 an acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to 
 know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com
 wrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org




 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



-- 
Roger Bamkin
Victuallers Ltd
01332 702993
0758 2020815
Google+:Victuallers
Skype:Victuallers1
Flickr:Victuallers2

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-31 Thread WereSpielChequers
My understanding was that QRpedia was used to generate the codes, but the
codes on the plaques use qrwp.org. which has been publicly offered to the
movement.

I agree that we should not be promoting the use of QR codes unless we are
reasonably confident that the site they link to is maintained by the
movement or a registered charity with a compatible ethos. I'm hoping that
the donation of qrwp.org  is still on offer and not subject to whatever
part of the negotiations is still ongoing.

When and if a deal is finalised then the things I will be looking for
include who is to own the two domains and whether the brand we will be
using when we promote QR codes is within the movement or something similar.
Personally I have no problem with us collaborating with something outside
but of a similar nature, Geograph and Open street map come to mind as
charities which we have or should collaborate with, or simply use but give
due credit for.


WSC

On 31 January 2013 13:33, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:

 many thanks jon! personally i do not like that the qrpedia domain is
 registered cloaked, so nobody knows what comes out there later on.
 this, and the long time the topic could not be settled is imo enough
 to consider the name qrpedia as poisoned.

 maybe it's best to just leave qrpedia to the people who registered it
 and use another domain. qrcodes pointing to some website which then
 redirects to some url is no rocket sience, and widely used since quite
 a long time.

 at WMCH we use qrcodes at least in two working groups, international
 (tunesia e.g.) and GLAM. they are important to us, and i'd consider it
 high risk to mount qrcode stickers physically which then link to a
 site which has a cloaked owner. if qrpedia in 2 years time links to
 pussy galore there is huge cost involved to change all the stickers
 installed, beside the enormous reputational damage.

 rupert


 On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Jon Davies
 jon.dav...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
  Joe (and lots of people)
 
  I really understand the sincerity of your interest and the need to get
 this
  settled. I can assure you that as I write two of the trustees are working
  hard to come to a solution that will be in the interest of the community
 and
  the movement in general.
 
  Jon.
 
 
  On 26 January 2013 11:39, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Jon
 
  It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
  of what these arguments are.
 
  We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to
 an
  acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
  what is being done on our behalf.
 
  Joe
 
 
  On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.com
  wrote:
 
  On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:
 
 
  However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
  quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this
 list.
 
 
  How did we get get here then?
 
  Gordo
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 
 
 
 
  --
  Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
  tweet @jonatreesdavies
 
  Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
  Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
  Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A
 4LT.
  United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
  movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
  operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
 
  Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.
 
  Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
 
  ___
  Wikimedia UK mailing list
  wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
  http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
  WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
 

 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-30 Thread Andreas Kolbe
There is an article on Wales Online today, Wikipedia: How a project
launched in Monmouth has gone global, that requires some corrections.

---o0o---

Roger Bamkin is director of Wikimedia UK. Wikimedia is the body that
operates Wikipedia.

Read more: Wales Online
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/need-to-read/2013/01/31/wikipedia-how-a-project-launched-in-monmouth-has-gone-global-91466-32713327/#ixzz2JXIb7GFQ

---o0o---

Andreas




On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.comwrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to an
 acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.comwrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 __**_
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-30 Thread John Vandenberg
Freopedia is spelt wrong.

John Vandenberg.
sent from Galaxy Note
On Jan 31, 2013 6:34 PM, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is an article on Wales Online today, Wikipedia: How a project
 launched in Monmouth has gone global, that requires some corrections.

 ---o0o---

 Roger Bamkin is director of Wikimedia UK. Wikimedia is the body that
 operates Wikipedia.

 Read more: Wales Online
 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/need-to-read/2013/01/31/wikipedia-how-a-project-launched-in-monmouth-has-gone-global-91466-32713327/#ixzz2JXIb7GFQ

 ---o0o---

 Andreas




 On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Joe Filceolaire 
 filceola...@gmail.comwrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to
 an acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.comwrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 __**_
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-28 Thread Jon Davies
Joe (and lots of people)

I really understand the sincerity of your interest and the need to get this
settled. I can assure you that as I write two of the trustees are working
hard to come to a solution that will be in the interest of the community
and the movement in general.

Jon.

On 26 January 2013 11:39, Joe Filceolaire filceola...@gmail.com wrote:

 Jon

 It does seem extraordinary that nobody seems able to write out a summary
 of what these arguments are.

 We are not asking for this information because we think it will lead to an
 acceptable agreement more quickly; we are asking because we want to know
 what is being done on our behalf.

 Joe


 On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Gordon Joly gordon.j...@pobox.comwrote:

 On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


 However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more
 quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


 How did we get get here then?

 Gordo


 __**_
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-lhttp://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org



 ___
 Wikimedia UK mailing list
 wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
 http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
 WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org




-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.

Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


[Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-21 Thread Jon Davies
*QRpedia - the current position.*

There is some interest on where we are with QRpedia and much speculation. I
wanted to respond as I take the interest seriously.

WMUK is currently negotiating in good faith with Roger Bamkin and his
colleague Terence Eden with regard to ownership of QRpedia.

This has been a complicated process and is ongoing.

After several attempts to reach agreement the board of WMUK has entrusted
negotiations to Saad Choudri, a trustee who is a practising copyright
lawyer.  He has been reporting regularly to me, and the board, as to the
negotiations.

I can understand that our community may feel that this is a process that
has continued for far too long and I'm sure everyone involved would agree
with this.

However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more quickly
if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.

What I can assure you is that the trustees understand the need to reach an
agreement soon or disassociate the charity from any involvement in QRpedia.

We will let the community know as soon as we have something to report.

Jon.

-- 
*Jon Davies - Chief Executive Wikimedia UK*.  Mobile (0044) 7803 505 169
tweet @jonatreesdavies

Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and
Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered
Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT.
United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia
movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who
operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
Telephone (0044) 207 065 0990.

Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org


Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Where are we with QRpedia?

2013-01-21 Thread Gordon Joly

On 21/01/13 17:10, Jon Davies wrote:


However I do not think an acceptable agreement will come any more 
quickly if we rehearse the many and complicated arguments on this list.


How did we get get here then?

Gordo


___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org