[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104837]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104837 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104837

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104837:

Add support for Nepali, Konkani and Bhojpuri

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104393]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104393 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104393

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104393:

Change the scope of config to local.
Follow up r102770

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103925]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r103925 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103925

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103925:

Narayam: Remove cc-by-sa from my contributions.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102770]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102770 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102770

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102770:

Create ext.webfonts.init and ext.webfonts.core modules, set 'position' = 'top' 
for both of these modules so
that they start loading and initializing from the head and only execute after 
document is ready.

ext.webFonts.fontlist.js extends mw.webfonts.config object with the list of 
fonts and languages

As per https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Krinkle/Extension_review/WebFonts

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102375]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102375 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102375

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102375:

Use the fonts for the variant script for wikis with multiple scripts(sr,zh 
etc). Use wgUserVariant
variable to find out the variant language code.
Font selection is based on uservariant, contentlanguage , and userlanguage.

i18n card #117

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103637]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r103637.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103637#c27122

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103637:

Apparently behaviour changed in trunk, so blacklisting actions instead of 
whitelisting

Siebrand's comment:

Hmm. Blacklisting instead of whitelisting is inherently unsafe. Do you know 
where this was changed, as we may want to point that out there...

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105418]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105418 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105418

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105418:

Adding the License for Madan font. Upstream just says that it is GPL.
So following the license text used by Fedora package maintainers.
It is a copy of the text given inside the font.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104842]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104842 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104842

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104842:

Fix the pointer behaviour in the menu items of Narayam extension.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104838]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104838 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104838

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104838:

Add GPL licensed font Madan for Nepali language.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104653]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104653 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104653

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104653:

update Lohit Oriya fonts from upstream.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104652]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104652 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104652

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104652:

Update Lohit Tamil from upstream. Use font names as per upstream.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104542]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104542 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104542

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104542:

Update Lohit Tamil font with Embolden transformation to fix hinting issues.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103132]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r103132 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103132

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103132:

Along with checking the font from cookie is available, check for 'none' too. 
Otherwise 'reset' option will not be remembered across pages.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102766]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102766 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102766

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102766:

Moving $.webfonts into the mw object instead of the jQuery object.
As per https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Krinkle/Extension_review/WebFonts

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105122]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105122.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105122#c27123

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105122:

Adding new debugging toolbar

Needs a UI cleanup still, but for the most part is working.

Nikerabbit's comment:

The good thing and the bad thing about $wgDebugComments is that it is invisible 
unless you look for it. But I kind of like this too. Even more if it was 
re-sizable :)

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104454]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104454 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104454

Old status:  deferred
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104454:

* Improve i18n (use formatNum for all numbers, add dir  lang attribute)
* Change td to th elements for titles (this also makes the sort script work 
again)
* General whitespace fixes

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105112]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105112 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105112

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105112:

follow-up 104454: use list()

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105078]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105078 to fixme
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105078

Old status:  new
 New status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105078:

* Show the list of wikis in two columns, to save space
* Add a list of all databases, excluding those that are defined in the wiki 
set; this makes it more clear on which wikis an opt-out set is enabled, and on 
which wikis an opt-in set is disabled

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105090]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105090 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105090

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105090:

The response title should be in the wiki content language

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104892]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104892 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104892

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104892:

(bug 32075) Always add lowercase interwikis. Patch by Vitaliy Filippov.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104426]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104426 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104426

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104426:

no need to hardcode font-weight:bold, tr is bold by default

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102998]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102998 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102998

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102998:

MFT r98140 r100023 r102786 r102802 r102893

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102667]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r102667 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102667

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102667:

Narayam: Update Assamese transliteration rules.
For bug 32120

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103657]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r103657 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103657

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103657:

Make Narayam work with page content language, so it detects the correct 
language of the edit field.
Thanks to Santosh

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103652]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r103652 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103652

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103652:

Narayam keymapping for Punjabi in Gurmukhi script, based on Fedora keyboard 
layout.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:21:43 
-0800]:
 The hype of 2.0 aside, is there a guideline for what should 
constitute
 a
 major version number change?

