[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: Revision status changed
Khorn (WMF) changed the status of MediaWiki.r109331 to fixme URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331 Old status: new New status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: New comment added
Khorn (WMF) posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109331. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331#c29717 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. Khorn (WMF)'s comment: Uhm... I'd revert this incredibly weird thing if I could find it locally. :/ ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Discussion duration and the SOPA shutdown
The Learn more link works for me, but I've seen a couple of reports of problems (where it gets the blackout too). -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Lee theornamental...@gmail.com Date: 18 January 2012 05:04 Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Discussion duration and the SOPA shutdown To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundatio...@lists.wikimedia.org The Learn More link at en.wp is blocked too. ___ foundation-l mailing list foundatio...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109333]: Revision status changed
Kaldari changed the status of MediaWiki.r109333 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109333 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109333: Implemented per-rep social media sharing ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
The facebook link should be better now. -- Yuvi Panda T http://yuvi.in/blog ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109336]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109336 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109336 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109336: make report link go to Special:CongressFail ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109085]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109085 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109085 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109085: MFT 109081 - configurable caching for banners. Will help when developing SOPA banner on testwiki ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
Ha, the blackout is a javascript powered blackout. No reason to bother text browser users, they won't notice the disruption in the first place! Please don't remove $wgSiteNotice from Mediawiki. It's the only way we http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Wiki_family administrators can with one edit to LocalSettings.php put a notice on our many wikis, without editing each MediaWiki:Sitenotice etc. database changing operations. DG http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportClients.htm That table looks horrible in text browsers. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109337]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109337 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109337 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109337: adding stub special page for recording errors ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109332]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109332 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109332 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109332: Renaming an increasingly badly-named file... ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109277]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109277 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109277 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109277: Correct typo in comment, so that it reflects the spec and the actual value in the regexp. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109260]: New comment added
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109260. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109260#c29718 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109260: Revert r107881 per CR. Siebrand's comment: Hmm, I was sure I changed two files... Let's see... ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109339]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109339 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109339 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109339: get the url for the special page in a more correct way ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109342]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109342 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109342 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109342: title for CongressFail page ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109271]: Revision status changed
Raymond changed the status of MediaWiki.r109271 to new URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109271 Old status: fixme New status: new Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109271: AFT5 - this is highly suboptimal, but it just needs to look OK for us to demo tomorrow, then I can go back and do it right. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109258]: New comment added
Raymond posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109258. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109258#c29719 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109258: AFT5 - more HTML chanes Raymond's comment: Value for $1 is 0 always? + ), wfMessage( 'articleFeedbackv5-updates-since', 0 ) ); Otherwise the message 'articleFeedbackv5-updates-since' needs PLURAL. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109338]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109338 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109338 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109338: wrong page name in parent constructor followup to r109337 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109289]: Revision status changed
NeilK changed the status of MediaWiki.r109289 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109289 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109289: this guy's CAPTCHA is broken with the other link. followup to r109285 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109344]: Revision status changed
NeilK changed the status of MediaWiki.r109344 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109344 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109344: contains a form, stores things in the database, is very web 1.0 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109348]: Revision status changed
Raindrift changed the status of MediaWiki.r109348 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109348 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109348: deal with lack of zip ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109347]: Revision status changed
