[Wikitech-l] Some Phabricator and Gerrit 2019 statistics

[Andre Klapper]

Happy new Gregorian calendar year everyone.

And congratulations and thanks to all Wikimedia contributors:


=== Phabricator 2019: ===

* 28928 tasks got created.
* 25891 tasks got closed.
* 3573 people were active in Phabricator.
* 2168 people created tasks.
* 783 people closed tasks.
* The 20 people who created the most tasks:
Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE492
DannyS712475
Krinkle  399
Urbanecm 361
hashar   295
Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE   281
Reedy273
Jdforrester-WMF  269
ppelberg 233
RobH 231
Tgr  228
Marostegui   220
MMiller_WMF  211
Esanders 210
MoritzMuehlenhoff209
MarcoAurelio 203
ssastry  191
Jopparn  188
Mholloway184
ops-monitoring-bot   184
* The 20 people who closed the most tasks:
Aklapper1142
Jopparn  657
Krinkle  549
Urbanecm 459
Jdforrester-WMF  449
hashar   419
Nuria408
ppelberg 388
JMinor   376
Reedy345
Lydia_Pintscher  329
Addshore 315
bd808303
DannyS712300
Etonkovidova 281
Dbrant   277
Jdlrobson257
matmarex 254
Marostegui   253
kai.nissen   251


=== Gerrit 2019 ===

* 57092 changesets got created. [1]
* 98385 reviews on patchsets happened. [2]
* 585 people created changesets. [3]
* The 10 people who submitted the most patchsets: [4]
Jforrester  2,501
Umherirrender   2,093
Pwirth  1,636
Marostegui  1,485
Robert Vogel1,404
Krinkle 1,269
Reedy   1,097
Esanders1,054
Elukey981
Urbanecm  919
* The 10 people who reviewed the most patchsets: [5]
Jforrester  5,886
Timo Tijhof 3,604
Robert Vogel2,476
Marostegui  2,376
Daniel Zahn 2,307
Luca Toscano2,281
Patric Wirth2,242
Jbond   1,997
Moritz Muehlenhoff  1,769
Thiemo Mättig   1,756


All data without guarantee, as software can always have bugs. ;) If you
find one, please see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Community_metrics


Thanks,
andre


[1] See "Gerrit 🡒 Changesets" on "Gerrit 🡒 Overview": 
https://wikimedia.biterg.io/goto/7cb967eef5dc53b06f52a9a0ee63cf5f
[2] (Still work in progress to get this displayed on 
https://wikimedia.biterg.io/ ; see T241664)
[3] See "Gerrit 🡒 Changeset Submitters" on "Gerrit 🡒 Overview": 
https://wikimedia.biterg.io/goto/7cb967eef5dc53b06f52a9a0ee63cf5f
[4] See "Submitters" on "Gerrit 🡒 Overview": 
https://wikimedia.biterg.io/goto/7cb967eef5dc53b06f52a9a0ee63cf5f
[5] See "Approvals by Reviewer" on "Gerrit 🡒 Approvals": 
https://wikimedia.biterg.io/goto/0d79dddb1f24742745d7b542945fec09
-- 
Andre Klapper (he/him) | Bugwrangler / Developer Advocate
https://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Fwd: [Analytics] Introducing statistics for media files

[Pine W]

Also forwarding to Research-l and Wikitech-l.

Pine
( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )


-- Forwarded message -
From: Francisco Dans 
Date: Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:52 PM
Subject: [Analytics] Introducing statistics for media files
To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an
interest in Wikipedia and analytics. 


Hi everybody,

Just in time for the holidays, we're announcing the addition of Media
Requests to our metrics catalog. Over the last few months we've been
working on a dataset offering request numbers for every single image,
audio, video and document in the Wiki universe, since 2015.

This means we have 3 new metrics available in the Analytics Query Service:

   - Media requests per referrer: e.g. how many images, audio, videos...
   have been accessed from English Wikipedia in the last month? *73 billion
   for November
   
.*
   - Media requests per file: e.g. how many hits did this cool painting
   
   get in November? The answer is 483,791 hits
   

   .
   - Top files by media requests: e.g. what was the most popular video
   yesterday, December 22nd? Fred Rogers testifying before the Senate
   Subcommittee on Communications
   
.
   Fun! You can check out the top 1000 media files for any month or day, for
   any media type.

Media requests is, in terms of absolute numbers, a huge dataset, so the per
file and top metrics are still being loaded with data all the way to 2015.
We expect this loading to finish in mid January.

You can read more about this in Wikitech
. As usual
if you have any questions about the dataset or the new metrics please send
them our way here on the list or via Phabricator.

Happy holidays!
Francisco + the A team
-- 
*Francisco Dans (él, he, 彼)*
Software Engineer, Analytics Team
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Analytics mailing list
analyt...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Equivalence for using Template:Cite_Web with templates surrounding Wikicode

[Egbe Eugene]

Thanks for the help Bartosz.  However, I have a large data definition of
both texts and citations so I was wondering if its possible to insert the
texts and citations
all in one go when writing to the VE surface. In such cases, we expect the
VE surface to identify, the citation where
we are including the 'mwTransclusionInline' template in our data. Please is
this possible?

Thanks

On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 4:56 AM Bartosz Dziewoński 
wrote:

> {{Cite web}} and similar templates can also be used outside of a 
> tag, e.g. on a page like this:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_aggregator#Bibliography (not the
> greatest example, but the best I could find quickly).
>
> If you want it inside of a footnote, it's a bit complicated in visual
> mode, since the footnotes can be reused multiple times. The way it works
> is that there is a separate place in the document where the contents of
> every reference are placed (the "internal list"), and the location of
> the  contains only a small node that links to the internal list.
>
> Manually constructing the data so that both these things refer to each
> other would be a pain, but there is a helper class that makes it more
> convenient, ve.dm.MWReferenceModel.
>
> You'd use it like this:
>
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P10018
>
> I adapted that example from the code in
> ve.ui.MWCitationDialog.prototype.getActionProcess, which is how VE
> itself inserts new references.
>
> Hope that helps (and doesn't look too awful).
>
>
> --
> Bartosz Dziewoński
>
> ___
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l