 It looks like we are doing something like: Major.Minor.Release

 1.18 = Major: 1, Minor: 18, (alpha|beta|etc.)

 I'm just curious what people think would constitue a major version.
 We've
 certainly had major rewrites of systems in the past that didn't seem 
to
 justify a version bump. Is there anything wrong with having version
 1.249?
 Is there a practical reason for bumping the version at some point 
(like
 when the minor version hits tripple digits)?

 Also, a rewrite of MediaWiki should for sure be done in Node.js :)

 - Trevor

Is Javascript really that good? Some people dislike prototypical 
inheritance, it seems that jQuery prefers to use wrappers instead 
(that's a kind of suboptimal architecture). Also, Google had some 
complains about Javascript flaws (for example primitive types don't 
allow high performance available in Java / C#), suggesting to replace it 
with something else.. Although having common clientside / serverside 
codebase is nice thing, for sure. And there's nothing more widespread 
than Javascript at client side. Also, it's object side is strong 
(something like Lisp with C-syntax), however it does not have generics, 
named parameters etc..
Dmitriy

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:32:06 -0800]:

 IMO a switch to a visual editor as the default editing environment
 would be sufficient to merit the 2.0 moniker. Heck, it'd be sufficient
 to get rid of the double square brackets in the logo. ;-)

Let's hope that raw wikitext still will be available to ones who 
prefer old fashioned way of article formatting.
Dmitriy

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
* Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org [Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:54:22 
+1100]:
 On 07/12/11 12:34, Dan Nessett wrote:
  On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:15:41 +1100, Tim Starling wrote:
  How many servers do you have?
 
  3. It would help to get it down to 2.
 
  I assume my comments apply to many other small wikis that use MW as
 well.
  Most operate on a shoe string budget.

 You should try running MediaWiki on HipHop. See

 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/HipHop

 It's not possible to pay developers to rewrite MediaWiki for less than
 what it would cost to buy a server. But maybe getting a particular MW
 installation to run on HipHop with a reduced feature set would be in
 the same order of magnitude of cost.

 -- Tim Starling

An easier and probably more exotic-extension-compatible way is to use 
upcoming PHP 5.4, they promised faster execution and smaller memory 
footprint comparing to PHP 5.3.
Dmitriy

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103664]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r103664 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103664

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103664:

Narayam: Changes suggested by Marathi wikipedians at Hackathon.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104159]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r104159 to resolved and 
commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104159#c27124

Old Status: fixme
 New Status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104159:

Limit the Narayam menu height so that it doesn't overflow the screen - had to 
increase padding to accommodate the scrollbars.

Santhosh.thottingal's comment:

r105281 fixed the IE scroll issue.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104577]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal posted a comment on MediaWiki.r104577.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104577#c27125

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104577:

Adding Tamil InScript mapping.

Santhosh.thottingal's comment:

In Malayalam it is required since there is a rule: ['ര്\\]', '', 'ർ'], which 
required lookbacklength 2.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104594]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal posted a comment on MediaWiki.r104594.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104594#c27126

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104594:

Followup to r104577, adding characters according to the standard.

Santhosh.thottingal's comment:

-['\\*', '', 'ஷ்ர'],  - why this removed?  I see this mapping in standard.


___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105280]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Edokter posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105280.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105280#c27127

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105280:

Diff colors now use the french Wikipedia scheme

The french community has been using a specific set of colors for diff, it is
believed to be easier to read for people perceiving colors differently.

Source is from:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=72567845uselang=en

This commit override r94429 / r94461.

See also docs/uidesign/mediawiki.action.history.diff.html

Edokter's comment:

You're welcome :) I heard because Brion spilled the beans on wikitech-l.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104577]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r104577 to fixme and 
commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104577#c27128

Old Status: new
 New Status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104577:

Adding Tamil InScript mapping.

Santhosh.thottingal's comment:

['\\}', '', 'ஞ்'], is wrong. It is ['\\}', '', 'ஞ'],

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104594]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r104594 to fixme and 
commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104594#c27129

Old Status: new
 New Status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104594:

Followup to r104577, adding characters according to the standard.