NeilK changed the status of MediaWiki.r109347 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109347 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109347: fixed a db bug, added a success message. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109330]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109330 to fixme URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109330 Old status: new New status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109330: Netbeans SVN client generated message: create a new folder for the copy: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: New comment added
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109331. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331#c29720 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. Siebrand's comment: Let me have a go... ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109330]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109330 to reverted URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109330 Old status: fixme New status: reverted Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109330: Netbeans SVN client generated message: create a new folder for the copy: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109331 to reverted URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331 Old status: fixme New status: reverted Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: New comment added
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109331. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331#c29721 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. Siebrand's comment: Reverted using TortoiseSVN's repo browser. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109352]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109352 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109352 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109352: Todo already done ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109346]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109346 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109346 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109346: r109276: Ignore new message for translation. Propably for 1 day in use only. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109343]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109343 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109343 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109343: Fix r109271/r109272 in a better way to make translations less awful. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109272]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109272 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109272 Old status: new New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109272: AFT5 - sigh. Last boneheaded commit of the night, probably. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] [Foundation-l] Blackout notice errors (English Wikipedia)
On 18 January 2012 08:03, Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com wrote: Just a foreigner sidenote: we got the notice about SOPA and PIPA which does not start by defining, or even linking to what SOPA and PIPA is, what they are shorthand for, and background if anoone wants. It could be (should be) links on the same site, wikipedia style, as we always do. We raise awareness, so what about those who were not aware their existence at all? Yeah, the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more should link to those two articles (which are not blacked out) in the first sentence. (Dunno how feasible that is with the wiki read-only ...) - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
2012/1/18 Yuvi Panda yuvipa...@gmail.com: The facebook link should be better now. Nice Thomas ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
On 18 January 2012 06:19, Thomas Schmidt schm...@netaction.de wrote: Clicking on the Google+ button I am forced to accept the tracking of my location and some new general business terms. Yeah - is there any sort of G+ link possible that *doesn't* demand you sign up for the mobile TOS (even on a desktop)? Linking to a commercial data-gathering exercise is less than ideal ... - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
ON the german site, they have identi.ca as well. diaspora is missing on all. It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. I dont see why we can have them for the fundraising or when wp wants to be known, but not for articles. mike On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 January 2012 06:19, Thomas Schmidt schm...@netaction.de wrote: Clicking on the Google+ button I am forced to accept the tracking of my location and some new general business terms. Yeah - is there any sort of G+ link possible that *doesn't* demand you sign up for the mobile TOS (even on a desktop)? Linking to a commercial data-gathering exercise is less than ideal ... - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
On 18 January 2012 10:03, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: ON the german site, they have identi.ca as well. diaspora is missing on all. It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. I dont see why we can have them for the fundraising or when wp wants to be known, but not for articles. The usual barrier on en:wp has been neutrality concerns, and being seen to advocate particular services over others. - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
well, when it serves the purpose, then wp shows no shame in promoting some other sites. It is just inconsistent. but I guess I dont have to say that? Sometimes it is ok, sometimes it is not ok. mike On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:12 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 January 2012 10:03, Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote: ON the german site, they have identi.ca as well. diaspora is missing on all. It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. I dont see why we can have them for the fundraising or when wp wants to be known, but not for articles. The usual barrier on en:wp has been neutrality concerns, and being seen to advocate particular services over others. - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107982]: New comment added