Santhosh.thottingal's comment:

Either we need to add the extended layer as per the Inscript 2 draft standard, 
Or we need to make it compatible the existing inscript( 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Indic/TamilKeyboardLayouts#Inscript_Keyboard_Layout)

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104160]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r104160 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104160

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104160:

Follow-up r99389: Lower diacritics are invisible in titles in Indic languages 
Assamese, Bengali and Odiya.
Add bug numbers and issue description to release notes.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105414]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105414.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105414#c27130

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105414:

Follow up r105160. Make sure that resourceloader get correct module name.

Nikerabbit's comment:

Do I see a bit of code duplication here?

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread David Gerard
On 7 December 2011 01:21, Trevor Parscal tpars...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 It looks like we are doing something like: Major.Minor.Release
 1.18 = Major: 1, Minor: 18, (alpha|beta|etc.)
 I'm just curious what people think would constitue a major version. We've
 certainly had major rewrites of systems in the past that didn't seem to
 justify a version bump. Is there anything wrong with having version 1.249?
 Is there a practical reason for bumping the version at some point (like
 when the minor version hits tripple digits)?


Drop the first digit, as Java and Emacs did.

The current release is MediaWiki 18. MediaWiki 19 is in progress.


- d.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105415]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105415 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105415

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105415:

Add a small shadow for the menu.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105416]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105416 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105416

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105416:

Add a small shadow for the webfonts menu.
Remove an unwanted css style definition.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105414]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105414.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105414#c27131

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105414:

Follow up r105160. Make sure that resourceloader get correct module name.

Nikerabbit's comment:

And we usually write } else { in one line.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105414]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105414 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105414

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105414:

Follow up r105160. Make sure that resourceloader get correct module name.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105281]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105281 to fixme and commented 
it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105281#c27132

Old Status: ok
 New Status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105281:

Fix Narayam for monobook skin(Bug 32124)
Fix IE scrolling issue of the menu in Vector skin.
Placed the menu in body instead of hidden block in the pt-narayam. On mouse 
hover, show it in proper position.

Nikerabbit's comment:

# Now the menu does not disappear if the cursor never hovers it - not a big 
problem.
# More annoying is that there is considerable delay before the menu becomes 
visible.
# This line should have some more spaces:
 +  $( 'body').prepend($menu);


___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103786]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r103786 to ok and commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103786#c27133

Old Status: new
 New Status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103786:

(bug 27793) Make a config variable ($wgBabelUseUserLanguage) to make the Babel 
user language header and Users by language footer be in user language 
instead of page/content language.

This feature is intended to be used on commons.

Nikerabbit's comment:

Should we even enable this by default? Most of the users are small wikies which 
don't see any performance hit. Heck, if WMF doesn't need to disable it, we 
could do it unconditionally.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103649]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r103649 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103649

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103649:

Fix r103637

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103637]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r103637.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103637#c27134

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103637:

Apparently behaviour changed in trunk, so blacklisting actions instead of 
whitelisting

Nikerabbit's comment:

in_array() already returns boolean. X ? true : false; is redundant then.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103735]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r103735.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103735#c27135

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103735:

Hindi Transliteration by Junaid, originally implemented on 
https://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BF:Hi_rules.js

Nikerabbit's comment:

Really?
 + * @date 2011-02-26

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103737]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r103737 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103737

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103737:

Narayam: Gujarathi

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103637]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r103637 to fixme
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103637

Old status:  new
 New status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103637:

Apparently behaviour changed in trunk, so blacklisting actions instead of 
whitelisting

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102912]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102912 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102912

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102912:

Don't show the Users by language footer if it doesn't link to a page. (The 
Babel user information top still makes sense without link). See also bug 
31115.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102900]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102900 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102900

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102900:

The first parameter should be the level... $categoryLevel wasn't used, and 
$categoryMain was used twice. Strange.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102899]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102899 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102899

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102899:

Do not depend on the level category being configured, when adding the main 
category (or not). Having $wgBabelMainCategory configured and the level set to 
false, will now add the main category.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102759]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102759 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102759

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102759:

mw.util.addCSS will not work for IE if the css is font-face style. IE crashes.
Reverting to old way of adding css.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7931658/dynamically-adding-font-face-rule-in-ie-8-and-less

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102754]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102754 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102754

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102754:

Better the css construction using array of fontformats and then joining.
Add the css using mw.util.addCSS, also adding mediawiki.util as dependency.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102509]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r102509 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102509

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102509:

Followup r102501, css cleanup.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105425]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105425 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105425

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105425:

Spell language name consistently

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105420]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105420 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105420

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105420:

Fix 3 message keys from r104974

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105247]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105247 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105247

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105247:

Messages for property creation now come from Semantic MediaWiki, not from Page 
Schemas

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105251]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105251.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105251#c27136

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105251:

have the setup script run via the db update hook, so people do not have to do 
this separately

Nikerabbit's comment:

This looks wrong:
 +   * @param DatabaseUpdater $updater|null


___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105253]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105253 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105253

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105253:

Follow up to r105251;

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105255]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105255 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105255

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105255:

Minor fix

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105258]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105258 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105258

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105258:

Additions and small fixes

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105270]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105270 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105270

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105270:

0.4.1 rel

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105271]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105271 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105271

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105271:

oops, its 1.4.1, and extension type should fall back to other, not parserhook

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104210]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r104210 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104210

Old status:  deferred
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104210:

else if - elseif

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105256]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105256 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105256

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105256:

up rel notes

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102187]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r102187.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102187#c27137

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102187:

* Merged Title::userCanRead() check in Title::getUserPermissionsErrors()
* (bug 26020) Setting $wgEmailConfirmToEdit to true no longer removes diffs 
from recent changes feeds
* Added second parameter to Title::userCan() and Title::quickUserCan() to allow 
callers to pass the User object to use for checks; this changes 
Title::userCan()'s second parameter from do expensive queries flag to User, 
but all callers should have been updated in r102183
* Updated callers that might throw a PermissionsError to use 
getUserPermissionsErrors() instead and pass the error array to the exception
* Refactored duplicate code in missingPermissionError()
* Moved Title::isNamespaceProtected() a bit upper and Title::userCanRead() near 
Title::userCan() to have related functions in the same location
* Some minor refactoring in permission-related functions in Title

Siebrand's comment:

Done in r102896.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102880]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102880 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102880

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102880:

Quick fix for r102187 breakage

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102886]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102886 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102886

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102886:

Follow-up r102187: fixed two remaining hooks that were expecting 'read' to not 
be checked with getUserPermissionsErrors(Expensive)? hooks

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102884]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102884 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102884

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102884:

Make language name manipulable

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102866]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102866 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102866

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102866:

Shut up PHP Warning:  array_values() expects parameter 1 to be array, boolean 
given

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r102296]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r102296 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/102296

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r102296:

Skiplanguages were overwriting all other conditions

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105281]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r105281 to new
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105281

Old status:  fixme
 New status: new

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105281:

Fix Narayam for monobook skin(Bug 32124)
Fix IE scrolling issue of the menu in Vector skin.
Placed the menu in body instead of hidden block in the pt-narayam. On mouse 
hover, show it in proper position.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105296]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105296 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105296

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105296:

fix

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105299]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105299 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105299

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105299:

added missing items

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105302]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105302 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105302

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105302:

Remove unused $wgInteractiveBlockMessageCacheTimeout

Fix some minor style issues

Remove one redundant else block

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105386]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105386 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105386

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105386:

these are seconds, not ms, and the touched time does not get updated on render, 
so this caused 2h+ invalidation :/

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105394]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105394 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105394

Old status:  deferred
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105394:

1.7 beta 1

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Dmitriy Sintsov
On 07.12.2011 13:33, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
 * Trevor Parscaltpars...@wikimedia.org  [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:21:43
 -0800]:
 The hype of 2.0 aside, is there a guideline for what should
 constitute
 a
 major version number change?

 It looks like we are doing something like: Major.Minor.Release

 1.18 = Major: 1, Minor: 18, (alpha|beta|etc.)

 I'm just curious what people think would constitue a major version.
 We've
 certainly had major rewrites of systems in the past that didn't seem
 to
 justify a version bump. Is there anything wrong with having version
 1.249?
 Is there a practical reason for bumping the version at some point
 (like
 when the minor version hits tripple digits)?