Hashar posted a comment on MediaWiki.r107982. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107982#c29722 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107982: [jquery.footHovzer] new plugin for mw-log-console and mw-debug-toolbar * Previously mw.log and mw.Debug both were in a fixed container on the bottom, overlapping each other. mw.log did increase the body's padding-bottom to account for the height so that all content is still visible, but it was still a problem when mw.Debug came along. * This plugin adds a single fixed position element to bottom of the body, to which other stuff like mw.log and mw.Debug can append a non-fixed position container. That will take care of it. * Method update() will re-check the padding and scroll position and fix where needed * Reduces code a little bit Hashar's comment: Last jumping solved by r109354. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r107982]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r107982 to resolved and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/107982#c29723 Old Status: new New Status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r107982: [jquery.footHovzer] new plugin for mw-log-console and mw-debug-toolbar * Previously mw.log and mw.Debug both were in a fixed container on the bottom, overlapping each other. mw.log did increase the body's padding-bottom to account for the height so that all content is still visible, but it was still a problem when mw.Debug came along. * This plugin adds a single fixed position element to bottom of the body, to which other stuff like mw.log and mw.Debug can append a non-fixed position container. That will take care of it. * Method update() will re-check the padding and scroll position and fix where needed * Reduces code a little bit Hashar's comment: Looks fine to me :-) Marking resolved. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109349]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r109349 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109349 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109349: Revert r109330 and r109331. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109328]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r109328 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109328 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109328: qunit tests for webfonts -- build menu Fixes in extension javascript - Before creating the menu check if one exists or not. if exists, remove it - Correct return values of the method. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109340]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r109340 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109340 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109340: Follow-up r107881: revert. Adding forgotten part in r109260. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109260]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r109260 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109260 Old status: new New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109260: Revert r107881 per CR. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109334]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r109334 to fixme and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109334#c29724 Old Status: new New Status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109334: Added tests for application of web fonts to body, input, select and textarea. Nikerabbit's comment: pre Expected: \Lohit Telugu\,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif Result: 'Lohit Telugu', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif /pre ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109341]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r109341 to fixme and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109341#c29725 Old Status: new New Status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109341: localisation Nikerabbit's comment: Output should be escaped. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109071]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r109071 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109071 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109071: Follow-up r108185: removed now unused ALLOW_STALE param ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109354]: Revision status changed
Nikerabbit changed the status of MediaWiki.r109354 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109354 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109354: dbg toolbar: prevents screen jumping preventDefault() ask the browser to ignore URL fragment which we handle manually (by closing/opening tabs). Works with Hovzer plugin added by r107982 ping r105122 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r108960]: New comment added, and revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r108960 to fixme and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/108960#c29726 Old Status: new New Status: fixme Commit summary for MediaWiki.r108960: Adding jquery.arrowSteps to core, from UploadWizard Hashar's comment: Files did not get copied with their svn history So you should probably revert this rev and follow up and redo it properly (unless nobody care ...) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109353]: New comment added
Santhosh.thottingal posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109353. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109353#c29727 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109353: Doc header updates and consistency and few small fixes Santhosh.thottingal's comment: Almost ok, except @copyright Copyright © 2022-2012 Niklas Laxström ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109353]: New comment added
Nikerabbit posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109353. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109353#c29728 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109353: Doc header updates and consistency and few small fixes Nikerabbit's comment: Darn those typing errors...fixed. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109355]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109355 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109355 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109355: I really have to stop traveling to the future this often, ping r109353 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109353]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109353 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109353 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109353: Doc header updates and consistency and few small fixes ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109355]: New comment added
Peachey88 posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109355. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109355#c29729 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109355: I really have to stop traveling to the future this often, ping r109353 Peachey88's comment: So that is who has the blue box... ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109334]: Revision status changed
Santhosh.thottingal changed the status of MediaWiki.r109334 to resolved URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109334 Old status: fixme New status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109334: Added tests for application of web fonts to body, input, select and textarea. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r108970]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r108970 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/108970 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r108970: * Use WikiPage instead of Article to call doEdit() * Pass the User object to WikiPage::doEdit() ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Wmfcc-l] Black out saying Enter your Zip Code but not saying in the US