 Also, a rewrite of MediaWiki should for sure be done in Node.js :)

 - Trevor

 Is Javascript really that good? Some people dislike prototypical
 inheritance, it seems that jQuery prefers to use wrappers instead
 (that's a kind of suboptimal architecture). Also, Google had some
 complains about Javascript flaws (for example primitive types don't
 allow high performance available in Java / C#), suggesting to replace it
 with something else.. Although having common clientside / serverside
 codebase is nice thing, for sure. And there's nothing more widespread
 than Javascript at client side. Also, it's object side is strong
 (something like Lisp with C-syntax), however it does not have generics,
 named parameters etc..
 Dmitriy


A small correction: functional side, not object side.
Dmitriy

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r103786]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Bawolff posted a comment on MediaWiki.r103786.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/103786#c27138

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r103786:

(bug 27793) Make a config variable ($wgBabelUseUserLanguage) to make the Babel 
user language header and Users by language footer be in user language 
instead of page/content language.

This feature is intended to be used on commons.

Bawolff's comment:

I mostly had it disabled by default because it seemed controversial based on 
r82967.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105404]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105404.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105404#c27139

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105404:

commited for brion for review

Nikerabbit's comment:

have a look at mw.util.wikiScript too

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105427]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105427 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105427

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105427:

Avoid showing the no-op link if there are no input methods available.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105404]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Petrb posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105404.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105404#c27140

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105404:

commited for brion for review

Petrb's comment:

Thanks for replies, please note that Brion already updated that, I will try to 
look it up and add as follow up.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105426]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105426 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105426

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105426:

CSS cleanup,
Dont wait, just show the menu without animation
And some spaces.
Follow up r105281

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105281]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r105281 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105281

Old status:  new
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105281:

Fix Narayam for monobook skin(Bug 32124)
Fix IE scrolling issue of the menu in Vector skin.
Placed the menu in body instead of hidden block in the pt-narayam. On mouse 
hover, show it in proper position.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105419]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Hashar posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105419.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105419#c27141

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105419:

(bug 32853) DBA cache broken in MW 1.18

DBABagOStuff was not refactored by r83140 which pass BagOStuff constructors
an array. This patch honor the 'dir' parameter to let you override the global
$wgTmpDirectory.

Need backport in REL1_18

Hashar's comment:

Need back port in REL1_18.

WMF does not use DBA.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105428]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Hashar posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105428.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105428#c27142

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105428:

(bug 32473) [[Special:PasswordReset]] can not be used on private wiki

This patch is a quick fix for REL1_18 branch.

For later:
We should not have hack in Title.php to allow some specific special pages
this should be made possible using SpecialPage. Would make code cleaner.

Hashar's comment:

Need backport (and release note) for REL1_18.

WMF needs that since we have a few private wikis.

Please note this patch does not refactor anything so we can get included easily 
in REL1_18.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105428]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Bryan changed the status of MediaWiki.r105428 to ok and commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105428#c27143

Old Status: new
 New Status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105428:

(bug 32473) [[Special:PasswordReset]] can not be used on private wiki

This patch is a quick fix for REL1_18 branch.

For later:
We should not have hack in Title.php to allow some specific special pages
this should be made possible using SpecialPage. Would make code cleaner.

Bryan's comment:

The nice solution would probably be a new function 
SpecialPage::isAlwaysReadable();

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104625]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Bryan changed the status of MediaWiki.r104625 to ok
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104625

Old status:  new
 New status: ok

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104625:

Merged changes from trunk up to r104623

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r104625]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Bryan changed the status of MediaWiki.r104625 to resolved
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/104625

Old status:  ok
 New status: resolved

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r104625:

Merged changes from trunk up to r104623

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105432]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
GWicke changed the status of MediaWiki.r105432 to deferred
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105432

Old status:  new
 New status: deferred

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105432:

Convert template argument production to generic inline with syntactic stop.
Fix a bug in generic inline production. Nested multi-line templates are now
parsed okayish.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105434]: Revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
GWicke changed the status of MediaWiki.r105434 to deferred
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105434

Old status:  new
 New status: deferred

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105434:

Add some documentation to syntax flags

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105418]: New comment added

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Reach Out to the Truth posted a comment on MediaWiki.r105418.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105418#c27144

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105418:

Adding the License for Madan font. Upstream just says that it is GPL.
So following the license text used by Fedora package maintainers.
It is a copy of the text given inside the font.

Reach Out to the Truth's comment:

According to the [[w:All rights reserved|Wikipedia article]], all rights 
reserved doesn't do anything that copyright law doesn't do automatically. It's 
effectively meaningless.

I've seen the phrase used in a number of free software projects, myself.

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Daniel Friesen
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:52:31 -0800, Dmitriy Sintsov ques...@rambler.ru  
wrote:

 On 07.12.2011 13:33, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
 * Trevor Parscaltpars...@wikimedia.org  [Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:21:43
 -0800]:
 The hype of 2.0 aside, is there a guideline for what should
 constitute
 a
 major version number change?

 It looks like we are doing something like: Major.Minor.Release

 1.18 = Major: 1, Minor: 18, (alpha|beta|etc.)

 I'm just curious what people think would constitue a major version.
 We've
 certainly had major rewrites of systems in the past that didn't seem
 to   
 justify a version bump. Is there anything wrong with having version
 1.249?
 Is there a practical reason for bumping the version at some point
 (like
 when the minor version hits tripple digits)?

 Also, a rewrite of MediaWiki should for sure be done in Node.js :)

 - Trevor

 Is Javascript really that good? Some people dislike prototypical
 inheritance, it seems that jQuery prefers to use wrappers instead
 (that's a kind of suboptimal architecture). Also, Google had some
 complains about Javascript flaws (for example primitive types don't
 allow high performance available in Java / C#), suggesting to replace it
 with something else.. Although having common clientside / serverside
 codebase is nice thing, for sure. And there's nothing more widespread
 than Javascript at client side. Also, it's object side is strong
 (something like Lisp with C-syntax), however it does not have generics,
 named parameters etc..
 Dmitriy


 A small correction: functional side, not object side.
 Dmitriy

Generics, named parameters? Why are you picking on things that even php  
doesn't have.
If you want names parameters JS is even closer than php. It has a more  
concise object syntax which means that foo({asdf: 1}) is barely any longer  
than a normal function call to type, compared to the php equivilant which  
is foo(array('asdf' = 1)).

And jQuery is jQuery. It uses it's funky syntax for a reason related to  
what it does.


Now I AM a JavaScript on the server guy (I have a company web application  
that runs with server side JavaScript and I even participated in the  
CommonJS pesudo-wg group for awhile) but I'm not so sure about Node.js  
being the way forward.

Actually, aiming for something with ES5+harmony/next features might even  
be the best. Traceur could add the features client side.

var {Foo, Bar} = asdf;
var [asdf, qwery] = arr;
function foo(bar = 5, ...rest) {}
for ( let key in obj ) {}
(x for ( x of list ) if (x % 2 === 0))
module Foo {
   export let bar = 42;
}
var obj = {
   [variable]: value,
   foo(bar) { return bar+1; }
   get baz() { return 5; }
};
let text = qzx$cv;
asdfzx$cvqwerty.match(re`^adsf${text}qwerty`);
foobar.startsWith(foo);
typeof null === null;


-- 
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Svip
On 7 December 2011 02:34, Dan Nessett dness...@yahoo.com wrote:

 3. It would help to get it down to 2.

 I assume my comments apply to many other small wikis that use MW as well.
 Most operate on a shoe string budget.

Tried a caching system?  My wiki gets 3000+ visitors a day (I don't
know how many Citizendium gets).  But my server (costing 49EUR a
month) can easily manage that plus several other websites including
running some game servers as well.  All I am saying is; it may be too
easy to blame it on MW alone.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki 2.0

2011-12-07 Thread Dan Nessett
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:54:22 +1100, Tim Starling wrote:

 On 07/12/11 12:34, Dan Nessett wrote:
 On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:15:41 +1100, Tim Starling wrote:
 How many servers do you have?
 