-- Forwarded message -- From: Delphine Ménard notafi...@gmail.com Date: 2012/1/18 Subject: [Wmfcc-l] Black out saying Enter your Zip Code but not saying in the US To: Communications Committee wmfc...@lists.wikimedia.org Hello, just realised that the blackout page to which social media buttons point is US centric (Contact your representatives), which is OK, but it is being spread worldwide and the zip code thing makes little sense for someone who is *not* in the US. Could we add If you're in the US to it or something? It's kind of confusing otherwise. Cheers, Delphine -- Hey folks, It looks like Delphine Menard is not getting the international geolocated version of the blackout page. I believe she's in Berlin. FWIW Florence Devouard, in France, *is* getting the international version. Thanks, Sue (CCing Jay and Erik because I had earlier sent them a note about this, before I got pointed here.) ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109027]: New comment added
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109027. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109027#c29730 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109027: Point the Narayam help link to the https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:Narayam If wikis with Narayam deployed have the local help page, don't break it. For wikis without the extension remove the non-existing help page links and default to mw help page Siebrand's comment: Please make the help page open in a new tab/window. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com writes: It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. Unless I'm mistaken, Admins on-wiki could do this without consulting the WMF by installing a gadget which people could then opt-in to use. As far as built-in functionality, the first thing to do is to get an extension that provides this reviewed. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Review_queue does not show anything that would provide this. Mark. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Change request please: Congress Lookup page text
Hey folks, I'm not sure where to send this, so I'll send it here. Could someone please change the Congress Lookup page text, as per the note below? Essentially, it is changing two instances of will to would and adding one new would -- that's all. No formatting changes, just the three words. Thanks, Sue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CongressLookup This page -- Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they will fatally damage the free and open Internet. CHANGE TO THIS Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA would put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA would build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they would fatally damage the free and open Internet. -- In other words. SOPA and PIPA put the burden SOPA and PIPA would put the burden SOPA and PIPA build a framework SOPA and PIPA would build a framework they will fatally damage they would fatally damage -- Sue Gardner Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation 415 839 6885 office 415 816 9967 cell Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Change request please: Congress Lookup page text
Fixed: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109359 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey folks, I'm not sure where to send this, so I'll send it here. Could someone please change the Congress Lookup page text, as per the note below? Essentially, it is changing two instances of will to would and adding one new would -- that's all. No formatting changes, just the three words. Thanks, Sue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CongressLookup This page -- Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they will fatally damage the free and open Internet. CHANGE TO THIS Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA would put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA would build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they would fatally damage the free and open Internet. -- In other words. SOPA and PIPA put the burden SOPA and PIPA would put the burden SOPA and PIPA build a framework SOPA and PIPA would build a framework they will fatally damage they would fatally damage -- Sue Gardner Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation 415 839 6885 office 415 816 9967 cell Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- John ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Change request please: Congress Lookup page text
On 18 January 2012 05:25, John Du Hart compwhi...@gmail.com wrote: Fixed: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109359 Much appreciated! Sue ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
Message: 13 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:53:02 -0500 From: mhershber...@wikimedia.org (Mark A. Hershberger) Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks To: wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org Message-ID: 87hazttbo1@spyke.nichework.com Content-Type: text/plain Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com writes: It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. Unless I'm mistaken, Admins on-wiki could do this without consulting the WMF by installing a gadget which people could then opt-in to use. As far as built-in functionality, the first thing to do is to get an extension that provides this reviewed. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Review_queue does not show anything that would provide this. Mark. I disagree. First step would be to convince Wikipedia et al that social networking buttons are a good idea. Social networking button type extensions are very simple (Its a linked image, that's it) and thus trivial to create. The issue has always been that whenever asked, the Wikipedians say no (and its not like they once said no 7 years ago, the topic seems to come up at a quite regular basis). -bawolff ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
Ok, thanks mark. that is good to know. Will look into this some time. mike On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mark A. Hershberger mhershber...@wikimedia.org wrote: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com writes: It would be nice to have these social tools as opt in tools for wikipedia in general. Unless I'm mistaken, Admins on-wiki could do this without consulting the WMF by installing a gadget which people could then opt-in to use. As far as built-in functionality, the first thing to do is to get an extension that provides this reviewed. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Review_queue does not show anything that would provide this. Mark. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- James Michael DuPont Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109358]: Revision status changed
Siebrand changed the status of MediaWiki.r109358 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109358 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109358: Open the Narayam help page in new tab/window. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109358]: New comment added