 3. It would help to get it down to 2.
 
 I assume my comments apply to many other small wikis that use MW as
 well. Most operate on a shoe string budget.
 
 You should try running MediaWiki on HipHop. See
 
 http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/HipHop
 
 It's not possible to pay developers to rewrite MediaWiki for less than
 what it would cost to buy a server. But maybe getting a particular MW
 installation to run on HipHop with a reduced feature set would be in the
 same order of magnitude of cost.
 
 -- Tim Starling

Are there any production wikis running MW over HipHop?

-- 
-- Dan Nessett


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] Fundraising bug triage TODAY 2100UTC (was Fwd: Fundraising -- use your technical skills to help)

2011-12-07 Thread Arthur Richards
Just a reminder this will be happening today at 2100UTC/1pm PST!

-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark A. Hershberger mhershber...@wikimedia.org
Date: Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:23 PM
Subject: Fundraising -- use your technical skills to help
To: wikitech-l wikitec...@wikimedia.org, foundation-l 
foundatio...@lists.wikimedia.org
Cc: Arthur Richards aricha...@wikimedia.org



   What:  Fundraising triage
   When:  Wednesday, December 7, 2100UTC
  Time zone conversion: http://hexm.de/bc
  Where:  #wikimedia-dev on freenode
  Use http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-dev
  if you don't have an IRC client
 Etherpad: http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/BugTriage-funcom

Tomorrow, I'll be holding an IRC meeting on the open fundraising-related
issues that Arthur Richards and I identified today as things that could
benefit from community involvement.

If you are able to contribute any help on these issues -- several of
which are targeted to the CentralNotice system -- you will improve the
experience of many users of the Wikimedia projects.

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/17108 Make Hide Cookies notice
independent

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/24950 Make CentralNotice option checkboxes
sortable

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/26026 Add API module for
Special:FundraiserStatistics

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/26387 Add better key to Fundraiser stats
page

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/30818 Special:FundraisingStatistics should
display selected yea...

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/32441 Year filtering on
Special:FundraiserStatistics broken

* https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/32536 CentralNotice API

Bring your javascript and PHP chops and I'll see you there!

Mark.



-- 
Arthur Richards
Software Engineer
Fundraising/Features/Offline/Mobile
[[User:Awjrichards]]
IRC: awjr
+1-415-839-6885 x6687
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] WikiEditor Preview tab: unparsed wikitext

2011-12-07 Thread Daniel Barrett
I have a parser function that is not being rendered properly by the 
experimental Preview tab in WikiEditor.  The function does the following:

*   It add a custom property foo to the ParserOutput object, with value 
bar
*   It hooks OutputPageBeforeHTML to render the value bar

When I use the Save Page or Show Preview buttons below the edit box 
everything works fine.  With the experimental Preview tab, though, the value 
doesn't get rendered.  (It is in the ParserOutput object though.)  I'm guessing 
that OutputPageBeforeHTML doesn't get called by the Preview tab.

I also tried hooking EditPageGetPreviewText to render the value also, but that 
doesn't work either with the Preview tab.

Any advice appreciated. Should I be using a better/additional hook?

Thanks,
DanB




___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] Reason for having php5-common pinned?

2011-12-07 Thread Leslie Carr
Do we have a reason we have php5-common pinned in puppet? (see
generic-definitions.pp::145 generic::webserver::php5 )

The reason I ask is that with this, another generic definition
(generic::webserver::php5-mysql) breaks due to the dependancy of
5.3.2-2wm1 , while the pinning causes the installation of
5.3.2-1ubuntu4.10

I would change the generic::webserver::php5 definition to remove the
pin, but I want to make sure that nothing breaks first.

Leslie

-- 
Leslie Carr
Wikimedia Foundation
AS 14907, 43821

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r105455]: New comment added, and revision status changed

2011-12-07 Thread MediaWiki Mail
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r105455 to fixme and commented it.
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/105455#c27145

Old Status: new
 New Status: fixme

Commit summary for MediaWiki.r105455:

work on ui

Siebrand's comment:

* time and date should be separated in running sentences
* {{messagedocumentation}}

___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview


  1   2   >