Siebrand posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109358. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109358#c29731 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109358: Open the Narayam help page in new tab/window. Siebrand's comment: Follow-up to r109027 ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109361]: Revision status changed
Hashar changed the status of MediaWiki.r109361 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109361 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109361: Copying Lucene-Search for Oren, he's having auth issues ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Change request please: Congress Lookup page text
And merged[0] and deployed[1]. May be stuck in caches for a little bit though. -Chad [0] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109362 [1] http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/index.php?diff=42110oldid=42109 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:25 AM, John Du Hart compwhi...@gmail.com wrote: Fixed: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109359 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote: Hey folks, I'm not sure where to send this, so I'll send it here. Could someone please change the Congress Lookup page text, as per the note below? Essentially, it is changing two instances of will to would and adding one new would -- that's all. No formatting changes, just the three words. Thanks, Sue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CongressLookup This page -- Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they will fatally damage the free and open Internet. CHANGE TO THIS Call your elected officials. Tell them you are their constituent, and you oppose SOPA and PIPA. Why? SOPA and PIPA would put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. SOPA and PIPA would build a framework for future restrictions and suppression. In a world in which politicians regulate the Internet based on the influence of big money, Wikipedia — and sites like it — cannot survive. Congress says it's trying to protect the rights of copyright owners, but the cure that SOPA and PIPA represent is worse than the disease. SOPA and PIPA are not the answer: they would fatally damage the free and open Internet. -- In other words. SOPA and PIPA put the burden SOPA and PIPA would put the burden SOPA and PIPA build a framework SOPA and PIPA would build a framework they will fatally damage they would fatally damage -- Sue Gardner Executive Director Wikimedia Foundation 415 839 6885 office 415 816 9967 cell Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- John ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] COMPLETED: Mailing lists server migration today
On sJan 13/sJan 18, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Mark Bergsma wrote: Today I will be migrating the mailing lists from a very old server (lily) in Amsterdam, to a new server (sodium) in our new Ashburn data center. Mailman will be upgraded to version 2.1.13 along the way. During the migration, mail will be delayed as all data will need to be transferred to the new host. No mail should go lost, but no new mails will be sent out during the process until done, and the web interface will be unavailable. This shouldn't take about one hour, if all goes well. I will report here when things should be back up and running. Afterwards, please let us know of any new issues, in bugzilla or on IRC (#wikimedia-tech). We don't expect any problems, but as with any software upgrade or migration, this can't be guaranteed... The mailing lists server migration is now complete - Mailman is now running on server sodium. As some people pointed out, my message earlier today was indeed sent out with the wrong Date header. I simply redirected my old mail and edited it a bit, forgetting that the Date header would not be adjusted by my mail client. Sorry for that. :) The Mailman migration went smoothly, and I'm not aware of any problems. Please let us know in Bugzilla or on IRC (#wikimedia-tech) if you're experiencing any new issues. Unfortunately we needed to change the IP address of lists.wikimedia.org for this migration. Some large e-mail providers (e.g. Google) are rate limiting reception of mail messages from the new IP (208.80.154.4) because it's not known and whitelisted yet. To prevent further mail delivery delays today, I've configured the new lists server to forward mails that would otherwise be delayed via the old mail server and old source IP address again, for the time being. Thanks, -- Mark Bergsma m...@wikimedia.org Lead Operations Architect Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r85244]: New comment added
Cneubauer posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85244. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85244#c29732 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r85244: Drop connetion between Skin and Linker and turn Linker into a staticly usable class. Cneubauer's comment: Things which should actually NEVER be trying to load up a skin which is dependent on the user in the current session. I just finally implemented what was noted forever. Not sure what you mean. How is using the user specified skin to generate links different from using the user specified preferences to generate date formats or edit sections links? Regardless, I don't really care about all that. What I'm really looking for is a way to work around this issue from an extension point of view. There don't seem to be any hooks in Linker or Parser that allow you to modify the way links are parsed. I guess the best option is to override the replaceInternalLinks function in a custom Parser subclass. Any other suggestions on that? ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109367]: New comment added
^demon posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109367. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109367#c29733 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109367: updated from zip4prefix file from govtrack, fixes some errors reported by folks ^demon's comment: This passes a sanity/syntax check. I haven't verified if the data's correct though. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
To make the redirect a javascript is not a good idea. At least 2,213,922 users will never see it https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/?src=search and maybe way, way more. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
Today, virtually NONE of my (many) friends ever noticed something changed, until i told them. And even with js, you can see the 'real' page popping up first before the redirect takes action. It does not feel like 'oops wikipedia is gone !!?' but more like just another anyyoing advert. You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. And yes i would even block editing since this is also alerting people. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Wednesday wikipedia shut down does not get through
(I sent this already in reply to another thread but with too narrow topic, and i think it's important enough to deserve its own. So pls excuse if you already read this.) To make the redirect a javascript is not a good idea. At least 2,213,922 users will never see it https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/?src=search and maybe way, way more since there are many similar features on any browser or platform. Today, virtually NONE of my (many) friends ever noticed something changed, until i told them. And even with js, you can see the 'real' page popping up first before the redirect takes action. It does not feel like 'oops wikipedia is gone !!?' but more like just another anyyoing advert. You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. And yes i would even block editing since this is also alerting people. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109368]: New comment added
Reedy posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109368. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109368#c29734 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109368: Development of feedback page style sheet. Reedy's comment: pre Index: trunk/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5/modules/jquery.articleFeedbackv5/images/bg-feedbackpage-header.png === Cannot display: file marked as a binary type. svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream Property changes on: trunk/extensions/ArticleFeedbackv5/modules/jquery.articleFeedbackv5/images/bg-feedbackpage-header.png ___ Added: svn:mime-type + application/octet-stream /pre Need to fix your [[Subversion/auto-props]] ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Change request please: Congress Lookup page text
Sue Gardner wrote: I'm not sure where to send this, so I'll send it here. Could someone please change the Congress Lookup page text, as per the note below? Essentially, it is changing two instances of will to would and adding one new would -- that's all. No formatting changes, just the three words. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CongressLookup This page snip patch Well done on submitting your first patch Sue! Next step would be to learn how to submit the next patch using subversion :-) Congrats! -- Antoine hashar Musso ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
bawolff wrote: I disagree. First step would be to convince Wikipedia et al that social networking buttons are a good idea. No way I am going to let anyone do that on any WMF site. Social buttons are leaking your private data (URL you are browsing) to a private company (ex: facebook) which already know a ton of things about you. Remote linking is bad. PS: I use http://www.ghostery.com/ to prevents that. -- Antoine hashar Musso ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wmfcc-l] Black out saying Enter your Zip Code but not saying in the US
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote: It looks like Delphine Menard is not getting the international geolocated version of the blackout page. I believe she's in Berlin. I believe Delphine is referring to this page, which is the one that gets shared on social media: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/SOPA/Blackoutpage It's a static page and it never had geo. Easiest thing to do would be to add the share buttons. Geo on the main blackout page is working as far as we know. -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] [Wmfcc-l] Black out saying Enter your Zip Code but not saying in the US
You can see what it does if you change the country: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page?country=mx Jeremy On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Sue Gardner sgard...@wikimedia.org wrote: It looks like Delphine Menard is not getting the international geolocated version of the blackout page. I believe she's in Berlin. I believe Delphine is referring to this page, which is the one that gets shared on social media: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/SOPA/Blackoutpage It's a static page and it never had geo. Easiest thing to do would be to add the share buttons. Geo on the main blackout page is working as far as we know. -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l -- Jeremy Postlethwaite jpostlethwa...@wikimedia.org 515-839-6885 x6790 Backend Software Developer Wikimedia Foundation http://wikimediafoundation.org/ ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Wednesday wikipedia shut down does not get through
Michael wrote: Date: 2012-01-18 16:18:15 GMT (1 hour and 11 minutes ago) To make the redirect a javascript is not a good idea. +100 At least 2,213,922 users will never see it https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/?src=search and maybe way, way more since there are many similar features on any browser or platform. Today, virtually NONE of my (many) friends ever noticed something changed, until i told them. And even with js, you can see the 'real' page popping up first before the redirect takes action. It does not feel like 'oops wikipedia is gone !!?' but more like just another anyyoing advert. You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. +1 And yes i would even block editing since this is also alerting people. +1 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109385]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109385 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109385 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109385: Abuse filtering is now turned off by default, as this feature needs to be on hold a few weeks ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109404]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109404 to deferred URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109404 Old status: new New status: deferred Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109404: maven project layout - already comied to new locations ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109359]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109359 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109359 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109359: Fixing wording per email by Sue ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109357]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109357 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109357 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109357: Pass some more __METHOD__ to DatabaseBase::begin() and DatabaseBase::commit() ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wednesday wikipedia shut down does not get through
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote: You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. +1 Doing it via 404s would mess up search engines. -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Wednesday wikipedia shut down does not get through
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Thomas Gries m...@tgries.de wrote: You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. +1 Doing it via 404s would mess up search engines. -Chad Do it via 503's then. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] SOPA commercial social networks
2012/1/18 Antoine Musso hashar+...@free.fr: Social buttons are leaking your private data (URL you are browsing) to a private company (ex: facebook) which already know a ton of things about you. We talk about simple links, not iFrames or JavaScript. I do not want to see the Facebook logo on any Wikipedia page. It is more an advertisement for Facebook than an advertisement for Wikipedia on Facebook. Thomas ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
Michael, As was mentioned here, a 503 would be the most appropriate HTTP response code to serve. It would also prevent non-js users and text-only users from bypassing, it would avoid the flicker effect, and would cause search engines to correctly back off trying to index our pages. It would also correctly shut down all editing (if the site can not be read, why do you need emergency edit rights anyway?) I have no idea why this ineffective kludge was effected instead. On Jan 18, 2012 11:13 AM, Michael codejod...@gmx.ch wrote: Today, virtually NONE of my (many) friends ever noticed something changed, until i told them. And even with js, you can see the 'real' page popping up first before the redirect takes action. It does not feel like 'oops wikipedia is gone !!?' but more like just another anyyoing advert. You should do a straightforward real shutdown instead, and deliver a fake 404 with explanation link. And for several more days. And yes i would even block editing since this is also alerting people. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
Please see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/English_Wikipedia_SOPA_blackout/Technical_FAQ Cheers, Erik -- Erik Möller VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109407]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109407 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109407 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109407: Fix special page name: it is defined as 'Profiling' and not 'ProfileMonitor' ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109389]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109389 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109389 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109389: replace twitter icon with foundationWiki uploaded version ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109408]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109408 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109408 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109408: update from zip4pref file from govtrack for wildcard zips less than 5 digits ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109367]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109367 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109367 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109367: updated from zip4prefix file from govtrack, fixes some errors reported by folks ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109329]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109329 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109329 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109329: Wrote a table dumper that's actually useful for our purposes, that can be run through the command line. Output from here will land in CongressLookup/data, and should be copied over the old data file and committed. Note: You will probably have to remove one comma from the second to last line in the file... ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109274]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109274 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109274 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109274: Adding explanatory note for users who will be displayed contact information for 1 representative ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109270]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109270 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109270 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109270: Adding minor documentation ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109414]: Revision status changed
Reedy changed the status of MediaWiki.r109414 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109414 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109414: Update documentation. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109331]: New comment added
Khorn (WMF) posted a comment on MediaWiki.r109331. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109331#c29735 Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109331: Renaming an ever-more-badly named file. Khorn (WMF)'s comment: Ah, good ol' Tortoise. Thanks, Siebrand! (I should really get tortoise for my virtualbox...) ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109378]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109378 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109378 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109378: tests: mark tests requiring a database connection ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109418]: Revision status changed
Aaron Schulz changed the status of MediaWiki.r109418 to ok URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109418 Old status: new New status: ok Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109418: Remove support for the deprecated and no longer used in trunk hook MagicWordMagicWords. ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
Re: [Wikitech-l] Text browser users won't see your important site notice
On 18 January 2012 18:20, Dan Collins dcoll...@stevens.edu wrote: Michael, As was mentioned here, a 503 would be the most appropriate HTTP response code to serve. It would also prevent non-js users and text-only users from bypassing, it would avoid the flicker effect, and would cause search engines to correctly back off trying to index our pages. It would also correctly shut down all editing (if the site can not be read, why do you need emergency edit rights anyway?) I have no idea why this ineffective kludge was effected instead. I don't understand why it was done this way either... the consensus was for a full blackout, so why not just set all the squids to redirect to a page with the banner and explanation along with a 503 status code and be done with it? I was rather concerned by people thinking we need to allow emergency access - what kind of emergencies are going to mean people need Wikipedia? And is everyone having such an emergency going to have read the FAQ and know how to get around the blackout? ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[MediaWiki-CodeReview] [MediaWiki r109423]: New comment added, and revision status changed
MaxSem changed the status of MediaWiki.r109423 to resolved and commented it. URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/109423#c29736 Old Status: new New Status: resolved Commit summary for MediaWiki.r109423: More detailed messaging re API usage examples MaxSem's comment: Congrats on your first code commit! :P ___ MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-codereview
